ANGRY Interviewer LOSES IT With Starmer In Interview As He Tries To Gaslight!

And hello everybody, welcome back to the channel. Guys, we've got quite a fiery interview with Keir Starmer here. Yes, it does get a little bit ferocious as Keir Starmer is trying his crap. He's trying his gaslighting tripe that he tries every single time. Now this is with regard to him being asked about a possible Privileges Committee investigation. That sort of debate is happening as we speak.

And basically this interviewer asked him, is it humiliating to be referred to the same breath as Boris Johnson, a man you disparaged? And he essentially says that of course he's done nothing wrong, continues his gaslighting, but also at the same time here is just simply saying that people were pissed off because of party politics. They don't actually care. Again, I think a lot of people care and so did the British public. So it's not about politics whatsoever. But look at Kirstahmer, the way he tries and pedals his way out of it. Guys, let's have a watch of this. But first, please do it the

like button and the subscribe button for more. You've seen the state of this country, now where the message? Wank here, Stunk Farmer, Liber. Shop the full collection by going down into the link in the description or heading over to Britishstan.com.

And you've also done more than a dozen U-turns on policies that you haven't listed there, but you know what I'm referring to. Today we now know that MPs are going to get a vote on a Privileges Committee investigation into whether you misled Parliament. Now that's clearly the charge that brought Boris Johnson down. Is it humiliating to be referred to in the same breath as Boris Johnson, a man you disparaged?

Well it is important there's transparency in relation to the appointment of Peter Mandelson, I completely accept that, and there's a huge process already underway, it's called the Humble Address Process, where literally thousands of documents are being put before Parliament and we're complying with that in full, so the full picture is there under that process. The Foreign Affairs Select Committee, which Emily Thornberry chairs, is also calling evidence and we're fully complying with that. So there's a huge amount of transparency there already,

quite right too, but what my political opponents are doing tomorrow is a political stunt. Yeah and it's a stunt that you pulled on the last protest didn't you? It's a political stunt and the reason they're doing it is that they don't agree with what we're doing as a government. It's a stunt that you pulled though Prime Minister isn't it?

On Boris Johnson you tabled the motion to refer him to the very same committee.

I think the circumstances are completely different and in addition to the processes have already set out I personally was in Parliament last Monday for two and a half hours answering I don't know how many questions on this and again at Prime Minister's questions so there's no lack of transparency here but it is a political stunt. I think it's unfortunate that they're focusing on that because you know we are facing a war on two fronts. I think people are really, they know that

what's happening in Iran is going to impact their lives. It's my job to manage and support the country through that, so having a political stunt that adds absolutely nothing to the transparency we've got is not good use of Parliament's

time. I'll come to Iran, but if you're so confident that your conduct is so very different to Boris Johnson, why not just let the Privileges Committee investigate and you know you'll be proven right? Why are you whipping your MPs to vote against this call for an investigation?

Well because it's a stunt. You are whipping your MPs against it? Well we've got a meeting of the PLP later on tonight where that's usually determined on Monday evening but it is a stunt, we've got huge amounts of transparency going on already and frankly as Prime Minister and as a government it is really important I focus on what matters to millions of people across the country. I know what they're feeling,

they're feeling worried about what's happening in the Middle East, they don't like to see the damage that has already been caused and deep down I think in their stomach they feel this could impact me, my bills might go up and they're looking to me and the government to say what are you doing to manage that and make sure that the impact on our country is limited. That's what we're doing with the work on the Strait of

the Bosporus etc. I want to discuss that next but just to finish on this point because you've mentioned the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, your former Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney is giving evidence there tomorrow. He denies telling civil servants and I quote to just approve Mandelson's appointment. Does that sound

like the kind of language that he would use? No, I've known Morgan a very long time and I'm sure he'll give his evidence tomorrow, I have no doubt about that. Right, you've never heard him drop the F-bomb? That isn't Morgan McSweeney, that's not the way he operates.

Right, and when did you last communicate with him? Two or three weeks ago I think

we had a catch-up, I can't remember precisely. So you're still friends? Yeah, I've known Morgan for a very long time, we worked together in changing the Labour Party and picking it up after a terrible election victory in 2019. But you fired him didn't you? No he resigned but we have worked together for eight or nine years, he is a friend as well as a colleague. Do you miss him? Well I talked to him from time to time and I think it was two or three weeks ago that we last got together to talk about a number of things. So you haven't spoken to him about

his evidence tomorrow? No I haven't. So yeah, Joseph Borg's standard Kirstarmer interview and he goes on and talks about sort of transparency and all the rest of it, however again I feel like if he was telling the truth he wouldn't need to basically whip his MPs ahead of this sort of vote. So, if you've done nothing wrong you wouldn't need to whip your MPs. It's a direct threat from his own MPs and it stinks. That's the way

it is with Kirstahmer. Kirstahmer has not been transparent since the start of this. We've showed so many times where he's misled Parliament and it's pretty insane is is a political stunt and that's all it is. Keir's done nothing wrong and the party's opposite. They don't interested in making Britain great. Whilst Keir Starmer's not actually making Britain great whatsoever, he's destroying the country and just trying to cling onto power.

That's all he really cares about. But there is no leadership whatsoever. And Starmer's a liar. He's ruined this country and he's certainly in the wrong over the Mandelson appointment and should be punished over it. Again, if he was so innocent, then why did he sack so many people? Even this news host smelt the bullshit coming from

his mouth. That's the reality here. She could smell it. As she was calling him out on it, the thing is he's smirking all the way through it this guy is just a compulsive liar and if he did have a single shred of integrity left which he clearly doesn't he'd have referred himself to the Privy Committee but no he'd rather cling on to his delusion. Starmer is a threat to Britain's economic security and defense posture in all different ways and he's certainly not on the side of working people but must go for this and when he compares Boris Johnson to his thing

right he appointed a security threat to our country that went into one of the most sort of vulnerable positions one of the most important roles in our government the thing that Boris Johnson did was ate a slice of pizza I mean he's saying that they're different entirely but I would say Starmer and what Johnson did was ate a slice of pizza. I mean, he's saying that they're different entirely, but I would say Starman, what he did was a whole lot worse. But guys, do let me know your thoughts on that interview down there in the comment section

below. below. And as always, please do hit the like button and the subscribe button for more.