Ann Widdecombe's ‘murder’ reignites debate over Farage's £5m security | The Daily T

As counter -terrorism police take over the investigation into Anne Whittacombe's death, the safety of politicians is firmly under the spotlight.

Are we doing enough to protect our MPs in an ever more polarised world?

Lots of us have had threats.I've had death threats.My grounds were invaded by people who the police refused to move.You know, we've had an attack when my wife was with me, a physical attack, and the court refuses to see this.I actually had Labour MPs coming up to me saying, how horrific, you know, what's going to happen?Because they were worried that if this isn't found to be, the people aren't found to be guilty of this, then what happens then to MPs?

And the answer is, we're fair game.for anybody that has an objective or a concern.

Jacob Rees -Mogg, how lovely to see you, covering for T Stanley, who is currently celebrating his birthday.

Oh, well, we wish him many happy returns.Is his birthday today?

I believe so, yes.We've sent him well wishes and he's away for the week.

It's a very good week.It would have been my father's birthday tomorrow.So it's a good week for birthdays.

Is that Cancerians?I'm thinking.I'm a Gemini and I'm in June.

Right.Who comes after us?I think it is Cancer because I'm May. I'm the same as you.

Do you believe in that hocus pocus?

No, I think it's all nonsense.And I think Holy Mother Church says it is the sort of thing you shouldn't bother yourself with.

Well, indeed.It's almost practically pagan.Can we talk about worshipping at the altar of the England men's football team, please?Because some people might look at you in your double -breasted suit and think, what does this man know about the beautiful game?In fact, it turns out quite a lot.

Well, I don't really know very much, but I have got five sons, also one daughter, but I can't pretend my daughter's very interested in football.My sons are absolutely fascinated by football.They're playing it in the garden the whole time at the moment.They've rather sacrificed a little bit of cricket and yesterday I had a go with them.

Did you?You had a look about?That must be the first time you've run since the 1980s.

Something like that.I'm not very good at it, I can assure you, but therefore I have been watching it.I did watch the last match, which I was delighted that we won, and now through toplay Argentina.

I'm worried about that.

Well, I'm worried about that because it's eight o 'clock on Wednesday evening, which is the time I broadcast State of the Nation on GB News, and I have a nasty feeling it may dent my viewing figures.Anyone who listens to this, why don't you make sure you put GB News on in the background in case you need a bit of cheering up.

We're all used to double screening these days, and I don't think there's a problem with it.Would you say that it's all about Harry Kane or is it becoming increasingly more about, if I do this, you know who I'm referring to with this celebration?It's Christ -like in a way.I mean, that could be offensive to you, Jacob, but that's what he does when he scores.Who am I talking about?

I don't know, but is it Mr. Bellingham?It is Mr. Bellingham.Is he related to Henry Bellingham?I'm very keen to find out whether he's Henry Bellingham's cousin.I haven't yet congratulated Henry on the capability of his cousin, but I hope it's part of the Bellingham cousinage.

Well, you'll be very impressed with the fact that actually Jude Bellingham did so well.He was on a yellow card because of the advice of his mother, Denise, like you.And you listen to your mother's advice a lot.And actually, so does Tim Stanley.There's something about the men who appear on this podcast that listen to their mothers a great deal.And he had said that his mother had given him some advice.

You know, don't swear.Don't do any dodgy tackles.Just mind your P's and Q's, my boy.And that's how he avoided, again, getting any bookings.And now he's the hero of the tournament.

Very sensible lady.

Very sensible.Right, let's move on to actually, we had moments of jubilation at the weekend, obviously, with England winning.And then the news about Anne Widdicombe.And I was trying to sum it up with Giles Brandreth this morning, who knew her very well, because they were at Oxford together, same generation.And we were saying that when we heard that she'd passed away, OK, she's 78.It did ring a few alarm bells, because I thought, well, she was only on the telly last week.

She seemed perfectly fine.

I'd seen her at an event a week or so before.She'd been around.She seemed perfectly...She seemed absolutely her normal self.

Her normal self.

And so, yes, it was a surprise, but at 78..

.You just think, oh, well, how awful.It's been extremely hot.Something's happened.When it then emerged that a murder investigation had been launched, my reaction to it was...Literally, what is the world coming to?

What is the world coming to?Where somebody like Widers, she was affectionately known to all that knew her.has meets just the most tragic and grisly end.I actually thought that Nigel Farage, when he laid the wreath and he spoke very movingly from the heart outside Anne Whittacombe's home in Dartmoor, I found it quite touching.

She was the fiercest proponent of free speech I think I've ever met.She believed that we had the freedom and the right to say things that insulted each other.Her career in politics, of course, spanned decades.As a minister, And then for many years, as a shadow minister, and I spoke to one of her colleagues last night who said, during those years in the shadow cabinet, she was the only one who always, always, always spoke up.for what she believed to be the national interest.

I mean, clearly this party has been rocked by this.The Conservatives also, Kemi Bade -Knott making the point, this is a 78 -year -old woman we're talking about, regardless of her illustrious political career.This is a woman by herself in her home.

I thought Kemi hounded so beautifully, reminding us that we are all part of the broad Tory family and not making narrow points or not being generous because she'd left the party, but recognising that Anne was one of us and we were with her.I think Nigel is deeply upset by this.I haven't spoken to him, but I think the sadness, the shock is really genuine and that he wanted to do something, wanted to pay tribute and to lay a wreath.I don't think there's any falseness in this.And I think the people who are crying it's political opportunism.

No, that's that's very unfair.

Or to look into their own hearts.

Yes.Ian Dale was on the show, my GV News show yesterday, making the point that actually Ann Widdecombe worshipped Nigel Farage.She really, really thought he was making the point.She wasn't even strident Brexiteer until he came on the scene and then decided that that was the path that she wanted to follow.Can I also just say a word about her being completely posthumously misrepresented?Now, I appreciate that the people who have been responsible for maligning her memory have since apologised.

We had this extraordinary discussion that Adam Bolton of Sky News had about her sex life, which I just thought under no circumstances if a male former parliamentarian had been killed, would that even enter the lexicon of discussion?Point one.We then had the gay rights campaigner, Peter Tatchell, suggest that she was, quotes, a bigot.She was strident in her views.She had a very strong Catholic faith, like yourself and my fellow podcast co -presenter, Tim.But I mean, she wasn't bigoted.

Dale cites the example of her stepping up to help a gay candidate that had been deselected in the 1990s because of his sexuality.She took up his case.Some of her best friends in politics were gay.I don't say that as in some of my best friends are gay, but literally Andrew Pearce has written this tearful tribute to her in the mail.Ian Dale was a close personal friend.She's been misrepresented by some on the left.

Why do they do this?Why can't they just say a 78 -year -old woman who dedicated her life to public services died and we mourn her unequivocally without having to caveat it with, oh, but I didn't agree with anything she said?

Because the left is unbearably self -righteous and thinks that anybody who doesn't agree with them is a bad person.And the right doesn't think that.The right thinks that people we disagree withwith are trying to do good, but in a different way.And there is a deep intolerance on the left.And I think this is broadly because most of their arguments are bad and have been shown to be bad by history.

And therefore, they have to attack the person.And some of these attacks on Anne shortly after she died, I thought, were vile.I note they've apologized.I think that's a very good thing that they have.And I think one should accept apologies when they are given.But what I would like them to do, and this is both Adam Bolton and Peter Tatchell, is to pray for the repose of her soul.

I think if they were to do that, that would show real repentance.Perhaps go to Westminster Cathedral, light a candle for her, to show that they mean it.Because apologies that come from politicians and people around politics often are, I'm sorry if I've given any offence.

I'm sorry if?

If I've given any offence.Not, I am sorry, mea culpa.Yes.And I think that gave Westminster Cathedral light a candle for the repose of her soul would be a wonderful thing to do.

What's your analysis of her contribution to public life?

Well, I think it was hugely important because she showed that there's a place in politics for people who believe in things and stand up for things.And that at parts of her political career, she was very unpopular.At other parts, she was hugely admired.And by the end, she was greatly admired.And this was because of her constancy.And it explains why politics is worthwhile.

Being a politician just to hold high office, just to be taken around in the shape of a different car, is pointless.It doesn't get you anywhere.Being in politics for things you deeply and profoundly believe in is a worthwhile vocation.And I think Anne had a vocation for politics, which she carried out right to the end.

And that link between her staunch Catholicism and her politics, I mean, you understand that.association.Did you discuss Catholicism with her much?

A little.I mean, I first came to know her because we both went to the same church in the Horse Ferry Road.It's not open anymore, but still that was not open.And both of us used to read when we were there.

She was a convert to Catholicism, I should say.

She was a convert, that's right, that's right.I wouldn't claim I knew her enormously well but I'd known her a very long time and we always met as friends and she came to speak for me and stayed with me in Somerset and so on.So I knew her in the way you know people you like and have known for a long time.Catholicism was fundamental to her and crucially this understanding and it's what you say about her views and her friendship with people whose behaviour isn't in accordance with the Catholic Church.She didn't judge people.No.

She was certain about truth.Yes.But she wasn't there saying, you're a good person, you're a bad person.No.She recognised that everybody is made in the image and likeness of God and took the view that if God liked them, if he loved them, She would love them too.

Well, she also had a good sense of humour and was able to poke fun at herself.And actually, when I mentioned Ian Dale, he'd come on to talk about his book, which is about his life and career interviewing politicians.And her endorsement, which is on the bottom at the back, is along the lines of this is a great and thrilling read, but I would avoid chapter six at all costs, in which Ian discusses his sex life, basically.OK, OK.But even that's funny.

Yes.Yes.

So she's sort of depicted as this former Tory now reformed battle axe.She was much more self -deprecating than that.

Oh she was.She was very good company.She was amusing and charming.

Set herself up on Strictly Come Dancing famously.

She didn't take herself too seriously.

Well it's a Tory fest on the podcast today because as well as Jacob's company we'venow enjoying the company of Ian Duncan Smith, former leader of the Conservative Party.And just as we all sat down, there's some breaking news, which is now leading the Telegraph website, which is that this investigation into Anne Whittacombe's murder has now been taken on by counter -terror police.So they have now gone in and assumed responsibility for this investigation.I think from Devon and Cornwall Police.That is quite the development as breaking news for this podcast, simply because...

We had been previously told that this wasn't terror -related.And when they say it's not terror -related, what they're really saying, I think, is it's not politically motivated.Well, that appears to have shifted in the last few minutes.

Well, just about all of this thing has shifted over a period of time.So this contradicts what the police said, because they were very clear that this was neither terrorist nor political, they felt.There was no evidence to suggest, I think was the line they used.In actual fact, I think they'd have been better off saying absolutely nothing until they had a clear understanding, first of all, of what had happened, and secondly, who was the main suspect in this.They seem to have managed to get to Yorkshire after having arrested the wrong man.Suddenly, they were able to get to Yorkshire.

Where was that evidence of the connection?And I think, therefore, they get caught, the police, and they don't seem to be able to understand as they might have done in days gone by, the first thing is if you've got nothing really good to say, say nothing.Wait until you have some kind of sense of what happened.Let them then the public know what happened.And don't go speculating yourselves about we don't think this is a bit of this and a bit of terrorism or whatever.Just say she was murdered, brutally murdered, and they're hunting now for the person, anyone with evidence, blah, blah, blah, and leave it at that for the moment.

And then others fill in the space.Once you start ruling bits out, they start speculating.And that's what we've had from a number of people,including Nigel Farage.

Yes.And he's been criticised for some saying he's cashing in or he's trying to use this as leverage on his case about the five million pound donation from Christopher Harbourn, which, of course, he has said was to keep him secure for the rest of his political life.I actually don't agree with that analysis.I think people within the Reform Party have been completely rocked by this.I think people in the Conservative Party have been.I think people in the country I think people in the country are saying to themselves, if this can happen to Anne Whittacombe of all people, what on earth have we become, Jacob?

Well, it's very shocking and I think that Nigel is very shocked.But Ian, I want to come back to what you're saying because when the police don't say anything, That creates a vacuum.But it seems to me they say the wrong things.But what people want to know is a broad idea of who it may be, if they've got a suspect in mind.They want to feel that things aren't being covered up, but they don't want the police speculating.And Devon and Cornwall Police seem to have mishandled everything so far.

They seem to have no idea what they're doing.

Yeah, I think it's a problem really that's erupted over some of the political interference previously, particularly that terrible case where the children were murdered.They are scared about upsetting one group or another.But at the same time, they need to indicate that they're doing a good job.So we got this, I think one of the inspectors said, this is a great sign of how, you know, Devon and Cornwall police are really good at what they do.And they've already now found the individual.I thought that was completely unnecessary.

Don't lord yourself for something which is still ongoing.So there is a balance.As I say, in the old days, by and large, the rule was until you're clear a what's happened and be who you're looking for then just let people know the circumstances and leave it at that for the moment when you've got and you need those around to say we haveevidence, we saw somebody, then you make it clear to them, we are looking for this sort of individual.Now you can start putting out the person.But the speculation that takes place is mostly because of the internet these days.

You cannot silence that.And so somehow the police have got to figure out how they manage that internet interruption, which they're going to get the whole time.With regards to Nigel Farage, we're all shocked.I mean, I was appalled on Friday morning I got up and the Today program wanted me on and said, you know, what's this, you know, sad that she's died.By midday, it was not sad, it was a tragedy.It's a human tragedy and it's a real question mark over our politics at the moment and everything else that's going on.

These are wider issues that we're going to have to seriously debate because we don't want to say that there are threats, but I've had death threats, I've been attacked in the streets.The courts didn't uphold that.You know, this goes on.The MPs are probably the least protected of any of these groups that you see, and probably the most out there.Now, I'm not asking for protection.I don't want it.

You know, it's just not necessary.But I think an understanding of some of the risks that most MPs take, because you have to be close to your constituents, you are always letting people know where you will be.These sort of things mean that you are a very easy target, as we've seen in a number of cases so far.not least of which was David Amos, who was murdered brutally, and the individual didn't even attempt to get away.He just sat there after having stabbed him God knows how many times.Yeah, Joe Cox.

Joe Cox, exactly the same.So, you know, I'm not saying that this is a crisis.I'm simply saying we need to draw breath here and ask ourselves the question, once we understand what has happened to Anne, what do we do after this?

Which is why the police's initial statement saying this isn't political, it isn't terrorism, seems to me to have been such a mistake.They were trying to reassure people without any evidence and that has now made peoplethe opposite.They've made more concerned, more worried because of this fake reassurance from Devon and Cornwall police.

Yes, I was intrigued as to why he suddenly tried to tell us that there was no political involvement.I mean, I don't know how you know that, because you have no...Until you get to the individual that you want to arrest, you have no idea what their motivation was.So I thought putting that out there was trying, obviously, unnecessarily to calm people down about jumping to their guns.And the second bit was to start talking about the type of offender when they arrested the wrong man in the first place.And I think that's an issue.

So they were suddenly panicked about.And I noticed it was very definitive.It was a white young man of a certain age.Now this suddenly was almost like a reaction to previously when they did not release any information about the type of murder.So all I'm saying is I think this needs a big rethink by the police forces generally.

context to counter -terrorism police taking this case over.So Martin Evans, our crime editor, is reporting at this very moment.They're now leading the investigation into the death of Anne Whittacombe after, quote, new information and evidence has come to light.This is counter -terrorism policing South East speaking to journalists.Obviously, we know that Miss Whittaker was found dead at her home in Devon on Thursday, July the 9th after sustaining serious injuries.Police believe she was killed nearly 24 hours earlier at around midday on Wednesday, July the 8th.

We've obviously subsequently seen the messages that were exchanged between her and a producer at Channel 5.She was due to go on air.She'd been on air the day before with talk TV's Mark Dolan.She was you know, in the prime of her commentary life in her post parliamentary life.And she was obviously actively campaigning for reform as well.Lawrence Taylor, the head of national counterterrorism policing said, building on the progress made by our colleagues in Devon

and would ask them to continue to support us in the next stage of the investigation.Obviously we need to be careful how we're discussing the suspect in this case because he is still under police investigation.He was arrested, no charges were at that point brought, but we now know from this press update that the man in custody has been re -arrested on suspicion of commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.So this is a rearrest by counterterrorism police following on from Devon and Cornwall's initial arrest of the 26 -year -old man, as you say, up north in Rotherham.We've got to be careful how we discuss this because this man is innocent until proven guilty and investigations are ongoing.Does this put Nigel Farage's investigation by the Standards Commissioner into the £5 million donation from Christopher Harbourn, which he says is to better protect him?

throughout his political career.He is a target, isn't he?I mean, there could be a case here for actually a degree of funding for protecting Nigel Farage that comes from the state, perhaps, Ian?

Well, there is. I remember when I was leader of the opposition, I was offered security protection by MI5, who said, you know, we think there could be threats, but, you know, if you want to have protection, we're happy to do it.But I said, they're not going to protect me against a suicide bomber.And the reality is that if we're careful, it's far better than having people literally living outside your house,which goes with all of this stuff for protection.So I was, I'm afraid, not in favor of it because I felt it limited my ability to do stuff.And that's always offered, I think, to the leader of the opposition.

I have no problem if leaders of parties are offered security protection.It may be something that now their government will have to review.Not personal to him, but personal in the sense that it's who he is and where he is.Having said that, though, I don't know that this has a huge bearing on the money because the issue around the money is not what did you receive it for.The issue around the money was why didn't you declare it?Why weren't you clear and obvious about it when you came and you were told?

as everybody was when they came to their induction part of their time in the beginning of the House of Commons when they get elected, is these are the rules.And the rules are that certain sums of money need to be reported, even if they came before you were a member of Parliament.And that's quite clear.So all of that does seem to me where the inquiry will go.It's not about what usage you put it to.It's about why was this money not recorded?

And if you were in doubt, why didn't you go and ask about whether you should do it?

claim that he's the most persecuted person in British politics?

Up to a point that Ian and I have had our share of people who don't like us.That's political life.

Well, you had an attack on your house.

But I've never felt under any threat.I mean, bits get thrown at you occasionally.gets milkshakes thrown at him and I've had coffee thrown at me and these things happen.It's part of political life until it gets to serious physical assault.And that's where it's different.And I wonder what you think about this making politics serious again, that the initial reaction to Nigel's by -election was count Binface.

And everyone think that was all great hoot.I just wonder whether people nowrealize again that politics matters and that the view in Clacton is going to be very different.It's not going to be some great jolly fest of Binface.It's going to be people saying there are serious issues and people are being killed in this country because of their politics, and that changes things.

Yeah, I think the public are.now concerned about the nature of their streets and about what's happening in public life.I don't think there's any question about that.Lots of us have had threats.I've had death threats.My grounds were invaded by people who the police refused to move.

We've had an attack when my wife was with me, a physical attack.

Yes, I saw you after that.And the court refuses to see this.Somebody threw a traffic cone at you.

I actually had Labour MPs coming up to me saying, how horrific, what's going to happen?Because they were worried.if this isn't found to be, the people aren't found to be guilty of this, then what happens then to MPs?And the answer is, we're fair game.Now, for anybody that has an objective or a concern, that's really where I think Parliament is.Now, Parliament's taken some action over things like, if you're having a surgery, to have somebody there to make sure that you're okay.

But quite often, the police are pretty poor about this.They're supposed to be somewhere in the area, and they're not always, because they've got other priorities.

But I never wanted somebody in a surgery, because I thought it would intimidate constituents, find it quite well.

I use my outside the surgery.So what happens is they're in within distance if you needed them.That's not because we didn't ask for them, because that's what Parliament wants you to have at the moment.But for pretty much that's a fixed time when you're in a set location where everybody knows you're there.So it's very easy to target you at that point.But other things like when you're canvassing, you don't want anybody with you at all except other political supporters, etc.

And Parliament itself has been made a hideous fortress with new fences around it, which seems to me to be far too extreme.The other direction, it's our heart of democracy.People ought to feel welcome when they'rego there whereas in fact we treat people like criminals when they try to go to the House of Commons.

I know but then after PC Keith Palmer was killed in the Westminster attack you can't blame.

PC Keith Palmer was murdered because as a cost saving they had rotated the armed police from fixed points to all around Whitehall.And I'm afraid they've been doing some of that again.So there aren't armed police on the fixed points and the entrance to Parliament anymore.And that was really stupid.And that seemed to be the underlying reason for why Keith Palmer was murdered.

Also, does it help?I mean, it's one thing to face brickbats in life, but in death, Some on the left have really tried to sully Anne Widdicombe's memory.We've had Adam Bolton quite inappropriately discussing her sex life on Sky News.He's had to apologise for that.We've had Peter Tatchell, the gay rights campaigner, describe her as a bigot.We've got somebody else, a transgender former Labour candidate who celebrated Miss Widdicombe's death, saying that she prayed she had screamed in agony.

now being investigated over.What is wrong with people?I mean, even posthumously, Anne Widdicombe's memory and legacy is besmirched in this absolutely grotesque way.What hope is there for public discourse in this country if people behave like this?

Well, as I say, people talk about public discourse, meaning politicians and people in power, but in fact, some of the, since the internet has arrived, the public discourse by people who aren't involved with politics.You've named a few people, haven't named them, but you've explained what they said.And the answer is, how can you expect decent behavior if you aren't prepared to act like that to your neighbor?And your neighbor is, by definition, everybody.And the point I'm simply saying now is that, for the most part, most people are reasonable.You knock on their door, you talk to them.

and they are polite, and then say, no, I'm not voting for you, I'm voting for somebody else.That's all normally politely done.It's very rarely you get abuse.What you get abuse from is some of these people that are sort of twisted and tortured into their position on the far left or way maybe on the far right or whatever it happens to be, they are not part of mainstream politics.But what the internet has done is allowed them to have a voice.And they never used to have a voice before, because that's how, you know, parliamentary democracy worked.

But now they can have a voice and any person who is miserable, mean, spirited and doesn't care really about the harm that they cause can now make a bit of a storm.Famous for five minutes on the internet.And I do say that some of these companies that run this stuff need to be much more careful about the kind of abuse that goes down on these podcasts and things.

Because it normalizes bad behavior.That's the point.

Completely.It becomes very easy for you to hide behind this idea that you are anonymous.and then abuse somebody appallingly, and it's not surprising then that this gets taken up elsewhere.

Walter, we don't want the consequence to be that parliamentarians or commentators are editing themselves, are not saying what they truly believe in because they're worried about receiving abuse both in person and online.

Yeah.

Which moves us on to the next topic actually, Ian, former Work and Pensions Secretary.You've never been shy in expressing a view about the Welfare and Benefits Bill.You've written a piece for us which is entitled, Welfare Claimants Need Fat Jabs, Not More Money, which isn't necessarily going to ingratiate you with left wing backbenchers who believe that the benefits bill can just continue climbing higher and higher.I'm just going to give some stats because I thought this was very interesting following from Stephen Timms, who incidentally was almost killed in his own surgery and survived a stabbing.He's gone on to have a look intoour entire benefits system and he's concluded that the system is broken, which probably is no surprise to either of you.

And then the Times recently revealed the following.100 ,300 claimants are claiming disability benefits for ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 228 ,000 are claiming them for autism, 435 ,000 for anxiety and depression.These numbers have either doubled or trebled since lockdown.How on earth do we deal with this?

Well, I think Lockdown was part of the big problem in breaking this process, because up until then, we had, whilst, you know, still problems and things were still rising, we had actually reduced the cost of it quite dramatically by about 25 billion year on year.And we had reformed much of the way in which it was delivered.And key to that was face -to -face meetings.When somebody makes a claim, you sit down with them and talk it through.If it's for PIP or it's for sickness benefit or whatever, you need to go face -to -face with them.The government suspended the face -to -face checks and basically just loosened everything.

Far too much money poured in, and the result of the lockdowns led to lots of people sitting alone in their houses, then claiming they were now depressed, because they probably were depressed.They weren't doing anything.Maybe many of them didn't have lots of friends or family.But the thing about this that I wrote in this was to try and draw attention to the fact that you should treat the problem itself.Because if you look at what's going on, depression, anxiety, and even ADHD, the greatest health care for them is work.It's as simple as that.

Without work, you seem to have no purpose in your life, and without purpose, you sit there and you get depressed.So if you have, the key for the welfare system is to be getting them back to work, helping them if they need support while they get to work, but don't pay them a benefit to sit in their rooms doing nothing.So we've already come out of the center of social justice.clear plans to say, instead of giving people money for being depressed or suffering from anxiety or ADHD, say we'll put a bit of that money into helping you through talking therapies or whatever, but we're going to get you back to work and we'll work intensively with you to get you into work because that will cure your depression more than anything that you can do.So you don't spend the money on locking people down into their problem.You spend a little bit of the money making sure they rise out of their problem.

And the same goes for, it's not the fact that somebody's way overweight or morbidly obese, it's what happens when you are.And the consequentials of that in healthcare are astonishing, not least of which is just a whole list of these things where people can't move around properly, they also suffer from diabetes, all these things become consequential on the health budget as well.And so my point is very simply, if there's a way of curing people, getting them ready, then that's what we should be doing and talking to people about.And that was just open the argument.The way if you want to save money is not just a slash or cut it, to save money by changing the lives that are trapped in this benefit system by moving them out.And we discovered that save far more money than anything else that we were doing.

And that's what this government should be doing.But they're not even talking about it.I like Stephen Timms.I get on very well with him.We've had debates, et cetera, but he's absolutely what you'd want from somebody, personable, polite, but always argues his case.But what he's done is after a year of looking at this, they've come out with a retrospective look, which I could have written in 10 minutes on a sheet of paper, this is the problem.

Now they say they're going to spend another year thinking about what to do, and we can tell them what needs to be done.And all their views will say the same.And the problem, therefore, is it seems to be like a stepping stone to avoid the labor backbenchers having to be confronted about reducing spending on welfare, which is the key argument in all of this.The question is, how do you do it?

Ian, is there a fundamental problem with PIP not being means -tested, so that if you get a certain amount of money, for some people that will be enough to pay for the lifestyle that they want, and therefore they've got no reason to go out to work, and that actually PIP encourages people to stay at home because it pays all their costs?

Yes, well PIP is not a work -related benefit.It came straight out of the back of Disability Living Allowance, which has been around for a long time.We've always had problems with this because the biggest growth area is in mental health.It was really set up more on musculoskeletal, but now what's happened with all these claims on it for mental health, it's very difficult therefore to define the nature of your problem.So if you're depressed or you have anxiety or whatever and you're claiming PIP, then for those who are trying to assess you, it's very difficult because what's the assessment you make for somebody who's depressed without a medical assessment that goes with it?And so the idea behind disability benefits going way back was that they put a floor underneath somebody who had difficulties so that they could get on with their lives without having to worry about buying extra equipment and all the other bits and pieces.

However, For mental health, that has become a problem because it isn't the same problem that they face as musculoskeletal people do, who have a physical, very identifiable problem in getting around and doing things.For those suffering depression and anxiety, there we've come back to exactly the same point.Instead of paying them that benefit, work with them to get them back into work, because that's the treatment you need.And don't go paying people the full benefits for those just to sit at home.

Okay, but that means taking benefits away from some people.

Well, it means basically changing their lives in that regard.So in other words, work seems to become the key and the system can drive you towards work making you more available.And there are big shortages in the labor market at the moment.And therefore there are jobs available.And the key thing about all of this is thatto say, what is the purpose of welfare for?

It's to pick you up when you have a significant problem, a health problem of some description.If it's a perennial problem, to support you to a degree as far as they can to live a normal life.but it's not there because you feel bad about life.So the key problem here is it exploded massively under COVID because all the checks stopped going on.And GPs are very reluctant to say to somebody, you don't have depression because, you know, as they can say, yes, it doesn't seem to be something wrong with you.It's not what they think physically.

It's very difficult to get that done.So you do need very fast, psychological checks on all of this to make sure that those experts can see you to define you better.And that never really takes place.It's very difficult to get that done in the present circumstances.But if instead of paying people huge amounts of the benefit, you put some of that saving into getting more people who are experts to be able to define what your problem is, and then working with occupational therapists to say, how many hours can you do?And the other one is, by the way, trying to stop people falling out of work onto statutory sick pay.

getting companies to be prepared to support them more because of the training they've had, to keep them balanced while they get treatment, talking therapies or whatever, and then back up the scale into work because you save money and you don't dump them on sickness benefit.

Ian Duncan -Smith, thank you very much indeed for joining us on today's Daily T. Jacob, we'll be back tomorrow, 5pm.

If you're enjoying our journalism, why not sign up to From the Editor, our free email newsletter.Start your day with the latest news and opinion, plus our bite -sized puzzles.Scan the QR code to sign up free today.