BREAKING: Bombshell document ties Trump to Epstein

In a stunning update, even by 2025 standards, the latest tranche of Epstein files revealed a 2019 note purportedly signed by J. Epstein addressed to Larry Nassar, the team doctor for the US Women's National Gymnastics teams and serial sexual predator, which also references the president who, at that time, was Donald Trump. The note reads, quote, Dear LN, as you know by now, I have taken the short route home. Good luck. We shared one thing, our love and caring for young ladies and the hope they'd reach their

full potential. Our president also shares our love of young, nubile girls. The note was purportedly sent in August 2019 when the president was Donald Trump. The letter itself was postmarked three days after Epstein's suicide, CNN had reported back in 2023 that while he was jailed, Epstein sent a letter to Nassar, although the contents of the letter were not disclosed. It was discovered by prison officials investigating Epstein's suicide weeks after his death and it is not known if Nassar

and Epstein had a relationship. The FBI in 2020 requested from its laboratory a handwriting analysis be done to compare the letter to other writings from Jeffrey Epstein, according to another document posted on Tuesday from the DOJ. It did not say what the lab concluded. Now a few things to note here. I obviously can't attest to the legitimacy of this note, although it IS confirmed that

the note was included in the Epstein files released by the DOJ. I want to cover this however because it's newsworthy while also making sure that I'm being upfront in stating that it's not 100% confirmed whether the note is legitimate. I presume more information is going to come out, but until then, I'm offering the information that exists right now. But zooming out, taking a 30,000 foot view, I've spent a lot of time wondering why Donald

Trump would be willing to absorb so much bad press by covering up these files. You have to ask yourself, why would Trump subject himself to all of this if he wasn't hiding something worse in the files? You think that Donald Trump doesn't understand the damage that he's doing to himself by suppressing these files on a daily basis? You think that Donald Trump doesn't see the damage he's doing with his base?

You think he doesn't see the damage he's doing to his reputation? You think he doesn't understand what it means to lose the news cycle day in, day out. The only logical explanation is that the only thing worse than all of that is actually allowing us to see what's in those files. And that's a point that Mark Elias made here. Doesn't the Trump administration recognize that that by virtue of prolonging this cover up all they're doing is is increasing the pain for themselves?

Like we can all see what's happening. We can all see when they release, you know, a fraction of the Epstein files already bad enough, but then the files that they do release heavily redacted and just page after page, there were grand jury transcripts with the whole thing, 100% of them were redacted. Don't they recognize that they're just adding to this narrative that they are already participating in a cover-up? Yes, they are. And so you have to ask why. Right.

So there are, I think, two reasons, both of which are true. The first is they have decided that this is an instance where the cover-up is not worse than the crime, right? Everyone always says that the cover-up is always worse than crime. No, no, that's actually not true. Like sometimes the crime's really bad. And so the cover up is actually better than acknowledging what's underneath. As crappy as the cover up looks, like you're actually better off. So you should judge and you know, you should consider why they are going to

all this effort as you either decide to give them the benefit of the doubt or not give them the benefit of the doubt. So that's number one. And then the second is they think they can get away with it because they have a compliant media. Like, you know, if this was the days of Watergate, you know, they wouldn't think they could get away with it because the only questions the legacy media would ask them every day over and over again were about the Epstein files. They wouldn't cover a bullshit address from the White House like all these outlets just did. By the way, Brian, I don't know that you and I have had a chance to talk about

this very much, but when Barack Obama wanted to give an address in 2009, a press conference in primetime, Fox News said no. In 2014, when he wanted to do a primetime address, all the networks said no. And Donald Trump wants to give this bullshit thing like he's, you know, on some kind of whatever, you know, stimulant and he's rushing through everything and he's yelling and none of it makes any sense. That they cover.

But the White House knows that that media, the media that put that crap on primetime

is not going to hold him accountable here. And frankly, a note from Epstein to Larry Nassar is exactly the kind of thing that Trump would want to cover up. If you're asking yourself what could be worse than this daily barrage that Trump is contending with, it is a note sent from the worst pedophile in history to the second worst pedophile in history, naming Trump. And if you have doubts, by the way, about that point, ask yourself what right-wing media would look like today if, instead of Donald Trump, that letter released in the files named

Bill Clinton. Do you think Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham and Jesse Watters would just brush it off? I think we all know the answer to that question. The silence from right-wing media, that doesn't mean they're too much for Trump's own weaponized DOJ. In the immediate aftermath of this latest batch of released files, the DOJ posted on

Twitter that the Department of Justice has officially released nearly 30,000 more pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already. Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing

these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein's victims. So as far as the Justice Department is concerned, they're broadcasting that they will be perfectly content to run cover for Trump until the bitter end. There is no information too damning for Pam Bondi's DOJ to debase itself on behalf of a president who was the quote closest friend of a notorious pedophile for a decade. The notion that everything pertaining to Trump is false because it would have quote certainly

been weaponized against President Trump already is the least compelling argument that an agency that's supposed to operate off of facts could offer. In other words, they're saying that because Merrick Garland, who by the way is the least aggressive attorney general in history, didn't go after Trump, that somehow is proof that Trump is innocent and this is supposed to be an agency that operates off of facts? The reality is that this DOJ is not going to be a neutral arbiter.

It's clearly in the tank for Trump. But as Ro Khanna mentioned during our most recent interview, this issue is going to remain far after Trump is out of office, which should worry not just him, but everybody else involved in this coverup.

People are subjecting themselves to the risk of prosecution. They are obstructing justice. And this is not just about these three remaining years. A new administration could prosecute these individuals. The statute of limitations would not have run out. And I'm one of those, these people, I don't know about you, Brian, my view is,

yes, I want healing and reconciliation after Trump's gone, but I want accountability too. I'm not gonna have reconciliation without accountability And if you violated the Epstein Transparency Act if you bombed innocent people off the coasts in the Caribbean if you Ripped people off there out of their families on as ice there is going to be criminal accountability

So if the DOJ officials want to align themselves with those perpetuating the cover-up, that's their prerogative. But this issue isn't going away, we are not going to forget, and the prosecutions will continue long after the inmates are no longer running and you want to see more and support independent media, please subscribe to this channel. The subscribe button will be right here on this screen. But second, the reality is that we are now in a political environment where this administration can lean on any of the social media platforms to suppress certain voices if they don't like critical coverage.

That means my longevity here is in the hands of a few tech billionaires who are already That means my longevity here is in the hands of a few tech billionaires who are already making it clear that they are willing to cater to this administration. will do.