BREAKING NEWS: Massie And Bondi Have Shocking Fight As He Accuses Her Of Epstein Files 'Cover-Up'

May I respond very briefly to her statement?

I think we can do that probably on one of our members.

Thank you. I don't want that to get away.

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Behind me I have three documents from the DOJ production that are emblematic of the massive failure of the DOJ to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. To my right is an e-mail that was sent by the victim's lawyers to the DOJ.

It was a list of names not to redact. Or, sorry, a list of names not to release. What did the DOJ do with this e-mail? They released this e-mail in the document production. Literally, the worst thing you could do to the survivors, you did.

And they're getting phone calls. A lot of these people didn't want to be known. And we know you touched the document because you redacted one name, and you redacted the lawyer's name, but you left the survivor's name there.

The next document I want to show you, and that was in the title, the victims' survivors' names, all right? The title of this one is Child Sex Trafficking. Co-conspirators. Fully redacted.

And by the way, I'm going to un-redact them here. Les Wexner is in this. Now, your assistant, your deputy attorney general, said, oh, well, he appears hundreds of times in the files, but he doesn't appear in this file until I forced you to release it, where he's listed as a co-conspirator not to tax evasion but to child sex trafficking,

not to prostitution, not to money laundering, child sex trafficking. And then finally, what we have here, the third exhibit that I have is emblematic of the FD-302 release. These are the documents that we need that you're holding onto and over-redacting because they have the names of the men who are implicated. How do we know?

Because the survivors gave testimony to the FBI, and it's in there. And what happens when you go to the portal at the DOJ to look at what's behind this redaction? Another redaction. So we can't even see them. And then there's some of these files you've pulled down from the website that we will never see,

because we can't search the redactions. So I have several questions for you. Who's responsible? Are you able to track who in your organization made this massive failure and released the victims' names? Are you able to track who it was

that obscured Les Wexner's name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document? Do you have that kind of accountability?

I believe Wexner's name was listed more than 4,000 times about...

Yeah, I already told you that.

This is where he's listed as a co-conspirator. Can I finish my answer? Come on let me finish my answer. We corrected that within 40 minutes. He was already you're acting like everybody's trying to cover up

Wexner's name. Reclaiming my time. I'm going to answer this question. Reclaiming my time. Mr. Chairman. This isn't how this works. Can I have my time back? Mr. Chairman. The gentlelady can give her answer. The time belongs to the gentleman from- All right, I'm reclaiming my time. So I'm going to put the language of the bill up on the screen.

Chairman, may I give my answer on that?

Here's the question.

It's a political joke and I need to give my answer on that.

We'll let the Attorney General respond and then the gentleman can move to his next question. Chairman, it's my time. Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question.

Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back.

Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed.

Red-handed.

There was one redaction out of over 4,700.

He's listed as a co-conspirator.

And we invited you in.

You know what?

Show the video. We invited you in. We invited you in. This guy has Trump derangement syndrome. He needs to get, you're a failed politician. You need to get on the end of the matter.

I want you to watch the video.

Mr. Chairman, please restore his time and remind the witness of the rules here.

Himself, there is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.

Is that your position as well? My position is any victim who comes forward, of course, we would love to hear from them. 1-800-CALL-FBI. Did you ask Merrick Garland that the last four years? Did you talk about Epstein at all the last four years?

I'm reclaiming my time. I'm glad you're asking about Merrick Garland.

You don't get a reclaimed highway.

Because this is bigger than Watergate. This goes over four administrations. You don't have to go back to Biden. Let's go back to Obama. Let's go back to George Bush. This cover-up spans decades,

and you are responsible for this portion of it. Now, I want to know, at what point, at what point did the FBI and the DOJ decide that Lex Wessner was not a co-conspirator? Because our Epstein Files Transparency Act requires you, please put it back on the screen, to release the internal decision about whether to prosecute him or not, and it's not in the

files, and it's not in the files for any of these other men. The time of the gentleman has expired. May she answer? And he's a

hypocrite because he voted against the ban that we were talking about on deep fake AI porn. Only two people voted against it and you were one of them

hypocrite. The gentleman's time has expired. Mr. Chairman, could she answer the question? Chairman, I was wondering. The Attorney General is allowed to respond the way she wants to respond to any member's questions. Republican, Democrat. I have unanimous consent request.

Gentleman is recognized for a U.C.

All right. This is an example. I'm submitting these 302 forms that are entirely redacted, even when you go to look at them.

Without objection.

I'm submitting a witness statement that implicates Les Wexner.

Without objection.

I'm submitting an article from the New York Times that the DOJ released nude photos and identifiable pictures of the victims. I'm submitting a letter from A.G. Bondi to Cash Patel, imploring him to quit keeping the files

when you found out that they were keeping files from you because they're still redacting files. Chairman, are we going to recess for votes?

Yes, we are.

I'm submitting for unanimous consent a document of 17 individuals who've resigned because the Epstein file.

Not objection. Just wanna check on what time, how much time we have left in votes, but one thing I've learned here of late that they'll wait on us. that they'll wait on us.

How much time do we have?