“Carney Blew it Up At Midnight!” | The Real Reason Trade Talks Collapsed

The Americans have increased by a margin of 50 % over the past 10 years.You know what happened.And many of you, I know, said, yes, it was about to happen.Apparently we weren't making a profit.They were finding a way to break because they never wanted a business.For the truth, there is a word yesterday.

We read the middle column here, and we will read it again.It says, in the last weeks of the United States, however, this progress was not enough to meet our goals for Canadians.As a result of this, Canadian products are worth minus 28 billion dollars.Canada will respond with similar dollars in exchange for dollars to protect our workers and businesses.In the coming days, the government will show additional steps to support those able to do business.And so, naturally, there is a lot of competition.

There is a fierce competition against the United States, The proposal was led to the creation of an ASPACA network immediately, complete actions against This is an important opportunity for Canada to cooperate with the United States, the fastest -growing economy in the G7.So, this is the sugar representative of the United States.This is their point of view on what will happen.Carney claims that the United States has set unreasonable demands at the last minute, and we cannot agree with them.The sugar representative claims that Canada came back from what it agreed on earlier this week and wanted changes, and therefore they left.Who is telling the truth?

What's going on right now?What happened?And so, McKenzie Gray, Mem, Global News Team, and to end the restrictions on American companies to own in provincial branches, changes in milk production, and the dissolution of the government and ambassador to Canada in Washington, presented the business as the best that Canada has ever seen.

A senior Trump administration official said that if Canada takes a step forward, it will give the president opportunities.Mark Carney had a lot of people listening to him.He had, you know, industry experts who were not responsible for the direction in which things went.They had the heads of the companies who were not responsible at all for returning the alcohol to the distributors.They also put pressure on Mark Carney.They were not responsible for anything that came from that direction.

Because the important thing, on the Canadian side, no matter what happened, we would not like this business.Because we are the second party.Do you want to blame your Prime Minister for this?No.He explained it more than it was necessary.What caused people to believe that he never ran a business from the beginning.

So that's number one.Number two is the fact that we talked about it in his politics yesterday, in fact.It was when they went through the various concessions that were drawn up.The draft of the agreement was rejected and went up before it was approved.There was pressure on Donald Trump.Pressure was put on the sugar team to be more resistant to his claims that were published yesterday, when he says that he is not happy with the direction in which the trips went.

So, this is the perspective that there were people on the American side who were not happy, who also intervened on the American side and who were not happy with the direction in which things went.Then Marek Karni went to accuse the real Amman.I think they're both right.I think they both had pressure from both sides, which ultimately led to this deal.You look at Marek Karni and the deal he agreed to.And he said, they said it themselves.

They had an agreement earlier that week.But then Howard Lutnick showed up on Wednesday.But Marek Karni published the text to people in Canada.And they didn't respond well to it.While Kreni cried on national television for 25 minutes about how it is not fair that it is the rest who cry about the Iranian war, Mark Carney failed to sell the business to Canadians.He did not succeed in selling the business to secret agents, and he knew that this would deprive him if he agreed to a deal.

So when you hear the phrase that there is no better deal than a bad deal, he does not mean Canadians.He does not mean us.He means himself and his office.The deal for a bad deal is political.Then, when he had a few Americans who might have arrived at the last minute to press a little more, Carney already knew that he could not sell this business to Kendim, and if he gave up more, he would get a strong hand here.So, politically, he had to say there is no business instead of agreeing to a bad business.

Now, maybe you don't agree with this interpretation.That's okay.I saw that from both sides, there were pressures from both sides, but there was much more pressure on Mark Carney because he launched a full campaign and leadership on this issue.And if you agree to a business that everyone hates, and indeed, it's not exactly going well for you, right?So, there was no higher incentive not to agree to it.From the beginning, he didn't want to agree to it.

And then, who knows if the United States pressed a little more in the last few moments if Howard didn't give up.But it seems that the more we live, that's what I see will happen.Carney tried so hard to see if he could sell it to Canadians and secret agents, and no one bought it because he waited too long.And the longer he waits, and he will continue to wait, this business will become a problem in this matter.Dave McClepalin said, to nominate Trump by the first statement on this issue, was the best media work we've seen lately.It was also the goal of the Canadians.

They wanted to be the first to issue their message.Mark Carney did it.Mark Warner, an international sugar expert, said, Canada is sometimes close to nominating Trump by the first statement on sugar news, but sometimes far from it.Most of it happens through flattery and flattery.I think, from what I see and from the people who were involved, that both sides present a version of the truth.I don't think both sides are lying.

I think they are giving a version of the truth.But Carney is under a lot more pressure to get results than the United States at the moment.That's what we know so far.But when Mark Carney gave a response, Mark Warner also said, causing the Trump administration to ask, what can be done to get both countries out of the eye -to -eye sugar conflict?That is, in a certain sense, it depends on the candidates, right?If they are interested in reconciliation, then this is their choice.

This is indeed a choice, my friends.This is indeed a choice.This is all from my side.Have a good day.I'm out.