“Disgraceful hypocrites” Keir Starmer & Lady Victoria unveil secret son on camera outside Downing St

I was absolutely shocked by something else that happened yesterday outside Downing Street.And this is going to be controversial and some people will disagree with me talking about this.But regular viewers know that I have long tracked Slippery Stammer and his miserable wife, Lady Victoria Stammer, who I do have great sympathy for despite her misery.I have long tracked their hypocrisy over their own family.over the fact that we still do not know the true shape of Slippery Starmer's family, and over the fact that he has used his family, including his teenage son, for political expediency when it suits him.For example, when he was in deep trouble about the fact that We found out he was staying in Mayfair at this very posh apartment owned by Lord Ali.

All of a sudden, he was more than happy to hide behind his teenage son.Oh, I had to be there because the teenage son was sitting in the GCSEs.All through this period, when he has been not prepared to name his son, when he has been absolutely defiant about the fact that his children should not be pictured whatsoever, Stammer, when it suits him politically, has hidden behind his family.And I talk about that from the situation with Lord Ali to the discussion about adolescence.Well yesterday, you are not going to believe this, Slippery Stammer and Lady Victoria Stammer positioned said son, Toby Stammer, in front of the cameras.He could be seen watching Stammer's speech yesterday.

And these are some previous pictures actually, which I will come to, but if you look here, this was the speechyesterday, and there, number nine is Starmer's son.I find it utterly extraordinary and quite disgusting that the family have done this, totally taking the piss out of the fact that for the past two years, they have claimed that there has to be a total secrecy shrouded over their family.Well, good on the Daily Mail, who isn't playing ball.They released this piece, Lady Starmer leads Team Keir and Downing Street as PM's family and closest allies gather to watch his tearful resignation, but where was Rachel Reeves?But within that article, they identified number nine, Keir Starmer's son.

In his resignation speech, Sir Keir paid tribute to both his son and daughter.He said, when I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job.And his son was watching, watching this moment as he burst into tears.

on the most important job.Being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife, Vic, who has been a rock by my side through good times and bad.And being the best dad I can to my beautiful children, who are my pride and my joy.Thank you very much.

Now, I'm sorry, I know this is a divisive issue, but Starmer has never told us the truth about the true shape of his family.He has never told us the truth about whatthe Ukrainian firebombers were targeting his personal property and his personal cars.How did they know the location of said cars and said properties instead just blaming it on a Russian conspiracy without the evidence to back that up.And while I do have great human sympathy for his son.I mean, being Keir Starmer's son, that's got to be tough, right?

At the same time, I find it sickening that for the past two years there has been a media blackout while Starmer and Lady Victoria are prepared to take the piss by positioning their son in the photos outside Downing Street when they are prepared to leave Downing Street.That is fundamentally wrong.to me and I will call it out and I will give credit for the Daily Mail for actually doing the right thing.Now I have since done a lot of research on Toby Starmer and it turns out that actually Slippery Starmer also allowed his son to be there.You can see him in the top right when he was going into Downing Street.Their young daughter also attended that public celebration, although I have decided not to name and show her given she was not in the official lineup outside Downing Street yesterday.

Stammer has also regularly taken Toby Stammer to the football and attended in public with him.Now, I think, I mean, in that shot, actually, he's got a black eye too, which I'm sure was through some type of, you know, football injury or something like that.But look, my point is here, Slippery Stammer should not have been able to play this game with the mainstream media.You are the elected leader of this country.You are regularly in vote.your children and your wife when it suits you in political decisions, be it from the defence of Lord Ali to the constant talk about why adolescence proves that there's a massive issue with young white boys.

So if you are also prepared to put your 17 -year -old son outside of Downing Street to watch your speech, I'm afraid I am not going to join in the mainstream media censorship.I credit The Daily Mail for doing what they did, they didn't name him, I have, but I find it disgusting that there has been this two -year -long stitch -up.I really do.I really do.And it's interesting because a lot of people have celebrated the fact actually that the Stammers are gone.Many Royalists online were not happy with the fact that Victoria Stammer gave a little nasty side -eye to the Princess of Wales when she was in public with her young child at a Royal event.

And we have also, of course, seen the fact that Stalmer shed tears in public for his children, for his wife, for what he had lost, rather than what we had lost as a country when he was leader.I give a lot of credit to the UKIP party, actually, for making this point.Stalmer did not shed a tear for Henry Novak.Stalmer did not shed a tear for Rhiannon Skywhite.Stalmer did not shed a tear for Wayne Broadhurst.Stalmer did not shed a tear for B .

B.King.Stalmer did not shed a tear for Elsie Dostanko.Starmer did not shed a tear for Alice de Silva Aguirre.Starmer did not shed a tear for Harvey Wilgus.Starmer did not shed a tear for Katie Fox.

Starmer did not shed a tear for Stephanie Irons.Starmer did not shed a tear for Lily Whitehouse.Starmer did not shed a tear for Finbar Sullivan.Starmer did not shed a tear for all the victims of mass uncontrolled migration.When he did shed a tear, it was for himself.Let me bring in today's superstar panel, Christine and Neil Hamilton.

So Neil Hamilton, as I say, this is going to be controversial.This is the type of reason why Starmer wants to shut down independent media operations like this one, because he has constant control over the mainstream media who have protected his secrets about the real shape of his family, about the truth of his children for the past two years.But I'm sorry, Neil, it crosses a line for me when, in front of the world's media, he brings out his son to watch his resignation speech knowing that there are cameras on it.knowing that it's being broadcast live, while expecting the mainstream media to continue with the conspiracy of silence.No.This kid is 17 years old.

I wish him the best, but he has made a decision as a young man.By the way, I point out, Neil, that Slippery Starman wants to give 16 -year -olds the vote, okay?So under Labour's regime, this young man would have the vote as a 17 -year -old.For me, I'm I believe he was making a decision to go public in that moment.

Yeah, I totally agree with you.It's the hypocrisy which makes it a public issue.And if you keep your family completely hidden from view, except for some incidental appearance which can't be avoided, then I think if you're using them in some circumstances, even if only implicitly as some kind of political weapon,your hands, then you've got to accept the consequences of that, that it's gloves off as far as the media are concerned.And public life is public, that's what you've got to realise if you go into it.You can't turn off the cameras and if things become a matter of public interest, then they will be exposed and debated.

So I think it's an entirely fair game, as you rightly say.In Wales, Labour have already given 16 -year -olds the vote and in Scotland the SNP did but Labour supported them.So of course you can't have the penny and the biscuit if 16 year olds are no longer children for the purposes of voting then they're fair game anyway.If they're old enough to vote then I think they're old enough to fend for themselves.I personally am against votes for 16 but that's not the point.If we have it then I think the rules of the game have to reflect that.

Of course I mean I do have sympathy for the boy.It could can't be easy to realize that your dad's a dud.And so that's the problem, isn't it?And to see him standing there on the gallows and then pulling the lever himself.to go through the trap.I mean, that's not something which I would want to put any son of mine through.

But that's the reality of the situation that Starmer himself is in as a result of his own uselessness, incompetence, and hypocrisy.So I'm afraid I have no sympathy whatsoever.

Christine, there are a lot of people who disagree.And I'm always happy to put both sides of this.I'm just looking in the live chat now.Steffi810 says, leave them alone.Bad form.There will be some people who say, as the child of a politician, they should be protected.

But unfortunately, Christine, from my point of view, I think this is a very weird place we're going to.And I use the example, and I'm sorry to do so, of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who seem to have this very oddsituation going at the moment where they want to, to some degree, protect their children, while when it suits them, dragging them out and using them to sell product.I'm sorry, in my view, if you are the Prime Minister of this country, your children are to an extent public figures.Now of course we should treat them with kid gloves, and I'm not for one second attacking Toby Starmer here, but I think the idea that they should be secret is just weird.And I find it so weird that the mainstream media have been part of this facade for the past two years.

I don't think it's something they would have done for Boris Johnson's children, Christine, who I saw constantly slagged off across the newspapers.

Well, Boris Johnson had too many children to count.You couldn't possibly hide all those children.

Well, good.We need the birth rate to be going up.Seriously.Good on him.

To be honest, Dan, I think your use of the word secret... is a little bit too far.He's not said he's got it.It makes it sound as though he's got illegitimate children that he's really hiding.That's why I think the word...

Well, there's a lot of discussion about that too, Christine.

Well, of course there is, because the media are like that, aren't they?They want to push these things all over the place.As far as I'm, I do not believe that Starmer has an illegitimate child.Too boring, there you are.I stand to be corrected if one appears.And I think these Ukrainians who tried to firebomb his home and everything, I may be wrong, but I believe that it was discovered in court that this was basically a Russian plot.

This was nothing to do with them being love children or something of Starmer, I don't know.I mean, if Starmer takes, what's his name, Toby, to a football match, and you've just shown all those photographs of him, I hadn't seen any of those before, then he's public, he's sort of public property.I mean, leave the lad alone, but if you are photographed with him in public, you probablyreally complain when people print those photographs.But I really think the use of the word secret is, even for you, Dan, I think that's a bit far.

I mean, Christine, I totally hear what you're saying, but he made him secret.That's the thing.He created this sort of aura of weirdness in the same way that I think Harry and Meghan have done with their children.Like, actually, just be proud of the fact you've got two kids.at some point they're going to be known.People would show them a lot of respect.

I honestly do believe that.But to hide your children, that's weird.And he did make them secret.That was his choice.

He wasn't hiding them, he's just saying, basically, leave them alone.And what's wrong with that?I mean, Harry and Meghan, what really gets me angry?I don't really mind the Starmer situation.Sorry to disappoint, but...

No, I want to have the debate because I think there'll be a lot of people who are with you, actually.I appreciate my view on this is not going to please a lot of people.

I think you're making a bit of a mountain out of a molehill there.But Harry and Meghan, what really riles me, and I think a lot of people, is that she's called Lilibet.We all know perfectly well why that was done.That was to give her some, you know, oh God.And the idea she said that the Queen approved it, well...Rubbish.

Show us the proof of that.And actually quite the opposite.Lots of people say the Queen didn't.Look, Neil, there's a different...

It was her little pet name.

Yeah, exactly.And she's made it public.It's gross.Neil, a lot of people have a different view on the whole firebombing case.People like George Galloway have said they don't believe the truth has ever come out.I just want to show you what Tommy Robinson had to say about this, Neil, when he appeared here on Outspoken yesterday, because he doesn't believe the official explanation, which is that, oh, this was all a big Russian plot.

Watch what Tommy had to say.But first, we've been told our whole lives that wrinkle creams were theeasiest way to look younger.Now, one doctor says that's nothing but old news.According to Dr. John Lake, the world -renowned Beverly Hills beauty expert, most wrinkle fixes on the market are nothing but glorified moisturizers.He says they hardly make a dent on your appearance.

Some can even be harmful to your skin.Now, recently, Dr. Lake has focused his attention away from mainstream cosmetic practices.Why?Well, so that he can pursue a revolutionary anti -aging breakthrough run that some experts say could empty the wallets of the cosmetic industry.He says it's almost like Photoshop for your face and you may even be mad after seeing how easy it is to visibly erase your wrinkles from view.His personal clients have dubbed his new do -it -yourself technique the Age Rewinder Method because it can take years or even decades off your appearance in under two minutes.

In light of this amazing breakthrough, Dr. Lake has released a step -by -step video to the public free and uninterrupted where he outlines exactly how to use this simple solution from home.And he says if it even helps one person look younger or feel more confident, he will be thrilled knowing he helped.The video has since gone viral.At first, it was shared by users on Facebook, but since then, it's racked up over 2 .3 million views and counting.So far, the comments and feedback have been outstanding, with thousands of women reporting they look decades younger.One viewer commented, best results of anything I've used.

I can't believe how well this works.I'll never stop using this.I don't understand how it works, but the results are great.Thank you.So you can find out more about this yourself right now.Go to bhmd1 .

com slash outspoken or click on the link in the description box below.That's bhmd1 .com slash outspoken.Now there is one thing that Dr. Lake asked from his viewers.If watching this video helps you look and feel younger than you have in years, then please share this video with your friends and loved ones.Together we have the power to help as many women reclaim a youthful look as possible.

So go watch the video andbhmd1 .comcom slash outspoken right now, or just click on the link in the description box below.

But now back to the show.What a story went on with him.He's trying to blame everything on Russia, isn't he?He's trying to blame his rent boys on Russia.

This is after the conviction last week.The BBC is reporting that this was a Russian plot, but obviously we still don't know who the mysterious figure behind the firebombing actually was.And Tommy...

Look, I'll tell you something.Certain people do firebombing, yeah?Certain people do things like that.Growing up in the UK, you know, the criminal fraternity, you know, who's that?Rent boys don't go around blowing shit up, right?It's not the sort of people that are hired to go and blow stuff up.

People who are hired to go and bomb and...If you look at the arson attacks that have come out that are funded by Iran, there's no rent boys blowing stuff up, right?So it just doesn't add up.Those three rent boys, I bet they have no criminal history other than their sexual practices.I bet they have no criminal history and there's a lot more to it.

Neil, do you think there's more to it?

Well, I haven't got any idea, obviously, but it wouldn't surprise me if this was some kind of undercover operation by the ex -KGB president of Russia.That's, remember, the only job that Putin had before he became the mayor of St. Petersburg, was working for Boris Yeltsin.But before that, he was a KGB operative.he speaks fluent German because he ran a KGB operation in East Germany.Germany.And we know that Russia engages in all sorts of destabilizing activities like the Skripals and Novichok murders, etc, etc.

This is a different category altogether, no doubt, but I don't really see what the purpose was actually.But it's perfectly possible that it was some kind of Russian operation and they found some Ukrainians, for example, to try to discredit Ukraine and put the blame on them.I don't have no idea.It's a world of shadowy practices where anything can happen.But nobody's going to be firebombing Starmer hereafter, so you can be grateful for that.

Christine?

Well, I mean, do I understand, are we supposed to believe that the people who were firebombing were in fact rent boys who were trying to blackmail Starmer or something.I mean, where is the proof, apart from what Tommy Robinson says, that Starmer has dealt with rent boys?I've heard the gossip and people will say, and you say, well, how do you know that?Oh, somebody told me.Well, who told you and who told them?I mean, things go round like that.

I'm not remotely convinced that there are any rent boys involved as far as Starmer's concerned.He's too boring, as Neil said about something else earlier.

It was a blowing up job.

Oh, stop it!

What was very concerning to me, I think, in court is that we were all just meant to accept, okay, there's this Russian mastermind behind it, but we're never going to be told the identity of this Russian mastermind.We've hit a dead end.Now, the father of one of the Ukrainians involved says that this guy is a total Ukrainianpatriot and would never work for a Russian.So all I'm saying is that I don't think we've got the full story.But it's also important, I think, that we talk about Stahmer's overall legacy.

This from Alison Pearson really struck me.She said, there are so many reasons to rejoice in the humiliation of Stahmer.His disgusting persecution of veterans, preferring our enemies to our heroes every single time, demonization and merciless jailing of white Britons after massacre of children in Southport, total lack of empathy, calling decent people far right when it was he who was far left, telling Trump we have always had a lot of free speech while the sanctimonious Stalinist was ushering in more hardline censorship, U -turning on the hard choices necessary to save the country like cutting an unsustainable welfare bill just to buy himself popularity with his student backbenchers, sanctimoniously denying our most important ally the United States permission to simply use the airbases they had paid for, doing enormous harm to the special relationship and leaving us unprotected just to buy himself popularity with his student backbenchers, see the trend, Taking the knee to DEI and poisoning our society, two -tier care.Ruining thousands of businesses, putting hundreds of thousands out of work with increased job taxes while claiming absurdly to have restored economic stability.trying to avoid a national inquiry into the rape gangs until shamed into one by Elon Musk.Feel free to add your own.

And Tim Shipman certainly did add his own.This is the political editor of The Spectator, and he came up with 42 reasons why Starmer failed.But I just want to share a couple of them with you that really struck me.He said his second foundational error, according to voters and focus groups, was his handling of the Southport killings of three young girls.I've always said this, the mainstream media do not understand how Southport changed this country fundamentally.The PM and his team denied it was a terrorist attack.

even though the perpetrator, Axel Rudigabana, had been referred to the government's prevent program and had ricin and an al -Qaeda training manual in the house.This created the notion that he would not tell difficult truths on security and cultural issues again.It still comes up to this day unprompted.Starmer supported harsh sentences against those on the far right who rioted, while leaving the impression he did not speak out against left -wing protesters, a tendency which left him characterised as two -tier care.And of course, the attempt to rewrite history on Starmer has already begun, in earnest this week.And I want to share this from Daniel Hannan, who said, I sense the political obituaries are preparing to run with the line that Keir Starmer was a decent fellow.

but ill -suited to politics.Honest but naive.Well, have a look at this.And then try to tell me he was honest.The signs were there from the start.Watch.

Okay, half of you watching this are not subscribed to Dan Wotton Outspoken.And the best way you can support what we do is by hitting that subscribe button.It is completely free.And turn on the notification bell to be alerted to our new episodes.

I want to pay tribute to Jeremy Corbyn, who's a friend as well as a colleague.

You wouldn't call Jeremy Corbyn a friend?

No.

We have to make the case for freedom of movement.

We don't want open borders.Freedom of movement has gone and it's not coming back.

Cutting off power, cutting off water.I think that Israel does have that right.

I was not saying that Israel had the right to cut off water, food, fuel or medicine.Wounded by the media, the Sun.in this city, a hurt for this city.And I certainly won't be giving interviews to The Sun during the course of this campaign.

Would you write to them again, Sir Keir?

I would do, yeah.

Can you guarantee that under your leadership, the 2019 Labour commitments to nationalise water, energy, rail, the Royal Mail, they'll all be in Labour's next election manifesto?

I've made that.commitments.

Will you nationalise the big six energy companies, yes or no?No.No, you will not.

decision.

In 2019 you said stripping her of a British citizenship was the wrong decision.She's lost her appeal to regain it.Should she be allowed to appeal again?Should she be allowed back here in order to face justice in the UK?

I think the court decision yesterday is the right decision.The Labour Party in opposition needs to be the Labour Party in power and a government doesn't go on picket lines, a government tries to resolve disputes.I'm really pleased to be here this morning supporting the staff at McDonald's who are on strike.Air quality, climate change is the issue of our time.And as the Extinction Rebellion protest showed us this week, the next generation are not going to forgive us if we don't take action.

I think they're wrong.I think their action is wrong.I mean, Christine, Daniel Hannah is completely right, isn't he?We cannot allow this rewriting of history in regards to Starmer, who lied such an astonishing degree.He lied to get in power.Now, you can say he thought he was doing that for the greater good, but it's not acceptable.

Because then he lied once he was in power.We could never trust a word that man said.

Well, some might say he lied, some might just say that he flip -flopped, but whatever it is, he does it a hell of a lot, doesn't he?Of course, you're entitled to change your mind, but if you're going to do that, you should then accept it.And of course, social media, not to mention recordings of television and radio programs, people can get so quickly hoist on their own petard by what they say, but not if you're a conviction politician, because if you're a conviction politician, you know what you think, you know what you mean, and you say that, and you don't have the opportunity to flip -flop, because you don't flip -flop, you know what you want.This is the problem.I think is going to be far worse on all that than Starmer.Look at all the stuff that's already come up to surface from his Twitter accounts and social media accounts, you know, when all the Tory Prime Ministers were chopping and changing.

Oh, we're going to have an election for every single one.Yes, you were right.They should have had an election, but so should you.And he's not going to.So, I mean, they're all so shallow and they don't they don't stand for anything except trying to get into power and they don't know what to do when they've got the power.And Keir Starmer has been an absolute example of that.

So it's not surprising there are all these examples.You know, by the way, when you were listing slightly off thing, but you were listing all the things that Alison Pearson's list, that's what it was.There was a lady, a rape victim who was on the television, one of the big channels, the other day, and she was told in advance, please don't mention the nationality of your rapist.

Yes, Sammy Woodhouse on Good Morning Britain.

Ah, Sammy Woodhouse, that's right.Thank you.I'd forgotten the name.And of course, she ignored that and she did.But I mean, the grotesque.

Yeah, but how often does this censorship go on, Christine?Because, you know, there's a consequence for Sammy Woodhouse.She'll never be asked back again.And so this is the problem.

Weren't we told, I think it was Axel Ruud de Cabana, but you will know, we were told he was a choir boy from South Wales.

Yeah.

I mean, what?That was to put us all off the scent.Well, I mean, you know, there he is.Look, butter wouldn't melt in his mouth.But my God, he changed, didn't he?

Dan Moulton Outspoken is your no -spin, no -bias, no -censorship outlet for independent news.We have no big tech backing or billionaires pulling my strings, but that does mean I need your support.So please hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell, and subscribe to Dan Moulton Outspoken on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.It's totally free, but allows me to continue my promise to always keep fighting for you.