"Drug addled embarrassment" Prince Harry must be PUNISHED by King Charles says Lady Colin Campbell

Harry is a drug -addled embarrassment who should be either locked up or shut down.And things have reached a path where his father really does need to remove him off the royal family website.And if he continues to fail to do that, he is being remiss in his duty to the British people and to the British crown.

The state of Prince Harry's hairline, and I genuinely believe this, is now indicative about the ruin in his life.I mean, this was a man who had the front to say that Prince William was alarmingly bald.And as Andrew Lawrence pointed out, after seeing Harry during his UK appearances this week, Evan Helmet, Clippers, number one, all over.And as I say, It's not because I have any issues with the fact that it's very difficult for men who are going bald.Trust me, I know about that and I dealt with it.But it's about what this represents.

It's about the fact that Harry doesn't see himself like the rest of the world does.Why on earth?Would you go around as a 40 -something -year -old man with that type of hairline?You've got to do a Prince William.You've got to acknowledge where you're at in your life and get rid of it.So for me, there is something symbolic when we look at Harry as this sort of pathetic, balding man.

And even the mainstream media who have tried to be positive about Prince Harry have had to admit that while he is defiant in defeat, his life's work now lies in ruin.That's the Daily Telegraph and ladies see I want to get into, Lady Colin Campbell, I want to get into what this court defeat means and how important it is really and what a loss it is.from someone like you who has actually regularly taken on the newspapers for lies and won.But first, can I just ask you about your impression of Harry this week, how he did look like a broken man, how there is something very weird about the fact that he just won't deal with his hair one way or the other.It's like he's trying to cling on.to an image of him as this sort of handsome young prince when the rest of the world now sees him for who he unfortunately truly is?

Well, Dan, I actually take the view that if he wants to be natural, which he is being, he has an absolute right to be natural.I'm actually mystified that he simply doesn't go and get his hair implanted because, I mean...Absolutely.

I've done it.It was the best thing I ever did.

Well, one of my sons has done it, who you know, you know them both.Very handsome, he is too.I gave one of them as a present because he was going bald and he's very good looking and he didn't want to go bald.But what gets me about Harry is the lack of insight, that he looks at William, who's equally bald, and says how terribly bold William is, but then that somehow he's, it's okay because he's not bold when he's equally bold.It's a total lack of insight that, that, and, and the, you know, putting down his brother for, for situations that he shares.It's, it's, it's, it shows how immature and rarely very stupid

he is.

Well, indeed.And, Lady C, that's why I think it completely fits with what happened in court this week, because remember, he genuinely had led to believe that he was going to be the dragon slayer, that he was going to destroy the British free press.Now, of course, we understand, and as someone who's worked on Fleet Street, that there have been absolute outrageous crimes committed.And I am the first to say all of those people who committed those crimes should suffer for it, should lose their careers, should go to jail.But you can't make stuff up.You cannot make stuff up, and you've got to be very confident when you go into a case like this.

And Lady C, you have written this week, and I want to share it with people because it's very, very fascinating.You wrote on your ex about your own experiences as a dragon slayer of the British press, posting on ex as someone who has successfully sued Associated Newspapers on several occasions, and has been a fierce critic of them at times, I am relieved that Mr Justice Nicklin found for them and against the host of money -grubbing damaged shoppers whose case they knew was founded on a fraud, yet they persisted in pursuing it nevertheless.As someone whose life has been far more unwarrantly damaged by the lives of the mail and other papers spread about me for some three decades than any of the claimants, I have scant sympathy.for anyone who was so egotistical that they would try to destroy one of our largest, if not our largest, newspaper company in the country.And make no mistake about it, that was their and Hacked Off's objective.It would have been a sad day indeed for Freedom of the Press if Prince Harry, Elton John, David Furnish, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley, Sir Simon Hughes and Doreen Lawrence had won.

I have personal experience of Mr Justice Nicklin as a judge.He was the judge on my action against the Daily Mirror.For three long years, Alison Phillipsand her crew did everything in their power to run up my costs so that when they had to settle, I would suffer a financial loss.It didn't quite work out like that, but they weren't to know that.Mr. Justice Nicklin exercised great patience with them, as he did with that cabal of hacked -off, money -rubbing adventurers who hoped to get massive settlements for no good reason.

He was an impressive judge.And I've said all along that although I don't make predictions, I couldn't see with five decades of litigation experience how they could win.It is therefore outrageous that Harry and Doreen Lawrence, who should be undyingly grateful to the male for having brought her son's murderers to justice, for make no mistake, without the male's campaign, Stephen Lawrence's killers would still be working free, would issue a statement accusing Nicklin of stitching them up.They had no case, they never had a case.They, or at least their lawyers on their behalf, tried to fabricate one, not out of thin air, but fraudulently.The whole lot of them is damned lucky that the matter has not yet been referred to the police for criminal investigation.

Uttering false witness statements is not only fraudulent, it is an attempt to pervert the course of justice.In my opinion, the misconduct in the case has been so flagrant that it is only exceeded by the arrogance of the claimants and their legal team.They persisted in trying to shake down Associated Newspapers as they pursued a fabricated case, even after their main witness Gavin Burrows had sworn that the witness statement they had pegged the case upon and were alleging was his was a forgery.The brass neck of Harry and his cabal, not to mention their lawyer -in -chief, David Sherbourne, is truly stupendous.Harry is always talking about accountability.I think it's about time that some, if not all, of those involved in this £50m shakedown are held to account.

I agree with Paul Dacre.Some willwhom I have previously crossed swords and in fact once said the message that was so graphic that I couldn't possibly repeat it here.I want to know what he said.But he is right.There were clearly criminal activities involved in the matter.

Mr. Justice Nicklin's judgment is a bright day for a free press in this country.If I make no mistake about it, Had that band of leeches had their way, either they would have walked away with huge payouts to which they had no right, my view of what they really hoped for, or then they would have destroyed Associated Newspapers, which is not only one of our major newspaper companies in possession of the world's largest internet website, but by its very existence, and despite its many failings, absolutely fundamental to such freedom of expression as still remains in this country.an incredibly powerful statement.And what I want to pick up on with you, because it's really important, is Justice Nicklam himself, the judge.Because here you are, revealing to the world that in your case versus the Daily Mirror, he was totally fair.Yet Harry has suggested that he is in some ways compromised, that there has been a whitewash, because in the past, he had represented the Daily Mirror.

And what you're doing with your personal experience is blowing that argument up.The stories about Harry and Meghan, the establishment and the media are working overtime to suppress.I'm Dan Wotton.This is Outspoken.Subscribe right now for free if you want the truth straight.

The whole thing is outrageous.I mean, you know, quite frankly, Harry is a drug -addled embarrassment who should be either locked up or shut down, and things have reached a path where his father really does need to remove him.the royal family website.And if he continues to fail to do that, he is being remiss in his duty to the British people and to the British crown.The rest of it is more complicated, but Harry has also, I am told, Harry and Meghan have been going around moaning about white privilege, and that they are victims of white privilege.I mean, you know...

He couldn't make it out.Exactly.So now they're playing the race card as well as the class card and, you know, they are victims of a cruel establishment because they are the underdogs.Harry and Meghan are two of the most privileged people on earth.I mean, it's about time that he really was stopped in his tracks, certainly in terms of the presentation on the Royal Family website.It's now inexcusable for the king to continue to have him on the website.

He's taken the king's rave to court.He gets a judgment against him.He then complains to an elected politician to get a lawyer's and a court's judgment overturned.And now he tries to destroy the British press, which is fundamental in a democracy for the maintenance of our freedoms.And, I mean, Charles really does have to do something, you know.This is now beyond the pale.

He is accusingJustice Nickling of corruption.And he is basically saying that when he said it's a stitch up and that that that, you know, that influence was used to prevent him from winning the case when it was obvious to me that that there was no case and never was.You know, please cannot be broad.Sorry.

Well, I was just going to say just just to jump in.It looks like even Harry had realized that because it has just emerged.Look at this headline.He had sought a deal with the Daily Mail before the doomed court case.But what's so fascinating about this, Lady C, and good on them, you know, good on Paul Dacre.And like you, Lady C, as you know, I have my issues with the Daily Mail.

I have my issues with Paul Dacre.The way they treated me was absolutely appalling.

Oh, it was beyond dreadful, beyond dreadful.Sorry, just to back you up there.

No, but I totally accept, in this case, they have been absolutely heroic.He did totally the right thing, Paul Dacre.And you know what, Lady C?They should never have settled.Because what Harry wanted them to do was settle, but at the same time agree that they would never attack Harry.And that was impossible, so they risked everything.

Because, ladies see, mark my words, if even just one of those 97 stories had come from illegal means, you know Harry would have been calling for the whole newspaper to be shut down.

This was a plan, as Paul Dacre said, but you and I have been saying it since this case began.This was hacked off, trying to shut down Associated Newspapers.

Great.

And Harry was the useful idiot.But Harry's behavior and Doreen Lawrence is inexcusable as well.Doreen Lawrence should know.I know people who know Doreen Lawrence.And remember, I'm Jamaican.She's Jamaican.

And her husband is Jamaican.And OK, we are completely different to be blunt about the classes of Jamaicans.And in the ordinary course of life.Our paths would never have crossed, but she is not in the ordinary course of life.And she was made a pair by David Cameron, who was trying to suck up to the brown and black voters.And David Cameron is very leftist.

And so he was sucking up to the left and within the Tory party and trying to get leftist Labour voters to jump ship and vote for him.And he made her a pair.And they didn't make the husband the pair.And had Neville Lawrence be made the pair.She would still have been Lady Lawrence, but by making her the pair in her own right, he is just still Mr Neville Lawrence.And I know people who know both of them because I found out stuff about them.

He absolutely hasn't.He deplores the way she has behaved.She has gone on to be a real, what they used to call, Uncle Tom in America.She's right up there sucking up and she's a very humble woman who, and I'm not decrying the fact that she's humble by the way, and when I say humble, I mean not humble in character, I mean of humble background, and she's been made muchof a deal of, and on the back of her son's murder, incidentally, and it's completely turned her head, and she's busy ingratiating herself to all sorts of lords and ladies and princes and all the rest of it.But it's all very left -wing, because as soon as she was made a pair, a conservative pair, she jumped ship to sit on the Labour benches.

So, I mean, she didn't even have loyalty to the very person who elevated her to the period.And she certainly had no loyalty whatsoever to the Mirror.

And remember, well, I was just going to say, and remember Neville, Stephen Lawrence's husband, sorry, Stephen Lawrence's father remains loyal to the Daily Mail.Lady C, there's another aspect of the Daily Mail case that I want to ask you about, given your own experience with Princess Diana, because of course Harry has tried to make this argument that he is doing what Diana would have wanted, but both Paul Dacre and Richard Kaye this week, Richard Kaye being the former Royal Editor of the Daily Mail who was friends with Princess Diana, have said absolutely not.Diana was actually pro the Daily Mail newspaper.I just want to play you what they said and then I'll get your reaction.Watch this.

Would it be fair to say that the male, effectively, not that we took sides, trying to be balanced, were more on her side than the rest of Fleet Street were when it came to that divorce?

Absolutely.I mean, I can remember the coverage of the Charles Diana divorce, which went on for many years, the War of the Whales, as we called it, and we unashamedly took Diana's side.We felt that she was more sinned against than sinning.She was a friend of the paper, too.It's perfectly true that she and Ihad a friendship that went beyond the fact that I was merely a journalist here.

We were good friends outside my work.Kensington, where we are based in West London, was also our base when Diana was alive, and it's right across the road from Kensington Palace.We were kind of Diana's local paper in many ways, and she would often drop in to meet editors and executives.She was a frequent guest at internal private boardroom lunches, for example.Or she would just come in to pick up the latest edition of the paper.

The bitter irony is that his mother, Diana, liked the mail.We were her paper.We took her side in her acrimonious breakup with Charles.She and I would speak and meet.The mail's superb royal reporter was her friend and confidant.The truth is that this trumped -up action, which has cost well over £50 million and wasted a huge amount of valuable court time, should never have been brought to trial.

So, Lady C, obviously you had your own interest in history with Princess Diana, given your book revealed a lot of what was going on in her life.But it's the fundamental point that Richard Kaye and Paul Dacre make incorrect, which is that Diana actually had a pretty positive relationship with the Daily Mail on the whole, and she wouldn't have wanted her son to try and bring down that newspaper, and specifically Dacre and Richard Kaye, who she had a relationship with, at least a friendship with.But first, do you remember when energy used to feel effortless?You'd get through a workout, a long day, a bad night's sleep and still feel sharp.But as you get older...trust me, it can start to feel like your body and brain don't have the same spark they used to.

Here's the interesting part.That's not in your head.It's biology.When we're younger, our bodies naturally produce and regenerate high levels of creatine.But as we move into our 40s and beyond, that production steadily declines.And that means less readily available energy for both our muscles and our brains.

That's exactly why Qualia Creatine Plus was created.Here's the key thing though.You can't just take any old creatine and assume it's doing the job.It has to actually get into your cells and then be activated so your body can use it properly.That's why Qualia Creatine Plus is different.It combines two clinically studied forms of creatine with electrolytes, all chosen to support absorption and activation.

It includes easy to mix, micronized creatine, monohydrate in a new form called OptiCreatine plus creatine magna power along with a precise amount of sea salt to help support uptake where it matters most.What makes this stand out is that it's not just creatine, it's the delivery system your body needs to make it work for you.We're way past the dark ages of creatine being just for gym bros.Creatine is critical for energy, metabolism, cognition, and healthy aging, not just lifting like a bodybuilder.So go to qualialife .com slash dan for 50 % off.

And here's a bonus.Use the code Dan for an additional 15 % off your order.That's q u a l i a life .com slash Dan and use the code Dan.And thank you so much to qualia for sponsoring this episode.Now Back to the show.

She, she was a Daily Mail girl.There are no two ways about it.So David English, who neither of them has mentioned, but who he was the head honcho at the time.And he said about Diana that she was an absolute genius in PR.And And had she not been the Princess of Wales, he would have recommended that she set up her own PR company and head up everybody else's PR.She was a PR genius.

She used the Daily Mail.Daily Mail was, you will know Dan, the Daily Mail is one street over from the, across the road from the...And High Street Kensington, yeah.And, and, but that's, the proximity was coincidental.It was the fact that she was able to use Richard Kaye as a conduit, Paul Dacre and David English were happy to have her using them as the conduit.They took, by their own account now, they took her side in the action against Charles, and in fact they were sometimes very unjust to Charles, as I used to point out at the time, and I'm still prepared to point out, but no matter what, whether they had been pro -Diana, anti -Diana, pro -Charles, anti -Charles.

And personally, I thought they were very remiss in their covering of the breakup of that marriage because they bent over backwards at times to accommodate Diana.They're missing it now, aren't they?Well, but they wereinformation directly from Diana.And so they were keeping her sweet.So that really was a little bit unethical, because the reality is they should have been even -handed, as indeed was I.

I was always very even -handed.They weren't.But none of that matters now.All that matters is that they are a reputable newspaper company.Yes, they have made mistakes.I mean Harry talks about how they affected his life.

the damage they wrought in mine is far greater than anything they could have wrought in Harry's life.And Harry and I defending them and saying they have a right to exist and they should exist and anything that, because the law already by and large has sufficient safeguards that if you have a complaint against the newspaper, there are ways and means of remedying I do think that there are problems in terms of the conditional fee arrangements, arrangements at the moment, which the newspapers lent on the courts to alter, and the courts altered it adversely.But putting that aside, there are already legal remedies.Harry and Meghan and Elton John and Hugh Grant and that whole cabal.They are trying to shut down a free press on both sides of the Atlantic, Harry and Meganor.He's a member of the Aspen Institute.

He is trying to shut down not only newspapers, but control social media so that they willbasically be in control of what pundits and writers and authors can say.This is outrageous and it needs to be stopped.And I am not surprised by Mr. Justice Nickling.I found Mr. Justice Nickling in my action against the Daily Mirror, to be extremely fair.And what he does, which is very difficult for the loser, is he gives the loser every chance to remedy himself and to put forth his case.

And then he comes down foul against them.So let's see if this Associated Newspapers case is going to be appealed.I mean, I know Harry's hinting at that, but there's just no chance.There is no chance.If they appeal, I don't think it's going to succeed.But you never know what these idiots will come up with.

Financially, there's just no way.There's no way they can take the risk.Lady C, I just want to show you Piers Morgan also weighed in on the whole Princess Diana side of it.So I wanted to get you to respond.Watch this.

Diana used to call me regularly.I used to go around for lunch at Kensington Palace.She'd call me.I'd tape the calls and she knew I was taping her.I'd send her the copy of the story I was going to run.She, you know, she would send it back with little amendments.

I've got all this, right?So this idea that Prince Harry seems to want the public to buy into, that every story about him and his family has been gained illegally by terrible journalists, you know, it's just not true.

Well, it's been knocked out.Every single article was legitimately sourced is Justice Nicklin's findings.

It appears right there, lady.

Absolutely.

I mean, Diana was the greatest manipulator of all, you know.I mean, she she she actually wrote Andrew Morton's book for him.She actually wrote Princess in Love, which was the Anna Anna Pasternak James Hewitt book.It was It was written off her letters to Jane Siewert.At the time, the book was criticized for being overblown and Mills and Boone.It was Diana's words, word for word.

My first Diana book started out as an authorized biography to raise money for three of her charities, which were three of my charities.And in 1990, it might have been 1989, but I think it was 1990, after we had spoken about it, I went into the palace, gratis her arrangements to have things done officially.And then the whole arrangement changed because she wanted out of the royal system and she thought that my book would be her get out of jail card and when she started to tell too many lies to me about Charles, which I could, I could check anything that she told me.And she was naive enough to think that even though she used to say, you, you know, both sides of it, because I did, because my boyfriend at the time, James Buchanan Jardine, was his cousin, one of his cousins was married to Maggie Glombs, who subsequently became the Earl ofStrathmore.So I had, on both sides of the fence, I had impeccable connections.

And she used to try to milk me for information about what was going on up at Glombs, because Isa and Catherine Wetherall were married to Mikey Gloves and Nicholas Soames.And Nick Soames was, whose sister Fiona was an old friend of mine.I went to her 21st birthday party.Nick Soames was, everybody knew, was Charles's good friend as well.And Diana knew all of this.So I had access to people that Diana didn't have access to.

Equally, I had access through Diana to people that Charles didn't have access to.And so I had a very comprehensive view of what was going on.And when I came to the conclusion that I could not honorably write the book that Dan and I had effectively started out writing, because she was telling too many lies about Charles and what a victim she was.But the mistake she'd made was she came clean initially.She said that, you know, basically the marriage was never going to be able to work.because they were hopelessly mismatched.

What she didn't see was that she had deceived Charles into thinking she was a country -loving, very amenable girl, and once the wedding ring was on his finger, he discovered she was a metropolitan who didn't like the country, and also she was extremely dominant.He didn't understand how dominating she was, until the wedding ring was off the finger.But she was pretty frank about all of it until Iknow whether she went home and spoke to one of her stupid friends, because she had some really stupid friends, or she simply decided herself.But I always thought she'd spoken to someone who said, you know, Diana, You can't say that you're so miserable that you want out because you don't like royal restrictions and you want freedom because all those factory workers in Dagenham who love you are going to loathe you because they still have to go into the office every day and they have to work.And so that's when she came up with being the victim.

But she didn't come up with being the victim initially.And so there was all of that going on.And Harry has no concept of the nuances.And Diana played the press brilliantly.And she and they were very collusive with her.I'm not knocking Paul Dacre and Sir David English and Richard Kaye for having jumped on that bandwagon.

I mean good for them, you know, but the fact of the matter is they were not even -handed and they were not as even -handed as they should have been.I was even -handed and I paid the price both from the press and from other people as well because People may have forgotten, but initially I was abused roundly for the positions I took.

Absolutely.Old Lady C, what fascinating insight.For so much more of it, make sure you subscribe to Lady Colin Campbell's brilliant channel on YouTube.Fair, as she says, and not sensationalist, as Charlotte Griffiths claims.And of course, if you do want to watch my full interview,with both Lady Colin Campbell and Charlotte Griffiths, then please do subscribe to my sub stack www .outspoken

outspoken .live.The UK government, by the way, is trying to completely destroy independent broadcasters like me outside of the Royal Rota, outside of the mainstream media.They want to push into your feeds the likes of BBC News, Wokai TV, Sly News, and so we really do need your support more than ever at the moment.And the best way that you can do so is by signing up to the paid annual or monthly subscription on Substack, which is a free speech platform.We're protected there.

You can do so at www .outspoken .live.I would so appreciate your support.Dan Moulton Outspoken is your no -spin, no -bias, no -censorship outlet for independent news.We have no big tech backing or billionaires pulling my strings, but that does mean I need your support.

So please hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell, and subscribe to Dan Moulton Outspoken on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.It's totally free, but allows me to continue my promise to always keep fighting for you.