GB News censors live on air Islam fight after Adam Brooks explodes at leftist "Arrogant leftie t***”

trying to make the audience think I've got a problem with Muslims.Which you do.How dare you say that?

You are one arrogant lefty twat.It's interesting to see how these debates over Islamism are now erupting in the mainstream media when people are actually allowed to talk.And one of the most fascinating exchanges actually happened on GB News when my friend Adam Brooks, the publican, was accused live on air by a right little weasel, revolting little bloke called Sebastian Salek, who was apparently a regular left -wing commentator on GBN, who was previously a Labour councillor and political journalist.And Adam just wasn't going to have it.When Sebastian Salek decided, I'm just going to say that you hate Muslims, Adam Brooks just finally said it.And it's what people want to say, right?

When they're sitting next to these awful people on GB News, you know, the Matthew Stathlens of this world, he just said, you are a twat, you are an awful twat.But of course, because we have GB News having to deal with the huge amount of censorship that they face, this desire to sort of become mainstream, to stay out of trouble with the off communists, certainly since my sacking in the Lawrence Fox incident, Not only did the presenter immediately have to step in and apologize, but this exchange has been completely scrubbed from the internet.Or at least GB News thought it had been.The great news is I've got the receipts and can show you exactly what went down.So I'm going to set up firstly how the fight kicked off.This was on a show hosted by Alex Armstrong.

And in -person child sexual abuse.So you can'tmake a direct comparison.They're two different atrocities we're talking about here.Pakistani community within London that this these sort of crimes that we've seen prevalent up north and in many towns around the country are not happening in the capital and that's what he alluded to basically when he was trying to skirt around the question with Susan Hall.So what we know we know it tells us that we know the religions by zooming in on one in particular what because no no disrespect it's one of the biggest scandals that this country has ever seen Pakistani rape gangs that were covered up not just by their own community by police, by councillors, by social services, by MPs.

This is from a range of religions, yet you are choosing to focus on one.

That stinks to me.No it doesn't stink because it's the biggest scandal of our lifetime.

Okay, so that was the setup.So you can see what type of rat Sebastian Salek is.He clearly looks down on someone like Adam Brooks.He thinks that he is intellectually superior.And he thinks that the way that he can get away from talking about the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs, and the fact that they have been covered up disgracefully by his party, by Labour, still being covered up, in the UK capital by his hero, the Islamist Mayor Sadiq Khan.He thinks the way that he can get around that is by simply telling Adam Brooks, you just hate Muslims, don't you?

You just hate all Muslims.Watch.

There is no problem with Muslims.

I've got problems with grooming and rape gangs, Sebastian.But this story is saying this is a range of religions.

How dare you say I've got problems with Muslims, when up north that is the most...We're not talking about up north.This is a London story.Where there's nine million people.So the odds are, with large Pakistani communities within London, we've still got that problem as well.And my question to you, why are you making this about Muslims?

I'm not making it about Muslims.I'm talking about...it about Pakistanis?I'm talking about the biggest scandal that we've ever seen in this country.

Oh my God, Adam, we're going round in circles now.

No, we're not.I'm telling you.You're trying to deflect, Sebastian.I know exactly what you're doing.And now you're trying to make the audience think I've got a problem with Muslims.Which you do.

I've got a problem with Muslims, yeah?Well, listen to the way you're talking.I've got a problem with rape and grooming gangs.I do not have a problem with Muslims.I've got Muslim friends.How dare you say that?

Did you really just say that?Yes, I did say that because I have got them.You are one arrogant lefty twat.I've got to say, for saying this, for saying I'm against Muslims live on air, pathetic.

Can you both of you stop?

Apologies for the strong language.I understand that Adam feels insulted.Very insulted, Alex.Very insulted.So they have wiped that from the internet.I have found it.

Leo Curse, you obviously are a former presenter at GB News.You're still a contributor there.So I appreciate that you'll be limited in some ways.But what is it like, Leo, when you have to go on?And because these people were not there when I was there, like someone like Sebastian Salek or that guy, Jonathan Liss, who I think is just repulsive.And they almost on air try and suggest that you are racist or that you hate Muslims.

How do you deal with that?Because is it...Bill Rammel, he's the other one that seems to fight with Adam Brooks all the time.Is it friendly, off -air, or is this actually very real?Because to me, I know Adam pretty well.He wasn't putting that on.

That felt very genuine.

No, Adam's a very honest and open person.That's his honest and open reaction in that moment.Maybe slightly too honest and open.I mean, as an Ofcom regulated channel, there's certain words that you're not supposed to use.I mean, as I'm sure you know yourself from your many years of broadcasting.But it's so infuriating when somebody like Sebastian employs these rhetorical tricks to try and win the argument.

Because they're not actually arguing the argument.The point is that Pakistani Muslim men are vastly over -represented as perpetrators of this type of crime.deflect away from that, away from that point to make it about the motives of Adam.Oh, you're just bringing this up.You're just bringing this up.You're talking about this because you're racist, because you're Islamophobic.

That's a despicable thing to do.That's like a footballer kicking the player instead of kicking the ball.And it's a really cheap device.I think it says, you know, it's a posh boy debating club.device to try and win an argument.But it's so illegitimate.

It's so wrong.And when it's something like this, when it's something as serious as children, British girls being raped in their tens of thousands by grooming gangs, which are predominantly Pakistani Muslim, not even, I mean, you can even narrow it down from there.It's Beraderi clans from the Mirpur Valley in the Kashmir region of Pakistan.in what 60, 70 ,000 of these people from this area in the 60s and 70s.And then there's chain migration since then.So now we've got a huge community.

They're very insular.And they see, a lot of them see people outside the clan as sort of infidels and less worthy.So in fact, it's them that are committing the racist hate crime when they're targeting British girls.And for somebody to, deflect away from that, to try and cover it up, to try and almost defend it by deflecting away and accusing people of racism, to silence them.Man, that's disgusting.And I can totally understand why Adam was so incensed in that moment.

You actually also came for Piers Morgan for similar reasons, Leo, when he posted, C -word.E -ist.Angle on anything.People get so annoyed when I say that, so that's why I'm just gonna...I'm just gonna...People can read it.

People can read it.Angle on anything to get rage clicks.Also, he is fat, which made me giggle.But what point was he trying to make there, Leo?Because he was talking about a grooming gang that, in this case, was not Pakistani Muslim.New explosive takes on the culture war and politics every single day.

Yes, the ones the establishment don't want you to see.Subscribe to Outspoken right now so you never miss what's really going on.

Yeah, and it wasn't a grooming gang in the sense that we understand grooming gangs.So this was a husband, it was like Giselle Pellicott, a husband who drugged his wife and then had random men, I don't exactly know how he met them, come around and rape his wife while she was drugged.So, I mean, it's despicable and it's horrific.And not all the men in this group were Muslim.So I think Piers is saying, well, why aren't people making a fuss about this group, this rape gang?But the answer is transparently obvious.

This wasn't covered up by the establishment.The men have been arrested.The woman was believed as being taken seriously.It hasn't continued on an industrial scale because left -wingare receiving votes from these communities.It's not emblematic of an imported culture that's completely alien and antithetical to our values and is treating British girls as less than human.

They openly call them, you know, white slags, say despicable, dehumanizing things about them.And it's not happening to children.So, I mean, there are a number of reasons that it's not received.I mean, we say it's not received the same attention.It's received vastly more attention than most grooming gang cases receive individually.But Piers knows what he's doing.

He knows all this, unless he really is stupid as well as fat.He knows all this.He's deliberately saying this to inflame a reaction, to get people like me angry, like Adam Brooks sitting there to just think, what a stupid twat.This is what Piers is doing.And he's very good at it.It's his only talent.

And we really do need to talk about how fat he is.He's fat and he's unhealthy.He slipped on a step and broke his leg or his hip or something.Somebody his age shouldn't be doing that.He needs to be weight training.He needs to be eating nutritious food.

I don't know what he eats, but I assume it all fits in an air fryer.And he's got a family -sized air fryer just for him.

Leo, I actually wanted to speak about one of Piers Morgan's nemeses too.and horrible man called Hugh Grant, because the worrying thing about Andy Byrne becoming Prime Minister is that Hugh Grant, who really is one of the worst cretins in the country, so determined, Leo, to shut down you, to shut down me, but also to shut down GB News and Talk TV andthat's even moderately right -wing, shut down the Murdoch empire, simply because he can't get over the fact that he was quite literally caught with his pants down with a prostitute in the 90s.And it has led this sort of craven, bizarre campaign that has taken the shine off any work that he has done in his career.And he's tight with Andy Burnham.The Daily Telegraph has actually gone inside, hacked off Hugh's push for Burnham to curb free speech.

We already know, Leo, that the Labour government under Slippery Starmer is going super far with this.They are banning social media for under -16s, but that is effectively going to usher in digital ID for all of us, whether you like it or not.They are in a battle with the social media companies to effectively fix the algorithm, to stop shows like this being a success, and to boost the British Fashion Corporation, Wokai TV, Channel 4 News, Sly News, which is shows that no one actually wants to watch on YouTube.And they spoke about it, they went inside this event that Hugh Grant was hosting, and they wrote, As we switch leadership of the Labour Party, switch prime ministers, there's a chance finally to get something done.The actor and press regulation campaign has told a gathering of like -minded activists.All I say to whoever is the new prime minister is when you're weighing up whether to do the right thing for the people against a massive corporation or to cozy up to those giant corporations for your own political career, bear this in mind.

Those media organisations are going to pour a bucket of shit over you whatever you do, whether you support them or whether you don't.And they write, the scene is.set for an almighty free speech clash under Burnham, in which the British news publishing business is a relatively minor concern.After the Southport riots in 2024, Ofcom raised concerns about the crucial role social media played in spreading and amplifying misleading and divisive material.Now, again, I just always like to step in here.It wasn't misinformation that caused the so -called riots after Southport, it was a fact that a homegrown terrorist called...

Axel Rudig Bader, who shouldn't be here because his parents came over from Rwanda for absolutely no reason, went to a Taylor Swift dance class and stabbed three beautiful young girls to death.That happened, okay?That's what caused the so -called riots.It wasn't a few posts by Lucy Connolly.So let me just be very clear on that, because I find it really terrible that people even suggest that It was anything to do with misinformation that caused Southport.It was Southport.

It was the terrorist attack.That's what caused the issue.Anyway, they went on to say officials have also highlighted its role in recent unrest in Belfast.Again, you know, that happened because Stephen Ogilvie was nearly beheaded by a migrant and in clashes between Hindus and Muslims in Leicester in 2022.In each case, the suspected influence of malign foreign forces has compounded concern in Whitehall.Now, Labour has a plan to fight back.

Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, another close ally of Burnham, Published plans this week to force tech giants such as YouTube, Facebook and X to prominently display news from public service broadcasters including the BBC, ITV and Channel 4.Predictably, platforms which build their advertising businesses on serving up whatever is most likely to keep users engaged are ready to oppose the plans.The UK's creator Economy is a global success story because of one simple idea.On YouTube,viewers decide what they want to watch, says David Weald and YouTube's head of public policy for Europe.Videos become popular because they connect with their audience, not because we're required to prioritize them.

Prominence rules seek to distort that.forcing YouTube to prioritize government -picked channels over whatever viewers actually came to watch.That's not fair on users, creators, or the wider journalism ecosystem.And America is deeply concerned about this.The Trump administration, with a spokesman for the majority Republican House Judiciary Committee telling The Telegraph this weekend, For years we have warned that UK and European tech regulators are working to censor American speech.The UK's Online Safety Act empowers the government to pressure American social media platforms into suppressing so -called disinformation, misinformation and hate speech.

Now regulators have gone even further, deciding what news outlets people see.Big government will never be satisfied and its censorship efforts will keep expanding.And Leo, I hate even talking about this because in some ways you just want to believe that we are going to be able to continue to broadcast independently and that people will be able to watch.But unfortunately, the government are going to step in here.It's very obvious that they are.And the fact that Hugh Grant was actually on the campaign trail with Andy Burnham, I think is a very worrying sign.

But first, we've been told our whole lives that wrinkle creams were the easiest way to look younger.Now, one doctor says that's nothing but old news.According to Dr. John Lake, the world -renowned Beverly Hills beauty expert, most wrinkle fixes on the market are nothing but glorified moisturizers.He says they hardly make a dent on your appearance.Some can even be harmful to your skin.Now, recently, Dr. Lake has focused his attention away from mainstream cosmetic practices.

Why?Well, so that he can pursue a revolutionary anti -aging breakthroughrun that some experts say could empty the wallets of the cosmetic industry.He says it's almost like Photoshop for your face and you may even be mad after seeing how easy it is to visibly erase your wrinkles from view.His personal clients have dubbed his new do -it -yourself technique the Age Rewinder Method because it can take years or even decades off your appearance in under two minutes.In light of this amazing breakthrough, Dr. Lake has released a step -by -step video to the public, free and uninterrupted, where he outlines exactly how to use this simple solution from home.

And he says if it even helps one person look younger or feel more confident, he will be thrilled knowing he helped.The video has since gone viral.At first, it was shared by users on Facebook, but since then, it's racked up over 2 .3 million views and counting.So far, the comments and feedback have been outstanding, with thousands of women reporting they look decades younger.One viewer commented, best results of anything I've used.I can't believe how well this works.

I'll never stop using this.I don't understand how it works, but the results are great.Thank you.link in the description box below.That's bhmd1 .com slash outspoken.

Now there is one thing that Dr. Lake asked from his viewers.If watching this video helps you look and feel younger than you have in years, then please share this video with your friends and loved ones.Together we have the power to help as many women reclaim a youthful look as possible.So go watch the video at bhmd1 .com slash outspoken right now, or just click on the link in the description box below.But now back to the show.

analysts and outlets reporting on things, when the information is just controlled in one central broadcaster, as we saw in the Soviet Union, as we see in North Korea, that's when you don't get democracy, you don't get the scrutiny and oversight of government and its processes and its ideas that are quite often terrible.I mean, this idea that we should bring people from Rwanda to Britain is obviously a terrible idea.We've seen this.emblemified in the actual Ruta Cabana attack.And like you say, people aren't taken to the streets because of something they've seen that's false.They're taken to the streets because of something they've seen that's true.

They've seen a horrific stabbing or they've seen They've seen horrific rapes of children, and they're taking to the streets because of that.The government wants to hide that truth.That's what this is going to be used for.But on the other hand, this might be great for the right, because the right are going to take power in a couple of years, because I can't see Burnham lasting very long.I think Labour are going to cycle through leaders quite quickly and then implode.So when the right take power, they're going to have this tool to silence any dissenting views, to silence the Guardian, to silence the BBC, to silence anybody who doesn't push a right wing agenda.

And why wouldn't the right use those tools if they've been created by the left?I don't think we should just do away with those tools.I think any any weapon the left invents should be used against it.But yeah, as somebody points out, this is going to be terrible for Britain's AI and tech industries, which Britain's trying to desperately stay relevant and scrambling to get a place in the new technology.If people are going to be constrained by regulation, if companies are going to be constrained by regulation, they're not going to come here and they're not going to be regulated here.They're not going to do business here.

People need to be, business needs to be free and not ruled by a micromanaging despot, which is what the Labour Party are.I think the Labour Party should put more effort into stopping stopping fake refugees from coming here, stopping violent men from coming here, and to stopping grooming gangs.And then people won't take to the streets and people won't get angry about it.People won't riot.People are rioting because they don't want this stuff.You can't just make them want this stuff by making them read BBC articles.

That's nonsensical.

Yeah, indeed it is.And the thing is, you are completely right.At the end of the day, If this Burnham government decides we are going to pick a war with the Trump administration, with big tech, they are crazy.Because that will send us back to the technological dark ages.And remember with Slippery Stump, he had a very different technique.It was to always say this, wasn't it?

We've had free speech for a very, very long time here.

And we didn't.And we all knew we didn't, we knew he was lying.And so that's going to be a very difficult path for Burnham to navigate.And personally, I hope that he just says, FU Hugh Grant, back to acting.Thank you very much.Dan Moulton Outspoken is your no -spin, no -bias, no -censorship outlet for independent news.

We have no big tech backing or billionaires pulling my strings, but that does mean I need your support.So please hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell, and subscribe to Dan Moulton Outspoken on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.It's totally free but allows me to continue my promiseto always keep fighting for you.