I Seriously Can’t Believe This is Canada

Having the best job numbers in Canada shouldn't be like having the best bobsledding team in Jamaica.

We have experienced a U -turn.Welcome back to Moose and Loose.My name is David.We've had some stuff happen here in the past week where we thought things were headed in the right direction.Well, that's not the case.We've got panels and pundits talking about Mark Carney's temper, how he interacts with liberals behind closed doors.

We've got more of that going on.We've got a bunch of stuff here.Let's jump into this.Starting this episode off with this story coming from Black Locks Reporter.We've got Carney Fund costs $750 million per year.Can you guess which one it is?

It's Prime Minister Mark Carney's Sovereign Wealth Fund.The one that's a supposed to provide wealth?Well, no, it's going to provide debt.It will cost taxpayers $750 million a year in debt.Interest charges, finance department figures show.The estimate yesterday followed criticism of the $25 billion Canada Strong Fund, which was not a savings account.

Based on the projected interest rates, interest costs are estimated to be $750 million annually once the $25 billion is fully deployed, the department wrote in a finance response.This is just it.Carney's using our money and he wants Canadians to invest personal money into this fund to de -risk net zero for Brookfield and himself.That's all this is.This has got to be one of the dirtiest schemes in Canadian history.Jumping ahead, we've got Alberta natives call on Premier Daniel Smith to resign.

We've also got civil disobedience, an option if Alberta referendum proceeds.First Nation chiefs.That's right, civil disobedience.We've got First Nation chiefs in Alberta and well, across Canada that take money from big billionaires in America to block pipelines in prosperity and then get money from taxpayers.And if they don't get their way, civil disobedience, blocking the referendum vote.This is getting ugly in Canada.

And with that, we've got Conservative Andrew Lawton dropping this bombshell.So we already had a vote on this earlier and it didn't pass.Now we've got this here where he says she admits liberals are working with Lia Gazan on her bill, whichmakes it easier to lay charges.Leah Gazan should not be in Parliament.She's crazy.

So this starts out a little bit slow and it ramps up as it goes through.

The issue of residential school denialism is a very important issue, and I know that the government was working with Leah Ghazan on her bill on it.The question about where this is being placed in the Act, I think is important from a consultation perspective because Relying on the AG to give consent is, I'm just not sure that without consultation, we know that Indigenous leaders and elders are on board for that, that the other option that would carry a greater consequence, not require consent, might be something that upon consultation, we might find that is the preferred.

So if you're not familiar here, Bill C -9, as it says here, an act to amend the criminal code, H -word propaganda, H -word crime, and access to religious or cultural places.They tried to slip in making it an H -crime for any residential school denialism, which is ridiculous.This should just be based on fact.What's going on in Kamloops?Is it fact or not?I don't know.

We paid $12 million and they refused to dig the ground.So now what we have a situation where it's just theft of taxpayer money and refusing to dig the ground.And now, as I showed you in a previous video coming from the National Post, it may just be And so, because

have a situation where everybody agrees that residential school denialism has to be addressed, but there's an option A and an option B and reasonable people could disagree or about each one or make a case for each one.It would point to a lack of consultation, you know, and I think that I look at the draft resolution at the AFN, for example, that happened in December.And they specifically said that they were directing the AFN to work with survivors, elders and First Nations leadership across the country to ensure the drafting and amending of such legislation reflects the lived experiences, provides clear legal definition and withstands constitutional challenges.So, I mean, that's that's only the AFN speaking as an Albertan.The Alberta treaty chiefs would probably say something in their own words because they very rarely agree with the AFN.I don't know.

I don't know how the the Métis Nation of Alberta might.So I just think without consultation, I worry that we're taking the lesser and leaders, Indigenous people across Canada might want the stronger one.And it's for that reason that I can't support this because I, while I agree with you full heartedly, I did my doctoral research on this.I'm afraid that we might be watering our wine and not going for the full the full force of what should happen with residential school denialism.So I just wanted to say that before we voted.

This is unreal.She did a doctoral thesis.What are we even talking about here?It's just black and white.Did something happen back in the day or did it not?Are there bodies there or are there not?

I can't believe people like this are in the government.These are decision makers in the government.No wonder Canada's failing so badly.This is a slippery slope here.So if somebody doesn't agree with someone else on, say, their framing of something that happened back in the day with residential schools, as she said, she wants this to go further.She wants to make it so the government then can come in and crack down on someone, put them in jail, charge them for not holding the same opinion as somebody else.

This is a loss of free speech if this goes forward.That's what this is.And now, especially in a situation here where the government keeps hiding files, December 16th, 2025, of the 215 so -called graves, which they refuse to dig up because it's likely septic lines.Obviously, something's going on here.They're not being transparent.From what I hear, they put barricading fences around it so people couldn't come in the night with a shovel and dig it up and prove this whole hoax to be wrong.

And this Teclimax First Nation has just pocketed $12 .1 million of taxpayer money, essentially stealing it right out of her pocket and not being forthcoming of how they're spending this money.Are they going on lavish trips, buying new houses for each other?Well, what are they doing with that money?And now they want to make it that if anyone talks about this, oh, you're going to jail.free speech.Yeah, no kidding.

Getting scary.Canadians need to unify against bills like this.This isn't hockey.This is the future of our country.Yeah, totalitarianism isn't rad.So someone asking here who Paddy Laboutkine Benson represents in the Senate.

She's appointed by Justin Trudeau.Moving ahead here on this panel, this is interesting.They bring up this Althea Raj story of Carney saying he yells, he punches down.Is Mark Carney a yeller or a demanding boss?Liberal MPs have thoughts.And then what does CTV put on?

They get reactions from liberals, and what do they all say?

Yell at some people in a meeting.I haven't seen it.No.No, you've not seen it.I have not.No.

Oh, I haven't seen it.and he is someone who is used to being in a boardroom and I appreciate the back and forth with him.He's an incredibly smart guy.He is an incredibly smart guy.He's a good way with people.Oh, he's a good way with people.

They found liberals that all give flowery answers.Of course they did.Christy Clark, where are you?

tough boss?Were you demanding?Was it hard to work for you?And is that okay?

Well, no, I didn't yell at people.But, you know, the thing is, the thing that Prime Minister Carney and I have in common in terms of our caucus is that we I ran a coalition government.It was very clear.We had conservatives.We had liberals.We even had a few kind of soft New Democrats in the group.

So and he's got the same thing.I mean, he's got a lot of old Trudeau guys that are in there who come from across the political spectrum.He's got Gregor Robertson, a former New Democrat, and I think probably still current provincially.And then he's also got Tim Hodgson, who's Definitely, definitely not the New Democrat camp.So he's got to manage these personalities, very different ideological perspectives.It is really hard to do that.

But it is really important, I would say from my experience, in keeping everybody as happy as you can and keeping the door open to making sure that they know that they're heard.even if you have differences with them, that they can find a way to contribute in the context of it.But he's a man in a hurry.And he doesn't have, as the media is constantly and the opposition is constantly pointing out, he's got to start delivering results reasonably quickly, like I would say more quickly than could be reasonably expected.So he's I'm sure it sometimes tries his patience a little bit.And in addition to that, I'm sure it's a bit of a mystery to someone who's come into politics out of the private sector or the public sector, but not elected sector to look at this group of people and say, wow, how do I corral all these people around these ideas?

when I didn't really get to choose any of them.

brought in Don Farrell, Tim Hodgson, he's brought in some of them.And really, I think he wants to have net zero to be do decently well.It doesn't have to be doing extraordinarily well for him to just roll out all these different grants to Brookfield, boost his own Brookfield Global Transition Fund 1.If Canada sinks into a recession further and further and further, his runway as prime minister is going to get shorter.And he knows that.That's why he's putting in some policies, changing some things.

He can't have it get worse and worse, be the net zero guy.And everyone can point to the net zero as the problem.That's why he keeps stealing policies from Pierre Polyev.

may say that they're getting yelled at today are the same people that were many of the same ones who were in the Trudeau caucus.And legend has it that when they would do a standing ovation for the prime minister in the caucus, the first person to sit down was the first person who lost their cabinet or committee role.So, you know, I'm not sure it can get much worse than that.

Well, she says that's a legend.I wouldn't be surprised if that's true.Justin Trudeau's like, don't sit down.Keep clapping for Papa Trudeau.Like, you know, that's the kind of guy he is.Just power hungry.

He's out doing speeches and stuff right now.I don't put them on the channel.He's speaking at events and he posts images of himself at these events.Somebody with a nice camera from far away.Like, it's just embarrassing.The guy's a megalomaniac.

It's all about himself.And Mark Carney's really no different.I mean, listen to this clip here where Mark Carney's getting told where he's supposed to be after question period and all.that and listen to what he says about himself.He's saying it as a joke, but you know, he's serious about this.His ego's just as big as Trudeau's.

And look at this guy, Adam Vancouverton, kissing his butt.He wants one of these cabinet positions.It's so embarrassing to watch.

You know, the prime minister can maybe go, hey, so how are you enjoying this?seat right now because a year and a half ago wasn't going to be so comfortable, was it?

Yeah, but what have you done for me lately?What's happening in the next election, right?The thing is, we'll need these people as well.We'll need these people.And I know they're putting a lot of pressure on liberal MPs to meet the fundraising deadline that was set for them.And a lot of them have not met them yet and are asking for extensions.

I've heard that.But the thing is, when your prime minister As long as you're on top, it can't be my way or the highway.You can manage that.You can survive that.But when the polling numbers turn, if you have not bought the loyalty of your caucus by listening to them, hearing them, giving them a fair shake in their expression of what they're hearing on the ground and how they're feeling about the government's policies, they will be quick to turn.You know, floor crossing can go a different way.

That has happened before, and it can't happen again.So they have a very thin majority right now.It could turn quickly if the polling numbers change.And this is why.That caucus relationship is one of the most important thing for a prime minister to do.Brian Mulroney used to say that was the biggest part of why he stayed so long, because he established a strong relationship with his caucus.

Now, it still didn't save him in the end, but it saved him.It was important for him to do that.And if Mark Carney doesn't care, well, you'll have the whisper campaign.And it's beginning when he's on top.Just imagine when he goes down.Yeah.

Yeah, that's well said.The whisper campaign, we already have it with the Green members of his caucus.That's already happening.There's already fractures.There are people who have their daggers out.They want those minister positions like Adam Vancouver and guys like that.

And things change quickly.That's what we've seen in politics.Things changed quickly.Something can happen and people will see Carney in another light.Those polling numbers are going to drop.We just have to hold steady here because we know who Carney is and what his agenda is.

The average Canadian has no clue.And that'sproblem.They need to know what his agenda is, and things will change.Unfortunately, on websites like National News Watch, a liberal website here, we've got too close to call recession says Canadian authority on economic downturns.This is just running cover for Mark Carney.

Something else that happened here yesterday is the jobs numbers came out.The timing of all this stuff here, you've got 88 ,000 jobs that were created in May, which is good.Mark Carney had the statement somewhere.He said, created in the private sector, that's a lie.I'm not sure what clip that was, but basically 20 ,000 of these jobs are going to the public sector.And with a decreasing population, why are we adding more people to the public sector?

We don't need more people in the public sector.With all this said, we've got Garnet Jennis here during question period.Brings up an important point about these jobs, though.While there's jobs created, we're still down.

Mr. Speaker, under this Liberal Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country in recession.Now, we're glad to see that more Canadians are working this month than last month, but we're down over 20 ,000 jobs since the beginning of this year.We're still expecting negative growth and we have the second highest unemployment in the G7.Simply put, we're comparing to a worse baseline.This should not be the new normal for this great country.Why is Canada the only G20 country in recession?

up to some incredibly good news for Canadian workers.The Canadian economy added 88 ,000 jobs in May alone.mainly in the private sector, and mainly in full -time work.

Job growth, 20 ,000 in the public sector, 20 ,000 of 88 ,000 is 22 .7%, so 72 % of those are in the private sector.

In May was broad -based across all industries, but get this, Madam Speaker, since December 2024, Canada has added more jobs per capita than the United States, Madam Speaker.We have incredibly

They're celebrating today in a recession.

Compared to pre -pandemic averages, unemployment is up by 0 .6 % overall and over two and a half points for youth.Under this Liberal Prime Minister, we have the second highest unemployment in the G7.Madam Speaker, having the best job numbers in Canada shouldn't be like having the best bobsledding team in Jamaica.Canada is the only G20 economy in recession.

The Honourable Minister for Jobs and Families.

Well, Madam Speaker, I'll just pass by the obvious material in that question to focus on what's important, which is jobs and jobs for youth.That member that has spoken many times about the importance of creating good jobs for youth.And in fact, ninety nine thousand new jobs for youth.Mr. Madam Speaker, that's something to celebrate.

Canada's still failing here despite these jobs numbers, as he brought it up.We're still down jobs from the beginning of the year.Councillor explains why he will not perform land acknowledgements.

was traded for services.They just say everything's under claim.So it's it has to be a two way street.And I don't see that that's happening right now.So I don't believe in doing land acknowledgements and I won't be supporting this.

Thank you.Any further comments?

This is so on point.There's no recognizing, as you said, land sold, land traded.Where is that?Because that makes complete sense.I'm sure he'll be hauled before a human rights tribunal within days.No kidding.