Independence Day Special : आजादी के 79 साल बाद आपके Vote को है आजादी ? | Rahul Gandhi | Vote Chori |

15th August, the day of our freedom. The day when the Prime Minister flutters the flag on the Red Fort and welcomes the nation. And we remember that 78 years ago, in 1947, we broke the chains of slavery. We chose democracy, in which every person's vote is equal. Whether someone is rich, poor, educated or illiterate, whether they are president or ordinary workers, everyone's vote is considered equal in democracy.

That is, the right to vote is the greatest power of a free India. But today, on the 89th Independence Day, it seems that this power has been placed in the circle of doubt. Because in the week of freedom, protests were taking place all over the country No, they were saying that vote stealing is happening in our country They were accusing that the election is affecting the results along with the BJP They were saying that when the opposition loses, they accuse

And when they win, they remain silent He keeps accusing people when he loses and keeps silent when he wins. But today, on the occasion of Jashni Azadi, we felt that this video was made for the common people of the country, beyond the opposition and the ruling party. Was it an excuse for defeat or is there really something wrong? And now, Congress and other parties are doing this. The question today will also be asked that the opposition parties often raise questions about EVMs in elections. People are skeptical about the voting process.

Is everything okay in voterless? Or do they include names of dead people and false addresses to influence the election? Are the allegations that there are 80 voters in a small house seem normal? And the biggest question is... This is not just a technical question. This question is connected to the foundation of our democracy.

If the principle of voting for every person becomes weak, then the trust of the people will be broken. India's strength is in the people's faith. If this faith is shaken, our democracy will be weak. That's why today, on the occasion of Jashn-e-Azadi, we will understand these questions in four parts.

First, we will know that the allegations that Rahul Gandhi has put on the election commission and the government, how much strength does he strong are those allegations? Is it true? Secondly, can the special intensive revision be hacked in Bihar? Can the votes be reversed with the help of EVMs? And the fourth and final question is, is the politics, but for our future. So, listen to this video, understand it and share it with your loved ones.

Also, join our WhatsApp channel so that we can make videos on such topics in the future. We have provided the link in the description and comment section. Now, let's start with Rahul Gandhi's vote theft allegations. Actually, on August 7, he was stealing something. He said that he felt suspicious about the corruption in the 2023 Madhya Pradesh election and the Maharashtra election in 2024. Rahul Gandhi also gave an example of the Mahadev Pura Vidhan Sabha,

the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha of Karnataka. According to him, only 1,00,000 voters were added. And BJP won because of these voters. Rahul Gandhi mentioned five mistakes while accusing. Like, there were many votes for one person. He also cited the names of the Aditya Shrivastav's name was on the list of voters of Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra.

He had written strange words like Election Commission of India. He mentioned many voters on the same page. Like 80 voters in a small room. Or without a photo of the voters. Or a photo that is so small that the face is not visible. Wrong age voters.

Showing the first time. Rahul Gandhi said that if the election commission gives him the entire voter list, he will prove that India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister not by winning in reality but by the vote. Now these allegations were very serious. So the election commission answered it.

The election commission called these question. The election commission found the allegations to be false and misleading. The commission also asked Rahul Gandhi for a letter in which he could provide his information. So that he could investigate the matter. This rule is in the Registration of Electoral Rules of 1960. But Rahul, after this, since this news was very big, and the whole country started discussing it,

journalists, media people and other organizations started investigating it. For example, India Today's team investigated the house number 35 of Muniredi Garden in Mahadevpura. It was claimed to have 80 voters. They found a room of 10-15 sq.ft. with a delivery boy. The owner, Jaya Ram Reddy, said that the rooms the room and the tenants get voter registration on the same address. This increased the number of voters.

The Indian Express also investigated Marathahalli, where 46 voters were claimed to be there, and Venakyanagar, where 69 voters were claimed to be there. These areas are actually owned by migrant workers, but no voter has been registered there. Rahul Gandhi also gave an example of Shakun Rani, who voted in two places. But the Aayog says that Shakun Rani voted only once and the tick mark shown by Rahul is not a part of the official record. In the case of Aditya Srivastava, The Quint found that his voter ID IDs are only Karnataka's The old names are not Dhanli's

The question is, what is the truth behind this accusation? Some of the issues are true, like not removing the old names But is it a conspiracy? It is difficult to say It may be due to the system's shortcomings. But the question is, why are the old names not removed? And how do so many voters get disqualified?

What does the IOC's law say? In June 2025, the IOC said that if no one challenges the court for 45 days, CCTV footage will be deleted. The IOC argues that this will stop the misuse of footage on social media. But this rule raises questions on transparency. Because footage could have answered many questions.

Now the question is, whose responsibility is this? The responsibility is of the Election Commission. The Election Commission should investigate the issue. But the opposition should also take legal action. The opposition should also monitor the booths. For example, Delhi's Chandni Chowk has 139 booths.

But Congress and AAP have not a single agent. BJP has 90 agents. In Meerut, there was no agent of opposition in 2758 booths. BJP's strong surveillance keeps an eye on voter lists. But opposition is left behind. When the opposition was questioned about the election, the Indian Express, a well-known newspaper, said that the Aayog should answer the allegations in detail. But without any evidence, the claim of fraud is serious.

Economic Times also agreed that an impartial investigation should be carried out. If the Aayog is wrong, then an investigation should be carried out. And if the allegations are wrong, then an investigation should be carried out. And if the allegations are wrong, then an investigation should be carried out against Rahul Gandhi. Yogendra Yadav had predicted that BJP will get 240-260 seats in 2024. Now BJP got 240 seats in 2024 elections.

Yogendra Yadav is considered person who is considered to be a close ally of Congress. The government accuses him of being a protest activist because he participates in protests against the government. In this case, Yogendra Yadav's claim of 240 seats was absolutely right. In this case, is the opposition's accusation of Dhanli true? Or is it just a claim? This question arises because Yogendra is a close opponent of the ruling party. Anyway, this is one issue.

The second issue is about the head-to-head debate in Bihar. The Election Commission has done a special intensive revision to rectify the voters' list of issues. Now, there is a ruckus. Before the Bihar elections, the opposition accused that all the mess is in this. And with this BJP wins. Instead of old list, new list is made.

But there is a controversy in Bihar. Aayog has removed 65 lakh names from the draft. In which the dead, went out or fake voters are included. But the opposition accuses that it has also removed the of names including fake voters. But the opposition has also removed names of many real voters. The Aayog has neither given the reason for removing the names nor the list of people removed. Aayog says that the rules don't force him to do so.

Now the question is what is the problem? Yogendra Yadav presented two people in the Supreme Court. They were alive and got 270 votes. 3 lakh people were registered as House No.00. Minta Devi was registered as 124. She was born in 1990.

Some voters' names were blank. One family's name was only a dot. The date of birth is 1990. The name of some voters or their fathers were not mentioned. The name of one family was only dot. When the election commission was asked about this, they said that people do not fill in the entire form. And the system is that 2.93 crore voters who were elected after 2003 have to prove their Indian citizenship. The Election Commission has given a list of 11 documents which does not include Aadhaar and Voter Card. Supreme Court has also asked Aadhaar to be considered but the Commission has denied it.

Because it is their argument that Aadhaar is the proof of citizenship. Now the worry is that poor people who do not have a passport can be excluded from the voter list. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia said that it is not possible to ask for a birth certificate from everyone. Indian Express newspaper wrote that it is necessary but it is wrong to act in a hurry. The former Chief Election Officer, O.P. Rawat warned that this could cause chaos. Those who lose their name will have less time to appeal. In such a case, they may be deprived of voting which could affect the elections.

Although this is not the first time. In the Delhi election of 1925, Arvind Kejriwal accused BJP of cutting votes in Shahadara in 1118 and Janakpuri in 4874. These votes were for AAP. In 2024, Nitin Gadkari also claimed that 3.5 lakh votes were cut in Nagpur. But Arvind Kejriwal and Nitin Gadkari's accusations never proved to be true. When the election commission asks questions, they say that the aim of the SIR is to clear the voter list. In 2003, the SIR was completed in two years in Bihar. But this time, it is being completed in just three months.

The commission says that it is investigating on every point. But the opposition repeatedly says that in many places many block level officials are filling forms without any investigation. Ayog also says that voters are informed to remove their names and they have a chance to appeal. Now the question is, what do the facts say? Some mistakes are technical like wrong birth dates or incomplete addresses. But removing names in such a large number and not to give a list without a reason,

this brother definitely raises questions. On the other hand, the election commission says that it is working according to the rules, the opposition should cooperate in the investigation. This is said by them. Anyway, the opposition says in the state that has lost that BJP hacks EVM. Now the opposition also says that in some states BJP wins and in. Now opposition says that BJP wins in some states and loses in some states.

Again and again, EVM is accused of hacking. After losing in 2017 Uttar Pradesh election, Mayawati claimed that EVM was a mistake and BJP lost the vote. In 2024, Akhilesh Yadav said in Parliament that he will win 80 out of 80 seats but he will not trust EVM. Rahul Gandhi supported him. But the question on EVM is not only about opposition. When BJP was against EVM, they raised questions on it.

In 2009, Lal Krishna Advani said that EVM can be hacked. In Germany, EVM was banned. In 2012, BJP called EVM an electronic victory machine. Congress wins with it. Subramaniam Swamy went to the Supreme Court. After his victory, in 2013, the VVPAT system was introduced.

Voter can see on paper, which party he voted for. Who did he voted for was not the party he voted for. When the allegations of the election commission were made that the election commission was winning BJP through EVM, the election commission gave an open challenge in 2017 itself. That if any political party wants, they can hack EVM. However, when this claim was made, no political party came forward.

Supreme Court also considered EVM safe. In 2024, the court said that from 2019 to 2024, only once the data of EVM and VVPAT was wrong. Which was a mistake of an official because he did not delete the data of the mock poll. How can EVM be protected? Before voting, all political parties have agents. They check the voting machine.

If there is a problem in the poll, the machine can be changed. 2. Monitoring of voting. The agents of political parties are at the booth all day. After voting, Form 17C is given, in which the total number of votes is written. After voting, the EVM is sealed and given in the strong room. On the way, all the representatives. All political parties are monitored on the way.

CCTV and security cameras are installed in the strong room. On the day of counting, the seal of the EVM is checked. The total votes are added to Form 17C. And when everything is correct, the votes are counted only after that. EVM is actually a stand-alone machine, that does not connect to the internet. To hack it, the machine has to be physically modified, which is difficult to do due to multiple levels of investigation.

VVPAT gives the voter a proof of identity. This is why the Supreme Court said in 2024 that there is no evidence of fraud in EVM. But the opposition says that they will have faith in only if 100% VVPAT is counted. Only 5% VVPAT is being checked by the Parliament. The opposition also says that EV on EVM are an excuse to lose. It says that if EVM could be hacked, Congress would not have won in 2004 and 2009. BJP also says that opposition should keep agents at a high level so that the problems can be solved.

Now the question is, what is the truth in the accusation-counter-accusation? According to the technical experts and the court, it is almost impossible to hack EVM. But the opposition wants to count VVPAT, which will increase transparency. On the other hand, the election commission says that the current system is strong and most of the problems are due to technical errors. Now the question is, what is theM but the claim of hacking is also wrong Economic Times has suggested that the VVPAT should be increased so that the opposition's suspicion is removed The opposition is questioning the election commission. The opposition is questioning the election commission.

The opposition is questioning the election commission. The opposition is questioning the election commission. The opposition is saying that the election dates are set to benefit the BJP. In 2021, for example, there were 8 elections in West Bengal and one district was voted on on a separate day. Even then, Mamata Banerjee said that it was to give time for the BJP leaders to promote. In 2024, there were separate legislations in Haryana and Maharashtra, which used to be together.

In Haryana, the voting on October 1 was done on October 5 a separate session of the constitution. In Haryana, the 1st of October voting was postponed to 5th of October. The opposition says that this is done so that the BJP can benefit from it. However, when the election commission is asked this question, they say that the date of security and festivals are taken into consideration. The date of Haryana was changed due a different way than in J&K. The elections in J&K were held in a different way than in Haryana. But, there is a question that is raised on the issue of Acharya Sahita.

That, big leaders are not held accountable, but small leaders are held accountable. For example, in 2019, PM Narendra Modi was accused of 5 complaints of Acharya Sahita violation. But, the Ayog removed it. In 2024, Modi was accused of asking for votes on the basis of religion. But, instead of giving a direct notice, the Ayog sent a notice to BJP leader J.P. Nadda. The same happened with Rahul Gandhi.

Earlier, the rule was that the leader was given a direct notice. But after 2024, it was changed. Opposition says that it is done to save the big leaders. But BJP's answer is that the election is a Aayog is impartial and the opposition is against the election commission. The BJP repeated the same thing that happened in 2004-2009. Congress is harassing the BJP.

However, the allegations are not only in the BJP's time. If you remember the Congress' time, then the BJP used to put allegations of partiality on the election commission. For example, in 2005, Congress made Naveen Chawla the election commissioner, who was accused of misusing power in an emergency. BJP wrote a letter to the President against him and asked N Gopalswamy to remove him from the post. But the lawmaker said that the accusation was not proven and Chawla was later the Chief Election Commissioner Now, it is clear that BJP and Congress have been accused of using the election commissioners as per their convenience

But there is a truth to be said We want to tell you the truth. It is true that the election commission has been accused of many things. It is easy to accuse. Political parties in India have always raised questions about the election commission. But you should know about the election commission's achievements. Because the election commission voted for 65 voters. In Varshi, the same was done for 5 voters.

In Girjungal, only one voter was elected and the vote was distributed among the lions. This shows the power of India's democracy. Look, the allegations of partiality on the Aayog are old and every ruling party has been accused of appointing its own people. But the Aayog has repeatedly assured the government of a peaceful transfer of power. And this is the reason why India is different from countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh.

But we will still say that the election commission should be more transparent so that the allegations are not made. And the media has also given their opinion on this matter. Like The Hindu had written that the dates of the election and the process of the notice should be more transparent. However, today we will also suggest the election commission on this issue. Because democracy is not just a system, it is the heartbeat of India.

Every year, when the tricolour flag waves on the Red Fort on 15th August, then the feeling of freedom arises. But the real freedom is when every voter's vote goes to the right place. And he should believe that his trust is made. The voters should be able to vote in the right places. Since voters are being questioned about the election, we have some suggestions. First, keep the voters list open. Put it online in a machine-readable format so that anyone can check it.

Second, keep the CCTV footage for 6-12 months. And make clear rules to monitor it. Form 17-C should be certified. Form 17-C of every booth should be scanned and put on public portal. The reason for removing the name should be told. Like, the name is being added or removed from a voter list.

So, the reason should be made clear. And the biggest thing is, the opposition should also fulfill their responsibilities. For example, if there is a ghost, an agent should be placed there to catch the ghost. The legal process should be followed and evidence should be presented. The ruling party should also support transparency so that the people's trust is maintained. Because 15th August is not just a day to wave the flag.

It is a day to keep the dream alive, which our freedom fighters saw. An India where every voice is valued, every vote is counted. And that is why we are saying that the statue built in Himachal at a height of 15,256 feet, the statue built for 5 voters in Siachen, or the statue built for one voter, is not just a story.

This is the true power of the democracy of India. This power will shine when we, you, the government, opposition and the election commission, work together to make it stronger. So, let's take a resolution on Independence Day. We will not just raise questions, we will not just complain, we will also find solutions.

We will not just support the party, we will not just accept the elections as a political issue. We will also verify the elections. That is why we have shared so much information with you. Our vote, our power, our right is the power of India. It is not only the responsibility of the election commission to save it, but also of all of us. So, make this 15th of August a new India, where every vote is counted, every doubt is cleared,

every citizen's trust is removed. every citizen's trust is removed. Because democracy is not just a word, it is the heartbeat of our freedom. the country.