Iran walks out of Swiss negotiations after Trump threat, JD Vance snubbed | Janta Ka Reporter

In a historic development, the Iranian and U .S.delegations came under one roof today.But Iran bluntly snubbed U .S.Vice President J .

D.Vance by refusing to agree for a joint photo op.The deranged occupant of the White House today threatened Iran after the Islamic Republic announced the closure of the State of Hormuz.Frustrated by a series of setbacks, this Israeli slave today threatened to occupy both Iran and the State of Hormuz.Meanwhile, Israeli terrorists have decided not to commit any more war crimes in Lebanon after Iran threatened to walk out of the ongoing negotiations in Switzerland.This will be the broad focus of my video tonight.

Also in this video, another example of BBC's editorial dishonesty as one of its presenters makes a desperate attempt to blame Hezbollah for the carnage caused by Israel.So please stay tuned.So Iranian and American delegations came close to meeting face -to -face in Switzerland today, as both sides began the negotiations to arrive at a peace deal based on the Memorandum of Understanding that both Iran and the US signed recently.The US side was being led by Trump's deputy, J .D.Vance, while the Iranian delegation was being led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqir Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Sayyeda Basra Akshay.

The highlight of the event was the Iranian delegation's refusal to share the stage with the American delegation for a joint photo.This was the moment when Araqchi and Qalibaf entered the room where Vance was hoping to be photographed with the Iranian delegation.However, Araqchi walked up to Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and apparently told him that they were walking out as they had absolutely no desire to share the stage with the Americans.

to the world.

This was another video of the Iranian delegation walking out of the venue.You can't blame the Iranians for walking out of the venue and refusing to share the stage with the Americans.While both sides may have signed the MOU, the U .S.has simply failed to rein in its bloodthirsty Israeli masters in Lebanon, where these human devils have slaughtered more than 50 innocent civilians in the last 48 hours alone.But the Israeli lapdog from the White House was today threatening Iran by using insane language such as he will occupy Iran and capture the state of Hormuz and even steal 20 % of the oil flow through this waterway.

This is what he apparently told Fox News, his favorite TV channel.

Yeah, hey guys, good morning.I just spoke with President Trump for more than 20 minutes.and collect tolls.The president described this as the United States being the guardian angel of the Strait of Hormuz and the Middle East.And the president said, ultimately, that would involve the U .S.

taking 20 percent of the oil that passes through the strait.Remember, this comes in reaction to the Iranians saying they will close the Strait of Hormuz in response to Israeli strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon.President Trump tells Fox News he spoke with Iranian officials overnight.and said, you close it, and you won't have a country.He went on to tell these officials, you won't even make it back to your effing country.Now, earlier today, Iran's president, Massoud Pazeshian, said this about Iranian enrichment of uranium.

The president's also reacting to that.Take a listen.

We will not give up our right to enrichment.And they, too, will be forced to accept it.You all know what the so -called president of the United States was saying.He had made a complete 100 -degree turn.He was saying that Iran must surrender unconditionally.Iran has no right to do this.

It has no right to do that.

President Trump, during our call, responded directly to those comments by Iranian President Massoud Pazashkian.President Trump told Fox News he better watch his mouth, he better shape up or we'll take over the rest of the country.

Iranian expert Negar Mortazavi told Al Jazeera that each time Iran and the U .S.are close to a deal, Trump does his best to spoil the party.

The Iranians have gone into the room, as our Osama bin Javad described.They expressed their concerns to the Qataris.and then they walked out, presumably to have a huddle.It's not over.They're not walking out on the whole process.But what should we read into this?

What's the takeaway here?

So they went in, refused to do a photo op.We take it from the beginning.Yes.They did some talks with the importance of the mediators also being present, and then came to threats from President Trump, as we've seen a pattern.Every time you're very close to a deal or negotiations, President Trump ratchets up the rhetoric, thinking probably that this will give him more leverage at the negotiating table.And the Iranian response is always, we're not going to negotiate on their terms.

pressure, or more force, or tough rhetoric, or at least it's not going to make us change our position.So I think it's maybe a little bit of protest, but it's not leaving the negotiations.It's what's going on.I'm still waiting for us to get final confirmation.But from their viewpoint, looking at the big picture, the MOU was signed historically a piece of paper by two presidents, but it's not being implemented.Again, they're saying the first point of the MOU is a permanent end to the war, and the word Lebanon is mentioned in there, and Israel continue to escalate in Lebanon.

So essentially, their going to Switzerland is framed as we're going to make sure that the MOU is being implemented by the other side.

But does President Trump not also have a point when he writes on his social media platform, Iran must immediately stop their highly paid proxies in Lebanon from causing trouble?Is that not a fair criticism?It kind of takes two to tangle here, doesn't it?

It does.I mean, each side is saying the other started, they violated, they violated, and pointing to the last violation.But adding to this also is that we're seeing a very clear and public diversion between Israel and the U .S.We just had Washington Post report this week that U .S.

intelligence is warning the administration that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israelis, are going to try to torpedo or sabotage the peace process because they have publicly said that they don't agree with it.They were, I mean, essentially not at the negotiating table, but they wereon the table.So was Lebanon.But at the end of the day, this is something they negotiated.It took a long time.

It was complicated.But the Iranians managed to put Lebanon in that first point of the MOU, and so they want a permanent end.to the war, including in Lebanon.And I think the sort of discrepancy here is that that's not very important for the U .S.For the U .

S., what's important is the opening of the Hormuz.And for the Iranians, that's the most important point.So they're going to go and use their leverage, which is Hormuz, to try to bring that pressure to Washington to then indirectly pressure Israel to stop escalations.

Clearly, the Iranians' decision to close the state of Hormuz following the repeated violations of the ceasefire in Lebanon has left this depraved Israeli slave While publicly he was showcasing his fake bravado, privately he was busy pleading to his Israeli masters to not humiliate him anymore.This was evident as Israeli barbarians today held back from their savagery in Lebanon.JD Vance too hinted today that Israeli monsters will not bomb Lebanon.

Well, first of all, we've seen great progress over the last just couple of days in ensuring that the ceasefire holds in Lebanon.These things are always a little bit messy.If you go back to how much was happening three months ago and compare it to three weeks ago, great progress has been made.If you go back to three weeks ago to three days ago, additional progress has been made.The president has committed us to see a full regional ceasefire.We found great partners in working with the Qataris, the Pakistanis, our friends in Israel.

We're all working towards regional peace.There, of course, are going to be sometimes disagreements about precisely how to get there, but I actually feel great about where we are in Lebanon.There's still some additional wood to chop, but we're going to keep on working at it.

An Israeli asset, Lindsey Graham, today told the people of Lebanon that help was on the way.The same way Trump's help arrived for thein Iran in January.

Now's the time to open negotiations yet again for you to expand the Abraham Accords, for you to join.I think this is going to happen in 2026, and it can't happen until Iran's in a box.If we get a deal, if we get a deal, Iran will be in a box.If we don't get a deal, Iran will be in a box.To Lebanon, to the people in Lebanon, help is on the way.Hezbollah's been terrorizing your country for a long time.

That's about to end.

I have other questions.

If the U .S.media was driven by ethics and morality, this Israeli asset Graham should have been challenged when he said that help was on its way to Lebanon.Help against whom?It should be Israeli savages because they are the ones committing a large scale massacre there.Thankfully, not every American thinks like Graham or other Israeli stooges in the U .

S.Congress and Senate.Listen to American journalist Crystal Ball.who thinks Israel is a terrorist state.

I guess I don't think of it too much in like political strategic terms.I just think about it in terms of telling the truth about what the original sin was here is not now the inevitable deal, which is going to improve Iran's position because they won the war.The original sin is the war.Right.That's where the problem really lies.And that's where the criticism should go.

So, for example, I saw your post about how this is a quote gift to the mullahs, which I don't know if you're trolling.I don't know if you're like relapsing.

It is a gift to the mullahs.

It's not a gift.No, it's not a gift.

It's what they secure.The mullahs are stronger now than they were before the war.They're going to have more money than they did before.

The mullahs framing is also very right wing coded.But in any case, they are mullahs.

But I mean, they're bad.though.We can agree they're bad.

Sure.But like.Israel is the biggest terrorist in the region.We funded a genocide.OK, so I'm not really feeling too confident in our ability to moralize about really any regime in the entire world.

But Tim, it's more Iran killed like forty two thousand unarmed protesters earlier.

I'm not here to like I don't want to live in Iran.Right.I don't want to live in Islamic Republic.But I also think that Us bombing them, has that helped the protesters?No, I'm sure it's given them pretext to be able to crack down even more aggressively if that's what they want to do.But the framing of it's a gift to the mullahs, it's not a gift.

They won the war.This is what is going to be required to end the war.Is it a disaster?Of course.But the disaster comes from starting the war in the first place.I mean, really, the disaster comes from getting out of the JCPOA to begin with.

The root cause of the insane and wild reactions of Trump and his Israeli boss is their inability to digest the defeat at the hands of the Iranians, both militarily and on diplomatic front.Retired American Colonel Douglas McGregor thinks that the current conflict has led to the rise of two superpowers in the region, namely Iran and Turkey.

The two powers that are going to emerge from this war and will dominate the Middle East for decades to come, maybe longer.One is Iran.There's no question about that.And the other is Turkey.They are not the same.They are very different people, very different states with very different histories.

And I spent many years of my life visiting Israel back and forth.And I tried to tell them on more than one occasion, you're, you're barking up the wrong tree.As we said, your existential threat is not Iran, Iran, Persian civilization, the Persian world and Persian culture.those things aren't your enemy.You've got a real problem further north and to the east, and that's called the Turks.They're very different.

This is a resolutely martial people, people of great courage who are innately inclined to fight.These are natural soldiers.I mean, I've seen them.And I had the good, good fortune to work with the Turks.I think the world of them militarily, they're great people.But you do not want to go to war with them.

In Iran, you're dealing with someone who is rational, whether they like to think so or not.In Israel, they are.They will coexist with you.You can talk to them and do business.But if you provoke the Turks, it's a fight to the finish.I don't think President Trump wants to be involved in that.

And the frustration is being witnessed everywhere in the American media.Just watch this analyst on the ABC.

We give the president all the credit in the world for the June bombing of the nuclear sites.But now we get to February.He tells us this is about regime change, unconditional surrender, eliminate the nuclear threat, and eliminate their missile capability.That's what he tells us.He then does five weeks of war, less than what the Pentagon wanted him to do.And then he stops.

And he stops and fills the air with a whole bunch of empty threats about when he's going to restart.Then, He gets to the point where the Iranians have him in a corner because of the economic calamity that's caused by something that apparently his geniuses in his national security team didn't anticipate, that they would close the Strait of Hormuz.How they didn't anticipate that, John, I don't know.So now he has to make a deal because he feels the economy in the United States crumbling beneath him.And what's he do?He gives them the option of opening or closing the Strait of Hormuz based upon their interpretation.

of whether...They have to work it out with Oman.Right.Us and Israel are complying.Us and Israel.Not a party to the agreement.

He gives them a $300 billion bribe offer.He unfreezes all of their assets.He gives them their oil profits back, which is $35 to $50 billion a year.On top of it, he doesn't prevent them from charging service fees to go through this straight, which JP Morgan says could be $60 to $90 billion a year.And now to end it up, to end where you started, he hands over the negotiations to a naive and inexperienced vice president.And two other guys who would be better buying you an office building in Alexandria than negotiating this.

And let me say this.He's gone from America first to Iran first.All right.

Meanwhile, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan says that technical issues remaining in the recently signed MOU may not be quickly resolved and cautioned that the illegal settler colony of Israel could try to derail the process.I will now leave you with a video of a recent BBC broadcast.A BBC presenter was interviewing a former Lebanese diplomat, Tracey Chamoun, on the recent Israeli violations of the ceasefire.This video is another proof of just how rogue the BBC has become.It's no longer a serious news organization.What is horrifying is that this rogue organization is not even pretending to be impartial.

The settler colony, the illegal settler colony of Israel is violating the peace deal in Lebanon by bombing and massacring civilians.But according to this presenter, Hezbollah and Iran are to be blamed.Well done to this extremely eloquent former Lebanese ambassador for destroying this BBC muppet.You wouldn't regret watching this video.video.

Beirut.I was interested that the statement that came from Iran, Tracey, talked about a flagrant breach of the agreement because Israeli soldiers were 10 miles inside Lebanon.But you could flip that on its head and say that Hezbollah, supported by Iran, was undermining the sovereign government of Lebanon.I wonder what you make of Iran's role in this.

Before we go there, I just want to point out, as I'm in Lebanon, that Israel has violated this ceasefire already numerous times.They started at 4 -0 -8, the ceasefire having gone into effect at 4, and now recently they've also just carried out a series of airstrikes on southern Lebanon, the Nabatae region.And also they've made it very clear that the military spokesman has said that they're still reserving the right to to defend themselves where they see appropriate.Now, this is the clause that got them into the trouble from the start.So I don't know how they're going to abide by this ceasefire if they're reserving for themselves the right to attack and strike at will still.

Right.But does Iran have a role in keeping the peace in Lebanon?

Well, I think Iran is a deterrent right now.So it's putting pressure on Israel by threatening to strike Israel every time Israel escalates in Lebanon.It also is, you know, tied into the larger negotiations which are being held up by Israel's aggression and continued airstrikes and attacks on Lebanon.

So it's your point of view, is it that as long as as long as Israeli troops stay in that buffer zone,below the Latani River in Lebanon, then it's going to be very difficult to see how this latest version of the ceasefire holds.

Okay, let me clarify there as well.They're no longer just below the Litani River.They've taken extensive terrain further north, north of the Litani River towards Suhmar and the area of Nabatiyye.So when they're talking about the security zone and the original eight kilometers, they're now 20 kilometers inland.And so when they're saying they're going to stay where they are, they're kind of misleading everybody.So are they going to pull back to the original security zone which has already expanded because they put out a new map yesterday showing the expansion of that security zone.

So it's very unclear and I think it's deliberately unclear.

But it is fair to say as well, I take your point on the Israeli role in this, but it's also fair to say that the weapons Hezbollah are using have historically flowed from Tehran.

They've historically flowed from Syria, from the, certainly the funding has come from Tehran, but you know, all these armies are funded from somewhere.You know, Israel is funded by America.Hezbollah is funded by Iran, so it's not a road anybody really needs to go down right now.We know who the protagonists are.We know who the players are.And the most important thing now is that they get serious about applying the ceasefire, and Israel so far has violated it, even before it starts.

And then they will blame Hezbollah, and Hezbollah is actually reacting.Let's hope this time that Iran has put enough pressure on Hezbollah that they don't react.and that it becomes unilateral and at some point Israel has to stop.

We'll see in the coming days here in Switzerland what the ceasefire means to this negotiation, but what does it mean for your separate negotiation with Israel?Because President Aoun would hope that they could advance that and the Lebanese army could move south and take these positions from Hezbollah.How likely is that?

Well, I think that if Hezbollah agrees, Hezbollah has always said that if Israel pulls out of Lebanon, then they're willing to sit down with the Lebanese government to negotiate a national defense strategy regarding their arms.In the larger scheme of things, this big deal between Iran and the U .S.was very important to put the spotlight on what was happening in Lebanon, because this fighting has been going for months and nobody has been able to put any brakes on it at all.The secondary negotiations, which the president is going to undertake in Washington, are also important if the Israelis pull back.If they pull back to the border or at least the security zone, then you have a starting point to negotiate.

And also if they abide by the ceasefire, a comprehensive ceasefire.

If they don't, then there's nothing to negotiate.

That's it for me.Thank you very much for your support of this platform and our journalism.If you haven't subscribed to my channel, please do so, because that's one of the many ways you can support independent journalism.God bless you all.