These questions from Senator Johnson to Anthony Fauci relate largely to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.And just before we start, I think there needs to be inquiries made as to why apparently respected research organisations around the world demonstrated that ivermectin was not efficacious for COVID -19 infection.I believe it certainly is and a lot of others do as well.So how could this research conducted in the UK and around the world show it didn't work, in my view, completely erroneously.Were research programs nobbled in some way?It's an open question.
I first became aware of, I've met him, Tess Laurie, to begin with, Dr. Tess Laurie.And then I heard about the work of Dr. Jackie Stone in Zimbabwe through Professor Colin Aldous.how she was using it to increase oxygen saturations in a hospital where no oxygen was available.Anyway, this clip, FDA attacks on ivermectin working for vaccine injury in many cases.I've certainly seen that myself personally.Dr. Fauci saying there was no evidence when Tennessee Johnson produces a big pile of studies showing there's all kinds of evidence for the efficacy of ivermectin.
And that's not even without talking about the right to try.And we've got that Same situation now with the potential for ivermectin treating cancers.But many people simply aren't allowed to try.Was Fauci involved in sabotaging ivermectin?Was this so important?he could demonstrate that there were no treatments for Covid -19 because emergency use authorization could only be granted if there were no effective treatments to allow the vaccines to come in and therefore they had to disprove the efficacy of ivermectin in Covid -19.
These are really big questions but of course simple questions, technical questions and he refuses to answer them all.I think this is just outrageous but watch the clip now.
Throughout the pandemic, I always pushed early treatment.You know, we've got things in here where, you know, you were really concerned about remdesivir because it was untested, but hydroxychloroquine, yeah, it was an improved drug.You know, maybe some safety issues, but we had a great deal of experience with it.All of a sudden, you had the Surgisphere study.It was retracted within two weeks because it was completely false.Totally blew up the use of hydroxychloroquine.
And then when it comes to ivermectin, which, by the way, because I was contacted by so many people, I referred them to doctors who actually had the courage and compassion to treat vaccine -injured individuals.It works.But I was going to ask you whether you were involved in the FDA attack on ivermectin.You had an interview on CNN on August 29th of 2021, where, again, I just don't want to take time to find the exact quote, but you said, there's no evidence, there's no evidence that ivermectin is helpful.on that exact same day and I've got the studies right here.There was a website that was tracking the random controlled studies.
here they are, showing 60, 70 % efficacy of ivermectin.The same thing you say, there's no evidence.There was all kinds of evidence.Loved ones had to go to hospitals, had to sue hospitals.Just, would you try it?So I would want to know, to what extent were you involved in sabotaging hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and did you do that because you knew the only way you could get an emergency use authorization for these drugs his experimental gene therapy was if there was no effective treatment, he couldn't get the emergency use authorization.
So is that why you help sabotage these cheap generic drugs in favor of remdesivir, which by the way, nurses, are you aware of the fact that nurses called it run death is near?
On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
Let me end on this note because this just came to light.You know, we've got 11 million pages of documents.We also have other people who are in the room.But now you actually lied to your own diary.On March 27, 2020, you wrote in your diary, to my surprise yesterday, the POTA sent a letter to governors outlining a plan to reopen county by county while monitoring the spread of virus in low -risk counties.This was half -baked and never shown to Deb or I before it was sent out.
So we have evidence that in fact, You were fully aware of it and certainly approved it if not authored it.So I simply ask you, is that true?I mean, did you literally lie?your own diary?Did you know of that letter sent out to governors about reopening county by county?Again, Mr. Chairman, I'd ask you to ask the witness to just answer that one simple question.
On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It gets a bit tedious after a while, doesn't it?But hopefully something will be done about this.engagement will be facilitated on at least a technical level.I don't know how this is tolerated to be quite honest.Thank you for watching.
Get ultra fast and accurate AI transcription with Cockatoo
Get started free →
