Jason Arday: The hard truths we can't ignore | The Daily T Podcast

The closest academic colleagues of Professor Jason Arden claimed that the media had expelled him to death, and I wanted to think and wait before saying anything.What I did was to go to confession, because I have a weak faith in this matter.

We are dealing with the matter in a way that is sufficient to use this word, Christianity.I spent a very strange night on Friday, because I went to see Oliver's play at Gilgud theater on Chaffetzbury Street, and the play remained disturbed because of that warning, or yes, even if someone followed us.And soon it became clear that the people who were exchanging the start and stop of the plane, They are the ones who caused this warning, then were forced to throw a joke about the matter in the middle of Oliver's play, and he did that well in reality, saying that Oliver woke up because of a live warning.I went out to find a missing phone call from you, and the news spread, and it is a feeling that you may regret about such stories.It was on the media to do the same thing completely after Caroline ended her life.We don't know exactly what happened until now.

But the police say that it does not deal with his death as a suspicious incident.And even before coming to the studio, we were discussing what if he should not feed on the story.

But I think that as we talked about him in his life, it is right to talk about him after his death.It was covered by the Times for the high education, and it was covered by the newspaper Al -Gharid for what he described as a fierce, poisonous, and terrifying extortion campaign, and he felt that he had been extorted to death.So, I did not comment during the weekend because it has nothing to do with me, and I wanted to think and wait before saying anything.What I did was to go confess, because when I heard the news, I felt very bad and ashamed of some of the things I said.And for me, going to confession is the most important thing.a way to try to understand my feelings and what I did right and what is my responsibility.

And in that conversation with the priest, I do not want to reveal many of its details.He said with great wisdom, you cannot apologize for what I am not responsible for, and somehow.This is a Narcissistic behavior, isn't it?You are not directly responsible for the death of a person.And you are not responsible for things that happened in a wrong way in his life, such as stories and exaggerations, or the appointment of the faculty.It is like the physical pain that tells you that there is a wound in your body.

The feeling of guilt tells you that you must do something you do not do, or that you do something you should not do.So you have to specify exactly what you did, and take responsibility for it, then treat it.Therefore, in view of what I said about Jason Ard in the past two weeks, I think our newspaper is done with the transmission, but I am not just a messenger, I am a commentator.And I can't deny that I made a joke.You were rude.I didn't think about the person himself.

You did that in reality, because you said, allow me to interrupt you for a moment.You said in this podcast while I was on vacation and listening to it, we need to be very careful here, because there is a weak person in the heart of the matter, and we will deal with him in a way that I can describe as Christian.Well, and one of the things I regret is not following Hadith.because I also said in a special liberation session that we need to pay close attention to this man.It was not a racist story, but it was necessarily a story with ethnic dimensions, because if he was black and academic in Atherstaff, I would not have brought all this coverage.Yes, and if he was white and academic in Cambridge,

he would not have been involved in all of this cover -up.But because he presented to us a representation of the colorful achievements in Cambridge, for this reason it became in people's minds a debate about diversity, equality and inclusiveness.Yes, and with a positive effect, although anger is a legitimate matter.However, it was not fair to end the matter with one person who bears the burden of everyone who wants to see such a system as a place of mockery and change.Therefore, the conclusion I came to at the end of my confession of my mistake is that I forgot the human side.I think that there is a difference between the legal balanced coverage Whether we use sarcasm or not.

And among a kind of harsh and bad curses, which are often spread without punishment on social media.

Yes.

I pondered on the matter, not with a priest, but with my husband, who is always a standard for my honesty.And I told him, listen, I feel bad, because I am a member of the media.We covered this topic extensively in Telegraphy.And we discussed it in the podcast.Did you say unpleasant things about the professor?I felt sad because of course a human being is above the story, and I have good memories that I passed here.

I know that this man made a mistake.

But when I met him physically, this man was smiling and lively, and he gave some support to my daughter, who is interested in academic study and may apply for his university or another prestigious university at the right time, and therefore, either he is wrong.But if there were no contradictions in his personal biography and other things, he would not have had any means of media to expose him.Either, it is a completely legitimate journalistic search plan to interrogate a person who has been presented as a face of diversity, even if it was requested or imposed on him.Yes, and whoever has received a huge amount of advertising, it is completely legitimate to investigate, if the advertisements of that person are in front of the investigation, and I expect that from any person.What we need to ask ourselves about is whether there was a fierce media campaign, and what I always call for is coordination.

I strongly criticize the prominent characters in the press column.I am not kind in particular to the characters on the left and recently on the right.But I somehow believe in the culture of cancellation, and you and I agree on that.If you don't want to cancel people on the right, then you shouldn't be invited to cancel them on the left.

I looked at the story in its entirety and said, should this really be the end of this professional man's career?In the same way that he might say the same thing about the suicide scandal that affected journalist Johan Harry, and in the same way that you might say about David Stark, Al -Akademi Al -Muwaqari and Al -Mu 'arrihi, who was forced out of his context and lost everything literally, were left and right, because why wasn't there a fierce media campaign against him?Why are they better than any person who is currently criticized for contributing to the death of Uday?

After I was tough on myself, I will defend myself and I said at that time that he will go through hell, and for this reason I said that people should be careful.This concern was never shown to my friend David Starkey.

No, none of those who went through the same experience showed it completely.All his titles and positions were withdrawn from him.

Yes.

And the people who did not support him publicly or secretly, began recently by saying, listen, you were a victim of madness in 2020.And in fact, after many years, I think you have committed a great cruelty.This is not good.After six years.Yes.Yes.

And in fact, in the case of Starkey and Erdy, where the institutions abandoned these people, What is the responsibility that you bear towards the luxury of the person you have cherished for a day?There is a similarity here.Starkey, the historian, is the king of Cambridge.I know that he is not a young black professor, but his name was shining.Cambridge took advantage of Starkey's fame to achieve achievements.He was the world's first expert in the time of Theodore.

How much did Cambridge like that?How many talented students ended up in Cambridge to study history because of Professor Starkey?And similarly with Erdő, you put them on the Twitter platform.If you will benefit to this extent from the fame of that person, then he will fall from that platform.So if you are not there to hold him, who will do that?

Yes, and I do not apply this, by the way, to Lord Wally, the head of that college, because he says that he felt the urge to die, to the extent of his expression, and did not see an exit.Diane told him, while holding his hand, we will help you overcome this.But that day, we saw a man who lost half his weight and was desperate in an unbelievable way.

Now Lord Woolley is pointing my finger at the media, and I am sure that there will be certain claims, such as Hackett of, and others about Lipson 2 .0.Well, let's wait for those claims, and I do not suggest this at all about Lord Woolley.It is clear that he and his wife contacted Professor Ardy on a personal level, and thank God they did.Where was the rest in Cambridge?Because we usually Let's take Hugh Edwards as an example.It's different.

That means that Hugh Edwards was convicted of a very serious crime.It starts with a legal process where the lawyer or actor says, listen, the headlines have already been published.This man was suspended from his job.And he is now in a very bad situation.Can we advise all media outlets to stop and stop doing that?No.

His wife does not want to comment, whether it was officially or unofficially.Leave us alone.Whether this was said officially or unofficially, he is suffering from severe mental health problems, so let everyone stop bothering him.I don't know why that process didn't start in this case.The indication has been pointed out.Cambridge authorities, as far as I know, These statements have not been officially or unofficially issued by the state media.

Good.Instead, I have the idea that his criticism is racist.The problem in this defense is that we found clear evidence that he misled people, so it was not racist.and the defense was not convincing enough.And there is an issue related to the duty of care here.I mean, I go back to my criticism of the University of Cambridge.

I was a student in Cambridge and I suffered from mental health problems in Cambridge, and that was 20 years ago.I hope the situation has improved.But part of the problem of the institution is that it is a place where academics run other academics, and the academics are not very good at that.I mean, some academics, again,What?which clearly pointed to the black man as the cursed black man.

He was talking about that if there was a mass extermination of the black man, there would not be many cursed black men in Europe today.I will not say to David personally, yes, your words have been distorted there.Yes, no, those were the right terms.Well done, David.No, no, it was not like that, because it was the wrong thing to say, but that does not matter to me.Look, It all comes down to the ethical and personal responsibility.

Ethically, what he did was wrong.What is the personal responsibility behind the scenes?It is to be nice and to be there for him.And this applies to people who have committed really bad things, including imprisonment.

Yes.People do not give up on people.One of the reasons for not giving them up is that if you give them up, which is what often happens in cases of cancellation, so they won't find another place to go to.

No.

And for this reason, people start to think and do very dark things.As for your point about the behavior of the media, what people should understand about journalism is that it works within ethical standards, and by the way, we are trainers for that and we must attend training courses around it.This is confirmed all the time.Our coverage must be appropriate, We must respect people's privacy as long as it does not affect the public interest.Isn't that so?But at the same time, the means of protection

is like a force of nature.It is like a river that breaks its dam and floods everything.It is to the extent that it is not emotional because it is only related to the word of truth.And if we are presented with what proves that a person has not made a mistake, then no matter how good, respectful, kind or good that person is, We have a responsibility that we cannot ignore to report on it, and we will report on it.By the way, as a continuation of the flood, some people are trying to get on those waves.Politicians come to us all the time and say, thanks to you, Rougouly, Mumim, then when they make mistakes or steal money or cheat their wives and we say that, they say, why do the media do this to me?

Of course, this is a famous campaign, no.You have used us and we have covered you.Yes.

This is how things work.

You have to accept the sweet and the bitter.This is the argument against Prince Harry.As he learned, fame is fame.They all got their share of fame.You have attracted their attention to you.

Yes.

You have tried to present your own truth to the audience.So do not be surprised when people ask for their right to respond to your truth.Yes.And sharing their own truth.

And in the case of Jason Adeh.Yes.Yes.

I would like to make a point about this matter, which becomes a problem for the media.when people are in the depths of despair because of their reputation.And I would like to mention an example like the former Duke of York.

Yes.

It is not true that Andrew did not file a lawsuit in a legal court.

Yes.

For what?

Correct.

But he was convicted in a public opinion court.because of blatant mistakes in the judgment.

I have found.

But because the reputation has been completely destroyed by that time, it sometimes leads to a media obsession.where the media can spread more and more in the attack because there is no reputation left to distort it.

But again, I do not remember anyone who was aware of any concern.And again, I know that the matter is different because what Andrew was accused of, which is Edwards, in the case of a conviction and in another case, it is a very serious crime.This is not what Ordi was accused of.Good.Ordi was not accused of non -conflict and actual hypocrisy towards people who have a kind of media obsession, while they do not have a kind of obsession just because they agree or disagree with the matter.There are not many people on the left who deny their sympathy with Naib Faraj.

I don't think Jason Murti made a serious mistake.It was a wrong behavior, but I don't think it was important in the way he felt about it, and it was scary.If Prince Andrew died, That will not acquit him of his crimes.

Yes.

And I bet that no one will say if that happened.And I bet that no one will ask to conduct investigations about the press.Now, you can review the previous podcast episodes in which we discussed the accusations against Prince Andrew, and you will find examples of which we do not say.I really hope that there is someone who accompanies him now.I really hope that someone cares about him.And likewise.

Charles Moore wrote articles that explain your point of view about him not being guilty.You will find it in Waseemah.

Yes.

Yes.

Good.

If you don't judge him, you'll be accused of colluding with him.But this process, look, I really think we've gone through something similar in the shadow of the Sahwa, not on the basis of violence.but something similar to the Stalinist cleansing operations, to the point of treating them in a completely inhumane and inhumane way.Ahem, and I think that I...

Also, do not forget many of the academics who were simply fired for a reason.

True.

Do not forget that.True.We had scholars who simply asked to close a center.I am just clarifying this point.

And these experts were fired by people who do not have any scientific or medical knowledge at all, Mr. Taimou.The matter has reached this level of evil.

Yes.But there is one thing that makes the woman doubt the matter, and that is the party bias.It seems to me that people do not take the threats that Nigel Farage is subjected to, seriously.A comedian joked about a professional dismissal that did not take place.To cancel, Anne Whitecombe was killed recently in the most brutal ways.And I do not feel that it was accompanied by the same coverage and the same emotional tone that applies to the leftist characters who were killed.

Yes, like Joe Cox.

Isn't that so?And I don't understand why.And again, this is another reason, not justified, but another reason that made some people feel satisfied with the fall of Jason Erdői, because they are fed up with these double standards.And what they felt was that you promoted this man at a time when the school of Michaela Akademi had been established.Here everything, without the use of positive discrimination and without the exclusion of its students,but rather through the application of boring and old -fashioned techniques such as adaptation and serious work.

Yes, that Cambridge was calling for Jason Arday.

Yes, he was doing it.

And these students were actually doing it.

Yes.

And they were hoping to go to Cambridge.But we clarified that point.If you were hoping to go to Cambridge, you were hoping to be taught by professors.

Yes.

Their self -image is full of accuracy and their academic research is undeniable.

Yes.Now, I understand why the institutions want to promote and promote people like Jason.This is related to what the Saudi youth say.You can do that too.Because part of the problem in higher education or politics or journalism is that if people don't see a person who looks like them in a job, they think it's not theirs and they don't apply for it.And because I teach in universities, I can tell you that there are many times, and in a surprising way, and that partially goes back to the bad of high schools, you find students who do not find reading and writing, but you realize that they have excellent minds.

Yes, so sometimes you say, I mean, it is clear that you have to evaluate based on what is in front of you, but you may say, I will pay and I will encourage this student specifically, and I will talk to my colleagues about it because his background has abandoned him, but with additional help.I truly believe that they may be very talented, and a large group of people may have been destroyed, and that this story ended in this way, because I truly hope that the institutions do not avoid trying to encourage people from non -typical backgrounds to enter his group, a great deception and conspiracy against Al -Bidhi, because it is not like that, it is not a conspiracy.This story was a terrible tragedy.

The one who once sent me his reference book that he wrote about teaching.He is a former teacher and a reference in the field of teaching.His message is about the role of academics, the administration of academics, and what if this is the correct approach always.Especially those who supported him as an icon and as a prize for their own ideology about education in society.And when the journalists discovered that he was not worthy of that, His life has become hollow in any sense.Now, these people will use themselves, who are still teachers and teachers, as an ideological witness for them.

The real tragedy of this case is that two young children have now left without a father.Alfreda, in fact, at the top of the British educational elite, was doing that indeed, and proved to have benefited from his appointment.It is related to this matter, as he is the director of the Center for Monotheistic Research.Therefore, he is asking for an investigation and wants to get rid of the lessons from that.When you talk about what goes wrong in the public interest, and when you have public bodies such as universities, and perhaps the media and political institutions and others, when we conduct investigations, the whole thing is about how to improve them.He also confirmed that the mental health of the teacher was completely destroyed.

In addition, there are questions about whether the media has failed to take care of him as a vulnerable person.Well, maybe.But it is also certain that the University of Cambridge must take care of any of its employees, whether former or current.

And there will be a protest in the Trafalgar Square.We are now an organization that fights against racism and the activities of others.As I said before, we do not want racists to take advantage of the situation to say that every white person is discriminated against, and that blacks get an exaggerated promotion in it, and so on.We also do not want racist activists to say that all this is the result of evil people.people, isn't it?I think people should be honest, so I will be honest and I hope people feel that I was honest about my feelings towards what I said during this story, but let's also be honest about what it means to be human.

People continue to shout, Yes, and there are many examples of people on social media now saying that the problem was a lack of kindness towards Jason Erday.You can find evidence immediately, as clear as the night, such as, remember that he was human, as I said too.And when you say, Remember that being a human does not only mean that you suffer, being a human also means that you cause harm to others.I am honest about the fact that we actually cause harm.We all do that because we are human and because we are wrong.This is part of our nature.

We try to be better, but let us, God forbid, not to try what is claimed to be a campaign to expel the Greek tragedy.Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.In the name of God, the most gracious, the most merciful.