JD Vance Issues Stark Warning To Liberal Politicians | China Abandons Iran For Alaska

is at risk, I think, of creating, of engaging in civilizational You see them starting to limit the free speech of their own citizens.

fan of digging a little bit deeper below the surface.in a fact -checked, sourced, and truthful way to figure out what's actually going on beyond the headlines and press conferences, make sure you hit that subscribe button.Otherwise, you might not see me very often or ever again, thanks to Bill C -11 and C -18 and the country that I call home, which prioritizes algorithms only pushing state -funded, sponsored, government -approved narrative news.You can also like the video, hype it, share it, comment your thoughts down below as we get through all of the news of the day, including Alberta and Ottawa, what was announced this morning, Donald Trump and China, among so many other topics.have the Vice President of the United States of America saluting local citizens for doing the most basic thing that they possibly can, which is thinking and talking and saying, something doesn't add up.Let me share it.

What do you think about it?Right.And it's interesting, you know, you can really tell a lot about a government depending on where they stand on this issue.Either they want you tostop talking and they want to control it or they encourage you to keep talking because getting to the truth is helpful to them as well and they serve you, the citizen.And to really make that more evident, here is some commentary from committee where they had some meta executives and listen to how The contrast is between the Liberal government and what it was that they used their time to speak with them about versus the Conservatives.

I'll use the remainder of my time to plead to MEDA to please do curate an environment online that is I don't know, family -friendly, not just family -friendly, to be honest, one that invites people to positively participate as an elected.We have so many comments on our social media that do not create environments that encourage positive discussion.So just want to put that out there to you.

As an elected official, there are so many citizens who are completely demoralized by my governance, that they leave comments telling me how they feel.And I really just plead to you, Meta, to make their voices disappear, because it's not positive.

Thank you so much.One of my colleagues on the other side used his last 30 seconds to implore Meta to take limit free speech, and I would like to use my first few seconds to implore MEDA not to limit free speech.So I would say that first.

technically, to talk about lawful access surveillance.any of that, he used that opportunity to plead with Meta to curate and censor speech that he does not like on the internet.I don't know about you, but that definitely caught my attention because they keep saying this is about security, working with law enforcement.For who exactly?Who exactly are you trying to go after?When you specifically state mean comments you get on your posts from people who don't like your government, you want to go after those people for what?

For not liking you?That's telling.

Thank you.Thank you, Ms. Kirkland.So we just have three asks, three recommendations on this bill.Remove obligations for companies to add government or third party surveillance.tools or other software to their systems, that includes our company.Strengthen the definition of systemic vulnerability to explicitly rule out any requirement that would weaken or break encryption.

Mandate client -side scanning or otherwise introduce a security weakness.And three, codify the process for companies to challenge problematic requests.I think we've heard after the fact protections are really no protection at all.

geopolitical embarrassment for the nation, because it is so structurally flawed that even U .S.Congress has stepped in.CEOs, tech executives, international lawmakers, cybersecurity experts, everybody is sounding the alarm over this thing.And the reason being, I mean, here's a quote actually from the U .S.

Congressional warning letter specifically to Public Safety Minister Gary and Anna Sangre.It says, American companies would face a difficult choice compromising the security of their entire user base, including U .S.citizens, or risking exclusion from the Canadian market.Either outcome harms U .S.

With CEOs and tech experts saying and alerting the fact that this bill would give the public safety minister unchecked secret executive powers to decide exactly what it is that counts as a vulnerability.And they also note that it's mathematically impossible to create a backdoor that only the Canadian government can enter and forcing tech companies and private private companies to create a brand new surveillance map on every single law abiding citizen.Please tell me in the comments section if you see this pattern too, because the executive warfare behind the lawful access Bill C -22, it is the direct and predictable evolutionary outcome.of this regulatory architecture that was first established by the Online Streaming Act Bill C -11, which, after it passed, The federal government successfully broke the wall between the state and digital content, which forced digital platforms and algorithms to filter what Canadians are allowed to see.Now, with Bill C -22, they are attempting to break the wall of consumer privacy, where they will be dictating how platforms must track what Canadians say and do online privately.When Bill C -11 passed, the government repeatedly promised that it was never going to target user -generated content.

That claim was immediately blown apart when the CRTC began setting up frameworks to regulate podcast feeds and digital creators.The exact same pattern that we're seeing right now with this.The public safety minister claims that C -22 is not going to force platforms to introduce systemic vulnerabilities.But tech CEOs have learned a lot from the betrayal of Bill C -11.

I'm beginning to think the entire Democrat Party is a whole scam.What is it really about?Stealing money, flooding the country with illegals, and calling us racists.That's it.Every time you look under the hood, all you find are scams.

And I really hope I'm not alone in recognizing what the most probable end goal of this is, which is the establishment of total narrative and behavioral control.C -11 was about input.manipulating the algorithms, who's allowed to say what, what you're allowed to find on the internet.My goodness, and take a look at what CBC just did a story on.

Something mysterious appears to be happening on store shelves at Sobeys across the country.

So it looks like the maple leaf symbol has gone from the coffee.

Those ubiquitous maple leaf symbols promoting Canadian goods seem to be disappearing.

so that the state can dictate the political and cultural information that you hear most often and that's showing up unprompted.C -22 is about the output, shattering encryption, private spaces, private access, privacy, so that the state can monitor text messages, data, and dissent that may or may not be flowing out of your home.When you tie these two pieces of architecture together, what do you get?The ultimate goal of corporate state -sponsored censorship.If a citizen cannot easily find, consume, or discuss independent news, ideas, perspectives, media due to Bill C -11, and then they also cannot safely, privately discuss, coordinate, organize, communicate anonymously, Thanks to Bill C -22, well, the political class then effectively neutralizes all opposition.It is like they're building a digital iron wall around Canada that is designed to protect the ruling establishment from opposition.

accountability.

I think that Europe, and frankly, I would have said this about America a year ago, but America, Europe is at risk, I think, of creating, of engaging in civilizational suicide.They are unable to or unwilling to many countries to control their borders.You see them starting to push back against that and good.That's a good thing.You see them starting to limit the free speech of their own citizens, even as those citizens are protesting against things like the border invasion that got Donald Trump and a number of European leaders elected.So look, I want Europe to thrive.

I want them to be an important ally.Part of that is going to be Europe respecting its own people, respecting its own sovereignty.And America can't do that job for them.

And note how the main reason behind all of this is always safety.It's because we're so good and morally superior.We just want to protect you guys.That's why you need to give us all of this control.Because once you do, nobody's left to protect you from us.But we're so nice and kind.

And considering how our prime minister was literally in Europe just a couple weeks ago talking about how the future is going to be rebuilt out of it, how Canada is the most European nation, are we going to start doing this next?

But we will act decisively against hatred.We will use the full force of the law when that hatred manifests as violence.And we will ban those coming into the UK who seek to stir it up, as we have done already, because this country belongs to all of us.And I will not tolerate anyone who seeks to stand in the way of that.

Isn't it kind of weird that it is exclusively left leaning governmentstoday's modern world who have this new model that is, we're going to change your entire country.We're going to change the way your economy functions.We're going to change what works and replace it with what I want to replace it with.We're going to change your demographics.And if you complain about it, you're the problem and we will punish you.

But if you're compliant, well, you might just get a little bit of favorability from us.

And today's agreement is also about creating a better world for our kids and our grandkids through major investments that will help put Canada on the path to net zero.Through a methane equivalency agreement that will lower methane emissions from oil and gas by 75 % below 2014 levels by 2035.And through carbon markets that work.When we signed the MOU in November, an oversupply of credits had driven prices as low as $20 a tonne, $75 below the headline price.And today, as you just heard, Canada and Alberta have agreed to create markets that deliver an effective carbon price of $130 per tonne.We will also issue semi -tracts for difference to support major carbon capture, clean energy and other emissions.

If you comply with what I want, you will be rewarded for it.And this is a fundamental difference between President Trump and Prime Minister Carney.I mean, take a listen in Trump's own words.

$18 trillion car plants being built.I was in Japan.Somebody admonished me.He shouldn't be traveling.I don't like to travel.I don't like to travel.

But when I travel, I make a lot of money for the country, not for me.For me?I don't care.I have a much higher purpose.I have plenty of money.I don't need money.

I don't want money.I want to make money for the country.

Let's compare that.with what Mark Carney is doing.This coming from CBC News.

The real impact is political in the sense that the premier was able to ring a concession or compromise out of the prime minister and the prime minister was able to get Alberta to finally agree to a climate change plan that you know sort of keeps the veneer of Canada remaining on target with addressing climate change.But the facts are that The oil pipeline is unlikely to be built.If it is built, it's going to have to be built with heavy federal subsidies.And more importantly, the MOU suggests that all of this is tied to carbon capture and storage.And my research group a few months ago released analysis of carbon capture and storage.The Pathways Project, as mentioned in the MOU, and it's exorbitantly expensive.

That means the taxpayers would be on the hook for billions of dollars to start store carbon dioxide underground in Alberta.The whole plan simply doesn't make a lot of sense, but on the surface it makes a lot of political sense.

This coming from Premier Danielle Smith, she says a critical milestone has been reached under the Canada Alberta Energy Agreement MOU, so our province can expect approval from the federal major projects office for actual construction of the West Coast pipeline on or before September 1st, 2027.

Referring to the MPO, the major projects office, is not does not mean the project is approved.

She says it will be the fastest approval of a major oil pipeline from Alberta in a generation.Apparently it will expand their exports by a million barrels a day.They're going to reach new Asian markets and they're going to double energy production by 2027.But it comes with a sacrifice, a mandate that other countriesDonald Trump, is going to make Mark Carney a lot of money.

So if carbon capture and storage still isn't economically feasible without significant public money, and Carney saying no pathways, which is the current carbon capture and storage program that he's talking about, no pipeline if no pathways, Where does that leave us?

Carbon dioxide has to be captured at the refineries around Edmonton, shipped to underground caverns and other parts of Alberta.They are experienced in NIMBY and not in my backyard effect for people that are on the route of the pipeline, just like you would for an oil pipeline or a gas pipeline because of the potential for leaks.In fact, there were disasters and a carbon dioxide pipeline in Mississippi last year.So there are possibilities of an accident.Nobody wants these pipelines.And if it's stored underground, it's kind of like nuclear waste.

It's going to mean that taxpayers are going to have to pay huge amounts of money to store this carbon dioxide underground.

Now, there are many people who hear this news, they see the way that Danielle Smith is celebrating it, and they say, how dare you validate carbon pricing?Who do you think you are?You have betrayed us for conceding this ideological environmental nonsense to Ottawa.you are allowing us to be at a disadvantage competitively.

We are the only country among the 10 largest producers globally that has a carbon tax.And the carbon tax for our industry is nothing more than a cost.It doesn't incent us to decarbonize.It is solely a cost of doing business.So when you think about what we intended to do with the carbon taxes, it really works when it's globally applied.and that can be passed on to the consumer.

The consumer sees the higher cost of the product that they're consuming and they consume less of it and you get the price signal going back to the producer who produces less.What we've done is we've put a carbon tax on in Canada that is solely born in Canada and we compete in the global market so the products that we sell get a global price and we're not able to pass that along to the consumers.There's a breakage of the linkage in terms of what the policy was intended to do and what it actually does.So it's simply a cost of doing business that has to be incorporated into any investment decision.But we have that, plus we have the tanker ban, plus we have, you know, clean electricity regulations, plus we have methane regulations, and all of this is just combined to make an incredibly complicated a policy framework that makes investments in Canada difficult and non -competitive with other countries like the US and countries in Asia.

And I agree with that.That's all true.You know, there's no solutions though, only trade -offs.And that's another thing, playing devil's advocate, giving benefit of the doubt to Premier Smith.You can only do so much.And Alberta and Canada's economy as a whole has been hurting for so long.

And so if this is a concession, a compromise that needs to be made for now, until ideally a conservative government gets in and they get rid of all of that stuff, you know, at the very least, there is something tangible that can come from making those concessions.Is it enough?Absolutely not.Is it exactly what we need?No.But it's at least something slightly better than what we had before.

I'm encouraged that we're talking about selling them oil and gas.And I spoke to the senator from Alaska yesterday, and he was telling me that they're looking to explore Alaska, which is a muchshorter distance than the Strait of Hormuz.

Absolutely it is.And with specific regard to the rare earths, I mean, drill baby drill, Donald Trump's policy about energy doesn't just deal with oil and oil products.It's also talking about the rare earths that we're hoping to develop here in the United States, getting rid of a lot of the onerous federal regulations that happened were goosed up during the Biden administration.We saw them really roll out during the Obama administration.So we're way behind the curve in terms of doing that.

And why exactly would Prime Minister Carney be so adamant that you need to have all of this net zero stuff in place in order to succeed?

And that brings me to one more point, which is the question comes from Bloomberg and markets and just reinforcing the need to have a true market, a true carbon market, carbon credit market in this case, not an offset market, but a credit market in Alberta.And over time, we would like to see that developed and other provinces have the option of joining if they so wish.

Well, I mean, the answer to that question is exactly why, after a lot of pressure from Gerald Butts, Mark Carney agreed.to put his name in the hat for prime minister because it does very well for his own portfolios.Let's not forget that Mark Carney does in fact have performance pay in carbon capture technology that is directly linked to the investments of carbon capture and storage projects.So as carbon market prices rise and increase through influence, the value of all of those related assets, thus his compensation also increases.And that is hardly scratching the surface on how convoluted and calculated all of this has been.I'm not surprised Mark Carney decided to become prime minister.

I don't know why he didn't.would be, especially if they ever read his book values.

We're proud and you see our track record here as a government that the projects that are We've supported in some way or looking at through The major projects office our top quartile or top decile Low emission LNG and we expect that to continue and remember a last point under the major projects legislation We we need these projects to align with our climate goals And so that helps reinforce and as the food professor writes it's astonishing that almost no media outlet has reported on the UN's downgrading of some of the most extreme climate scenarios that helped drive the urgency behind the Paris Climate Accord and carbon taxes around the world.

The UN -backed scientific community is now acknowledging that the planet is likely not warming as fast as some earlier worst -case projections suggested.Canadians deserve to know this, especially as major policies continue to reshape economies, energy systems, and food affordability.But hey, Why would they tell us that?I'm Jasmine Lane.Like, share, subscribe.Give this video a hype as it does help in the algorithm and comment your thoughts down below.

I will talk to you tomorrow.That's exactly why I use Rumble Wallet.It takes all of that complexity and makes it simple.Choose what you want.Bitcoin, dollar bills.stable coins, or even digital gold backed by real gold.

No complicated setup.It connects with MoonPay, so you can use your credit card, debit card, bank, and it can be up and running in a minute.Start small.$10, $50, $100.It's not about the amount.It's about taking that first step and getting familiar while it's still early.

Once you're set up, you can even support your favorite Rumble creators like me directly.Scan the QR code on screen or click the link in the description and download Rumble Wallet.From there, you can set up your wallet, tap buy, and you are in the game.You can go from hearing about crypto to actually owning some.