MAGA World FALLS APART Over Trump’s “Natalie” Scandal

It is a very strong rock.As you know, a plant has a life like a human being has a life.It is rich, as you know, with many good ingredients in that plant soil.If you are a plant, you will be very happy.

But for many years, there were no barriers, you forget, because it is very precious.Barriers, you forget, are made of plastic or cloth.Are you in any of those places around the White House, as if you were in the neighboring hotel?Yes, all of that.But I bought some shares yesterday.I decided to look for another Scots Mirren company.

They had seeds for birds, and they put RFK Jr. eggs on them, which is likely to happen.There was a post on the insect website saying that Mr. Deathnan was very fond of fish, birds, and other wildlife, and their response was, slowly, it doesn't matter.Miracle, please subscribe.It's free.Just click on the button there.Subscribe to Bootsafe America, and it will provide you with more Bootsafe America content, which is great in algorithmics, where we try to provide a balanced weight for all that right -wing media.

I must say, as you know, 70 years ago, on the 2nd day, he said, and I quote, we are conducting positive and very effective talks.Then he said that diplomacy, and I quote, may be stronger than any time in the past.Strong, robust, is one of those words that is simply the worst.Then on the 3rd day, Tehran published, and I quote, there are no talks or conversations with Iran.So I didn't understand, was he arguing with a journalist?Was Gared lying?

It's hard to say.Was Gared just releasing the point of the conversation?And you saw today that the Gulf countries export 9 .2 million barrels of oil daily.So things are great.Things are great.We are only achieving our success.

Wow.So, there are other news.This is the 4th day of the most denial, contempt, and hatred of women.John Ossoff, who has no basis in the fact that the president likes to quote, travel with Natalie.That's all.Here is an example of what the candidate for the White House spokesman's position, Scott Jennings, is doing from a nervous breakdown.

He is ready to say that in a planned meeting, but he is not ready.It's Please listen to what you're going to say.

We all respected you when you had the platform.I thought we were going to get it.Get your hand away from my face again.These programs are very stereotypical.It's like a fool says something stupid, and someone attacks him, and the host makes fun of him for not sticking to the script in the studio.The fool interrupts everyone to make sure that he is not forced to respond in a way that exceeds the point of his angry speech.

Listen.I can't shave a small beard and this is a shortcoming of mine.This is a burden for me to bear.But if it looked like this, I would have shaved it anyway.I don't love, I can't look at that.I don't believe.

I mean, he's trying to get the job of the speaker in the name of the White House with this behavior.Despite the name of this position, I must say.You have to be more calm and stable than Scoot Jennings.Scoot Jennings is more emotional than necessary.He is very emotional to be speaking in the name of the White House.Carolyn Leavitt, you can say a lot about her, lies and things of this tribe, but she is stable to react in some way.

What is this?Of course, yes.It seemed as if she was talking exclusively to the beta and Xanax.Isn't that so?Nothing can affect her.Yes.

Scoot is very stupid.Yes.He is a small, very complaining donkey.Faker.Yes, the police force is widespread in this matter.It is a very ridiculous matter.

Listen, it is clear that John Ossoff took a very smart step here, as he sparked a debate about Donald Trump's strange relationship with this 35 -year -old woman, whom his team called the human nature.It is very important to Trump to the extent that it climbed the top of the secret plane, while his team used it as a human shield.shield on the reconnaissance plane, just like Hamas does.Therefore, the New York Times published some of Natalie's letters to Trump.Can I read them to you in a dramatic way?Please go ahead.

Yes, it wasn't fast enough.I want things to always stay as they come, with all my heart, Natalie.Who among us did not write to his boss at work?I always want things to be as they come between us.My dear Robert Jebbs, I am very sorry because I forgot to eat and I forgot to sleep.This is an unhealthy relationship at all.

Apologize for forgetting to sleep and eat because your boss at work bothers you a lot.With all my heart, Natalie.The issue and what is in it is as follows.The secret service has caused fears about the messages that you left for Donald Trump.So yes, John Ossoff says that he wants to travel with Natalie and build his own dance hall.Again, this is all John Ossoff said.

Then everyone immediately jumped to the conclusion that there is a sexual relationship or something of this kind.And I think that John Ossoff was kind of merciful in dealing with the matter with his mother, because the idea that she sends him these messages about her constant desire for things to be as they are, and that she cares about him more than anything else.Yes, I think Trump's words indicated that she is the only one who loves him as much as his family loves him.Everyone will leave us and leave him, while she will stay there.Again, this is not a healthy relationship between a president and an employee.She is a 35 -year -old woman with no government experience, literally chasing a car of his own, and the positive news is printed for him, and it seems that she is the one who gave him the video clip that shows Obama's family as a dog.

Yes, and she helped him in sharing that acceptance.Okay, what if one of John Ossoff's employees wrote him a message saying, you are everything to me and I always want to help you?to be on what is discussed between us, and it worried his security.Yes, I think it will be very fair for the Republicans to say something about that.And again, remember that there is no need to present a list of all the times that Donald Trump was in it, a terrible and mocking person, but the situation of attack and beating on his head with a hammer.Trump came out to show off and spread the conspiracy theory that the matter was a joke or that he was in love with him, Isn't that so?

I mean, he is the worst person in the world, a burden to all of these people.There is clearly a coordinated effort.It seems that the White House has these Discord communities or other social networks, where they send their foreign forces and their followers as a point of conversation to fight any attack and support Trump.I have set up that social network on this subject.which suggests to me that this is a matter that really annoyed Trump personally.

foreign foreign Author of the person suitable for you on The Precruiter

I'm more reluctant to react to this because of this hysteria.And it's more like, as you know, silence trying to say it's not fake.Either it's fake and you're all lying, or it's not fake and you have no idea what happened in the past ten years.Or maybe you don't really listen to what John Ossoff said, or you explain the matter more than you try to point out.I mean, what do you mean?Yes, I mean, what do you mean?

As Andrew Gillum said, the beaten dog barks, so for me This response suggests that there may be a fire where there was smoke.In fact, I think it's great that they are exaggerating in responding like this.I think it's great that Stephen Cheung and the White House's quick response account share John Ossoff's statements.They are doing Ossoff's work on his behalf.They convey this message in a way that does not happen often.We used to laugh, you and I, about the existence of this kind of conspiracy in the media and the political media, that John Ossoff has optimized the economy of clips and communication.

And this is true in the sense that he is doing a very effective job of taking an election speech and editing a few lines that deserve to be published, and making them cut and share on social media.In Obama's days, we used to call that the speech button.It was something that you do in every activity.I think this shows how much the party is retreating, and that this is a completely fair matter.The basics of communication are correct, such as this is the essence of my speech that I hope people will catch.I will guarantee the message in it, but I will put something that draws attention to reach the message.

Then people talk about it.This is how politics works.A word, a news, 75 % of it means new.So say something new about something that is relevant and interesting every day, and the media will cover it.Well, I know I saw some people say, well, he paid attention to the rest of his message.And the response is, no, he didn't.

He drew attention.He drew attention to the message.If you weren't there, no one would cover that message.Yes, our friend and former colleague David Axelrod did some kind of destruction as a policeman for literature about change.It's like, Axelrod, I'm sorry, you're completely wrong here.You may not like the suggestion that Usuf did not submit, and the one I submitted, frankly, isn't it?

That he may have some kind of relationship or something of this tribe with Natalie Harp.But it is completely certain that through the confirmation of the line related to traveling with Natalie, Usuf gained the attention of these comments more than a hundred times than what would happen to him otherwise.Good.Yes, I found it strange that he took the opposite side, because I thought that Ossoff's way was much more outrageous than what some opposing liberals might do.Look, I think when Ghaffin was fasting in the state of anger last year, and his account was, I thought they were much more harsh.Ghaffin was going out and saying that we are selling prostitutes to Trump, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly.

What is this?Right.Yes, exactly.There was a moderate way to resist doing that.which is what Ossoff did not do.In fact, I think he did it in a subtle and somewhat accurate way that everyone understood.

The question was raised and drew attention, but the exaggerated response to it was crazy.Yes, it was not exactly accurate, but it was accurate enough to think that it was completely appropriate.By the way, by Trump's standards, give me a break.I know, I know, I know.Well, there is one person who speaks logically in this matter, and he always speaks logically on issues like this.In such a dispute, let's listen to the frank person, G .

C.

Waters.No.Did Trump say things that are much more offensive to other people?Yes.Did you defend those things?Of course.

Therefore, I will not appear to be very annoyed by this matter.And the president does not even care.He says, what?

who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who because I think that at the end of the day, he just wants to be, as you know, the owner of a student's joke, a joke, and to enjoy his comments.He also wants everyone to realize that he is a participant in the game.Isn't that so?He acts as if he says, I realize that everything we do here is nonsense, and I'm just enjoying it.Now, whether that was intended or not, G .C.

Watters gave the best media and communication advice on this matter.which is the same instinct of Donald Trump that appeared when he was asked in the White House, where he talked about the party hall and other things, and there was no anger at all.G .C.was not angry at all, if everyone on the right simply ignored the matter and said, first, Trump does not care, we do not care, when no one was talking about the matter.Yes, the only thing that G .

C.was mistaken about was that Trump did not really ignore the matter.He seemed upset about some things because of him.He was upset, but he did not come out of his seat immediately, but he acted on the messengers later.And it seemed as if it affected him mentally.I must say that John Ossoff described B .

W .Herman as a very trivial matter.The play B .W.was performed and the film B .W.

was released in 1988.I mean, how many people do you think know who the hell is B .W.Herman these days?You know, and Maggie Haberman, I've talked about him a lot, but all his signals are related to the 80s.That's all.

He's still living in the 80s.He doesn't have any signs of popular culture beyond that.I'm sorry, but B .W.played from 1986 to 1990.Also, John Ossoff is not like B .

W.Herman.He is a very active young man in his election speeches, so you can try.I think he might need to go back to the zero point on the title, sir.Finally, there was a debate in South Carolina last night between Darlene Graham and Ralph Norman before the next week's re -election.The winner will face Democrat Annie Andrews to take the seat of the late Lindsey Graham in the House of Representatives.

Darlene is Lindsey's sister and supports Trump, who will hold an election campaign for her in South Carolina on Friday.Let's see how it went.

Excuse me, can you repeat the question?Are Taiwan and the South China Sea national security issues for the United States?And if so, why or how?I'll be honest with you.I am not much informed about the issues of national security, so I support the army.My brother was in the Air Force for 33 years, so I will do my best to support the army.

National security is not my field, it is not my field of experience, but I support the army.

This is not a difficult question to this extent.Yes, you can only say, yes, we support Taiwan and say anything and anything about the threat of China, and you can go ahead.Say, I don't know what I'm talking about, but you voted for me, it's hard for me to accept it.I was going to say, here's something else that she could have tried there.In the same context, she could have said, I learned what?I didn't do much of this, but I'm going to study these issues.

I will know everything about the national security and the South China Sea as soon as I reach the parliament." She could have been honest about her ignorance, without highlighting her problems to the extent that she said three separate times, National security is not my field, and it's like a gift to your opponent.Yes, and I think in fact there is a copy of what she said.to be He was one of the most ardent advocates of war in the history of the US House of Representatives.Perhaps this is something people want to overcome.But yes, I mean, it seemed as if he was a complete idiot.

I'm sorry to say that.I'm sure he's a nice guy.I found myself enjoying that, but at the same time I said, oh, I hope it doesn't hurt her that much.Because in reality, I think the seat is more of a competition than people think if she wins the presidential elections.You remember that D .C.

Graham did not survive his presidential elections because he had Donald Trump and became extremely supportive of him.But under that, there were people who still believe that he is not conservative enough for the Republic of South Carolina.Look.Abraham has always faced difficult preliminary elections.He always found a way to escape by acting crazy about immigration or anything else in the last six months.Is there any risk of losing it in the general elections?

I doubt that in South Carolina.I agree with you on that.It is a bad candidate to sit in the Senate and present it as a gift to one of the relatives.This is something that many people will not accept.This is what I think.I think that if you add up Trump's support rates, which is still good in South Carolina, but it's not as good as it used to be.

People are buying from Iran there, just like anywhere else, and the prices are just like anywhere else.And now you have a candidate who people feel is forced on them, and it doesn't seem like they know anything.I mean, the little opinions before the death of Lindsey Graham were showing great similarities between her and Annie Andrews.Now those are just opinions, so who knows for sure?But I don't think that if she wins, it will be interesting for attention.Yes.

It may be interesting for my interest.I just don't believe in the victory of the Democrats in that seat in the end.But we will discover that.I mean, look, everything is strange at the moment.We have candidates who are more moderate than the institution, they appear to be non -democratic.win the presidential elections on the democratic side.

Last night in Florida, under Vindeman, despite Vindeman's collection, it is close to 19 million dollars compared to a million dollars.Therefore, things are upside down, and no one knows anything at the moment.Well, we'll find out.In that case, I feel more confident in saying that I am not sure that Florida is a difficult state for us.I am not sure that we will win, as they have transferred it from a Republican to a Republican.to a guaranteed republic after the victory of Angie Nixon.

Look, I think we talked about it, and it is basically the first candidate at the state level of this movement ever.Yes, but it doesn't look like that.I've seen some of the videos I made about it, and it doesn't just look like it.It says, I don't support withdrawing funds from the police, and all that.It's like a contest.So this is good for her.

If she fell in love with Alexandra Vindman in a state, I don't know, any other popular state other than Florida, or North Carolina even, or Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, I was going to say, well, maybe.But Florida, I think only.Florida, there are many demographic changes that have happened for the benefit of the Republicans.There are many groups, whether they are Cubans or other Latin groups, that have withdrawn from the Democratic Party for various reasons.Socialism is a thought.I have heard someone say that this may be a blessing for us, because we used to spend a lot of money in Florida, which is not serious at all, and we can save that money.

So I said, Yes, this is not bad.