Mark Carney Fails to Form a Coherent Sentence After Admitting He Lied

I raise, I raise issues, messages is clear.

billions, it's owned by the Americans.New report says U .S.big tech controls 85 % of Canada's cloud market.So when Ottawa spends billions on A .I.

, are we building sovereignty or just feeding foreign monopolies?Convenient too, Mark Carney is 91 % invested in America, isn't it?We've got Donald Trump coming out with this tweet today.tax will immediately be met with a 100 % tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America.This tariff will supersede trade deals made with the country, whether implemented, signed or not.Additionally, the 100 % tariff will be immediately imposed if they proceed.

Thank you for this attention.So yeah, he's not having it with his DST.I mean, just dealt with this with Canada.Meanwhile, in Canada, what are we seeing on the CBC?There's all this talk of recession.Most Canadians agree we're in a recession because, well, things are so hard.

Cost of living is through the And who do they bring on here?I'm looking at your latest economic outlook and right there on the first page, rumors of recession in Canada are exaggerated.

What makes you so certain it's not a recession?

When we look at what a recession typically is, it is down.

turn in terms of economic activity and it's usually pretty broadly based which at this particular

time, it is not.a labor market that is un again, not really seeing The downturn is is it across all areas of the It's two quarters of negative GDP is a recession.

That is exactly where we are.And it's three of the last four.They can bring on Don Desjardins here to say all they want to try to bamboozle liberal voters once again.But the average Canadian knows we're in a recession.And speaking of bamboozled, we have this one from CP24.Ontario senior loses nine hundred thousand dollars to crypto platform scam that used a deep fake of PM Carney.

This is unreal.She got bamboozled by I saw an ad on Facebook of Mark Carney telling me took out all the value against her condo.So I agreed to put a mortgage of 300 ,000 on my condominium in a fake investment account.It appeared her money had doubled.I mean, this is so ridiculous.Like, come on, crypto scam.

This is so bad.If she really wanted to test this, she should take her $350 out of this account.And if it tripled, there should be a thousand bucks that's in her bank account.And then she could try that $5 ,000.And if it triples and she gets 15 ,000 in her bank account, you don't just go all in, especially the crypto scam.This is ridiculous.

I feel bad for her.but this is what happens when you don't do any research.You just trust some random crypto scam and you trust a guy like Mark Carney without doing any research.This is the kind of people that vote for him.Now speaking of Mark Carney, he's doing this press conference in front of 24 Sussex trying to crowdfund torebuild it because this is his priority.

It's not helping Canadians sleeping in tents in the middle of Toronto, Regina, Montreal, Pica City.He gets caught out lying in his previous press conference based on the answer he gives here.This press conference where he was asked about Kuzma and the renegotiations and he said that he didn't bring it up.I've got this queued up just before that question is asked.It's a follow up because he gets asked about Pete Hoekstra and I showed you that in the previous video where he He is very uncomfortable.He freezes.

He kind of panics.He doesn't know what to say because it seemed clear he didn't know that Pete Hoekstra let the cat out of the bag, that they're not close to a deal.Now, Mexicans also have let it be known that they're not even at the negotiating table.I want to point out a bunch of his body language here.So after he gets asked about the Pete Hoekstra question, and this is towards the end of it, you can see his hands here and he's really picking at it.There's a lot of nervous tension and energy that goes into the next question where he lies.

So both things can be true.

The ambassador also said he believed that the next steps would really be at the president and prime ministerial level.I'm wondering if you agree with that.And also, I mean, you spoke a lot about your call being about the Middle East.How much did Kuzma play a role in your call?

We we didn't discuss we didn't discuss Kuzma yesterday.

We didn't discuss Kuzma.And I brought this up every time he does this.He seems to lie.As I said in my previous video, it's a common denominator among many of the times he lies.

Yeah, I look.Ultimately, the a I don't know what how deep to go with this lie.

That's what he's thinking here.How deep do I go with this lie?Because he knows he just lied to the public or inversely as the next clip I show you is when he lies to the public.

We don't really know but one of these is a lie breakthrough if you will on this will will be at that level.We operate a little differently.We were very team oriented.here.

And so this is where he just tried to goes and blames everyone else for him not getting a deal.I think this is the lie.I think he brought up Kuzma and Trump said, well, the deal's been on the table since October.You guys want to do X, Y and Z, whatever it is that that he doesn't want to do, which obviously probably hurts his shares in Brookfield or his agenda going forward with Brookfield.There's something there that Trump wants that he doesn't want to do.And so thus he's saying, oh, I didn't bring up Kuzma.

He thought it was easier for him to not talk about it, but he doesn't seem to realize or care that Canadians have lost their jobs and can't afford to live.Now, I think he does want to deal with America, but only if it helps or at least doesn't hurt his net zero agenda.Otherwise, he doesn't want the deal.And clearly there's something in there that hurts his agenda that Trump wants.Now, jumping to today.

The message is clear.

I raise issues, messages is clear.That's not real English, Mark Carney.That's not a real sentence.So he knows he's stuck.He doesn't know how to answer this question.His brain is going multiple directions.

And that's why he just gave an incoherent answer that sounds like he's drunk.

But thank you for your question.I raise this, I raise Kuzma with the president.I have multiple, excuse me, multiple interactions with the president.The discussion I had with the President, which he initiated two days ago, was with the security, included the security and military, senior military personnel of the U .S.It was a very specific discussion around security issues, and then geo -strategic issues that related to those security issues.

There's a time and a place for that discussion.We are in active discussions about that.the U .S.S.Minister LeBlanc.

We all know that means nothing.Minister LeBlanc is not talking, not trying to make a deal.The Mexicans already called him out.The cat's out of the bag.These guys are not trying to get a deal for us.Canadians got bamboozled.

We'll be meeting in a tripartite meeting on July 1st with Ambassador Greer and Secretary Ebrard of Mexico, and those discussions continue.I will be seeing the President in NATO in a few weeks.So, look, we are fighting for those industries, but the other core message, apart from the direct support that we're giving to the industry, helping them to reposition for any eventuality, is that what we're not going to do is to accept a deal that damages those industries.

It's being damaged right now though.I mean, look at the tool and die industry.It's like on life support.And if we can't make our own machines that make machines, then what are we?Not to mention the forestry industry, the auto industry, everything is on critical life support right now because of this guy and his desire to enrich himself and his Brookfield shares versus doing what's right for Canadians.Like this is just so deplorable what's happening.

There are bad deals that have been on the table for those industries for months and we're fighting for those industries not accepting what comes in.

Last question.You're not though, you're not fighting for anything.So I think this is the truthful answer.I think he got called out, he got caught and then he just said, oh, well, yeah, I brought it up.There's going back and looking at his body language here.When he gets asked this question, he doesn't really move anywhere from the podium.

He doesn't look for the mouse under the podium.He doesn't back away.He doesn't lean to the side or any sort of asymmetrical kind of body language.

Why you didn't raise Kuzma with the president when you spoke to him and when you planned to?

I really don't know.issues around messages is clear but thank you for your question I raised this I raised Kuzma with the president I have multiple, excuse me, multiple interactions with the president.

So his body language when he said that there, I raise this with the president.I think that's true.I think he did raise it.I think Donald Trump told him the same thing he's probably been telling him for a long time.Hey, Mark, let's get a deal.You guys need to ease up on supply management or whatever it is, and we'll get this deal done.

Now, looking back at this one, you can see his body language is asymmetrical.Typically, when you have body postures like when you go to hug someone and you're happy to see them when they come out of the gates at an airport, you open your arms up and you give them a hug.You don't do this.You don't do some asymmetrical kind of hug.Our bodies are symmetrical.Our eyes, our nose, our mouth, our ears.

We have symmetrical bodies.That's how we're built.When someone is more symmetrical, if you put a mirror on your face or if you take a picture and then flip your face over, you can see we're not perfectly symmetrical.But people who are more symmetrical are just more beautiful in society.And thus our body language, our postures, like giving a hug at the airport, confident poses, hands on hips, even hand on your chin like this if you're thinking This is still a symmetrical kind of gesture.At least that's how we perceive it in our own mind, even though it's not technically symmetrical.

Any sort of confident body language typically is more symmetrical.Now, more asymmetrical body language comes from someone who's lying, someone who's unsure of themselves, someone who's got their shoulders shrugged down to the right here.This one's up.You can see he's picking his hand, head slightly tilted.He's looking down here.And look what happens with this question here.

Being about the Middle East, how much did Kuzma play a role in your call?

discuss uh we didn't discuss kuzma so he immediately leans over here now he's touching his face here he's tilting his head to the left uh yesterday uh now this isn't a foolproof way to analyze people but generally people don't tilt their head to the side like this unless they feel really uncomfortable because naturallywe want to stay symmetrical.That's just how we are.We have two arms, we have two legs.And if you look at, for example, say a creature, a monster, they are asymmetrical.Usually there's one big arm, there's three eyes, the jaws, the weird shape or whatever it may be.

It's just naturally how our body tries to be is symmetrical.And when we're happy, our postures reflect that as well.

We'll be at that level.

So you can see here, now what's he doing?He's backing away.He sat there for a long time.And now he wants to get away because he realized he lied to the camera.He doesn't know what to say.So I think he did talk to Trump about it.

I think Trump told him, OK, let's open up supply management or whatever it is, something you guys got to drop your draconian stuff.You got to stop having such close ties with China.And he's like, well, we're not going to do that.And then I'll just tell the cameras I didn't bring it up.That's what I think happened here.Something some part of the deal he doesn't want to do that's beneficial to him is blowing up the whole deal because his body language is telling me right here.

little differently.

We were he moved himself at least like half a foot away from the microphone.He doesn't like this engagement with the reporter, as opposed to this one.He doesn't move from the microphone.He's not moving around at all.

I raised I raised issues around messages is clear.

This incoherent answer here is just him getting caught out on it.And then he actually tells the truth.Here's what I think.

But thank you for your question.I raised this.I raised Kuzma with the president.I have multiple, excuse me, multiple interactions with the president.

So you can see his body language didn't move away from the microphone.And also his hands here are moving in tandem, symmetrical.

I have multiple, excuse me, multiple interactions with the president.

Now, the real question is here is what is it that he won't negotiate with Trump that Trump wants?Is it the connection to China?The EVs?Is it liberals deeper connection with China?Xi Jinping campaigning for Carney to win the election?Is it something on critical mineral supply management?

We don't know.Now, clearly, there's some funny game being played here where.the Mexicans blew it up that LeBlanc wasn't even at the negotiating table.So they're not really trying to get the deal.I don't know if they're just waiting out Trump and watching his polling numbers and hope it just gets lower and lower to Trump has to make a deal with us and then he's weaker.Thus, they can get a better deal and then say, look, we held out and got the great deal against the evil Donald Trump.

Maybe that's what he's trying to do here.And that way, he doesn't have to give up his China concessions or supply management concessions.This strategy, though, is sacrificing major industries and thousands of jobs in Canada.And we have more than enough leverage, we could have got a deal last year.But clearly he's holding on to something that's important to him.I think it's the connection to China or something like that.

There's some other promise or maybe there's something directly related to Brookfield.Carney's dragging this out as far as he can, but he can't not get a deal forever.Otherwise, he'll be just the guy who said he could get a deal and couldn't get a deal.So he has to get one eventually.Otherwise, Canadians will revolt.And I think we're getting close to that point.

The question is, how long does he drag this out, hoping that Trump midterms hurts him to get a better deal?I mean, there's a lot of stuff going on here.This is a very incoherent and and corrupt government.Now jumping over to CTV, we got Tom Mulcair with an awful take.So Polyaiv was asked about 24 Sussex and rebuilding, and he says, I'm not thinking about that.I'm thinking about Canadians.

And that is the right response.Like this is not a focus whatsoever.Why would any effort be spent on 24 Sussex right now when we have a catastrophe that's happening across Canada, where Canadians are sleeping in tents, lots of Canadians in tents.And this is what Tom Mulcair, Moneybags Tom Mulcair has to say.

I have to say, I was a bit shocked today to hear Pierre Poitieff mumble his disapproval because there are other problems in the country.Of course, there will always be other problems to point to.But the same Pierre Poitieff lives where I used to live when I was the leader of the opposition.He lives at Stornoway with its dozens of rooms.And it is completely free for Mr. Poitieff and his family.And they're well taken care of in there.

And he's complaining that they're going to fix up the prime minister's residence.I don't think that adds up.

And I think it does add up because people are sleeping in tents, Tom.And this isn't about the official opposition residents, which has been there for, as he mentioned, for himself.He's almost implying that Carney doesn't have an official residence.He lives in Rideau Cottage or his house close to Rideau Cottage.And Rideau Cottage, where Trudeau lived, is a beautiful place with dozens of rooms on beautiful manicured gardens.It's no slouch of a place to live.

And here's the inside of Rideau Cottage from the Trudeau days.So you can see it's, I think it's got 22 rooms in this house.Carney also gets to use this cottage here at Harrington Lake and the day Justin Trudeau resigned.What a great day.

We've got to give a good accounting here on both sides and say fairly that all Canadians want a proper residence for our prime minister and getting that in Getting that going and getting that in place by next year is going to be a great thing for all of us.

I think Canadians want a place for themselves to live, seeing how they pay taxes and live in tents, a lot of people.And if they're not, then they're on their way there.Credit cards are being maxed out.People are losing savings.Tom Mulcair with his big pension here doesn't seem to get it.

You're right.There's been a lot of criticism that the G7 nation doesn't have a residence for the Prime Minister to be living in, at least at this point.

So I think that point is well taken.What's embarrassing is that our own government is not doing what's best for its own people.And to finish off this episode on a lighter note, we've got Drea Humphrey here from Rebel News showing in Salmon Arm, BC, they have a veterans crosswalk.This is what we should be doing.No rainbow crosswalk.This is not distracting to Canadians.

There's a rainbow crosswalk in the city I live in.It's distracting when you turn left on it.I'm looking at all the colors and I'm trying to figure out if there's people there.It's distracting.This should be the only alternative to a traditional crosswalk.