MEGHAN’S MELTDOWN: Inside Her Plot To Steal Press From Prince George

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, it's the griftometer.Megan Markle, or Meganutt as I call her, has set it off again, because she wasn't getting any attention, was she, insiders?So what does she do?She drops 12 pictures on Instagram, you know, the social media platform that's so dangerous, because she wants attention.But these aren't any 12 pictures, they're 12 pictures of not her face, not the kids' faces, the back of her head, a trip to Portugal, and this just sums Meghan Markle up.This is a woman.

I truly believe her oxygen is press coverage.And what is very, very predictable is she decided to drop these images, and I'm going to explain exactly why she's done this, on a Thursday.Now she drops these images on a Thursday because the weekly magazines go to press on a Friday afternoon.So what's she managed to do?Push out all of the other coverage and dominate things again.But she's also released the images when everyone is celebrating Prince George's birthday.

and I spoke to Robert Jobson who is coming in shortly and oh watch out Megan because he has seen right through you.He said she's jealous, she simply cannot bear that the royal family are getting attention.Now, there's also an image, okay, of Harry, Archie, Lily walking in Allsorp, and they've got flowers.We, I think, can presume they're walking towards where Princess Diana is buried.Again, it's the hypocrisy.Harry and Meghan say they want privacy, but they're never ones to knowingly miss out, are they?

on a little press angle?If this is such a private moment, don't put it on Instagram.Don't forget, Megan marched over to Geneva in her black suit, pretending she was Angelina Jolie, and she wanted everyone to know how bad social media is.Well, if social media is that dangerous, Meghan Markle, why have you put a picture of your daughter in a swimming costume being thrown into the air by Prince Harry?Why have you put that on to your Instagram in a world full of predators?And this is where we come back to the point, everything Harry and Meghan are pushing when it comes to censorship is is a hoax, I believe.

Because if you're truly worried about your child's safety, about children's safety as a whole, you're not just worried about social media algorithms.No, you're worried about the kind of content you are actively putting out into the public domain.She is the deluded Duchess.Let's hear, okay, from Robert Jobson, who has been and is part of the royal rota but he's been part of royal circles for over 30 years he's dubbed the godfather of royal reporting and megan i'm afraid we see through you and so do independent journalists.Although sadly we are seeing the mainstream media, they've totally forgotten about everything Harry and Meghan have done.They've forgotten about the fact that Meghan has had bullying accusations follow her for years.

They have neglected when reporting on these images to actually discuss anything that we want to know.Now I asked Robert Jobson about the alleged trip to the UK.from Meghan and the children.Robert is adamant that this visit happened.You know I loveto respectfully disagree with people, and I did push back on this.

Because for too long, insiders, I feel that we're given a script, aren't we, from the mainstream media.Yes, that it happened because Buckingham Palace said it happened.Hang on, I don't trust Buckingham Palace.I'll take that out of the pot before I come up with, you know, a conclusion that's evidence -based.I still believe we are yet to see time -stamped images.Harry and Meghan, you know, maybe they did go and meet the King.

Robert Jobson is adamant that they did.But Harry and Meghan are proven liars.We've seen that in the High Court and various other pieces of evidence.And the Palace have played us for decades.So take a look at this and I would love to hear your thoughts.Do you think this meeting happened?

Are you sceptical that the meeting happened?Or perhaps you're like me, you're absolutely fed up of being spun a web of PR lies.And what does that mean?This means we have to question everything.Robert Jobson, last night, Meghan Markle released some pictures, of course she did, of their summer.And she just can't help herself, can she?

Anything to get attention?

It wasn't really a surprise, was it?But the only thing is, of course, they demand their primpancy.And the next thing you know, you've got pictures of the backs of their children's heads, of Harry in the distance carrying a bouquet of flowers.We presume it's all thought, but we presume it's to go on to the island where Diana is buried.And I can't really think of anything more private and personal than that.Yet she decides to post a picture of that.

You've got little Archie in a cockpit with his pilot's hat on and surrounded by pilots and navigators, etc.Sort of just comes after George asdone similar things.Also, George's 13th birthday picture has been announced.It's almost, isn't it, that she can't cope with other people getting publicity.And also, it all coincided with a big stage -managed event which, you know, like it, although the King had organised a slightly odd coming out of a TARDIS at the Commonwealth Games opening in Glasgow, but that obviously was going to take what the royal family thought would be a nice set of pictures.

pretty much blown out the water by Meghan's series of private photographs that she released.

And what I thought was particularly interesting in these images is Meghan in a swimsuit, but also she's put Lily in a pool in a swimsuit.This is the woman that has preached to everyone around the world about the dangers of social media.And we all know that putting a child in a swimsuit on the world stage.I find that absolutely disgraceful that the woman who is preaching to us to tell us how to raise our children is behaving in that way.But do you even buy this censorship stuff her and Harry are pushing?

Well, I mean, you know, I think any parent would be wary about putting the pictures of their kids, young kids and so on, on the Internet, given the predators and evil people that are out there.But I think it was a bit of a surprise for them to do that.You know, on the one hand, you're showing just the backs of heads to try and protect their privacy.Whatever way you look at it, I suppose it is something.I would say on my subset, it is like a witness protection scheme.All you have ever got is photographs of the back of these kids' heads.

But fine, if that is what you are going to do.But then don't have photographs of them in a swimsuit, and yourself in a swimsuit, when you are always going on aboutthe dangers of social media.So it's, you know, like everything to do with the Sussexes, it's sort of rank hypocrisy, really.

What I thought also was interesting is she dropped the images on a Thursday.Now we know that the magazines go to press on a Friday, don't they?So again, it's another calculated move to try and get blanket magazine coverage.

Well, they were never going to really use this whole trip to Portugal and then on to the UK.It was always going to be used as a brand boosting.She knows the value of being close to the royal family.She knows the value of photographs of her kids, Prince and Princess Archie and Lilibet.And even if you're not showing a lot of them, just the backs of their heads, it's going to get awareness in the legacy media.It's going to get awareness online.

And she's fully aware of the way that all works and it generates clicks and that's really what you know Meghan is all about is generating the clicks.

I've got to say everything when it comes to the royal family at the moment is making me very very concerned for Prince William because I don't even know if there's going to be a crown left when it comes to Prince William.

Well I think there will be and I think that William has probably dealt with it quite well actually.I think what instead of people talking about going on different paths I think William and Catherine, if you saw Wimbledon and the way that it was all, they're almost on a different level.They're completely away from it.The best way they're dealing with the whole Harry Circus and even the mistakes that have been made possibly by the King.I think they're trying to just completely be separate from it in every way.At the moment, I think that's working.

A father can do what he likes when it comes to a son and his grandkids and I think the king is making decisions being affected by it, probably.you know, probably the fact that he knows he's living with cancer and he has a finite time on this planet.He probably doesn't want to have it.He doesn't want confrontation.But, you know, the bottom line is a lot of things that are going on at the moment are different to what the late Queen Elizabeth had in mind.ruled on and she ruled on it very clearly at the Sandringham Summit, you can't be in half in and half out.

The reason she ruled on it in that way I think basically is because she knew of the art of survival she saw after the abdication crisis when she was just 10 in 1936.She knew from what everything she saw, everything that her mother and father taught her everything that she saw in her long 70 -year reign, that you can't monetize it in that way.You can't be half in and half out.You're either committed or you're not.And that is something that I think that she was right about.That seems to be being worn down at the moment.

And I think it's a genuine error.But the one thing that is clear, and I think by keeping separate, with William keeping separate, keeping all the different trajectory, really, is that when he is king, there'll be none of this for Harry and Meghan.There'll be no way back into the fold.And I think, really, in all honesty, this has probably got a lot to do with money, where there's a will, there's a family member.And I'm sure that this is all to do with what's going to be happening.I'm not saying His Majesty is any further down the line.

We wish him well.I wish him well.But the reality is, you know, when you're living with cancer, you have a finite time.And I'm sure that Meghan and Harry are fully aware of that and will be conscious of that and conscious of the fact that there's no rift being healed between him and his brother, no matter what Harry says.And I think he certainly is trying to make overduels to woo his brother back.I just don't see it happening.

I want to touch uponthe trip that Harry and Meghan allegedly did to see the King at Highgrove.

They definitely did, Lauren.I mean, there's a lot of nonsense about this.They definitely went to Highgrove.I have no doubt about it whatsoever.I've been doing this for 35 years, 37 years.I broke the story that Charles was to marry Camilla before anybody knew about it in one scooping year.

I've sourced it now with three different independent sources.I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that that meeting happened.I think what's going on online is Utterly stupid, to be honest.Based upon what?Based upon people thinking they know.I actually do know from the people I've spoken to.

I wasn't there, but I do know from the people that I've spoken to.100 % very cast -iron sources that this meeting happened.I have no doubt about it whatsoever.Now you can take my word for it and people can take my word, but I'm not doing just my word.I've independently sourced it with three different sources and they are impeccable sources.Well, believe it if you're not, but the meeting happened and I think it's probably time to stop this ridiculous speculation.

So with the meeting, what kind of, how many people would have had to have known about this meeting?

I don't know what went on in the meeting.And nor does anybody.That's the whole point.In other meetings I've had the information leaked out.On this meeting, the way that it was arranged, the people that were there, there's been no leak on it and that's the whole point really because they've been very aware that if it leaked from either side and we await leaks we await i mean i think the stuff that was said to have leaked in the people was a little bit of a push to say it was a leak about the meeting nothing about the detail of this meeting has been leaked because if it does i think that both of the sides know that that would be the last chance saloon and that's the most important thing really in this because the way it was staged it wasn't staged with a you know with a whole load of servants and courtiers.sitting in stands and notebooks trying to take note of what would happen.

It was staged in a way that they could actually do it so that they could have a conversation.From my conjecture, I doubt very, very much if anything was discussed other than the children and how they're doing.Because in an awkward situation where there's been when there's been issues in families, it's much easier to just talk about the two little kids that are running around causing trouble than issues that are clearly still not resolved.The fact that the Queen was there, I think personally, was to protect the King from from himself or from giving guarantees on things that he would not necessarily want to do.So that's the point, I think.The fact that Meghan was there and McQueen were there was important.

I think where the public, and I can only talk for everything I've read on my channel, but I think where people feel is that there's always a lack of transparency.So I think the way...

Well, it's a private meeting, a family meeting.You can't have a transparent private family meeting about meeting children.You can't.It's the way the story rolls out.I mean, it's just ridiculous because, you know, ultimately you're allowed, the king is allowed to have a private meeting with his grandchildren without it being plastered all over the newspapers.Of course he's allowed to do that.

Oh, and look, no one, I don't think anyone would.

Why should the transparency is clear?The palace announced it.The palace said that it has happened.At 6 .42, they said this meeting on the Friday, they said this meeting has happened.And that is it.

I don't see what the issue is.If I give you context, we had Katie Nicholls, who had given a story, Robert, and you know, I know it'sawkward because you work in mainstream but she said this was a cloak -and -dagger meeting no one knew apart from Harry, Meghan and the King.The King called Camilla and said get in the car Camilla, Camilla hopped in the car.

What I found so interesting was that it was ultimately the King who managed to pull off this 11th hour meeting, cloak and dagger, so I was told that no one knew about it apart from the King, Meghan and Harry.There was a call made from Highgrove because Camilla and the King spend their weekends often separately, which we'll talk about a little bit later on in the show, it's not as strange as it sounds, and the King called the Queen and said, This meeting is going to happen.They're on their way.She jumped into the car, didn't tell anyone.Her children didn't know.No one knew at all.

But the reality is that won't be the case.There would have to have been arrangements for staff to be at Highgrove, because Highgrove was pretty much mothballed at that stage, so there would have been a need for staff to get to Highgrove, and that takes time.There's no way that anything would have happened without the say -so of Sir Clive Alderton, the private secretary to the King.And of course, if it involved Camilla, it would have involved her private secretary.Other people that would have known about it would be the team, which is, I think, Leah Maguire, on Harry's side.So there is no way that there's been one quick phone call.

And let's not forget that there are also security implications, that Harry had his own team of security, and so would the King, who has protection with him 24 -7, and so does the Queen.So to say there was just a quick phone call between father and son, get yourself here, is frankly preposterous.It just won't happen.We're not living in the world ofordinary people.We're living in a world of billionaires and heads of state.

And if heads of state are having to involve their protection officers, you'd be damn sure that the security services would need to know about it, plus also the police of the area near Highgrove and Tetbury where the meeting took place.So to say it was a nobody knew, Sorry, I think that would be a bit silly.

And so this is where, when I said about the public, you know, want transparency, I think people are fed up of being force -fed utter rubbish.You know, Harry's staying in Buckingham Palace.Harry's not staying in Buckingham Palace.Harry was never going to stay in Buckingham Palace.And then the public hearing...

Well, they never said that.To be fair though, they said that it was offered and it was offered.And he didn't come back to them.It was offered.He never came back to them.And frankly, if he'd stayed at Buckingham Palace in the week I think they got away with one, a huge got away with it in a big way, because if they did offer it to him, which we believe they did because they said they did, and he didn't come back to them until it was too late.

In the week that he lost to the Daily Mail Associated Newspapers, so dramatically in a fight against the freedom of the press, and then he just claimed that there had been a judge who had whitewashed the case.It's not only attacking the press, which is hugely important, free press to this country, the country he doesn't live in, but the independence of the judiciary, which is pretty outrageous and would have been probably difficult for him if he had done it pre -2013 when the law changed.and also suing the independent government that is over his security.He left to do all this from Buckingham Palace, the headquarters of the monarchy, where of course the King had just announced they're not going to live there anymore despite 369 millionbeing spent on it in public money to refurbish it, would have been one of the worst optical sights ever.You've got this so -called Prince of England, as he calls himself.

I don't know what's happened to Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland and other realms.But this Prince of England, who's a stay -at -home dad as he describes himself, reigning against the three pillars of this of our society, a free press, an independent judiciary and an elected government.All things his father the king as sovereign is supposed to protect in his role as a constitutional monarch.All of those things from the head unit, from a guy that's just sleeping free at the headquarters of Buckingham Palace, that we the taxpayer have just paid nearly 400 million pounds to refurbish, would have been a disastrous look for them.I think that Sir Clive Alderton and all the courtiers, by Harry not replying in time, really got away with them.