Pauline's Press Club Address

Pauline Hanson just did a press junket.An hour.Crystallising her vision for Australia.It was mostly whinging.Philadelphia, Washington, Atlanta, Orlando, Dallas, Los Angeles.

Get your tickets at Friendly Geordie's.Links below.

Seriously though, we'll go through this, but it's what I've been saying for years now, which is that the crossbench are nothing but whingers.They have no vision for the future.They are completely a campaign tool, usually for billionaire interests, which is going to be abundantly clear in this.And that's what they do for a profession.And then you get them to come up and say, all right, well, what are your solutions then?And you get this, watch.

96, 30 years later, she's giving her first address at the National Press Club.It's fair to say she's packed it.

Can't you just change this man with anybody in Canberra Press?Like, what is the difference between him and the guy that hosts Insiders?

In a little bit during that time, though.if if Interestingly, you know why that was overturned.

It wasn't so much the fact that she was guilty, it's that the prosecution was going for a fraud sentencing.And to prove fraud, you have to prove malice, as in you intentionally defrauded the public.And really, the defense pretty much came down to this.look at her you've seen what Pauline Hanson has said in the past she's too dumb to pull off fraud and then they said yeah okay fine really that we should have just gone for like a civil dispute of um you know like like uh uh willful like uh what's the word again that's too early in the morning that what i just did then incompetence And 11 weeks after her release, she was on Dancing With The Stars.I don't know.I just did an early podcast with Charlie from Penguin Z .

O.So I'm really, really tired.You're going to have to bear with me on this.

She took her from political pariah to breakfast TV celebrity.Despite that fame between 1998 and 2015, there were eight failed attempts to win a seat in Queensland, New South Wales and federal parliaments, often just missed.

Oh, what an introduction.She's been to jail.She is a massive, massive failure.She's only been here once in 30 years because this is the only time she's ever been relevant.Again, it activates that Aussie in me.

Yeah, you tell them what's what, Pauline, this egghead doesn't know.In 2016 the drought was broken, Pauline Hanson was back, and with the balance of power in the Senate, the party's impact in the House at that stage was yet to be felt.1 .3 % of the national vote.It grew slowly.2019, 3 .1%.2022, 5%.

2025, 6 .4%.But today, a year after the last election, and every major opinion poll, one nation is in mid to high 20s and all by herself.

It's outperformed the coalition because of her rousing voice.

Oh, you will hear me roar on primary vote in the South Australian election and easily won the Farrah by election.Opinion polls and momentum suggest, albeit a long way out from the next election, she could in two years time either run the country or have a strong say in who does.So what would she change?how would she do it?For the record the club has also invited leaders of the Liberal and Greens parties to address the National Press Club and the Prime Minister of course and Leader of the Nationals have both addressed the club earlier this year.I remind our members the club will have a podcast of this address on our website later today.

Let's begin by welcoming Senator Pauline Hanson.

Thank you very much, Tom, and thank you very much for being here.Well, first of all, I've got to welcome my team, the One Nation team in Parliament, my colleagues, my cohorts, whatever.They're on this journey with me.So thank you very much for being here.

Look at how fucked they all look.You always forget, every single time I have a look at Barnaby, I always forget how much strain his cardiovascular system must be under.And just every time, there's always just this game.Is his face going to be bright red or purple?So, question for that, how is he not dead yet?Question for everybody else in there, collectively, how many crim charges do you reckon they have, 15?

Also, I'd like to welcome you, the ladies and gentlemen who've come here today, to be part of this and listen to my address.

It is really fucked, the regional Australia woman over 50 haircut, isn't it?It's like, it's like they looked at mullets in the 80s and thought, nope, not fucked enough, we're getting rid of the party part, it's all bish -nish.

at the National Press Club, but I am delighted that I can speak to the people of Australia, and they are the people to whom I am accountable.Just to get things out of the way too, I think this is important.

Holy fuck, she's bombing.

It's alright Pauline, take a glass of water, deep breath, take your time.

Oh man, I was joking about the bomb part.

No, she's actually trying to do a type 5.Oh man, maybe the National Press Club isn't the right place to try new material.You should have gone to an open mic first, Pauline.It's a tough crowd to begin with.Honestly, if you talk to any comedian, they'll always say the worst audience that you can ever have is a corporate audience.And journalists are a corporate audience with, on top of that, the idea that they're supposed to be like very scrutinising.

They've all got that sourpuss face and he's trying material on them first hand.Alright, yeah, I'm back to liking her again, she's a battler.

Well, in your question you're going to ask me, I just want to get that out of the way.

Yeah, okay, they're even trying, oh no, it's a sympathetic crowd too, they're trying to give her...It must have just been the Sky News crowd at the front.

A divisive welcome to country from me.Too right, Pauline!...belongs to Australians born here...Game strike!...and those who have come to join us.I would do...

I would like to acknowledge the men and women that have sacrificed their lives for our democracy, our freedom, for our country.

Everything's always just a culture war, isn't it?

I hate the export of American politics.It was so much better when there just really wasn't...Culture was not the purview of politics.It was all just boring facts and figures, but everything now...

either, we're a ninja land.I'm such a good person.

Or it's one of these, what about the vets?What about them, Pauline?You're going to cut their pensions?Yeah.

And also to those migrants, those people that have worked extremely hard, and those Australians born here with their blood, sweat, and tears to build this nation into the beautiful country that it is today.

Pauline's coming up with her own welcome to country on the fly.The beginning of this is just this weird creative mash of open nights.

You know what I mean?It's just slam poetry, it's cultural comedy, it's comedy.

Good introduction, Pauline, although much like Pauline's plane, a bit skittish on the landing.

My job may surprise you.I am elected to represent the concerns of the people of Queensland.I am also the leader of a political party.So I have a responsibility to the wider Australian electorate.My overriding concern and that of the people I talk to is that politicians today are good at talking but not listening.

What do you reckon Pauline Hanson's accent is?Queenslanders, can you help me out with this?It feels like she is an Ipswich Bogan that is a little bit conscious of that fact because she spent so much time in Canberra and so she tries to I don't know, like mask that by attempting the Queen's English.So it comes up with these kind of like...What do you reckon is going on there?

We will do anything to get your vote.But when that has been achieved, the voter is ignored.The public...

And we're tired of being ignored.It's got nothing to do with us being dumb and not knowing what we're talking about.They ignore us.

You know the thing is, I can imagine that being a politician in Australia you would be craving an intellectual discussion about water management.You would be.but it's just not here, is it?What you've got instead is people like Pauline.You know what I reckon we do, right?We just nuke the fuck out of the desert, and then wait for it to rain, and then we'll have a big fucking lake there, can't we?

I'm tired of being ignored.

So, what is happening...Yeah, tell you this, my inland sea idea must be heard, even though I got it from footyforums .com.Why am I being ignored?I am an intellect.

...recent times, when I have listened, I'll tell you what the issues are.Firstly, immigration and housing.

The classics.This is it.Really feels like I'm, you know, watching, I don't know, ACDC and they're just starting straight off strong with back in black, you know.

To the Housing Industry Association earlier this month, housing demand in Australia substantially outstrips housing supply.

I guess everyone knows that.

The HIA says the underlying problem we have is trying to fit 11 million households into 10 million homes.

That's why Labor has the target of trying to increase our house stock by about 1 .2 million.

Unsustainable demand has been driven by several...

He is fucked.Come on.

He's Gollum with hair.

But what is the pressure?Is it Pauline or is it just like, ah, that's the portfolio I want.Don't you reckon that everybody in One Nation, there's just something about their face that screams like you're a bit fucked in some way.Except Pauline.It's very similar.All right, in terms of the dynamic that it has, which what they're trying to set up is just mega junior here.

It's very much the same as what happens in the United States, where Donald Trump screams authenticity, even though he has that used car salesman feel about him, but he is authentic in that.And then everybody else around him is a freak.It's very much like this with Pauline, isn't it?And they're both redheads.What is it about fiery redheads and telling it like it is?

Factors.But the biggest is high immigration.

It's about time someone brings it up.

30 years and counted.

Give these numbers some perspective.In August 2000, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported Australia's population as a whole is projected to grow from the current size of 19 million to between 24 and 28 million over the next 50 years.It's only 2026 and we have already passed 28 million.

And whose fault is that?You have to ram this down every single One Nation voter's throat.John Howard doubled migration.Those were the estimates in 2000.John Howard doubled migration.There was no break.

In the entire decade that the coalition was in, Pauline Hanson used to be a liberal candidate, but she didn't have the chops for it because clearly she's not talented.She's an idiot, but she says what we're all thinking.And so she was able to rise up as a, you know, independent voice on the crossbench, which is what they all are.What the independents reflect is the narrowcast views of a section of society, and they put them on blast despite the fact that that section of society should not be represented.They really should not be represented.As you see with this,

because they don't know what they're talking about.And that was the whole beauty of parties like the Liberals, which is honestly becoming a thing of the past.When they say like the two major parties are going, they're not really, it's just One Nation's taking over that.But what is taking over it is, you know, people that actually know how to govern and have it as a profession with common sense.That's what's replacing it.But Pauline was, That's an entire crossbench.

I really wish, this is the only reform that I want in terms of transparency from the Labor government.Can you please force every independent to write out what they actually are?Replace the word independent with failed liberal.Every time.It is just a failed Liberal candidate that is pissed off and at that point realises the Majors have failed us.And this is exactly what she is.

And she has always preferenced the Liberal Party.That is the party of mass migration.We will go into the stats again because I do think that this is their Achilles heel.You have to keep pointing at them and saying you supported the party of mass migration the entire time because you got the vibe that John Howard didn't like migrants.while doubling it because you just look at their words and not their actions because you're dogs and you pick up on vibe.

At the time, the ABS did not consider net overseas migration exceeding 110 ,000 per year.At the time, it was pretty much unthinkable.Fast forward to today.Net overseas migration in the first three years under this Albanese Labor government has totaled 1 .7, 1 .27 million people.Let me repeat that, 1 .27 million people under this current government.

What they're bundling in there are students, what they're bundling in there is a bunch of other visas that are temporary and they go back.But on top of that, because look, this is what you need to understand about this.This is all IPA coverage.points.This is a think tank that is the opposite land version of the Australia Institute.And they do exactly the same thing, right?

Like the Australia Institute owned by Twiggy, the IPA owned by Gina Reinhardt.They are both WA mining magnate billionaires pushing their own agenda.What they do is pick out numbers like that.Don't explain that these visas are not permanent residency visas.And when it comes to permanent residency visas, yes, they are higher than 110 ,000.However, however, Labor introduced caps.

Labor introduced caps on student visas.Labor has tightened scrutiny on every single visa in this country and abolished visas like the Gold Class Visa.One Nation voted against a large slew of that.And the reason for that is because Gina Rinehart benefits from a cheap workforce.So any scrutiny around work visas, she doesn't want.One Nation votes against that shit.

So you can't complain about it.You are not an anti -migration party.They just have the flavour of it because they endlessly whinge about the migration intake, which is heavily skewed to create a diabolical image that doesn't exist.

than 423 ,000 per year.

And on top of that, always remember this, anybody that uses this statistic, I'm telling you, it's the inverse of the tax gas policy, the absolute inverse of it.They're both billionaire funded campaigns.And the reason for both of them is purely to get influence on the crossbench.In Gina's, she's going big, she's going big.She wants the prime ministership, right?Gina wants a Gina Reinhart prime minister.

So she's got more ambition than Twiggy, I'll give her that.It's all just about energy.All of it is about energy.But it's the same thing.It's just like, oh, this problem exists.Let's just whinge about this problem a lot.

No solutions to it at all.You look into their record and every single time they vote to exacerbate that exact problem they're talking about because their entire intention of getting in is to just represent that WA billionaire.It's really pathetic how controlled Australian opposition to the Labour Party is.It really just comes from two funding sources.Like obviously there's other ones, yeah, but like in terms of the outright effectiveness of it, it's either Twiggy or Reinhardt every time.

a total of more than 1 .9 million people arrived in Australia from mid -2022 to mid -2025.

Yeah, and why is that?Why is that?You have to keep ramming this into them.That's because of COVID.Those were Liberal Party numbers.They have reduced under the Labor Party.

The Labor Party has reduced the permanent migration cap.It has actually put in a student cap.What was happening under the Liberals was free reign, come one, come all, because every business model imaginable, you know, benefits from cheap consumption, which comes from migration.So they were happy with high migration numbers, absolutely happy with it.During COVID, however, you had to freeze all of those visas.And so what she's complaining about, really, is all of the visas that weren't processed under Scott Morrison doubling up into Anthony Albanese's prime ministership.

So it's just such a dishonest argument.Anybody that uses that is either stupid or misleading you, or in Pauline Hanson's case, both.

Deniably, immigration or immigration policy has our country in the state of crisis.At the centre of this crisis...

Yes, you can feel it on the streets, can't you?Everybody going to their jobs quietly and looking at their phones.I've never seen the country more roused in a state of, you know,those angry villagers really burned down Frankenstein's mansion.

It is the utterly flawed policy of multiculturalism.Yes!We cannot be a multicultural society.We are a multiracial society, but we must be monocultural.

I would really, really like her to flesh out what she means by a monocultural society.This is the whole, more buzzwords.I hate everyone on the crossbench so much because can you make an argument without saying left, right?multicultural, monocultural, like you can't, because it's just another one of these fluff things that means different things in people's heads.Because there would be Africans watching this right now thinking, yes, monocultural, it has to be Christian, voodoo Christian, you know, like, whatever, it'll just be anything in people's heads.When they say Judeo -Christian, what exactly is that?

What exactly is Judeo -Christian?So what, is this just every church imaginable under the umbrella, and then we're sort of just this, um, uh what are we talking about like are we going back to like the 12th century or something like that because even then that would be more monocultural than you could accept now because what are we just going to be led by Hillsong are we going to be led by the Anglicans which one is it because all of these have massive schisms in them and hate each other massively so can you please instead of just like you know saying monocultural and then what does that mean Judeo -Christian They never ever bring it in.They never talk about anything specific.It's all fuzzy crap because everything they say is vibe.They are not a governing party.They don't talk about...

It's so infuriating listening to these people and then you listen to a Labor politician and then they'll just be talking about the M5 highway needs an expansion of two lanes.It'll be something very concrete, literally quite concrete.

Australians must live under the one cultural umbrella.Now to the facts.

Yeah, but I don't even know if that was true when it came to the first fleet.There would have been the Scots, there would have been the Irish, there would have been the British.Like, please be specific.

As one of your own, Paul Kelly, reminded us recently, some of our best universities have nearly 50 % of their enrolments being overseas students.Is that what the electorate wants or supports?32 % of our population, 8 .8 million people have been born overseas.Is that what Australia supports?In the 2021 census, more than half of Australian residents, 51 .5 % were born overseas or had one parent born overseas.51 .5%.

Is that what's supported by the Australian electorate?

Regardless of whether it's supported by the Australian electorate or not, Pauline, it was supported by you.You have helped get coalition governments elected for 30 years.You're accountable to the public.Be accountable to that.Bring it up.Say that the coalition is the mass migration party.

It always has been.At least land it on them instead of making up bullshit statistics about the Labor Party.

Is that what Australia wants?The comparable figure for the United States is 14%.Do Australia...

Yeah, that's still 14 % of a 3%.million population country.Like you really have to understand this.Americans have had a massive head start because they're so much more resource rich than us.So in terms of their, let's just say for lack of a better word, native population, of course those numbers are going to be smaller comparative to the size of the country.Why are you even bringing up the United States?

You can still make your whiny point.Just, again, it's another whinge merchant tactic.

This other country's doing better in this one area.Oh, actually it's not.It just sounds glib if you say it in one sentence.

That the nation is losing its identity along with its values.We all know the answer to that.Let me amplify this issue of national identity and Australian values.

This is incredible because I've seen Pauline Hanson in multiple, multiple interviews when people say, what is the Australian national identity?And I swear to God, I am more concrete about it than she is.The national Australian identity is constantly complaining and bitching and moaning and also just being a bit of a dickhead at the pub in a funny way.That's what I think.We're just like funny, whiny dickheads.That is the Australian identity.

Fight me in the comments if you think it's anything different.But every single time she's asked about it, she always goes, well, you just know, don't you?It's like when you go to China, there's a Chinese national identity, isn't there?Yeah, but they've had like 5 ,000 years to stew in it.We've had 200.So if you are saying that we are supposed to be a monoculture and you are saying that it has to follow an Australian national identity, can you actually define it instead of just going, you just vibe it, man. which is a function of immigration.

Again, the 2021 census showed that one in four people, 23 % speak a language other than English at home.The most common being Mandarin and Arabic.

I don't see how that's a problem when they're doing it in their own walls.I thought she was one of these like, I don't care what you do behind closed doors, except speak Mandarin and Arabic.

You're both on notice.

How can you generate social cohesion if people can't speak the language?

But that's not what that stat is saying, Pauline.How many Australians can't speak English?I'd like to know that.And I'd also like to know why you're trashing the Labor government for this when they have specifically put those restrictions into visas.That to apply for most visas now, you have to have a certain standard of English.

In that same census, 872 ,000 people self -reported as speaking English.English, not well.

Okay, that's great.They can still understand the question.That's also a tiny, tiny portion of the $28 million that you were saying before.

Or not at all.

Wait, how do they understand the question if they're just like, do you speak it?Actually, yeah, I suppose you've got that, don't you?You can go to another country and it'd just be like, ¿Españole?And you're like, no, like, oh, sí.

Under the failed policy of multiculturalism, all cultures are allowed equivalence to ours.surely opposing that is not racist.It's common sense.

I don't even know if that's true.I don't even know if that was ever the...I'm going to have to do some deep dive research into this but I don't think that multiculturalism was ever saying that like every culture is equal and the same and special and unique flowers.I think it was mostly justeconomic argument of we are falling behind because we do not have the manpower to build an entire continent so we need to keep people in so we have to have some level of tolerance here.It was much more Lee Kuan Yew Singaporean argument of, okay, like there's Malays, Chinese and Indians here.

We're going to stop you guys from creating your own ethnic ghettos.You know, like, I think that's what the argument was.Correct me if I'm wrong on that, because, you know, I tuned out in year 10 history when they started talking about multiculturalism, because I think they did try to package that as like, everyone's a little unique flower.

My party is rightly called One Nation.

It is clear what we stand for.

one nation under one flag and proudly Australian.

Yeah and what flags that Pauline seeing as you bring out the bloody Israeli flag into parliament.This is something that I think really needs to be put on record.One Nation's meteoric rise in the polls seems to be tied to two things.One, Gina Reinhart got behind her.Then, she goes to Mar -a -Lago.Gina Reinhart pays for her, obviously.

All expenses paid for a lesbian lover.And they go to Mar -a -Lago, and then they meet the third lesbian, which is Donald Trump.Because they kind of do look like a cross between...Donald Trump looks like if these two had a baby.and the baby was around the same age as them.But anyway, met with the Don, kissed the Don's ring, comes back, all of a sudden she skyrockets another 15 points.

What do you think happened there?Well, I'll tell you what happened!They started bot farming.It's the exact same bot farming phenomenon that you are seeing in every Western nation.It is the same pattern.There is a very sophisticated organization of Eastern Europeans and Indians that sit around all day targeting memes at everything.

I hate this phrase so much, but you know, theflooding the zone thing.And obviously you're just saying that as the meteoric rise.When you have to understand, she's been around for 30 years.She has been a quirk of the parliamentary system that entire time.Now again, I don't mind there being a couple of oddballs as a vent in the crossbench.

I didn't mind when your Bob Browns and your Paul, Pauline Hansons, I was about to say Paul Keating on the crossbench, Jesus, the sacrilege.But like they were there and it was okay.And she's always been an entity and an oddity.And I didn't mind her when she was sort of just your auntie that lives in Gosford or whatever, just being like too many Asians.Like it's okay, fine, whatever.Let her go.

Let her go.That's fine.There should be a certain amount of that.Well, I don't think that there should be, but I'm fine with that.then they just actually started becoming formidable entities.And then you see these oddballs having an entire political structure built around them to the point that they actually could be prime minister.

Do you think that that was natural?No.What happened is Canberra scum machinery started building around One Nation and the Greens because they looked at it and thought, Oh, this is actually a viable brand.And that means that I can get like a cheap and easy staffer job.Then once that they have that layer, then they start getting interest from local billionaires.Then they start getting interest from international billionaires.

And what are those international billionaires want?Well, they want the bidding of Israel done.This is why, despite you endlessly whinging about welfare and how expensive it is, she wants to slap $400 billion onto the budget.for military defence spending.I can promise you that the Australian Defence Force would not know what to do with that level of funding increase.The reason that they want that is so that they can buy a bunch of America's cheap hardware that is going out of style, and it's always the same thing when it comes to Australian military expenditure.

It's just us buying excess crapthat the Americans don't want anymore or it's like fielding like orcas and they want that and they also want somebody that next time Donald Trump does something stupid, like block off the Strait of Hormuz in the interest of Israel, instead of Anthony Albanese being like, crap, okay, we've got the pact.Yeah, okay, you can have some surveillance equipment or something like that.Instead of that, they actually want Australians with boots on the ground in there fighting on the front line.That's what that is.That is Israel controlling the United States, who is then telling the rest of the West that you are going to be controlled by Israel.

And she pretends that she's for Dinky Dye Australia.The only reason that she is going up now is because of Israeli intelligence and billionaire funding.I know it sounds conspiratorial.Prove me wrong.

We oppose entirely people coming into this country and bringing with them the troubles they have left behind.Coming to this country and ignoring our values, our language, our traditions, our dress, and the fact that we are predominantly a Judeo -Christian society.

See, there we go.There we go.

It's time we woke up.Western civilization and its failures are under siege.

Please just give me like a 10 commandments.Just that.Are you going to be using the biblical 10 commandments?What is it Pauline?Just give me a 10 point plan of what monocultural Judeo -Christian society means.To you.

Because Even that, even that, if they went down into specifics, you'd have all the nutbags on X arguing over one another.They'd be the orcs killing each other over who's going to eat the legs of the hobbit.Wait, but again, what does that mean?Does that mean that you are going to be cancelling people's citizenship?Is that what that means?Like, what exactly does that mean?

Does it mean that you are sending those people home?Does it mean that you are doing what every other Western government does, which is put them behind bars?What is it?

In it, he explains why he joined radical Islam in Britain, what he saw inside, and why he left.The writer was from a loving family who taught him that Islam is a religion, no different from being a Catholic or a Protestant.But he soon was taught that Islam is not a religion, but a political movement.And he learnt that, quote, Islamist groups pose a threat to this country that we, Muslims and non -Muslims alike do not yet understand.

Yeah, we saw that in the Bondi shootings.And still to this day, I can't believe that the Australian Federal Police haven't been punished for that.That was entirely on them, just using it lazily as a honeypot.Oh yeah, there's more terrorists going in, is there?Yes, we're winning, we're surveilling.You're going to do any arresting?

Nah, nah, we've got all this surveillance technology.We'll just keep watching.Fuck, they really are Chief Wiggums, aren't they?Just sitting on their ass, doughnuts, television.

Look at all these beaters.

Every single journalist just sucks, don't they?That's what I do like about the MAGA movement, that they put these nerds in their place, at the very least.

And I lay bare what politicians and Muslim community leaders do not want you to know, unquote.What do we do here?We turn a blind eye.Why?Because we are frightened.Well, I am not frightened.

Look, I think it's pretty undeniable to say that the police force has turned a blind eye to it.That's absolutely true.I don't think that you can say that Boomer Facebook has.They're keeping watch.Every second post that I see on Facebook is, look, another mosque opened up.The neighborhood watch knows, and I don't think that they're afraid either.

But yeah, no, it is truly atrocious that the Australian Federal Police didn't do anything about that.

Oh, okay.

There we go.There we go.

All right.Fair enough.

All right.Yeah.You know what?That's fair enough.Very reasonable.Not enough of a reason to elect a prime minister, but you know, it's it's a coherent policy.

I will not walk away from my commitment to get rid of social cancer.But Labor has allowed this immigration catastrophe to happen in the middle of a national housing crisis.

So there is a housing crisis, but the not so smart thinkers in the I don't even know why they bother with this.I think all of it comes down to that.I think that she should get up and she should, for an hour straight, read out excerpts of that book and talk about how much radical Israel fakes her out.I think that that's all that her voting base really cares about.They add on the housing and all that as a tack -on.Maybe it is that, just to give them the tack -on again.

But, you know, as soon as we get out of that one very minor narrow -caste problem, and then you go into anything that actually, you know, is a national crisis, it starts to fall apart very quickly.

If you make a change to negative gearing, investment will move away from housing.

Good.

That is common sense.

Yeah, but also what's common sense, Pauline, is that negative gearing is still left on new builds.You are complaining about there being no supply.You are also admitting that investment moves with incentive.The incentive is to build houses, not take houses off the market, which you already said is a problem, that we need about a million extra houses to meet demand.And yet your solution seems to be take more houses off the market.

But common sense is not common.And what will this do to the rental market?We haven't been able to house everyone already yet.

Oh, OK.It's just a rhetorical question for everyone.I thought that she was going to answer that.She doesn't have one.This is the whole point.That's actually a much better thing to do than, say, what Dave Hughes does, which is bring up some, you know, like, property council point.

It's way better to just go, and that'll, well, I don't, what will it do?

Anyway, moving on.

Yet Labor has been bringing more than 1 ,375 people per day for the past three years.

Again, they put caps on it.Again, it is reducing.

Just two months ago, SQM research showed the national rental vacancy rate was just 1%.It was just 0 .5 % in Perth,0 .7 % in Adelaide, and 0 .8 % in Brisbane.

So why did you vote against build to rent?Why did you vote against help to buy?

It was only 0 .4 % in Hobart and Darwin.In the same month, the median weekly rent across Australia, capital cities reached $680.That's a $35 ,000 a year after tax.

Yeah, okay, but your answer to all of this, Pauline, is more of the same.Those are stats that exist with negative gearing, you dumbass.So you're saying, keep that while complaining about it.This is the remarkable thing about One Nation.It is constantly, these things exist and it's outrageous.And then Labor says, all right, let's fix these things.

No, that's outrageous.It is endless whinging.Do you understand why I use the phrase whinge merchant?for all of the crossbench.Like they've all got their different flavors of whinge, but it is all complaining.It is no solutions.

And you will routinely see that the crossbench vote against these solutions.And I honestly think a big part of it is not just influence from billionaires, which they all have.I also think it's that they understand in their bones that if problems actually get addressed, they're going to have to think of different things to whinge about, and they don't want that.The whole reason that they are in the Senate is because it is an easy, cushy, lazy job, and they want to get up, do their little speech, immigration's too high, and then fuck off like she does, where she's only in there like 14 % of the time.It's a bullshit job.

How many Australians can really afford that?According to the product...

A hell of a lot less if you were Prime Minister Pauline as you have voted against all IR protections, you have voted against wage increases.for those battlers.So what are you complaining?It's the same thing.It's very expensive.All right, let's raise wages.

Let's stop wage theft.No.

Activity commission in January this year, there were more than 250 ,000 applicants waiting for social housing in a country that's supposed to be as rich as us.

You voted against the half, you dumb shit.You voted against the half.that was to build 30 ,000 social and affordable homes.You are no different to the Greens.You don't have solutions.You just winch.

And she also voted against a bunch of different homelessness packages that the Labor Party has put in over the last term, which are to address this.Like in terms of like to stop, the major problem with homelessness is to stop it from increasing.And so they're trying to stop it from happening upstream.And she voted against that, she too.

43 % of lower income renters were experiencing rental stress.3 .2 million people.

Rental stress can mean anything from 30 % of your income spent on rent to anything higher than that.So they always use these stats to inflate the problem way further than it is.The homelessness rate is about 100 and something thousand.And Labor had a policy in place for an extra 30 ,000 homes to address those people, as well as increased funding to a bunch of homelessness shelters.She voted against it.

Australia were at risk of losing their home.Disgraceful.And we know that around 130 ,000 Australians are sleeping rough every night.

Didn't help that at all.Did not help at all.Has no solution to it either.Her solution is to cut welfare.It's incredible that she can get up and be like, this is disgusting.Anyway, my plan is to exacerbate this disgusting outrage.

Even the treasury's own forecast shows housing demand will exceed supply for at least the next five years.

That's what happens when you have under -investment in housing for 30 years.The Australian Labor Party now currently factually is investing a record amount into housing.What were we at again?I can't even remember the figure.Was it close to 50 billion?Look at this smug piece of shit.

All of them suck.Every single one of their faces.Don't you think that every single person there, it's like, dude, I'm glad that you have each other to drink with because I certainly wouldn't want to.

Two years ago, I tried to secure a national clavicide on immigration numbers.As usual, most of the Senate dismissed the notion of giving Australians a direct say on policy and voted it down.During the debate, I distinctly remember Coalition Senator Paul Scarr saying, well, the issue was too complex to put to the Australian people.

And it is.Have you seen how dumb the Australian people are?You're up in the polls.It's true.You do not understand the complexities of this issue.I don't understand the complexities of this issue.

My only strength is, unlike Pauline, I don't think that I have the answers.I think that I'm an idiot.Pauline Hanson genuinely thinks that she's going to come in and solve these problems.when all I know is that what she is advocating for is not going to solve those problems.And people far smarter than her have said, this is going to address these things.But who seriously ever thinks, oh, there's never going to be any homeless people anymore.

Oh, there's never going to be any migrants anymore.Oh, there's never going to be any poor people anymore.No one's ever going to have rental stress.No one seriouslythinks this surely like any thinking person if you sat down and thought about any of this It's honestly like people that go if you elect me, there'll never be another murder again.That is the type of person that that is voting in elections, and you want to give them direct say over something as complicated as migration.

Migration, if you are looking at it from the Canberra bubble perspective, as opposed to this kind of like, they're not Judeo -Christian, right?If you're actually looking at what its utility is to the Australian public, society and economy, it is an economic tool.And it seems like there is a huge portion of the population, maybe a third, that do not understand that.Or if they don't understand it, they don't care.Which means if they don't care, then you immediately lead for a recession.And then they're just going to blame the government that's in at the time for not having a job.

Disgusting comments says all you need to know about the political establishment's content for the Australian people.

As they should have.as they should have.I mean, you know, the other thing is when you look at Pauline Hanson's face, the one thing that I think when I look at her is that she has love and compassion, just like Judeo -Christian Jesus does for the average Australian, for everybody.There's not a single ounce of bitterness or hatred in her soul.But on top of that, yeah, I really do sympathize with politicians.I do.

Their entire life is nutbags coming into their office, screaming about, I don't know, 9 -11 or something.That's a huge portion of their life.

Of course, they're gonna have contempt for the public I have contempt for the public just looking at your comments contempt for their intelligence and Contempt for the very concept of actually listening to them.

I'm all yeah Listening to them and acting on their dumb ass whims are two different things which by the way, she isnot going to do.She is not going to act on your dumb ass whims.Most of the people voting for Pauline Hanson hate Israel, and yet she is the biggest supporter of Israel by a country mile in Parliament.By a country mile.This is why she is going up in the polls.

That reason.

Always listening.And that's why my policy to slash immigration reflects what most Australians want.The press might consider reflecting on this and better consider why more Australians trust One Nation on immigration policy than anyone else.

Because it's vibes.And the average Australian has no bearing or interest in policy.And if they do have a bearing of interest in policy, usually what they think is policy is just think tank garbage.

The story is simple.My views haven't changed.Other political parties are simply following me. I think your views have changed.

I think they have, Pauline.I'm pretty sure that you specifically wanted Asian migration to decrease and now it's changed to Muslims.

It's why my policy will restrict immigration from places immersed in extremism like radical Islam.

Yeah, there you go.

Because that's what most Australians want.

It used to be Asians.

Especially after Bondi and the return of ISIS -bribed terrorists.

I'm going to check this out in my own time, but I am going to look into, I am absolutely sure that there is going to be restricted migration from those countries regardless.

Make no mistake here, One Nation is dedicated to fighting against radical Islam and the obvious threat it represents to the peace of our country and the safety of our community.I will not hesitate to call it out for being incompatible with Australian values and our way of life, for its hatredand its love of deadly violence.

Look, I fully understand that it is a problem.Believe me, I do understand that.And I think that it is a vicious problem.But I also think that the amount of radical Islam in this country is not at this, they're at the gates of Constantinople level that she's constantly banging on about.

If we want a secure and peaceful world, radical Islam must be destroyed.There is no place for it in Australia, and my party and I won't tolerate it.

But there is room for Israeli influence in the government.

Now, let's talk about the cost of living.The Salvation Army's latest Red Shield report, released in May this year, is not easy to read.It reveals the plight of increasing numbers of low -income Australians who now need help just to get by.Thousands, thousands of Australians are seeking this help every day.Organisations like the Salvos...Oh, here it is.

It's coming down!They're having to turn people away.Wow.A very boring moment in history.19 % said they'd eaten food from a rubbish bin...Wow.

They're very slowly getting away.

Did they block out the sound?

What happened?

Oh, she kept going with it.See, this is what's so lame about it.Everybody thinks that she's going to have that same showmanship and verve.Trump, this would be a gift to him.You would get 10 minutes of gold stand -up if this happened behind him.She just ignores it and continues on like some boring bureaucrat that's slightly more scared of talking to other boring bureaucrats than your average boring bureaucrat.

This sucks.Come on, Pauline.Start getting the press to chant something.Do something!

...meals and 32 % said they do so on a daily basis.

Why isn't there any dirt bikes in here?This national press conference sucks.

35 % said they survived on only one meal a day.

35 % said they survived on only one meal a day now just so you know what she's talking about to put this all into context this was a survey of 4 ,000 ish people that yeah, they're on the Salvation Army breadline They are down and out, but I think the way that she's trying to you know Make this is that this is all of Australia all of Australia is doing it this tough There's a couple of things that you need to note about this the first one is that the Albanese government has increased money going to things like food programs and all that by about $150 million.A lot of that is targeted in direct funding to places like Salvation Army, but it is also making coordinated programs between government and charities that have the know -how so that they are more effective together.And it also includes the government expanding the level of contracts that these charities can apply for.That is what the Albanese government has done to address these figures, which I do really need to point out I'm not the same as Africa or something, like what she is trying to point out.There are always going to be, even a very rich developed nation, there are alwaysgoing to be people going to bed hungry.

There are always going to be people that are homeless.These are intractable problems.I mean, well, you can retract them a little bit.That's what I'm saying.Like, you know, this is mostly government.Mostly government is either, is this problem increasing or decreasing?

And that's what you can do.But I honestly think that Pauline Hanson thinks if I just keep complaining about things that exist, One day people will go, oh, maybe she'll fix it.

And then because there's no one complaining that when she's gone, no one will notice that it's not fixed.

And 67 % said they watered down food and drinks to make them last longer.God, this is pretty underwhelming, isn't it?

Yeah, look, it's just techies.Hey, take it down.All right.Well, yeah, there's a bit of aggression in it.Go boys.But that's what you should have gotten out of Pauline.

Isn't she supposed to be fighting for you?She can't even fight for herself.Oh, they didn't show it.Boo.

This is very important what I've just said.

Look, there's way more of a kerfuffle around everyone.Pauline, you've got no crowd work skills.You want to be Trump.You've got to bedazzle them.They're bedazzling themselves out of the lack of amusement antics that you are providing.

People watching this, 35 % of parents said their children had gone to school hungry.

And what did you do about it, Pauline?That's more of a state issue.I love saying that.Like, dude, that is the classic, like, you know, establishment simp thing.It's a state issue, but it is, mostly.And in every Labor state government, targeted food programs that are put out to, you know, you're like, it's not in a city, but you know, like your inner city Chicago, like our version of that, the POV schools, that has become far more precise under Labor governments in terms of what they're doing.

of the targeting of which schools have students that go hungry in all of them.Stephen Miles was in the position that they had such a budget surplus that they were able to roll out a lunch program or a school meal program across the entire state.Who was whinging about it?You guessed it, Pauline Hanson, the one there now.Outrageous.I can't believe there's children going to school hungry.

And then when Stephen Miles said, we are rolling out a statewide program for it.Waste of money.I'd say it's a one trick pony, but it's sort of just like a pony doing a trick, like jumping over the barrier and then halfway through going, no, I'm not going to be your show pony.And then lying on the ground.

We as members of parliament who were supposed to represent the people of this nation allowed that to happen.You were against it you fucking clown headed cunt.Oh my god.

Don't get too lectured.I mean yeah you can lecture the press all you want.Go Pauline.

people here but keeps bringing in more into the country and floods this country time.

Ah you fucking Pauline every single point that you just brought up you have voted against on record if you couldn't vote against it because it was a state issue you were against it in public announcements.You want to cut welfare what do you think that's going to do decrease the amount of hungry people?

And time and time again.59 percent said they're children.

Also, on top of this, who's going to pay for it if it's not the migrants?Who's going to be doling out all of this if it's not the migrants?Yeah, there's going to be some ex -cons that are like, I don't think I've paid back society, I've done some bad stuff.Yeah, all right, I'm at the soup kitchen.How are you, Daryl?There's going to be a few of them.

But man, you go to most of these places, and the actual employed staff that are working there are a bunch of Filipinos.and Indonesians.Hello, do you need your ass wiped again?

No, but not from an Asian.I want a white person that doesn't want the job and is complaining about it while you're very polite to me.Like, who do you think does these crap jobs?

Like, I just, look, I understand and I've been very vocal about this, that mass migration is an issue, but you are not fixing it.You are doing the exact opposite on every single metric.If you don't want mass migration, you need to have a skilled population.You have voted against all of Labor's education reforms, which are massive, that target everything from pre -K to post -K, a .k .a.

Tayford University.Everything has been massively reformed in one term.Everything.To address migration, along with a bunch of other slew of issues that are economically related, but that's one of them.You voted against all of it.It's not even enough to say that Pauline Hanson doesn't have solutions.

It's not that she doesn't have solutions, it's that she has ways to exacerbate the problem.

That was me growing up.Seriously, it was.

Anyway...Where is he with his reliable energy?

What is that doing for our...Oh, okay.All right.So, the way that we address the poor...Here's Pauline Hanson's solution.I get it now.

The way that we address the poor in this country is that we cut back on all of their welfare.Somehow that will, you know, make their heart warm, maybe, instead of the blankets at home.That'll make their hearts warm and eager and hungry, if you will.Hungry enough that they have to go out there and work.I don't know what the solution is there.But the other point that Pauline handed...

is going to solve this is by giving Gina Reinhart more money.That's what we do.We cancel the contracts to the Salvation Army and then we re -channel that into Gina Reinhart's business model of extracting coal and gas.

For our pensioners, those people that can't afford to pay their electricity costs.63 % said they use candles and torches for lighting their homes.What has that done with a lot of homes to go up in flames?People have lost their homes because they're trying to save a few dollars in electricity that they can't afford.49 % said they go to public places like shopping centres to keep warm or cool.51 % can't afford a doctor, dentist or optometrist.

51%.And 46%.

Yeah, but again, this is all from stats.that are from the absolute down and out of society.Yes, those people exist, but this is a survey of 4 ,000 people.I'm sure that the number is higher than that, but every time they use those stats of like, oh, 600 ,000 people are under rental stress, yeah, they have a portion of their income that they wouldn't like to pay in rent.And yes, rent is too high, but she's kind of making it sound like that this is a huge portion of the Australian population that are doing it this rough.They exist.

It is not the vast majority, I can assure you.

can't afford prescription medicine.

Yeah, and Labor has given us some of the cheapest prescription medicine in the world.Labor has also increased, I think it's like over 200 at this point, the amount of urgent care clinics, which is just the, it was a genius move.It is the reverse privatization of Medicare.So while she's complaining that the poor can't see a doctor and that the poor can't afford their meds, she wants to destroy the government that made both of those accessible on levels that were never beforeaccessible.Never before.

This is unacceptable.

Yeah, but Labor's addressing it.You aren't.

Unacceptable to me and my colleagues and my party.As I will explain later, the government's energy policy, which One Nation will dismantle, feeds problems such as these.

Ah, there we go.It's phenomenal.It is phenomenal.I can't believe it.I do apologize.For this last hour, I've been saying Pauline Hanson doesn't have any solution.

She does have a solution.It's just make Gina Reinhart richer.That is her entire one point of getting into government.That and, I don't know, I'm assuming that she'll start yelling at some Muslims and saying, go home, that are probably, you know, like the bad Muslims that she says.I'm sure that she'll do a bit of that.Is that really worth having a government in that is just going to make the nation so much poorer?

And just destroy the nation's future?Because everything that she is against is pretty much, we need to move beyond Gina Rinehart's business model for the good of the nation.Yeah, okay, coal and gas helped us in the past, but it's not going to help us in the future.And she just wants to freeze us there.How much poorer do you think that that is going to make us?Just turning us into this sort of backwater joke second world country like Argentina.

That really is her vision for the future.You want to look at Australia and what One Nation wants, just look at Argentina.It's the same thing.

This report having to turn away 74 ,000 people each month and every charity reports increasing demand.

Which is what you would expect after three major economic crises within the span of three years.

About 36 % of people seeking relief are doing so for the first time.

Almost a third of households Incredible, it's so internet -y.They're just so out of touch with us cool kids, us cool millennials.Protesters crash Hansen's NPC speech.What happened to you, Sky?I thought that you were the best one.

Souls needing relief had at least one employed person.What kind of Australia have we become?These figures are appalling and totally un -Australian for a rich country such as ours.Put bluntly, these figures derive That's such a cop -out.

What she was saying is that there is 1 .25 % of the population, so the bottom 1%.She's focusing on the bottom 1%.Yeah, it sucks to be in the bottom 1%.

Because of one policy above all others, the hoax of global warming, which is now climate change.

Remarkable.She is blaming addressing climate change for Australia's very high living standards.

It has reduced an increase in energy costs, which has taken Australia into energy poverty.

It's a complete lie.It has not.The reason that energy has gone up, one, cost of living, two, straighter for moors, three, and this is a big one, we have to re -firm our poles and wires because of the natural disasters that are increasing.You can take away the word climate change, they're still happening, aren't they?And then on top of that, four, the coal fleet is dying.all of the plants are dying across Australia.

And so you've got two options.You either replace them with more coal plants, which is exactly what she's advocating for, or you replace them with a 21st century grid, as opposed to replacing a 19th century grid with a 19th century grid in the 21st century.And she thinks that that's going to make you richer, giving you, say, antiques, refurbished.This is her bright image of the future.A technology that cannot supply the demand that we need forindustries.

From everything from data centers, to the processing of smelting, to the processing of aluminium, to the supercomputers that will be in Australia, all of these need huge amounts of energy.All of them need a very dependent amount of energy that is like, you know, that immediately on and off.You don't get that from coal.

The Albanese government itself is proof of what I am saying.Remember, When first campaigning to be elected, the Albanese government said it would reduce power bills by $275.

Yeah, and they reduced it by $300 by giving you the energy rebate, which you voted against, Pauline.

Truly, the slogan, fire the liar.Yes, very clever.Was it a lie to campaign in 2022 on the slogan?

Man, you know what?Koshi was recently interviewed on 3AW or something, I don't know what it was.Maybe the Adelaide version of it, whatever it's called again, like POWER ADELAIDE!I don't know.But anyway, he was interviewed on it and Pauline Hanson stopped going on Sunrise because Koshi's just the only good guy that we've ever had in the entire press.Mostly because he sounds like Pauline Hanson, but he's got an egg -shaped head, so it sounds better.

It's got more of a turtley resonance to it.But he was saying that Pauline Hanson refused to go on his show anymore because...Cause she would be doing what I'm doing, but to her face, fact checking her on the spot.Like look at how dishonest she has been this entire time.And she's pushing exactly the same thing that Tony Abbott did.You broke one promise, one for the benefit of the country.

Now I'm going to come in and break 50 ,000.

A better future.Is this how Australians feel today?

Who cares what people feel?People are notoriously bad at projecting into the future.Notoriously bad at it.There are people whose entire jobfuturists if you will, which is in big departments in Canberra, their job is to project into the future.You should be worrying about what they think, not what people feel is happening.

The cost of energy feeds into everything we use.We eat, we manufacture, everything.So food is dearer, housing is dearer, rent is dearer.There is your cost of living crisis.

Does she seriously believe this?This is what I want to know.Has anyone ever met Pauline Hanson?Is she this dumb?Is she just going to completely wipe out Trump causing an economic crisis by putting us into an oil shock completely artificially just off of his dementia ridden whims?And is she also just going to get rid of COVID?

Is she also just going to get rid of the cost of living crisis?That's your cost of living crisis.Literally the global cost of living crisis.

You lied to become elected and Australians are paying for it.

It's so stupid as well, because was that one of Aberdeensie's core campaigns, the $270, which he delivered on with an extra 10 %?Was that one of them?They just keep going on about it because they're using exactly the same thing that they do with migration.Well, the number's up!Yeah, but they reduced it by $300.Like, the number was naturally going up because of cost of living, because of firming, which is not usually even in the government's purview anyway.

Like, yeah, they firm some of it.The private sector firms a lot of it.

How many times were you, the media, condemned for simply asking before the last election whether a Labor government would make changes to capital gains tax and negative gearing.

This is the other thing that I really hate about this level of dullard.It's like your big chockies and all of that.Mainstream media, don't trust them.

Oh, here I am in an article in the Telegraph.Good on you, Telegraph.Thank you very much.

Put me on the front page next time if you don't mind.It's this.The media is untrustworthy when they're criticising me.The media is trustworthy when they are criticising my opponent.That's all they think.They are that monkey brain.

They are just the beginning of 2001 A Space Odyssey except for that Rod didn't make them super intelligent.They stayed as dumb as they are.They have nothing.There is no consistency.I'll give you consistency.The media has come full stop.

Well, I suppose I've never been tested because I've never said a nice thing about me once.

Didn't they lie to the electorate?To be a voice for that electorate.The public are sick to the back teeth with these lies.

What lie?You've mentioned two.You've mentioned two.

I honestly don't think that anybody cares about the $270 thing, which isn't a lie.I have not heard anybody say that except bots.

When the Prime Minister...

That's it, like...You know, entities approaching consciousness that do not have a vote are programmed to care.

There was delivering a speech to miners in the coal mining region of New South Wales, the Hunter Valley, in the 2025 election campaign.Did he fall off the stage and deny it?Let me be blunt.

What?

If you lie once, why won't you lie again and again and again and again?

Which is what you've been doing this entire press conference, Pauline.I just wish that she could say one thing that is consistent.I don't think that you could do this with the Liberals.I honestly think that if you listen to a national press conference, not that you would because it'd be boring as shit and it'd be very scripted talking points, I think that there would be consistency in their points.There would be some cohesion because they're trying to put the country somewhere.She is very much the same as Trump, just this sort of president for hire.

Who's the highest bidder to the top?So there's nothing.Yeah, but they're trying to fix that with hydrogen, but it's not at the stage yet.Just so we know, and we're all clear, nobody was ever saying that they were going to be run on wind.

Yes, we should invest more in renewables, but they won't solve this crisis anytime soon.

Which is not your position, so I don't know why you're bringing it up.

The inside of an electric vehicle is still made of plastic.That is made from fuel and petroleum.

Yes, we know that.

Our hospitals are made entirely from petroleum, our masks, Our hospitals are made entirely from petroleum, are they?

The irony of burning down in a hospital when you're in the burn victim ward.

Our syringes, MRI machines, CT scans, all need helium, which comes from natural gas.End quote.Because individuals and businesses are suffering from this net zero nonsense, the government shovels out millions of dollars of taxpayers' money just to justify their failing energy policy.Let me make no apology.

I don't know what that means, but yes, okay.

One Nation will end this renewable energy bribery, grants, tax incentives, concessional finance, even the government underwriting anything that sponsors the whole net zero hoax.

Which is going to make us just in terms of energy, hundreds of billions of dollars poorer.You just be very aware of this, even though, you know, we really are preaching to the choir for this one, because I don't think that there is anybody under the age of 60 that seriously wants coal in the grid.But, so we're all on the same page.It can range from about two to four times more expensive to put coal back into the grid as opposed to putting renewables in there.So let's just call it a third, right?Let's say that a third of the price for renewables as it is to set up a new coal plant.

In terms of just government investment, by the way, this is the thing that is so infuriating about all of their points.When they say the government is subsidizing renewables as they have every energy output in human history, including horses back in the days of the Roman Empire and the Chinese Empire.They would subsidize horse breeding, you know, like everything that has ever needed energy, because as she pointed out, it is the absolute core tenement of the economy.The more energy rich you are, generally the richer you are as a society.Every single government has understood this since the dawn of civilization.And so they subsidize it.

The thing that is bizarre about the renewables point is that this is the first energy in human history that doesn't need to be subsidised by the government, that would get built without the intervention.Let me repeat that.It will get built without the intervention.The only reason that they're putting it in there is so that they can build it faster, so that the government can have some of the ownership over it, except for because we're in a climate crisis, they need a lot of private investment to come into it.And on top of that, When you do have government investment into it, it starts attracting more private investment into it.And the reason that they want all of that is because they want to have a green grid.

They want to have a green grid so that they can set up all the data centers, all the supercomputers, all of the AI, all of the, you know,and aluminium and make it green so that it is actually attractive to people that aren't as stupid as Pauline and Gina Reinhart and aren't as invested in having a 19th century business model as these two dullards are, that actually see the future for what it is and the economic potential that is there, which is limitless.We have been through all of this.You can go watch our video, Hot Air.We go through all of this, how bright the future is under future management.in Australia.

It is truly astonishing that they're talking about killing this right now.It is quite alarming.Everything else that she has discussed so far is kind of just like, yeah, yeah, shut up, Pauline.Yeah, yeah, oh, yeah, yeah, you just care about it.But honestly, the fact that like the sole agenda of her getting elected is to dismantle Labor's future made in Australia is honestly terrifying.It is honestly terrifying because it's one of those mistakes that if that happens, we will be paying for that for generations.

And if it is set up by labour, those future generations will be profiting exponentially.It's not only just about that, it's also about creating the jobs of the future as well.All of these are massive job creators, as well as, you know, except in the case of AI and data centers.In those cases, it is huge revenue generators.And it all comes from green energy.If you want to be one of these backwater, second world at best, probably leaning towards third world countries that are still just pumping out fossil fuels, despite the fact that the rest of the world is moving towards renewables, by all means vote for Pauline.

Crap now that I said that I really feel like I feel like this is what's happening right now Look don't don't you again?

This is the dynamic even though it's not a real time because I'm too much of a coward to say to a face if you want an experienced public servant Vote for me But if you want to believe a bunch of crazy promises about garbagemen cleaning your gutters and waxing your car then by all means vote for this sleazy lunatic

Just by the by, that is my favorite episode of The Simpsons and I think that it should be mandatory viewing for every single Australian.Everyone in the world, everyone in the Western world should be forced to watch that episode on repeat.That should completely deprogram everyone.Because that is exactly what is happening to the West.Because of hucksters like this, because of hucksters like the Greens and the Teals, they are all Homer Simpson running for sanitation commissioner.All of them.

They have no experience.They don't really care about it.They have a bunch of dumb ass promises and dumb ass solutions that don't work.And because they aren't flash like what the major parties are offering.

Everyone goes, yeah, give me the fantasy.I want to live in the fantasy because I just think that my life sucks so much because I'm not a Hollywood movie star.It can't get any worse than living in a developed world that is one of the best governed in the world, even when the liberals are in.

You know, the other day I gave that out because there was somebody that was talking to me that was in the public service and I handed them that and they'd never seen that episode before.And they were just like, holy fuck, this is my life.This is my life.That's all I see.And I honestly extend that olive branch to the Liberals because one public service that I do have to give the Liberals is that they were keeping these nutbags at bay.And now that it's completely out, that wing is there and for the world to see and rising in the polls, you realise, Jesus, you're John Howard's and you're Tony Abbott's were tempering this shit.

They're really holding it at bay.

Let me give you one example of many.rewiring the nation to build some useless transmission lines and destroy prime agricultural land.

Oh my god, shut the...Building useless transmission lines...It's honestly got to be just so profoundly ignorant.If you read anything about them, what do you think is happening?What?The government is investing tens of billions of dollars.

It's not even tens of billions of dollars.I think it might be, or maybe it just scrapes over the tens of billions, like 20 billion or something like that.Those transmission lines are there, first off, to firm it up, because there's a bunch of natural disasters that are happening.It is also there to just, like, be able to conduct levels of electricity that will be needed in the 21st century, as opposed to the levels that were needed in the 19th and 20th century.What the hell are you talking about?We don't need that much!

Our plan is to keep energy levels as what they were in 1980!It's not gonna get any more than that!Not on my watch!It's not anyway!It's useless if you are actively handicapping the Australian economy for the 21st century.

It's also because, like, yes, she genuinely believes that climate change is a hoax, but what, are you just going to say that the 2020 bushfires were a hoax?It's also about making sure that those power lines don't and destroy like they did in the bushfires, or at the very least limiting the damage that they can do.

Taxpayers dollars.This will end.

Great, great policy Pauline, thank you very much for that.That's awesome.While we're at it, we can save money by just making the Postal Service messenger pigeons.

We'll always protect prime agricultural land.It belongs to farmers, not government transmission lines.Let me give you another example.

Okay.

The bloke in the corner store is productive.Does he get subsidies?

Easy, because every corner store bloke that I've ever seen is just some fat Greek watching Channel 10 on a tiny TV set.

I speak to struggling farmers everywhere.Do they get subsidies?

Yes, yes they do.You've been in government for 30 years.Well, parliament at the very least.How do you not know this?You know what it is, it's because she sits around with farmers all day and Christ, you want a sector of the population that has a victim complex, it's farmers.They never stop whinging, ever.

Everything is a big conspiracy against them because they're out on the land by themselves, staring at sheep all day, counting them.And then after a while, your mind breaks.

Does the young 25 year old going out on his own, starting up a business, does he get subsidies?

Once again, yes.Yes to all three.Fire the liar.

But no.community batteries, solar banks, regional renewable projects.

Which all three benefit from with reduced power costs.

It's impossible to keep track of all these taxpayer subsidies.The government's clean energy finance corporation provides tens of billions of dollars for renewable projects, of course, at favourable rates.This is a rort.

No, it's not.That is exactly what the government did when it was setting up trains.It is exactly what it did when it was setting up the coal plants.That's what it does with vital infrastructure.That's the whole point of subsidisation.

Renewal.

Infuriating.It is so infuriating knowing how many people just do not understand the basics of government.Nothing.

Energy projects benefit from cheaper finance than the market would offer.Are those benefits available to the bloke in the corner store?

What the fuck?Yes, they are!Like, he can get a subsidised solar panel and he fucking...What a fucking idiot.And a fucking battery.Yes!

Yes, even when you're talking about it being subsidised energy.

Yes, to all.God, I'd like to see a source on that.

I'm pretty sure it's like at the 30 billion mark.Where the hell is this 200 billion coming from?Are you extrapolating it out to the year 2100?

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not opposed to renewable energy.

Really?It sounds like you are.

It's the saviour of the energy crisis.And if it's profitable, why would government have to prop it up?

Okay, so she is admitting it.She is admitting it, that this is the only source of energy that has ever been available without government subsidy that can be built on itself.The only one.She is advocating for us to be built on coal, that you cannot build that without government subsidies.But the other thing is that the reason that you are doing that is because you are turbocharging and making a signal to private markets that we are serious about the energy transition.And this affects not just energy companies but everything else because everything else is built off of energy and if you say we are subsidizing this we are getting to this energy that costs around about a third of what energy currently costs now every business that needs huge amounts of energy which is major industry which they're always whinging about manufacturing is gone it's coming back if you have renewables it is not coming back if you have coal One nation is saying, put everything into the energy mix.

Let everyone share the wealth that is under our feet.

Okay, so this is her, just so everybody knows, she's saying, do not subsidise renewables, subsidise coal.She's just saying it.There is no way that you, if you just, what, if you have no subsidies whatsoever in the energy market, as well as the fact that there is a bunch of diesel rebates and all this for people that are mining out, and a lot of that does include coal, And there is economic justification for it, but the point is that...what, so you're just going to have no investment in energy at all.Okay, so her policy is to literally bring us into the dark ages.Is that what we're hearing here?

If you are not subsidizing anything, nothing is going to get built except renewables.It's just going to get built at a much slower rate.

We are one of the richest resource nations in the world.I am saying get ideas.

Yeah, and we are the richest in renewable resources.So we have all of it, but we have the most by a mile in renewables.It's really hard for most other countries to compete with the level of renewables resources that we have.

Out of the way, let me just add that it's clear that the hydrogen energy solution is blowing up in Australia's face, or should I say Andrew Forrest's face.

Yeah, see, this is the whole thing about them.She is right.to point out that Andrew Forrest has huge amounts of influence in the government.I'm glad that she did it.Well done, Pauline.But this is what I'm saying.

Everybody pretends that the Australian experience of politics is the same as America's.You want the Australian experience of politics?You're going the right way about it, Australia.You start electing One Nation, you start electing the Teals and the Greens, and you will very quickly have the Dems versus the Republicans.Right now you have Liberal versus Labor.These are normal parliamentary parties.

What you have in the United States.We saw it with the exact comparison in the 250th UFC cage match.You saw it.Biden's comparison and then you just have gay colors along the White House and then you have Trump's comparison, Trump's presidency and then you have fucking dirt bikes jumping over the fountain.You're moving into that territory because they are billionaire funded entirely.There is no seriousness of governance there.

They are just for hire studioSo she's very happy to slag off Twiggy and she should.People should be very aware of Twiggy's influence in politics.But they should also be very aware that the fact that like she is only there and only on the up because of Gina Reinhardt's influence in Israel.

Here we go again, taxpayer subsidies, a hydrogen Headstart program, $4 billion in full budgets.And the Prime Minister has announced 520 million of your money for green hydrogen projects outside the Headstart program.And what about Melton Turnbull's 2 billion Snowy 2 .0 project?

Yeah, okay, she's fair to bring up Snowy Hydro 2 .0.That was a white elephant.

He calls himself a businessman.but showed no regard for taxpayers' money.The $2 billion is now forecast to reach over $40 billion.Cancel it.Cut our losses.

Is it?I would really like to see those figures as well, because last time that I saw it, it was around the $12 billion mark, and I think it was going to go inflated, but $40 billion.Maybe, maybe.But the thing is, I'm pretty sure that it's supposed to be up and running in what, 2028?Maybe it gets pushed out to 2030 or something.Like, four years away.

Come on.Like, you've already invested this much into it.You may as well finish it off.What is she saying?That we just invest 12 billion into it and then put the dynamite in it and watch it explode?It's kind of worth a fireworks show.

But the reason that they invested in it, by the way, is because that is what the coalition does.They are not really serious about renewables.And the only reason that they put a bunch of money into that is because Malcolm Turnbull needs to say, I care about climate change, to his electorate, while the nationals don't really give a shit about anything as long as it's a wrought investment into their seat.So it was a form of pork -barrelling and jobs, so they could go, look at all this infrastructure we're building.That was the reason that was brought in there.It wasn't because of some grand bureaucratic plan like what Labor is rolling out.

It is pure, this is how we maintain our electoral prowess.

Governments have no money of their own other than what they take from taxpayers.

Not true, they've got a bunch of investments.

The Snowy Hydro 2 .0 is nothing more than a black hole of debt for taxpayers.

She's got a point.

Which is exactly what renewables produces.

Not only that, Pauline Hanson, I think once the Strait of Hormuz blocked further, she has been arguing for ramped up military intervention in the area.

Yes, that's what we're doing with renewables, you fucking moron.Yes.and the nation thrives." End quote.Therefore, moving forward, one nation will introduce nuclear energy.

There we go.She's complaining about tens of billions of dollars of subsidies over the span of getting close to two decades at this point with a proven energy source that reduces power costs throughout the entire economy.But she wants to implement something that best estimate is $600 billion.$600 billion.She's complaining about $20 billion, but she wants to put some form of energy into the grid that will cost $600 billion of government subsidy.It's not even subsidy at that point.

It is just government built.No private sector is going to kick in, no company is going to kick in unless the government makes like the vast lion's share of that investment.The vast lion's share.She picks the most expensive energy source there is.And on top of that, she's not going to any...I really don't understand why they're even doing this anymore.

Just outright say, I want more coal on the grid, because we all know it is not going to get built in Australia.How many reports do we have to go...We went through the Dutton saga before.It is not going to happen here.

Let me be plain and clear.Our energy crisis is a product of a failed energy policy, and this policy was supported years ago by major political parties and the big media giants.I have always opposed it.Ford and Holden closed their factories more than a decade ago for one simple reason, the cost of production.The source of much of our wealth is under our feet and should not be only for export.Of course, Basic environmental standards must be met.

I'd love to hear what she defines as basic environmental standards.

But they can't be allowed to throttle our economy.We will never be able to do without coal and gas.

Not true, but anyway.

We should encourage the investment in them and provide power to homes and businesses.

OK, so encouraging investment into them, subsidise them.

As we once did, as the world's cheapest price.Bond said last March that households still claim savings of up to...

This is all just the Gina Simpery out.All of this, this entire part is just to say yes I'm doing your bidding master.This is why they never shut up about Bowen.The reason that they hate Bowen so much is because he is without a doubt the most effective MP in Parliament.He is powering, no pun intended, through the energy transition.He's powering through it.

He is one of the most successful ministers in the Western world at transitioning the energy grid.And obviously, you know, coal barons hate that shit.That's why they never shut up about him in the press.

And they keep saying that anyone who opposes the budget measures is opposing the opportunity for young people to get into housing.I am loathe to call this another lie.But how else do you describe it?More than 40 ,000 18 to 20 -year -olds will lose out to Chalmers capital gains tax.

In the last 10 years, the numbers of young people making... 14 ,000, this is what she's concerned about.Half of our generation will not be able to afford a house, and she's concerned about 14 ,000 rich kids.

Income out of asset.

Battler, voice of the battler.

In an entrepreneurial way, buying an apartment, doing it up, selling it, there has been a 365 % increase in the number of 18 to 24 year olds who have done this.

to 14 ,000 out of a nation of 28 million.Don't know how many there are in that cohort.I don't know how many Gen Zers there are.Let's find out.Out of 4 .6 million Zoomers, 14 ,000 of you have done up a house.Therefore, we should keep in extremely distortionary economic absolute drains.

Like you want to talk about an economic drain, there is nothing bigger than what she is advocating.for bringing back.

A 351 % increase in 25 to 29 roles, a 246 % increase among 30 to 34 year olds.So the largest capital gains cohort is younger.

Who cares what age they are?Who cares what age they are?It is about the percentage of people that take advantage of capital gains.80 % top 10%.

There are now over 215 ,000 under 35 year olds who will see less income from their investments.

Oh no!So from Zoomers to Millennials, two generations, you'd have to say, I'm not even going to bother looking up the numbers, but Millennials would be even bigger.So it'd be close to 10 million people.And she's complaining about 250 ,000 that will be seeing less on their investments that they're going to get rich off of anyway.I really don't understand how anybody can be complaining about this.You are sitting on your ass.

You are still getting rich off of stocks.You have to pay a bit more in tax on them, but you are still making money for doing nothing.And she's concerned about that.She is like, while saying, I'm really concerned about the bottom 1 % of society and their housing insecurity.She is talking about taking more houses off of them and giving them to this rich cohort that she's now complaining about.

Punishing ambitious and aspirational young people who are trying to build a future, to build wealth, to build independence and to invest in Australia, Albanese and Chamas are heading in the wrong direction.

Albanesian charmers are punishing the top 1 % to help out the 1 % that you are complaining about at the bottom as well as the other 90 % of the population that don't really benefit from these.Let's be very clear about this.She is saying that 90 % of the population should be punished to make the already rich 10 % that have been taking advantage of a form ofwelfare for decades and generations that has badly, badly affected the productivity of the economy, that should keep going.

Chalmers argues when it comes to people under 35 with shares, quote, about one in 10 under 35 have shares, unquote.What a pathetic defence is that?One in ten is a lot of people.

Oh you fuck.Yeah it's nine in ten.that are not getting ahead precisely because these people are big.You are so whiny about subsidies when it comes to renewables, but when it comes to subsidies for people just taking houses off of poor people, bring it back, bring it back.That's what we need in this country.God, it's like every single problem in this country, Pauline Hanson was like, how could I make it as bad as possible?

Before COVID, in 2021 -22, nearly 75 ,000 Australians, 18 to 24 years of age, recorded capital gains.Now the Albanese Government is coming after these young Australians.They call it tax reform.How on earth can ripping another $77 billion out of the pockets of Australians be called tax reform?

I don't know.I don't know what other words you would use other than tax reform for exactly what you said.It was kind of just like you read the definition of the word umbrella and then said, how could you possibly describe it as an implement that is used to stop rain from pouring on one's head?

Outrageous.

You see, the truth this is, on April 21, 2006, Peter Costello declared the nation debt free.I have never been in government.We have done our best in the Senate to curtail the irresponsibility of previous governments and this government.I have always argued against it.debt.The difference between Albanese charmers and me is that I actually - That you have no degree or understanding of economics.

Ran a small business.

There we go.There we go.That's why she should be in charge of the nation's finances.Cause she ran a fish and chip shop.She seriously thinks that by the way.

Earned their income by working for government.taking their salary from the taxpayer.

See, this is the second whiniest cohort in the country.She just represents whingers.Farmers are the whiniest, followed by small business.

In the 20 years since Peter Costello made that declaration, in that time, the debt has climbed from zero to almost $1 trillion.That is on average, $50 ,000 million.

By the way, the only reason that Costello was able to announce that is because Keating had left the economy in a structural surplus.Like it was just naturally moving towards that anyway.

$1 billion a year, every year for 20 years.Dr Chalmers has a PhD from ANU writing about the Keating government.Well he hasn't learnt much.Paul Keating reduced spending to 22 .9 % of GDP.Chalmers has managed to increase that to about 28 % of GDP.

Alright, this is very much like the argument of, you know, back in the day the government used to fund the cavalry, the post office and the town crier.I don't see why we need any other government program, Jeanette, frankly.Also, the reason that Paul Keating had 22 % is because he had privatized a bunch of the useless assets that were not functioning anymore.Everybody's going to say Qantas and Commonwealth Bank.Can't be bothered getting into that argument here if you want that.We've done one on paper.

in fact actually just sign up to patreon entirely but the point is that there was in the 80s getting rid of a bunch of government assets that were basically just needed to be junked for the health of the economy like Now we are at the stage and also the reason that was also existing is the population back then was a lot younger than it is now.So a lot of this is because there is a much more unhealthy population.This is why we need the NDIS.This is why we need the pension to increase.It is because the population is getting older and this is another reason that migration is necessary because if you didn't have that then you would just keep going up in terms of who is going to be paying for these very expensive programs.So really If you want to cut migration and have no skilled people in the economy making the economy function further, how are you going to pay for pension?

How are you going to pay for NDIS?I honestly think that Pauline Hanson, if she was in, she would try to cut it, she wouldn't be able to cut it, and she'd just complain about it.But that is her ideal world.Her ideal world would be to bring back the government to being the cavalry.Yeah, okay.Living your fantasy world, Pauline.

It's incredible.Her conspiracies that she believes in... are the Port Arthur massacre, right?Like, didn't happen.But when it comes to Gough Whitlam getting, you know, couped by the CIA, no, no, it was because of bad economic management.Everyone knows that.

If the cake stays the same size and the population increases, there is less for every one of us.Debt doesn't seem to matter to this government or its predecessors.

No, that's why that they have done back to back to back surpluses.This is also why they have reduced debt to GDP ratio, which was projected to be when they came into office in the 30 to 35 % mark.It is now predicted to peak at around the 20 to 25 % mark.These are some of the healthiest figures in the OECD, by the way.Jim Chalmers is, by the IMF's estimation, the second best treasurer in the world.

In 2013, our debt was 257 billion, 257 ,000 million.Get your head around that.On the latest figures, we're heading towards a trillion dollars.This government keeps spending.Spending leads to inflation and inflation leads to interest rates going up.The IMF have warned that spending is breeding inflation.

The IMF also accredited Jim Chalmers with being the second best treasurer in the world.God, I wish that everybody knew just that one stat, just that.in terms of economic management, you think that Pauline Hanson, or whoever she puts up there, Barnaby is treasurer, you think he's going to achieve second best in the world.Well, I'll tell you what, when the Liberals are in, they're in like the, sometimes they didn't even break the top 100.

The Reserve Bank has warned that as inflation climbs, we must, so must interest rates.Therefore, regardless of whether you've got 500 ,000 homes available tomorrow, try borrowing on a single income.

Who's saying that?This is the third stat that I think she's pulled out of her ass, which is, it's going up to 10%.200 billion is spent by the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.Where are these numbers coming?I've never heard anything close to this.

But under this government, interest rates are heading towards 10%.Young people can't afford the deposit, let alone the mortgage repayments.Young people are the latest victims of the government's lies.

Look, it's just...I think we get the picture at this point.Do I have to keep going on to this?I'm just going to fast forward to what I saw as a highlight, which was her owning some press journalist.

Senator Hanson, Sarah Martin from The Guardian.Taxpayers are paying more than...

Yeah, I couldn't have guessed.

$150 ,000 a year for your daughter, Lee Hanson, to seemingly campaign full -time in Tasmania.

Oh man, who has a worse voice, her or Pauline?

Well, Employee is a political advisor for a New South Wales Senator.Did you have any role in appointing her to that position?

Dude, what is with her H's?Far out.She really needs that Pygmalion like, Happy Harold!

Honestly, you never give up.I've never seen a person that's such a trashy journalist, you know, and what you put out all the time, you've got this...

See, this is the whole thing.This is what's so gross and slimy.about journalists.Like, look at her face there.I don't even think it's a thing of, like, triggered.It's just this sort of, like, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm getting a response, yeah, yeah, yeah, I get to, I get to have me feed for another day.

It's so slimy, all of them.This is the only thing that I like about MAGA, right?Like, and I think that this is something that Labor needs to adopt, which is this.Just start trashing journalists.Anytime that, bring back the Daniel Andrews special.You would be so much more popular if you did.

Everyone hates journalists more than they do politicians.And I honestly think when it comes to journalists, rightfully so.

Constantly trying to pull down myself, my party, or Mrs. Reinhardt, whatever you do, you will be - Damn!

Straight up defending the sugar mama.Look at her go.The cubs defending the bear.

Banned from my answering.I'll ask you this question today, but I'm telling you now, don't come near me for an interview in the future because of 25 of your arguments.it's always in 28 articles is constantly bashing One Nation you don't research properly you don't know your information and you will put out lies about me well I've had enough of that but I'll tell you that no She didn't, I didn't get her that job.She got the job on her own merits.

You tell a boy!See, even though we've just spent like a last hour talking about how wrong she is, as soon as she starts attacking a journalist, it just feels so right.And I honestly feel like every Labor politician could do this so much better than she can because she can barely speak English.See, man, she is this fired up about defending what is clearly a nepo -baby job.How could you not do this about things that are actually factual and matter to the country?Look, I'm totally on, I am on Pauline's side for nepotism.

That's how good it feels attacking journalists.Anyway.I think that that'll do for today.Make sure, if you are in the United States, that you come to my shows.They will be in San Francisco, Portland, Washington, Vancouver, Chicago, Ferndale, Toronto, Boston, Brooklyn, Philadelphia, Washington, Atlanta, Orlando, Dallas, and Los Angeles.I will see you next time.