"Reputation destroyed" Prince Harry accused of committing PERJURY about Charlotte Griffiths intimacy
Prince Harry's entire reputation is on the line next week because in a matter of days, just as he flies in... for this very highly controversial visit in theory of course for the Invictus one year to go celebrations in Birmingham but in reality to try and bully and I'm going to use that word bully his father and the British government to give him paid security forever maybe using his children, Archie and Lily, in order to do so, certainly using his wife in order to do so, although I believe she is part of this plot very much.But his reputation could be destroyed, of course, if he is criticised by the judge at 2pm on Tuesday, UK time, for lying under oath, for committing perjury by claiming that he knew nothing.of Charlotte G. Streen Griffiths, now the editor -at -large of the Mail on Sunday, when indeed their Facebook messages revealed a very intimate relationship.Lauren the Insider has her own theory about the timing of this announcement.But before we get to her, I just want to lay out exactly what is going to go down on Tuesday.Newsweek reporting that the judgment could well impact this visit because if Harry wins against the Daily Mail, it would provide a positive backdrop.
If he loses, it could intensify what is already a highly charged period.Harry would then have to undertake public visits at which he will be heavily scrutinized for any sign of emotion.And as I have reported throughout this week, and you can go back and watch the videos for details, Harry is already in the midst of a breakdown, even though he's meant to be on a pleasant family holiday to Portugal.I think it is a breakdown which has been exacerbated by the use ofdrugs, including psychedelics and marijuana, which are legal in both California and Portugal.Jack Royston goes on, there will be journalists at his events, but no Daily Mail.
journalists are expected to take on the more intimate pool positions available.So what that reveals, and Lauren will get into this too, is that Harry is already controlling the narrative because public figures are not meant to pick and choose which journalists follow them around.Harry's visit, Royston says, is an opportunity to rebuild relationships with his father, introduce his children to the country of his birth, and draw attention to several of his major charitable initiatives.The one major issue that could get in the way is the charged emotional backdrop.If the ruling on Harry's security left him distraught, then there is reason to anticipate that losing the case, if he does lose, might have a similar impact.In that respect, an adverse ruling in his lawsuit could complicate the visit.
Now, Lauren, this verdict is due to be delivered publicly on Tuesday at 2 p .m.Now I've been involved in very high -profile cases like this.Very often you only get an hour's notice, so you will be told an hour beforehand.The lawyers might know earlier and some lawyers maybe break the rules, but officially the people who are actually involved in the case and are not part of the legal teams will only be told one hour before this goes public, which means Harry could find about find out about this at 1pm.He is then due to address Chatham House in London at 2pm the moment this verdict goes public.
Now, your view, Lauren, is that this is not a coincidence.What do you mean by that?
Okay, so first of all, Harry knew when everything was happening because he booked the flight.The trip to the UK was announced some time ago.I had the storyfrom someone on the 17th of June that he was flying in for the court verdict before it was announced.And I didn't do anything with it because I wasn't 100 % sure.I now believe that yes, he was given the heads up on this.
And everything feels highly curated where Harry's going to be at the time of this announcement.And oh, what is it?It's wrapping himself in charity and philanthropy.of the day, I just want to remind Outspoken viewers, what we have to do is we have to remember the mainstream media cannot be trusted.I personally don't trust Prince Harry either.So when we strip those out, what are we left with?
We're left with timings, we're left with evidence.And it's very strange, Dan, isn't it?That this is all what are we supposed to believe it's all a coincidence that Harry's court verdict is being announced The day he arrives into the country was meant to believe that.That was just a coincidence.And we're meant to believe that when it's announced, he is doing some do -gooder charity work.I'm not buying it.
The problem is, Lauren, that this court case could have quite a complicated verdict in some ways, because of course, as that operational night shows, there's a whole load of other claimants from you know, Elton John and David Furnish to Baroness Lawrence have all been drawn into this very tangled web.And Harry could almost win on a technicality, but still have his reputation shredded by the judge.So we're going to be looking out for all of that.And we'll be hosting a special live edition of Outspoken at 3pm UK time.on Tuesday.So that is one hour after the verdict.
We're pulling together a superstar panel because I think it's really important that we can bring some truth to what this verdict represents because there's going to be so much spin going on, Lauren, from Harry's team to try and paint what might look like a win when actually it's a loss.Because remember, Lauren, all of this case for him was scripted.and was planned.While Harry and Meghan demand special treatment and attack the royals, the mainstream media still protects them.On Outspoken, I call it out with no bias.So subscribe right now for the full story every day.
I'm glad you said that because I've interviewed Glenn Mulcair, the former royal phone hacker, but he's also a key expert witness and has been for 14 years.Now, he was due to be a witness in this very case, and for anyone that wants to watch it, it's on my channel, but he couldn't be a witness because they had pre -drafted his statement, he alleges.And so when I pushed Glenn on this, he was incredibly open.And I said, what do you mean they pre -drafted?And Glenn wasn't going to have his own witness statement written for him.It was either take my witness statement and my witness statement in full and he received threats.
He claims he was bullied and this is not just gossip.This ran nationally.This is factually within the public domain.Harry's team very much seem to be rather bullish and go about things in a very combative way.So what this verdict will bring, we don't know, but it's a tricky situation becauseyes, the media ethics back in the day, were very, very bad.
But Harry, by all accounts, from my interview with Glenn, well, Harry's team wanted to ultimately chop up.
100 % this was PR.Glenn's truth.Yeah, because Lauren, I mean, you'll remember here on Outspoken, what we did was actually use AI to recreate his exact words in court.And his final words, which, by the way, ended with him, you know, tearing up and it all looked like he was acting, were about Meghan Markle.which is completely nuts given that all of the accusations in the case dated back years and years before he had even met Meghan Markle.But here's just a reminder of what he said.
I've never believed that my life is open season to be commercialized by these people.To act in the public interest is to interest the public.I fundamentally reject that.Having my life, like others, commercialised in this way since I was a teenager, delving into every aspect of my private life, listening to calls, blagging flights so they could see where I was going.It was a time when everyone was in competition with each other.To sit here and go through this again, and to hear them claim in their defence that I don't have any right to privacy, is disgusting.
They have made my wife's life an absolute misery, m 'lord.
Michael is completely irrelevant to this case.And that's why my claim, Lauren, is that this is all PR for Prince Harry.And I think it has been cooked up with James Holt, a lot of it.Now, he's an interesting one.
Oh, James Holt, who's now come to the Liberal Democrats.
"99% accuracy and it switches languages, even though you choose one before you transcribe. Upload → Transcribe → Download and repeat!"
— Ruben, Netherlands
Want to transcribe your own content?
Get started freeGreat.Yes, the Trump -hating Liberal Democrats.And I wanted to show you this, Lauren.I don't know if you've seen it, but this was actually posted on James Holt's social media.So he's a gay man, James Holt.And I assume that that is his child and his husband.
We don't know that for a fact.But remember, James Holt, as you say, now a political operative within the heart of the Westminster system here in the UK.And all of this trial, I believe, was used as an attempt to turn around Prince Harry's PR.That's why there is so much riding on this verdict.
Yeah, I mean, look, I think you shouldn't rule out as well, there'll be a sob story show on Netflix with Harry after.Yes, I know that Netflix have got a case by case deal with them.They're not interested in anything about Cookie Queens or Polo, but a sob story from Prince Harry, they may be interested in that.James Holt is also, like you said, now political director, for the Liberal Democrats.You mentioned that he's back in politics, but actually let's look at the fact that Harry and Meghan have been incredibly political for years, when they shouldn't have been.And this is turning people against the monarchy, particularly when King Charles is silent on many, many things that he should not be silent on.
And James Holt, as the Royal Grift has so excellently covered on her channel, he's been behind everything that Harry and Meghan have done.This censorship crusade, this agenda they're pushing for globalist elites andphilanthropists.I believe it's James behind this.And that is very, very concerning.The fact that that political power is being used with Harry and Meghan.
I don't like that one bit.
Well, I mean, there's so much hypocrisy.This is the thing.Like, how could anyone with a straight face actually say that this has worked?Like, look at this from Queen Esther.this week.Prince Harry, you should be really, really worried, concerned and cautious about putting photographs of your children online.
Meanwhile, Meghan's Instagram is full of Archie and Lily.Do Harry and Meghan ever have these conversations at home or do they only happen when there's a camera and a microphone in front of him?Either Harry doesn't believe what he's saying or Meghan doesn't because someone in that house keeps making the decision to put those children online.And she made the point, and I really think this is very effective looking at this, Lauren, because again, Let's just use their own words sometimes, right?Let's use Harry's own words within what ends up online.
Whatever they want.The reality is from what I've learned, what I've seen, what I've heard and experienced through, especially through the Parents Network, is you should be really, really worried, concerned and cautious about putting photographs of your kids online.
especially now yeah with this surge of unregulated ai you just don't know where it's going to go you don't know how it's going to be used and look at all of the pictures i love the pictures i know i love queen esther's account she's so brilliant but you talk about one day oh and then she then this is generations from now children will look back at this era with absolute disbelief that adults once allowed digital spaces to exist without basic protection
Oh well done Queen Esther.I mean this is and this is where the PR falls down, it collapses.But first, do you remember when energy used to feel effortless?You'd get through a workout, a long day, a bad night's sleep and still feel sharp.But as you get older, trust me, it can start to feel like your body and brain don't have the same spark they used to.Here's the interesting part.
That's not in your head.It's biology.When we're younger, our bodies naturally produce and regenerate higher levels of creatine.But as we move into our 40s and beyond, that production steadily declines.And that means less readily available energy for both our muscles and our brains.That's exactly why Qualia Creatine Plus was created.
Here's the key thing though.You can't just take any old creatine and assume it's doing the job.It has to actually get into your cells and then be activated so your body can use it properly.That's why Qualia Creatine Plus is different.It combines two clinically studied forms of creatine with electrolytes, all chosen to support absorption and activation.It includes easy -to -mix micronized creatine monohydrate in a new form called OptiCreatine, plus creatine magna power, along with a precise amount of sea salt to help support uptake where it matters most.
What makes this stand out is that it's not just creatine, it's the delivery system your body needs to make it work for you.We're way past the dark ages of creatine being just for gym bros.Creatine is critical for energy, metabolism, cognition, and healthy aging, not just lifting like a bodybuilder.So go to qualialife .com slash dan for 50 % off.And here's a bonus.
Use the code Dan for an additional 15 % off your membership.That's Q -U -A -L -I -A life .com slash Dan and use the code Dan.And thank you so much to Qualia for sponsoring this episode.Now, back to the show.
But this is why, okay, people think that there's such a disconnect and the hypocrisy is so clear with Harry and Meghan.The reason why is because When they went to California, somewhere along the line they got in with Mark Benioff, the owner of Time, and various other globalist philanthropists who were all pushing this censorship agenda.Harry and Meghan, I don't think, give two hoots about this censorship.They are being given this script and they are letting it play out on the world stage.That is why This came out of nowhere and they're clinging on to censorship to try and give themselves some relevance in the public domain.If you take away their censorship crusade and if you take away Invictus...
What are you left with?You're left with some manky old jam that no one wants.And so this is exactly why Harry and Meghan are desperate to cling on to philanthropy and these ridiculous censorship crusades.Because they get to tour the world, don't they?Having talking points.Australia, Geneva, all of these places.
She wasn't there talking about strawberries.She was there talking.talking about this exactly the same kind of script that Keir Starmer is pushing, the Prime Minister, or soon to be ex -Prime Minister.
Well of course because, Lauren, I was about to say there is such a leftist pressure building over this, like Sky News in Australia pulling out Tessa Dunlop, you know, the left -wing historian, saying the King would have youhis millions to pay for Prince Harry's security if he really wanted to play happy families with his man -child son.Charles has the means, but clearly not the willpower, to make good on a Prince Harry demand that has thrown his long -awaited trip back to the UK with his wife Meghan into complete disarray.But I just wanted to use an example with you, Lauren, of Catherine, the Princess of Wales, at Wimbledon this week.And ironically, It was Woke ITV News that had to report on the fact that her trip was something that Harry would say was too unsafe.Look.
Transcribe all your audio with Cockatoo
Get started freeShe was smiling and posing for selfies and then she headed inside to the ticket office where she was helping out with staff there.Some pretty bemused people arrived to have their tickets issued by the princess.She then broke with tradition.She didn't sit in the royal box.She actually sat in the outer courts to watch the action.She was at court 18 sitting alongside Tim Henman.
So there and again, you know, It just shows you if you just go about your business.
What I love, Dan, is the fact that Catherine, she's just so cool.So she decides to not sit in the royal box.It's like, no biggie.I actually want to just be with real people.Harry would be desperate.But remember when he went recently to the basketball game and he was on like the back row.
He couldn't get anywhere near the front.This is the difference between them.Catherine is so classy.She is so cool.And the reason that, you know, she's able to go about her business and not be in danger is because, unlike Harry, Catherine hasn't done a book gloating about things.
And Harry is gloating about her Taliban kill count.Yeah, exactly.And also, like, putting her hand up and saying, I'm totally unarmed.come and attack me.It's like, look, Lauren, what Harry has done, I believe, is choose to make himself a permanent risk in the United Kingdom.That is what he wanted to do.
Lauren, let's have a bit of a palate cleanser and speak about the royal, real royals, because there has been some great news this week.Sophie and Prince Edward, so the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, proudly posing with Lady Louise Windsor, who is 22, in new official portraits after she graduated from St Andrews in front of her boyfriend Felix.And what was so lovely about this is the Royal Family actually announced the news on its official ex account, posting, congratulations to Lady Louise on her graduation from St Andrews University.Lady Louise was joined by her parents, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, as they celebrated the end of her degree.And they are just a really lovely, normal family, Lauren.
I think that is so great.And I love the fact that Lady Louise is such a great shining example to young women as well.She's not like Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.She's not materialistic.She's not a grifter.She's not out for herself.
She's very, very low -key, hardworking.And this is a proper royal.This is someone that girls should be looking up to.And she's a credit to the royal family and to her parents.
And Lauren, such good fun with King Charles in Scotland.I want us to look at this video to end the week because it's just such great fun.Look at this.So King Charles is obviously doing his week in Holyrood.And do you know at all about this game, Lauren?Apparently it's called handball.
It's some type of handball game.And you've got the king and he's going to throw in the ball.So let's just listen.for a little bit.I don't think so it's some sort of handball game but but what i just find so brilliant and this is so scottish isn't it they don't really care that the King's there.It's just like we're playing our game.
I love the Scots.They speak for us all on that.
And it's sort of amazing because this game, I mean, it's so bad.I should know what this game is really.I just, I just literally never seen anything like it.You're right.It does look like a rugby scrum, but I don't think it is.And then it moves to another point and the King sort of has to move out of the way.
And then eventually the camera has to move out of the way too.But I just thought, again, this is the sort of joy that you get from real royals doing their real job.
Dan, I can't.I can't say he's doing his job though.
Because you're so angry with him, Lauren, over the change in the Christianity definition, right?
I'm so upset about this.This is a sneaky, sly move that I'm afraid is going to change the course of our future.
Yeah, no, I know.And Lauren, we have, and I know you've covered it too on your channel in quite a lot of detail.We actually had Father Calvin Robinsonhere earlier this week, he raised his interview with you.And I mean, he's of the view that Charles should be, you know, removed from the throne as a result of this.So certainly it has caused a lot of issues this week.
I mean, can I say the irony is well done that Harry is so worried about his security and certain threats.Well, one of the things that is a safety mechanism for us all is a constitutionally Christian country.And so when that removes, Father Calvin and many people have said that becomes replaced with something else.
"Cockatoo has made my life as a documentary video producer much easier because I no longer have to transcribe interviews by hand."
— Peter, Los Angeles, United States
Want to transcribe your own content?
Get started freeWell, it's so interesting, isn't it?Because it's like Harry, Where's the terror threat coming from?Of course, he tried to say, oh, it's coming from the far right.No, it's not.No, it's not.If there's any terror threat, Harry, towards you, it's an Islamist threat and you should wake up.
Well, Harry uses the same wording time and time again as the government.He used it when he did his New Statesman piece the day after the King's speech.It echoed everything that the government was saying.And the minute I saw Far Right pop up, I thought, oh, right, there we go, Harry.Isn't that just fitting in with the narrative?It's absolutely ludicrous.
He's brought this all on himself.And I think for his safety, he should stay in America.
Absolutely.We don't want you.Like, look, no, no, no.But that is look, that's the point, Lauren, like to end the week.That is the fundamental point.Harry, you've caused all of this trouble.
There is no public demand.There is no public demand to have you.I actually love that idea of why does Zara and Mike Tyndall not take over the Invictus Games?It would be so much better.
I mean, what's interesting is I didn't see Harry talk about, you know, hissafety fears when he was in Jordan being photographed with Hamas sympathizers.You know, yet again, Harry cherry -picking things that suit the narrative.
Yeah, or in Colombia, or in Nigeria.But look, Lauren, of course, for people who want much, much more analysis on this whole decision for the king to effectively change his religious mission, you have got a whole load of extra content on that.your channel, Lauren the Insider, which has now hit 100 ,000 subscribers.Congratulations, Lauren.I loved your little video celebrating that moment.
I've never won anything, Dan.I couldn't believe it.
I don't believe that.I don't believe that.But you have done a lot of work on that.And so, of course, for people who want to see that, head to Lauren the Insider.And thank you, Lauren.for being here today.
And just a reminder, it is a huge Royal Week next week.Of course, Prince Harry is going to be coming to the country.Will he have Archie, Lily and Meghan in tow?Who knows?But what we do know is that there will be a verdict in this absolutely seismic case against the Daily Mail.So just a little reminder, of course, we'll be back with our normal Royal Show on Monday, but we have a special live edition of Outspoken at 3 p .
m.on Tuesday UK time.So that is 10am Eastern, 7am Pacific.That is a special edition of the show on Tuesday specifically to cover the Prince Harry verdict because I think it could be quite seismic.So thank you so much for your company all week.Of course, please, if you do want to support Outspoken and keep us outside of the mainstream media, keep us outside the Royal Road to keep us totally independent, the best thing that you can do, and I so appreciate it.
Thank you in advance is subscribe.my sub stack.The address is www .outspoken .live.You can subscribe completely for free, but of course the paid subscribers drive everything that we do and allow us to keep on producing this show totally independently.
Thank you so much for your company all week.It has been a big one, and I will see you next week.Dan Moulton Outspoken is your no spin, no bias, no censorship outlet for independent news.We have no big tech backing or billionaires pulling my strings, but that does mean I need your support.So please hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell and subscribe to Dan Moulton Outspoken on Spotify or Apple podcasts.It's totally free, but allows me to continue my promise to always keep fighting for you.
Get ultra fast and accurate AI transcription with Cockatoo
Get started free →
