SAS Commanders WARNING to EVERYONE in the UK

British Special Forces SAS -22, formerly British, are not a real defensive force.

Thank you very much for joining us.I have written an article that seems to me that our elites want to see them.Well, we are done.Tell me about this matter.

Well, I think the matter is related to many things.The sources are a common issue, or Iraq, or Afghanistan, or in other places.The matter is related to that.Those who want to go to court because of what happened in the Iraq war.You are being dragged to the courts to make decisions in parts of the second in some of the most extremist and oppressive situations.And I must tell you something, the soldiers who are working, including those who are in the British Special Forces, have been hit by the Kilo.

It was mentioned that the volunteers who trained at the top of the military capacity can face the terrorists face to face.And dealing with them at that time, whether in the seventies or eighties, or even in the last decades, they are suddenly subjected to completely inappropriate ways of fighting.What do you have in the area of ​​fighting to deal with those who only care about killing?And guess what?The only concern of these human rights lawyers is money.They did not go to war.

They do not understand war.They do not understand the reality of what it means to be under this high pressure, risks, threats, and taking decisive decisions in a fraction of a second.But all they see is the signs of the dollar.We have people on the other side.wars and may have committed crimes, but they want to earn a little money and get compensations, and the lawyers want to profit from that.And they are happy to drag innocent soldiers to the courts.

And we have seen that there are people inside the government who support that in some way.This is my opinion on any case.

I mean, there is one word that you liked more than you used.There are many words that I fight to use by the way, but you are talking about continuous improvement in defense, and I find that very important.This idea that war should now become aware and resistant to modern approaches.We have red -arrow planes that work with biofuel, or a plane that sends them to its own meat mill.Tell me about that as well, and how all this hooliganism affects us to be brave and strong men.

So, before he gives you his address, I will give you my experience in this matter, because this is very important.When you are in service, all you want is a person by your side who can carry out a very professional mission, who is organized and knows what he is doing, and you know that you can trust him in any situation.The British army and the military institution have gone a long way to build equality and diversity, and although they were personal goals and goals for me, we all had to adopt them.I know that some medical teams wanted to promote 50 % of women to a certain rank.despite the presence of a larger number of male colleagues within the unit, and it was not appropriate, but they wanted that to happen.We have seen this with other races and ethnicities, whether it was related to the social type.

This has happened in all parts of the army.I will not lie to you.I have seen this happen to myself.All we want does not concern your background or your race.The British army has a role to play in the gender role.It is possible for women to play it, but you have to be careful.

and this is what we need.Yes, and I think that defense is a speech tool.This does not mean that women do not have a place in our armed forces or in the area of ​​combat.What it means is the way in which the language or fashion has led to the over -awareness, as you said, to distance the army from its main goal, which is the war of the Ummah and victory in it through the destruction of its enemies.This means that fighting is no longer the central focus of our defense forces, but has become a kind of social program that is being used today, which is the deadly work of destroying those enemies who seek to threaten you, or occupy your lands, or eliminate you.The language is harsh on purpose in the army because the purpose of the army must be in this direction.

Therefore, those who are trying to distort the concept of defending women for sexual reasons misunderstand what we are saying here, or what I am saying here.What I am saying here is that the only purpose of defending women is to fight for the country in the most difficult circumstances, and you must organize yourself accordingly.And you must listen to the presenter Richard Williams.He has led most of the operations in the world, and he was in those positions himself.He knows exactly what he is talking about, whether you are left or right during the operations.Therefore, when a commander from the Special Air Force comes out and says this, this means that something must change radically and quickly.

Do you think that there was a big decline in employment and retention in Herfu?

it is their belief in the chain of leadership, in their support in the United Kingdom, to eliminate the old fighters who guarded our security in Northern Ireland, which we still do not know what the current Prime Minister and his government will pass, in addition to the ongoing investigations into events that took place later in places like Afghanistan, which have not yet provided a single judicial evidence.As our enemies may see in that a sign of great weakness, and the soldiers may hesitate because of that, this is what, this is what eliminates the recruitment.Imagine going out or continuing to serve.Imagine going out, I say day after day, this level of hesitation is unusual, but in campaigns like Iraq, they serve in large quantities.Then you spend the rest of your life justifying what was a legal operation in front of the courts, in the face of people who file charges.

And as for the resources, is this a problem?I will tell you a little secret, Richard, which is that I started the process of joining as a security guard in intelligence, and with the Royal Air Force, and I had a long break in the operation, and suddenly I saw what happened when Starmer said, You cannot use the British air bases for the good of America.When we were unable to send the HMS Dragon to Akrotiri, we were forced to rely on Spain, Greece and France to help defend it.I said at the time, well, I will stop the request to join this.That determination has been established.I imagine that many of the other people who are looking to join the armed forces have heard a lot of negative news about not taking care of the old fighters.

and the fact that the tanks are more rigid may cause a break in the lower column, and the fact that they are equipped with equipment that is frankly not suitable for the required standards.And they say, well, this does not seem fun as I thought.

Look, it is possible that the regulatory and precautionary forces have a great professional career in all respects, but I know for sure, since the publication of this article,and reading the comments, that there are many of you who will not join, or try to join and then withdraw due to the length of the employment process or because of what Ajax saw, and how people are not satisfied with the equipment, to the extent that they wonder why he joined, then he and our soldiers fairly.Well, from my point of view once again, I think that military service, since it was a large part of my life in the Armed Forces on behalf of the country, benefits the individual and his country for a very long time.So, the matter is left to you, of course, but I advise you to put politics aside and study the matter carefully.Nevertheless, your point is very easy for someone, my enemy, to finance a lawyer in the United Kingdom, to judge me and my friends because of it.So why did I do that?

The policies related to the wars we are involved in are changing all the time.As a former member of the Special Forces, I worked with the governments of the Conservative Party and the Workers' Party.This has nothing to do with the political issue.We, as a state, make decisions, and the elected officials are responsible for deciding the wars we participate in.I have different opinions sometimes about the government, but this is not the issue.The issue is that if we do not provide the resources to defend it, and we do not give it the money it needs, and we did not guarantee them the legal basis to carry out their solemn duties on our behalf, so we will not have the strength of defense.

We will have the strength of internal security, which appears to be good and can carry out some of the tasks, but it cannot fight and win our wars.He points out a great point here, which is the issue that runs inside the military institution, in my opinion.And this is what he is talking about.If the resources are not available, and the funding is sufficient, and the equipment is good, and there is no legal support, Will they be able to perform their work properly during the operation?And that's all.We have to prepare them appropriately and fund them appropriately.

The most important thing is to support them legally.When will that happen?They say that by the turn of the thirties, we will finally be able to reach the defense budget that we need.But this is too far.We need to do that now.Increase it.

Take the money from another place.I'll see you soon.