SELAMAT GINTING: PRABOWO SEDANG BUNUH DIRI

The road battle between the Solo Gang and ISANA has begun. Indeed, this is full of closed movements in this demo. It must be closed movements that must be infiltrated by the power of the intelligence mind. It's all over the place, information, information. Put down President Prabowo, put upload Gibran. Who is this? Unconsciously, Prabowo is committing suicide against his government by letting people who

do not have the capacity and capability remain in the circle of power. We must remember that. Prabowo can be labeled as an anti-democracy figure. Whereas CAP is in Jokowi's hands. The Indonesia Democracy Index in the Jokowi era is the worst in the reform era. Like throwing the rake to the new government of Prabowo Subianto. I remind President Prabowo,

if you compromise politically with Jokowi and his cronies, one by one, Prabowo will be stabbed, not only from behind, but also directly from the front. What kind of anxiety, what kind of injustice is felt by the public. So, the momentum of this action is so fast and the information is that this is just the beginning. They will move more massively in the coming months.

To discuss this, we present another political analyst here to discuss this. A security guard, who is also a journalist in New York.

Selamat Ginting.

Yes, Syed Bung Yinra. Alhamdulillah. What happened? There are many factors in the unexpected demo. First, it was strange when the security officers smeared the fence with oil and all kinds of things. Then, the massive amounte information about the demo was on social media.

But what we noted was that the big organizations that appeared in the demo did not appear. whether it's the Buruh led by Jumhur or the Buruh party led by Iqbal, then the United Nations or the entire Indonesian BEM also did not appear. Who is it that appeared? But if we look at it, there are many things that can indicate that there is a movement that is orchestrated. Who orchestrates it? Many parties, of course. First, in my opinion, there are many factors, for example, public disappointment with the statements of state elites in this matter, elites in parliament, elites in the executive. For example,

what was said by the members of the Sahroni DPR, for example, who said that the people who asked for the DPR to be dissolved as a negative statement. Then if we look at the Sahroni, I see that this is a form of arrogance of power that he has. And this is automatically a public insult by a member of the DPR and shows the minimum awareness of representation. Well, this is a common issue. Since the beginning, Gus Dur even criti has criticized the DPR as a kindergarten.

Criticizing has its reasons. For example, the member of the DPR, Nafa Urbah, who felt that the traffic jam from his stay in Bintaro to reach the DPR building in Senayan was an extraordinary traffic jam. This is an example of his justification to ask for a loan. So, this shows that he has no empathy. Then, reality is broken with the majority of the public who are in financial difficulties. There is an economic crisis.

Even though the public also suggests, actually, if from Bintaro to Senayan, it can take 15 minutes if using public transportation, for example, train. That's not done by the urban navigation. So, it allows the DPR to be given a housing loan which is so high. Third, the statement from Sri Mulyani,

who stated that the teachers and lecturers' paid very low, even some people see them as a burden to the country. Of course, this is a hoax. But from the statement of Sri Mulyan, it seems that he forgot that his future is he is also a lecturer at the University of Indonesia. He is a lecturer's son.

He should be looking for a concrete solution, not just stop discussing the teacher's salary, but their salary is low. But artists or whatever are paid high salaries to damage the morals of the nation. This is a contradiction. Then there is the statement of Emmanuel Ebenezer who suddenly asked for amnesty after being arrested by the KPK. This also shows that he asked for amnesty for personal protection,

even though he committed a fatal mistake. Because of that, the effort that Noel made used his power for his own impunity. Not to mention the statement of the Minister of Education, Stella Garcia, who said that the Ministry of Education can make English and math smart. What's the story? So, for me, this is an oversimplification of education policy

that reduces public intelligence. That the MBG promotion rhetoric can make English and math smart, it doesn't make sense. So, in my opinion, public communication of state officials is bad. First, it causes the loss of public empathy. Officials tend to live in an elite circle, then they are separated from the reality of the community.

Then they don't feel the pressure of life, the economic pressure, so they are unconsciously talking without thinking about the feelings of the people. Secondly, of course, this is an insensitive statement to the conditions of the people. Secondly, for example, it is an example of how minimal public accountability is done by state officials, both in the DPR and the government. So what's interesting is that there is no mechanism that can regulate the DPR members to be able to deny them that their statement is wrong.

Also giving sanctions for its bad public statements. This is not in the parliament, it is not in the government either. For example, there must be an indisciplinary system towards the members of the DPR who speak like that, towards the members of the cabinet who speak like that. The third is of course, unpractical personalistic communication. When they are gathered in a retreat at Hambalang,

a retreat at a military academy, they must be given an understanding of public communication. So that their communication is not just an emotional statement without calculating the social risk. The social risk must be taken into risks, including the demonstration. Then there is the fourth power culture,

which is the undemocratic power culture that they show. The feudal culture is still strong. They forget that they are public servants. But they feel that they are the country's elite. So, what do you want if I say that? That's the impression that Sahroni created. So, the officials don't see themselves as public servants,

but they feel like a ruler. Fifth, as I mentioned, this is proof of public ethics decadence. This is important, I think, because the officials who take up important positions are not because of their competence, but because of political connections, because of popularity like those artists, and also financial transactionalism so that they can enter the elite elite. That's what made the anger poured into the demo,

including the demo that happened yesterday. But all this time, the army has always been respected by the demonstrators. Was there any infiltration in the August 25th action that so the car was damaged was a TNI plate car. I don't know exactly, but what is clear is that the public saw a car with a state plate, not a TNI plate, if I'm not mistaken, ZZH or something like that. It's considered that they are arrogant in the crowd of demonstrations, and they just enter the building.

We also know that if there is a demonstration, we will not enter. We just look for another place. It's a bad thing for him. So, his car became a public offence. But I want to emphasize that at least this is the peak of public offence in the demo yesterday which they held until 17 August. For example, how in an uncomfortable life, the people are in trouble, why are they dancing in the building of the DPR?

Then the palace became the place where they danced. So, the loss of their souls is also a place to dance at the ceremony. I suggest that if there are elements of art, after the ceremony is over, the people's stage is at Monas. Not at the palace, not also at the stalls when they announce the increase of their loans, while the people are forced to pay taxes,

and the members of the DPR are not burdened by taxes. This is unfair. So, if the anger is not managed well, it will damage the interests of the nation and the country, especially will lower the reputation of President Prabowo Subianto's government. What is also interesting on TikTok, the president's representative, Gibran Raka Bumeng Raka met with the demonstrators.

And it was said that, Oh, this is what actually happened. That Gibran will become a hero and all that. So, the netizens thought that this action was designed by a moving public, but actually there was a Gibran behind it. What is the battle between the Solo Gang and Isanah has started?

I think this is the minimum communication channel of the time, wherever it is routed. What they know is the aspiration aspiration is in the parliament, in the DPR as a representative of the people, not in the ministry. In my opinion, it should be looked at first. What is the case? The case of labor, such as the harvest that should be done by the elites of the Ministry of Labor, then the demo should be in the Ministry of Labor.

Because it is the executor. For example, to pay for the K3 certificate, it's 270,000. Why can it be 6 million, 7 million, 10 million, etc.? It's very difficult for the people, for ordinary workers. The demo should be like that. Not all demos should be in the DPR. For example, the health issue,

please have the demo in the Ministry of Social Affairs. So, there must be a place for it. Because the executor is the executive. So, the impression of a country running with a system of Mr. Senang is always shown. they always show their happiness. They are always shown by our elites.

They forget that these statements hurt the people. But for the sake of their happiness, they forgot, they hurt the people's hearts. So the demo can be seen as an expression of public correction, actually, towards the policies of the countries that are considered lost. And this is of course an accumulation of frustration towards the poor elite communication, especially when they tend to look down on the people in their statements.

So this is what they have to learn again. They should not forget to press the people, but they need the people's voice to sit in parliament. So, I think this bad public communication is also a symptom of an ethical crisis, a political ethical crisis, and the deficit of empathy. This must be exposed. There is a deficit of empathy and the loss of the orientation of public service to the community. And I think this is a dangerous signal.

So it is normal, in a nutshell, that the people demand the disbandanding of the DPR because in this democratic system it can trigger delegitimization of what has happened in the election. It turns out that the representative of the people is not up to the expectations. That's delegitimization. That's why we need to give suggestions and recommendations. They need to be trained on how to communicate with the public in a good way, in a way that can be understood by all messages. If we learn communication, the important thing is that the message should be delivered. So, in a simple language,

with a bit of a groundless phrase, don't always use foreign languages that are not understood. Then, the ethical code of political communication should also be done immediately. There should be no sanctions for public officials who make communication errors. If they are allowed to do so, they will also say things like, you stupid people, you stupid people, etc.

That should not be released. So, the sanction mechanism must be there, both in the parliament and in the government. There must be an increase in public participation so that the elite can hear the complaints of the people more. Not complaints are answered by ejek.

Also, the political recruitment reform is also important. Don't just because they have a lot of fans, suddenly they are recruited to be a member of the DPR. Of course, like in the era of President Suharto, for example, it was a good thing to sit as a member of the political party for 5 years and then be nominated.

So, the relatives are done with themselves, not the ones who are looking for food in the building of the DPR-MPR. What is being chased by the netizens is the statement from Gibran. When the PIL press that 19 million new jobs will be available. And it turns out that it is not fulfilled. Once again, is this movement of the time a part of closing the door? So that it is no longer chased by the public.

What is being chased is the DPR. Well, from the political analysis, there are many things that can be analyzed. First, of course, is the August 25th demo, we haven't discussed the 28th one, because the situation is not final, it's still going on. Is this part of the effort to discredit President Prabowo Subianto, right? This is interesting because of course, political instability will discredit the ruling government.

So, it is possible to discredit the government of Prabowo Subianto. But we can't simplify the demonstration as an effort to discredit only President Prabowo Subianto. Because there are wild demands, for example, to remove the head of the DPR, Puan Maharani. Who is playing this? So many people are playing. So, is this also against the politics of the PDIP? Who is against the politics of the PDIP? Then, why is there a rumour? Information, information,

put down President Prabowo, put up Gibran. Like that. Well, this is from the groups that are in the Indonesian Solidarity Party. It's like that too. Who is this? in the Indonesian Solidarity Party. Who is this? That's why there should be players.

So, there is an automatic decrease in the quality of democracy. What does it mean? It's all confusing. Confusing the DPR,PR, DPR's chairman. Why only DPR's chairman? Not the others. So, there is a question about state assets that have not been goaled yet. The ROU, asset of assets for the corrupt.

Correct. It will also be targeted. So there is a dimension, I noted, the political elite dimension. Well, beyond that, it is very likely that there are political groups who try to play or for the purpose of delegitimizing the government of Prabowo Subianto. In the history of politics in Indonesia, big demonstrations are often used as a tool, political tools, and signals of pressure to the new president, for example.

And also how to maintain the influence of the old elite. The old elite is Jokowi, so the old elite is still there. So it must be respected. The old elite is still there. So, we have to respect it. This is the political compromise of Prabowo against the old government of Jokowi. It can't be broken. So, this also wants to show that the influence of the old president is still there.

In the form of mass movement. There is also a suspicion that I analyzed the involvement of supporters of Jokowi. There is a suspicion that should be suspected. It's normal that in political analysis misunderstanding in political analysis. How to prove it? Well, there is no direct proof.

It's called politics, right? Politics is not only on the surface, but also in the depth. This should be analyzed with political theories. But if we analyze it from an elite maneuver, for example, there is a relevant political indication there. For example, the facts of the context that should be seen. First, there was still a tension between Jokowi and Prabowo in the 2024 election. It still exists. After the press conference, political observers, including me, also noted that

Prabowo slowly began to distance himself from the influence of Jokowi. Especially in the cabinet. After the event that should be suspected, the meeting on October 13 between President Prabowo and former President Jokowi in Solo, there were messages from President Jokowi's agendas that had to be run by President Prabowo Subianto. It was still strong for 10 years. The analysis was like this. If you don't run it, you can do it in any way

so that there will be no October 20, 2024. It's possible. The prime minister can also be afraid, so he accommodates the interest of former President Jokowi to be able to place about 17 people in the government, including in ministerial offices. So, some figures who are suspected to be close to Jokowi also gradually strengthened in legal cases,

start to be isolated. For example, Noel. In this forum, I also reminded President Prabowo several times, if you compromise politically with Jokowi and his crony, for example, through the people who were given a place in the cabinet, and also the willingness to stab Prabowo, not only stabbing from behind, but also stepped forward.

The Noel case. Then, the case that should be suspected to be related to Budi Ari, the current Minister of Cooperation, until now, it has not been legally proceeded. If we look at the case, is not yet followed by law. If we look at the case, there are cases of police violence against Budi Ari,

Duga Anjudol, cases of violence against KPK, Noel, Yakut, Minister of Religion, Yak Religion, and all kinds of people. And then there is the Ministry of Labor, right? Yes, that's right. It's the same as, is it just Noel?

Maybe the elite of the Ministry of Labor always does the awarding through the certification of K3 to the farmers. So it should be assumed that the minister must also be non-active to be inspected. Also, the former ministers of the Ministry of Labor must be inspected too. Maybe this has become their habit to rush things. There is also a dynamic that we cannot deny, the dynamic of Prabowo's relationship with Gibran,

which in my opinion is not very smooth. Gibran is not active politically. Or he is kept away from Prabowo Subianto. The relationship between Prabowo's president and Gibran as a WAPRES we have to observe it. Who made Gibran and Prabowo talk? Of course, the parties that didn't want Jokowi's family to stay in the government.

And it's in the government of Prabowo Subianto himself, the coalition of his party. Whether the democrat is willing to be 100% or not, or Gibran is willing to be the president. Of course, they think, Oh, our general leader, AHY, is better. Something like that.

The same goes for the Golkar party. Of course, it's more realistic if the Golkar elite sit as the WAPRES. The same goes for the National Security Party or others. It's definitely like that. So, we have to observe the dynamics of political relations between Prabowo and Gibran because this shows that the reconciliation of the PASKA-PILPRES is tactical and not substantive. So it's just a tactic to win the PILPRES, then Prabowo will embrace Gibran, not in a substantive way.

If it's in a substantive way, it doesn't meet all the requirements, age, capacity, capability, intellectuality, morality, and so on. Except for the contents of the bag. The third, I think there is certain institutions or figures that we should always observe. Those figures are supporters of Jokowi, who always appear everywhere,

whether in the media, in the political party, or the civil society elements that was previously close to the palace. For example, we always remember, why did the people who used to push of Indonesian Liar to the King, I don't know what it's called, why was she given a place? Is this the fear of the King or what?

So this is a possibility, they always want to keep the offer position to limit the domination of the government? In the 25th of August, the demand was concentrated towards the DPR. There were several things, several points. But in the 28th of August, in the statement of Sahil Iqbal, it was like returning the bullets fired to the palace by quoting a number of statements from President Prabowo Subianto related to, for example, the plan to increase the rate of robbery,

robbery of assets, and also the election. Will the momentum of the action also go to the palace? After their aspirations are not fulfilled, they will be handled by the DPR. It is very possible. So, from an analytical aspect, it is very possible. What is the strategy of the demo? We have to see it first. They press the DPR and the government. Not just the DPR. So, they have already pressed the DPR, right?

So, after that, the government will be pressured. By what? For example, to prevent the RUU from being controversial, especially related to the tax, tax, and so on. This is actually carried out by ministers who are accused of torturing the people by raising taxes, then raising the price of goods, and all kinds of things. The figures like Sri Mulyani are always dragged.

So the demand for the future is a demand to do cabinet reshuffle, it is very likely to happen. So there are certain benefits for the opposition with the demo. The benefit is that this momentum can be used to raise opinions that the government regime of Prabowo Subianto has not met the people's expectations for the past 10 months. But the problem is this, Mr. Indra. If you force the Demodemo to ask Prabowo to step back, it means automatically asking for Gibran to replace President Prabowo Subianto.

For example, Bung Indra supports Prabowo, it could be because she doesn't want Gibran to be president. It's like that. Some people now separate supporting Prabowo, but not Gibran. So, I think this is a public opinion bias against the Prabowo-Subianto regime which was considered a failure from the beginning. This is a risk for Prabowo if it's not anticipated. For example, how can a lot of people or demonstrators

do live broadcasts in the DPRK? It's my question, I was asked why the area was not jammed so that everything could be done. They did social media efforts to broadcast. Suddenly it was a big deal. The anticipation was low. Then they discredited certain security apparatus. Like what Indra said, why are they being chased? Even though they are the ones who are doing violence. For example, TNI with their uniform is running without any weapons.

Without any barriers, without any guards, without anything. Meanwhile, the police in the front line use the other one. So, we have to realize that there is an effort to fight the security apparatus in this matter, the Ten Equality, it must also be watched intelligently. The risk for Prabowo if he mismanaged the demonstrations, including the future, if the August demonstration is held,

the government will hold the next year, in October, the government will be in power. So, if it fails from the beginning, if it fails to manage, Prabowo can be labeled as an anti-democracy figure. While CAP is in Jokowi's hands. When the Indonesia's democracy index in Jokowiowi era was the worst in the reform era. So, it was like throwing the rake to the new government of Prabowo Subianto. So, the response of the aggressive apparatus can also damage the government. So if we look here,

it is suspected that there is a political maneuver by the Jokowi supporters to force at least reconciliation or new political deal with Prabowo Subianto after a year of reshuffle of the cabinet. So, the most important thing... Who did the political deal with Prabowo? Yes, through the pressures, the elite is hidden. At least, it is.

So, the political pressure can be read as an effort to force reconciliation. So that there is a new political deal, they are not eliminated. What Prabowo did was also a weird thing in my opinion. When he gave the appreciation of the Grand Star to the ministers. What kind of ministers who have only been working for 10 months and already given an award?

So, this is Prabowo's effort to win their hearts. So that you have given the appreciation of coupling. That's coupling to be buried in Kalibata. Something like that. That's loyal to me, not to the old government. But it can't be said like that. But in my opinion, in this case, I have to remind

President Prabowo, don't use the TNI, the government, or the state to pay the debt to certain people with the gift of appreciation.

But that has already happened, Sir.

That's why I said this cabinet, the red and white cabinet, I critically evaluate it as a thank you cabinet. Thank you cabinet. Not a jack and cabinet that is expected by the public. And this happened after a meeting a week before the cabinet's announcement. So, the response of the state's elite, including the Greenra party, of course, they will try to do political stability, which is usually reflected by the statement of Sufi Dasko Ahmad as the Green Party elite.

So that there is a picture to be maintained, so that the old elite maneuvers that have not been absorbed by the government do not take any bigger action. So for me, this is a pressure, Bung. Pressure on the government of President Prabowo so that he doesn't immediately leave the influence of Jokowi in the government. the mass action is not carried out by the DPR or by the president, then they will do a national strike.

You know, the impact of the strike on the workers in the aviation sector, that's amazing. Especially if the workers are from the entire industry. What will happen if the national workers are done by the workers? Yes, of course there will be chaos. Because I read the demonstration on August 25th. It is a combination of public anger towards the parliament and also towards the government

and also the possibility of being used by certain elites. Including the old elites who want to regain power. Or the old elites who don't want to be eliminated. Second, it can't be concluded that this is a recreation of the Jokowi group. This is politics. It can only be investigated intelligently. And it must be proven about the dynamics of power that showsokowi who have incentives to protect their influence. To protect their influence, until now, for example, the corruption case that was done in the North Sumatra Public Works Department,

which involves the head of the department, which is Putra Ginting, with Governor of North Sumatra, Bobinah Sutyon, who is really the daughter-in-law of President Jokowi, until now, it seems like it's gone. And in the case of Noel,

the public is not wrong if they think that this is an alteration of the issue so that it is not discussed in the field. Well, this has become a burden. Noel was sacrificed. Noel became a burden, but Noel is actually an unsolved criminal. In the last two months,, they have received various things.

From the arrest and all kinds of things. What's interesting is why the KPK didn't continue until the government of the North Sumatra province. This is a detail. The first echelon of the Ministry of Labor. And this will also affect the second echelon.

So, it is suspected that the supporters of Jokowi also have incentives to maintain their influence in various ways, including directing public opinion. This is a battle. Public opinion is happening in the times ahead of the one year of Prabowo's government. Then the next thing, I think Prabowo also has to read this situation wisely, because if we only respond with repression or arrogance of power, it will accelerate the delegitimization of the government of Prabowo Subianto.

I think that's what can be understood from the context of this August 25th demonstration. And August 28th, the figures are still strange. Why are the demonstrators students of the University of Malaysia? So, there are many assessments. According to my political reading, there is an elite in the Prabowo government that should be accused of playing an issue in this August 25th. On August 25th? So, there is an effort to delegitimize, right?

Exactly. Delegitimize the government of Proposal Bianto. If the new government is delegitimized, what does it mean? It means that the old has gained a plus point. They can say, my goodness, the government is like that now.

The battle is still going on. Because there are still some groups that are fighting there. Is the 28th of August action trying to go back to the path for the mass movement. This is the hunting movement. As we know, the hunting movement, the teacher movement, and the farmer movement,

actually, these three movements are the most disciplined. The best in terms of mobilizing the masses, responsibility, the masses, responsibility, the order, then other movements are far more chaotic and irregular. Now when the herd movement appeared today,

what is the purpose of adding, say, strange actions that happened on August 25th. Yes, there are a lot of closed movements in these demos. There must be closed movements that can be infiltrated by the power of the intelligent mind that must detect. For example, why is the demo from morning to noon, so strong? Why is the corruption at this time?

Who is the actor? Not the important figures. So, in my opinion, what comes up is that we have to identify it correctly. There is a closed movement. The main actor of this network is supposed to be part of the old government. This is to speed up or at least delegitimize the government of Prabowo Subianto. Here's the story. Why is there a movement or an operation method to make delegitimization, because they don't attack in a frontal way.

Not directly to the government, right? Not in a frontal way. But it makes the government finally make controversial statements. The more people are wrong, the more people are wrong. And the ministerial decisions are like that. For example, increasing the price of gas, then the tax increase, then the PPP, ATK, the unactive accounting,

if you want to activate it again, you have to pay 100,000. 100,000, how many were blocked at that time? Including our accounting was also blocked. Because Bung Indra was not active, there was no money. Including the health budget, the money for the economy, etc. It means that the people were pressured, but the elite are the ones who are in a hurry. So, the purpose is to make the cabinet not be considered credible.

Then it is filled with problematic figures. It's clear that the effort to delegitimize the Prabowo government has already happened when the cabinet announcement was made. What does it mean? The problematic figures, the loyalists of Jokowi, So, people have their own personal agendas. Like Noel, he has his own personal agenda. It was seen, right? Yesterday, there was a call from a speaker that Noel used to talk to certain gangs.

From the four phones on the ceiling. So, in my opinion, when the Cabinet of Ministers of Prabowo Subianto was in power, it was an effort to delegitimize the government by by creating problematic figures. The problematic volunteers are given a place, including becoming commissioners. We have to remember that. Also, why is the loyalist Jokowi still given a place? Also, the controversial show of the big agents. controversial. Why did they let the US ambassador be empty for two years?

Then people who have been given a place to be a ambassador, whether he can work, we criticize. People in their 70s, do they want to be an ambassador or a publicist abroad? It's like that. Not to mention their capacity. So, there are many ambassadors

who are still in the Jokowi group. They are used to serve the interests of the Jokowi dynasty, the old oligarchy, and even for the interests of global groups abroad. The oligarchy? Yes, that's right. The neo-imperialism, foreign capitalist,

will be supported by the government. Yes, that's right. The delegitimization was also included in the appreciation of the Mahaputra's stars. For me, delegitimization towards the government of Prabowo Subianto is dangerous. Suddenly, Mahaputra became a mere asset. Assets are given to the unsuitable figures.

Not yet suitable, including those who have moral cases. Why do they get the appreciation? Well, this is for accommodation. So, the accommodation of the old government is still used by Prabowo Subianto. And also, in my opinion, the show of power is the luxury of the officials, including the members of the DPR. The house is like a showroom. Look at what happened in the Noel case.

Those luxury goods, luxury cars, are for display. So, I think the militaristic attributes also need to be re-examined. It's not appropriate to have a fat stomach, or a slender body, or too thin to use military equipment. We don't see it as a gagab, but it's funny. So, we should criticize it. Then, the elitist lifestyle makes people angry.

In the middle of the difficult times, they use batik that costs tens of millions. And we don't sleep to study anything that is used, anything that is used. I also saw the watch. There is a watch of the DPR members who have a portrait of each of their members and see how much it is worth and how many watches they have. It's easy for the litigants to say, your jacket can be captured and the price can be found.

Unfortunately, they know that it's 200,000, not tens of millions. They know that. We have to show that. So, the policies that are counter-popular, without realizing it, they delegitimize the government of Prabowo Subianto. For example, the budgetary spending, then the additional debt of 700 trillion rupiah,

then the increase in taxes that add to the burden of the people. Everything was directed to the President Prabowo's image. As far as I think, the state's response to this action, in my opinion, it's silent, not a response. Because there is no statement at all. There is no respond at all.

Why did it end up like that?

That's what I said. People who don't have the capacity to be a spokesman for the Presidential Communications Office who has already been shut down, why are they still being brought back

who has already been shut down? So, people don't like it anymore. People don't like it anymore. The explanation from the Presidential Communications Office, people don't want to hear it. This person has failed, and then the government continues. So, without realizing it, Prabowo is committing suicide to the government by letting people who don't have the capacity and capability

to remain in the circle of power. We have to remember that. We have to remain optimistic, the Prabowo government as a new hope, it has to run according to the rules. But there is a limit. We give it a year, and then we say, you can go back a year. But if you go back, the report will be higher.

It's a hassle. So, we have to see how this is a way to exploit the personal weaknesses of President Prabowo-Suguga. This must be understood from the SW from the circle of yes-men. If we don't, we criticize, you are confused here. If it's good, we praise it. If it's not good, we tell them. beritahu gitu loh. Artinya se buruk apapun, se ganas apapun aksi masa yang terjadi, itu istana harus memberikan jawaban. Dan bukan diem seperti sekarang. Oh iya.

Diam itu kan artinya menerima. Apalagi di dalam budaya politik Jawa, budaya Jawa. Diam itu nerima. Misalnya, aku cinta kau diam. Oh, dia menerima. Kalau nol silent, they will accept it. For example, I love you, keep silent. Oh, they will accept it. If you refuse, they will refuse. The information will be very wild. Because our interpretation of the movement of the time was a bit different.

This is one of the weaknesses of Prabowo. In my opinion, he likes to be respected. And it is really used by his political opponents. For example, they give respect, but it is actually a mock respect. A mock respect, a fake praise, something like that. So, the president can follow their agenda. He was praised. But it was just one sunny day. He was praised for making the decision. They were praised. Prabowo also praised them.

He made people feel weak when Jokowi was alive. So, it should be read not only from the statement but also from the action. The next one is impulsive. The supporters of Jokowi deliberately pushed Prabowo to take a decision quickly but not maturely. They were quick but not mature. Finally, Prabowo was. There must be an effort to push that. The next one is, of course, the condition is now biased in the inner circle.

How can Jokowi's inner circle still be in Prabowo Subianto's inner circle of Prabowo Subianto. That's a bias. So, it should be suspected that the old government has infiltrated certain people in the inner circle of Prabowo Subianto. This is what Prabowo Subianto should understand in the political intelligence war, in power. That's how it is. Is it scary? It is scary.

My friend, for the sake of this time, it will certainly give a value to remain critical of the government, be it legislative, executive, or educative. And we at Madilok will continue to monitor what issues have been reached by the time, what are their difficulties, what are the problems they face, so that this is heard by the rulers.

The rulers are not stubborn and the government is not firm in giving an answer, at least just an answer first, before taking more concrete steps towards the demand of the time. at least just an answer first, before taking more concrete steps towards the demand of the time. See you next week with Bang Ginting. Thank you.