Someone's Getting Fired Over This...

The Epstein hearings just backfired and exposed a whole bunch of people, but not in the way you might think.

I want to answer the question the way I asked it.

Chairman Jordan, I'm not going to get in the gutter with these people, but I'm going to answer the question.

How many of you invited?

Watch this. To my right is an email that was sent by the victim's lawyers to the DOJ. It was a list of names not to redact. It was a list of names not to redact. Or sorry, a list of names not to release. What did the DOJ do with this email? They released this email in the document production. Literally the worst thing you could do to the survivors, you did. And they're getting phone calls. A lot of these people didn't want to be known.

And we know you touched the document because you redacted one name and you redacted the lawyer's name, but you left the survivor's name there. The next document I want to show you, that was in the title, the victim's survivor's names, right? Co-conspirators, fully redacted. And by the way, we're going to redacted and by the way you know and redact them here Oh Wexner is in

this now your assistant depth your deputy attorney general said oh well he appears hundreds of times in the files but he doesn't appear in this file until I forced you to release okay pay attention He's listed as a co-conspirator. And then finally, what we have here, the third exhibit that I have.

He's saying all of this is proof of something.

These are the documents that we need that you're holding onto and over-redacting because they have the names of the men who are implicated. How do we know? Because the survivors gave testimony to the FBI and it's in there.

And what happens when you go to the portal at the DOJ to look at what's behind this redaction? Another redaction. So we can't even see them. And then there's some of these files you've pulled down from the website.

It does look messy. That we will never messy. But there's something happening here. Because we can't search the redactions. Wait till you see what it is. So I have several questions for you. Who's responsible? Are you able to track who in your organization did made this massive failure and released the victims names? Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner's name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document? Do you have that kind of accountability?

I believe Wexner's name was listed more than 4,000 times about...

Yeah, I already told you that. This is where he's listed as a co-conspirator.

Can I finish my answer? Come on. Let I finish my answer? Come on, let me finish my answer. We corrected that within 40 minutes. He was already, you're acting like everybody's trying to cover up Wexner's name.

Reclaiming my time.

I'm going to answer this question.

Reclaiming my time.

It's Mr. Chairman.

This is what you need to know about this whole thing. If you think this is a massive conspiracy to protect powerful people, here's your evidence. This senator has it right here. But on the other hand, if you think this is a massive conspiracy to try and tie the president to something that's been going on for decades. This is also proof of that because the thing he's mad about is a guy being Redacted who was already in the files unredacted Over 40,000 other times this is like we're splitting hairs here can give her answer the time belongs to the gentleman from

So I'm gonna put the language of the bill they don't want the answer chairman I have another question

on that here's the question can I need to give my answer on that it looks like

a show attorney general respond to move to chairman it's my time in 40 minutes

you asked me a question you can give me 40 minutes Wexner's name was added back

then 40 minutes of me catching you red

handed red here there was one redaction and we invited you in this guy has Trump derangement syndrome he needs to be a

politician chairman please restore his time and remind the witness of themselves

they're playing I no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked two other individuals.

Is that your position as well?

The whole thing is an attempt to try and tie President Trump to this in a way that many people are upset. Nobody has been able to do yet. And that's the thing that is coming out here. You've got these representatives who are up here with all these charts and all of this stuff

that looks like it's evidence of something, but it isn't evidence of anything, at least nothing tying Trump to any of this, other than that it is his Justice Department Department which now has to talk about it.

Did you ask Merrick Garland that the last four years? Did you talk about Epstein?

I'm reclaiming my time. I'm glad you're asking about Merrick Garland because this is bigger than Watergate. This goes over four administrations. You don't have to go back to Biden. Let's go back to Obama. Let's go back to George Bush. This cover up spans decades and you are responsible for this portion of it.

And that's weird.

I want to know at what point.

And she's the only one they want to be responsible for it. The FBI and DOJ decide that Lex Wessner was not a co-conspirator because our Epstein files transparency act requires you please put it back on the screen but he's already in there whether to prosecute they're fighting about nothing it's not in the files and

it's not in the files for any of these other men I'm of the gentleman has

which I may she answer and he's a hypocrite because he voted against the ban that we were talking about on deep fake AI porn. Only two people voted against it and you were

one of them hypocrite. The gentleman... Wow if you think this is a cover-up her quote-unquote deflecting is evidence of that or if you think this whole thing is a circus put on by people who could have pursued this in the past with past attorney generals and past FBI's and never did for some reason this is also evidence of that Why are all these people going after it now? Because they don't like the president and they want to tie this to the president

I did not expect this to happen Trump was one of the first people who was a whistleblower on Jeffrey Epstein. More evidence that Trump was the original Jeffrey Epstein whistleblower is coming out in the court documents. Trump was responsible for Epstein's first conviction. So you remember whenever this came out?

When he first heard the rubric, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant.

I can tell you that I talked to President Trump back in 2009, and several times after that, he helped me. He got on the phone. He told me things that were helping our investigation.

I now see why Biden didn't release the Epstein files when he had four years to do so. I don't think anybody was predicting this. This is the file. New Epstein was disgusting. Trump said Maxwell was Epstein's operative. She is evil and to focus on her.

Trump told blank that he was around Epstein once when teenagers were present and Trump got the hell out of there. Trump was one of the very first people to call when people found out they were investigating Epstein. No one could explain how Epstein made his money. Prince Andrew was a fixture in Palm Beach. So Jeffrey Epstein thought that Trump ratted him out. Epstein came to believe that it was Trump who caused him to be investigated by the law enforcement in 2005. This is now this is where you get the idea that Epstein actually had

it in for Trump and that he wanted to try and get rid of Trump somehow. And then he was actually part of this whole smear campaign when he was around. But for some reason, we're not hearing any of this from the people that are trying to tie the current Attorney General to it instead of the past Attorney General or the past administrations that had this information sooner.

Mr. Chairman, could she answer the question?

Chairman, I was wondering.

The Attorney General is allowed to respond the way she wants to respond to any member's questions. Republican Democrats are-

This place is imploding.

I will have the amendment's consent request. Gentleman's recognized for a UC.

All right.

This is an example. I'm submitting these three-

That is crazy.

That are entirely redacted. That is crazy. at them. I'm submitting a witness statement that implicates Les Wexner. I'm submitting an article from the New York Times that the DOJ released nude photos and identifiable pictures of the victims. I'm submitting a letter from AG Bondi to Kash Patel imploring him to quit keeping the files when you found out that they were keeping files from you

because they're still redacting files.

Chairman, are we going to recess for votes?

Yes, we are.

I'm submitting for unanimous consent.

The frustrating thing about this is the fact that there are redactions. And whenever you see something like this black piece of paper up here where the whole page is redacted everyone wants to know what it says and what it's talking about. You can't hide something even if there's a reason to hide it and not have people talk about it forever. I mean that's how area 51 survived. But here's where things get even crazier.

From Texas is recognized for UC. Thank you so much. Donald Trump's approval rating implodes a Here we go, Mr. Liu. Wait till he gets going. This is fascinating. Do these people want the truth? That's what you need to be asking yourself. Do these career politicians want the truth? I've spent a lot of time walking the streets of New York City, showing apartments, talking about crime, and letting people know what life is really like on the ground here right now.

And one thing has become impossible to ignore. Everything is more expensive, everything feels more fragile, and the people in the middle are getting squeezed from every direction. Rents are up, utilities are up, groceries are up, and the same institutions that created this mess are out there buying homes and telling regular people just to adjust.

Living in a city like New York teaches you pretty quickly that systems don't always work the way they're supposed to. And that's why I believe in owning something real like physical gold and silver from American Hartford Gold, not because it's flashy, but because it's tangible. Gold isn't tied to a landlord, a bank's balance sheet,

or the next policy experiment. American Hartford Gold has an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and thousands of five-star reviews. You can have gold or silver shipped straight to your door or stored securely in a tax-advantaged gold IRA

if you're thinking long-term. On top of that, right now, if you call and mention my name, you could get $20,000 in free silver with your first purchase. Call 866-679-4550, or text CASH to 65532. That's 866-679-4550, or text CASH to 65532.

Or you can just click the link in the description of this video. When you live in the real world, instead of a spreadsheet, you learn fast. Betting everything on systems you don't control is incredibly risky. Well, owning something real just makes sense.

Why have you not prosecuted former Prince Andrew?

Prince Andrew's been investigated.

He's finished. When he was attorney General and set before.

I agree with you. You twice. I'm reclaiming my time. I agree with you. I agree with you. During the Biden administration.

They all reclaim their time. The second anyone mentions Merrick Garland, people want to immediately reclaim their time. And that's what's so interesting about this. She got these career politicians that could have done something and nobody cared until Trump was Connected to it. Even if Trump's not in the files getting his Justice Department to have these conversations over and over again It is brand damaging to people who might be on the fence and to people who might look at this guy and say yeah

He's a nice guy. He just wants to get to the truth. And now that these files are released now there's all this evidence and it looks like something's being hidden and I'm just not too sure I mean you can't blame people for thinking that way but the problem is the folks on the screen right here that are bringing all these accusations they're leaving half the truth more than half the truth out and that's the sad part. In 2005 this is also one from 2016.

Bill Clinton.

I got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein.

A lot of problems.

That island was really a cesspool. There's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew. He'll tell you about it. The island was an absolute cesspool. Then I threw him out of a club. I didn't want anything to do with him. That was many, many years ago. Now, other people, they went all over with him. They went to his island.

Yeah, I got the people that went to the island.

Yeah. Why is he in the clear? He's not in the clear. But what it was showing is that before any public scrutiny occurred, Donald Trump expressed concern about Epstein directly to the authorities. It seemed pretty obvious to me that Donald Trump and Epstein were pretty close at one point. It's very hard really for me to say that you know like this guy's totally innocent but at the same time whenever you're the guy that's

ratting this person out before anything ever happens publicly then I do think that looks very good on you privately I think. So here's the thing if Trump had done what is also in the files, if he had blown the whistle on Epstein after something had happened, this would look very different. This would look very different if Trump says, okay, I'm gonna run for president. By the way, you should check out this guy Epstein.

Then it'd be like, whoa, wait a second. He's trying to disassociate himself. I think that the whole reason we didn't hear anything about Epstein and Trump for a long time was because everyone who really knew and knew what was on both sides of the aisles here realized there's no way to pin this on the president in the way you can pin this stuff on other people who were in these files for doing things that were wrong. If anything these files show

that Trump was ahead of the game when it came to taking down Epstein. He was ahead of the game when these career politicians who are now accusing the Trump Justice Department of protecting the guy, he was way ahead of them. He acted before they did. And now they're

trying to say it's his fault. I agree with you. During the Biden administration, I called for people looking at Epstein files. Merrick Garland dropped the ball. Asked the Attorney General Bill Barr, asked Alex Acosta, a whole string of failures. But you are in charge. You have the power to change things, to hold these men accountable. And you're doing the opposite. You're protecting them. So I want to move on to another man. I want to move on to another question. You answered the question. I want

to discuss another man, Donald Trump, who is all over the Epstein files.

He's all over the files. Even though he's the whistleblower in the files, he's all over the files. There's a massive coverup. This is a big problem. You have the power to do something about it.

You see?

Like former Prince Andrew, Donald Trump attended various parties with Jeffrey Epstein.

Like former Prince Andrew. You see the comparison?

I want to know were there any underage girls at that party or at any party that Trump attended with Jeffrey Epstein

This is so ridiculous and that they are trying to deflect From all the great things Donald Trump has done. There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime Everyone knows that this has been the most transparent presidency. He's the one that asked that those files be released.

I'm going to claim my time. I got your answer. You said there's no evidence. President Trump asked the clock to sign the legislation.

There's a massive brawl here.

Time belongs to the gentleman from California.

I'm going to put up another document from a witness who called the FBI's National Threat Operations Center because I believe you just lied under oath. There is ample evidence in the Epstein file. Don't you ever accuse me of a crime. I believe you just lied under oath and this is all on videotape. You said there's no evidence of a crime. I'm showing you here is the witness statement. No evidence Trump committed a crime. Called into the FBI's Threat Operations Center. he drove Donald Trump around in a limo.

He overheard what Donald Trump said to Jeffrey on his cell phone.

The goal here is to mention Epstein and Trump in the same sentence as many times as possible in an effort to try and take him down. It's actually a pretty weak takedown attempt because the evidence that we have for other people in the files is really, really bad. We don't have any of this stuff for Trump.

They want it, but they want to keep mentioning Trump and Epstein over and over again and just beat people over the head with Trump, Epstein, Trump, Epstein, Trump, Epstein, Trump, and just this big conspiracy and all these redactions and all we don't know anything and all They're supposed to release it. They never did you see how this is gonna work?

They're never gonna be able to release a hundred percent of the information here And even if they release a hundred percent of the information, you see, the conspiracy will go on forever. This is a never-ending conspiracy at this point. It's gonna go down in history books. People are gonna be talking about this decades from now just because of how much it is being talked about

and how it is something that powerful people were involved in who people think did not face justice. Do we know everyone in these files? No, I mean look at look at all the blank outs and stuff. This is crazy. But what we do know is that the one person they're using these files to try and take down to the exclusion of everyone else isn't in them the way they want them to be. And that's what's really driving these people mad. And that's why

want them to be. And that's what's really driving these people mad. And that's why these hearings are imploding. What do you think about that? I'll see you in the next video.