THE TRUTH Buried At The Heart Of This Story - Deep Dive #harryandmeghan #KCIII #Media

Hello everybody and thank you so much for joining me.Well Sussex propaganda weaponized PR proudly presented by most media outlets since 2020.Now I'm going to bring you lots of proof tonight.So I hope you've got your detective hats on.I hope you're ready to absorb lots of information and keep those comments coming either below the video or in the live chat.So proof, some quick examples.

Now I went a year back Click.just to give you a little sample of the fact of how much this story repeats constantly.Now, I set some parameters before I went back and investigated 2025.I only used stories that were actually put out by the Sussex propaganda machine that were attributed to a source close to the Sussexes.You know the drill.You know the drill.

So I don't have a visual for this particular part of the show.So just listen in, tune in, because it's all pretty important.Yeah, we should have a bingo card every time we've heard that expression, Olive Branch.We should have a drink every time we hear it.That sounds like fun.Okay, magazine, we're getting into the sort of the tabloids now.

Archie and Lilibet for Family Peace Summit.So you get the general idea.Okay, now that was 2025, one year ago.But I didn't just pull one year's worth, I pulled six years worth over the last three days.And I punched my notes into an AI thing that I've never actually ever used before.Now, I've got a full citation

list for all the headlines that I pulled.I can attribute them to newspapers.I have a broad range between tabloids and broadsheets, so -called reputable legacy media.I did this very, very carefully.And then I punched the notes into AI just to produce a graphic for you, because I ain't no graphic designer.And this is what it came up with.

I asked for three samples from various outlets for each year.And it looks quite smart, I think.So there it is.There's the graphic, but it's my data.Okay, now this is the recycled headline pattern and it's put into a handy little graphic for you to share and enjoy.I might link it down below.

So you can see that from 2020 right through to 2026, because 2026 isn't represented because we've already got that in real time, just reading the actual newspapers and listening to the news now, that this story has been spun by the Sussex propaganda machine for six years.And I wrote underneath, six years, same story, different headlines, and nothing ever happens.And that's the truth of it.Nothing ever happens.The same nonsense has been put out year after year after year.Now, a lot of people got sneered at, including myself, because we didn't react straight away and we didn't respond and we didn't think that it was really worth getting too het up over as yet.

We had a wait and see approach because we're saying, well, look, if she turns up, she turns up.We'll deal with that when the time comes.If she doesn't turn up, we'll just attribute it to the same spin that we've actually witnessed over the last six years.And I think people that sneerat clear evidence and the people that are sort of raising doubts, I think it indicates their bias.And quite frankly, ignorance of their subject.

So, zing!Ouch!But wait, there is more.I have more.Now, We all know this story.This was launched last year about Prince Harry's sure bet to regain his automatic armed security in the UK.

We had quotes.We had a surety that it was really going to happen.According to the Mail on Sunday, sources close to the Sussexes say that a reinstatement of armed security has been assured.It's now a formality.Sources at the Home Office have indicated that security is now nailed on for Harry, the sources said.Well, they're too scared to even make an announcement.

You know, they just feel like they're backed into a corner, I think, but it certainly is not nailed on.There has been no formal announcement, and again, more propaganda from the Sussex propaganda machine.And I think that's really important to be aware of that, don't you?Now, I've always believed, and we're getting into the more serious side of the program now, I'm going to be giving you a lot, so yeah, have you got a stiff drink?Now, I always believed, probably naively, that the long -suffering public had the right to the truth.Now, you sort of get it, but that's the aim.

And the part of all of this that truly matters, I think, is the important story about the monarch's institutional duty.Now, when I say the monarch, I mean the institution of the monarchy.It doesn't matter if it's Queen Elizabeth II or King Charles III or King William V.it doesn't matter.Whoever holds the role has that duty, that institutional duty, to protect the monarchy.Now, I've frequently highlighted how this institutional duty sort of plays out.

I did videos on the Lord Chamberlain, for example, the one that's currently in the role, and his failure to shut down the exploitation of royal titles by these two.And then I went back to earlier times about another Lord Chamberlain who seemingly covered up thousands of files, 30 ,000 files, that would help prove a serious alleged misconduct allegation against Andrew Mountbatten -Windsor.So institutional duty seems to have lost its way, doesn't it?Now, as I see it, the pressing institutional duty in this case now is to shut down this very loud, manufactured propaganda campaign that has been harming the public institution now for six years.And I don't think that's hyperbole.It's an ongoing clown show that's run for far too long.

It's humiliated the people of the UK.That's not exaggeration.It has, frequently.It's undermined trust.It's caused division in the country, which I think, you know, I think it's a safe bet that that was the aim, actually.by all those backing Harry and Meghan.

And it's not just humiliating for the UK.It's humiliating for every country that has the monarch or the current king as their head of state, like mine.That's why I feel like I have the right to discuss this topic, because he's my head of state in my country.He's the constitutional monarch.We're not just a member of the Commonwealth.He's actually the guy, the head of state.

Now it doesn't matter if you like or dislike the king.I've come to that conclusion.It doesn't matter if you think he's warm and kind and you love him or you think he's self -indulgent and weak.That's just private opinion.That's not relevant to this.This isn't constitutionally relevant.

In actual fact, it's completely irrelevant to the seriousness of this situation.So this is not personal.It doesn't matter if it's King Charles or King Bob.This isn't personal.This is an institutional requirement of the monarch to protect the monarchy.So this is not a personal attack, but I think what I'm going to show you is really important.

And currently to date, I feel, you can argue with me in the comments down below, I feel they're looking away and I don't think that's good enough.Now, the latest manufactured hoo -ha that is currently being rolled out by the increasingly empowered Sussex propaganda machine, and I just provided you with irrefutable proof that it's a pattern, And it's been going on for six years, right at the top of the show, right at the outset.And it's serious because it's weaponised PR.It's aimed at certain people, not just the institution.And I think it's eroding something we all value.Clearly everyone that sort of watches this channel values it, but I think it's eroding something in everyone.

When you can't trust institutions, whether you're a royalist or not, if you can't trust institutions, you lose faith in those democratic systems.It's awful to see all this being eroded, to see trust being eroded.It's heavy stuff for a Sunday evening Aussie time.Now, even sections of the legacy media have acted really appallingly in this over the last four or five days.Is it four days?I don't know.

It feels like a lifetime.Might only be three.They've been running with the Sussex propaganda, as you know, and initially printing utter rubbish, particularly in those first really hysterical 24 hours.And ridiculous claims were being made and were being left to just hang out there.for 24 hours, and they were extremely damaging claims.They implied the king was covering the security with some sort of private funds, that he was covering it all for Harry and Meghan.

And the implication was that he was paying for security, so we had to assume, oh, is that some sort of private armed 24 -hour security, some sort of private armed security force?What, an army?And it's blatantly ridiculous, but more importantly than that, it's blatantly constitutionally impossible.I had a text with Taz over that one.We had a bit of a giggle because it was just so ridiculous.This is before anything was debunked.

So Harry was told when he wanted to supposedly offer to pay for his own armed security, that you can't, that rich privileged people don't get to have a private armed security force.And democracy and the rule of law at that point, if they can, would pretty much be dead, destroyed.So it took a couple of days, but then, you know, sensible heads prevailed and the palace didn't make an official decision.they just briefed via friendly journalists, trusted journalists, Rebecca English, people like that, which is fine, at least they got the message out there, some sensible facts.Now the only fact worth printing though was information that we already knew.And this is the quote, the king has offered his son, the Duke of Sussex and his family accommodation in a royal residence during his visit to the UK this summer, end quote.

That's it.And that interested me because I thought, hmm, that sounds familiar.Oh, Yes, it's been offered before.When did we first hear that the King could and would offer royal accommodation to Harry if he was to come over to the UK post Frogmore Cottage being yanked out of his grasp?Oh yeah, 2024.We first knew about the fact that the King offered accommodation to Harry two years ago, 2024.

Now tell me, why is this a story?Okay, we'll just keep going.Alright, so...Two years ago, we already knew this.This is under the heading of we already knew it.Next, the King is said to be interested in seeing his grandchildren.

This is another quote from Rebecca English's column and other trusted people.But it's understood that he has no wish to play any role in security provision for the Sussexes.Now, the security aspect of that message that was put out with briefings had to be done.It just had to be done.However, including the king would like to see his grandchildren sentimental piffle and it had no place in that statement.If they're going to brief about security

correct the record because the record was severely distorted, it was very, very, very damaging, well then don't put in the sentimental piffle about the king wanting to see his grandchildren.That's highly unprofessional.

If you want to see them, see them.We don't need to hear about it.It's not a major concern.

What we're concerned about is a public institution being eroded as we watch.We're seeing it being eroded as we watch by this endless tacky family drama.And it is demeaning.It is demeaning to the people of the UK.It's demeaning by extension to the people of the Commonwealth.and as if the King couldn't arrange or Harry and Meghan couldn't arrange to have a private meet -up at Balmoral for the King to meet his grandchildren at any point over the last six years in complete privacy.

They have the capacity to fly in private planes.They have a whole fleet of private helicopters at their disposal.No one can enter the Balmoral grounds for that matter.No one would have even known.No one will know.So don't drop these little PR points, Pallas, in serious information.

that everyone needs to know to correct the record.And I would suggest less informal briefing to journalists.It's quite pathetic.More official statements, thank you.Courage.Discipline.

Professionalism.Little things like that.Give that a go.So, let's deliver some more real world reality and then you'll understand why I'm a little bit snarky.A little bit snarky.

bit sarcastic.You'll understand why because if you'd read what I'd read over the last three days you'd be a bit snarky and sarcastic too.So the other thing, the other point we have to make is a really serious point about the veterans.Now, the moment Invictus Birmingham was announced, and that's the announcement, one of the announcements in the newspaper, the outcome was already predetermined.

This was all going to unfold exactly like this because Invictus had been weaponized by Harry and Meghan as a pressure tool against the palace ever since their exit from the UK.

So everybody knows it, don't they?The game stopped being a veterans platform.The second Birmingham was granted.I know there was troubles before that.Believe me, I'm not ignoring that.

But the nail in the coffin for it to be a veterans platform was that announcement, Birmingham, because it became a bargaining chip at that point, a bargaining chip for Harry and Meghan for what they want.It's not about the veterans anymore.It's not about the veterans at all.

It's about the grubby little fight between Harry, Meghan, and the monarch, started by Harry and Meghan.I'm not attributing any blame to the actual monarch, definitely not to William and Catherine, they had nothing to do with it.But this grubby tussle that is being generated by the Sussex propaganda machine against the palace that just upped the ante the moment that Birmingham was released.And they knew that.That's why they did it.That's why they chose Birmingham.

And the fact that the government entities supported that bid and pushed that bid is really concerning.

Now, they've used federal

as a way to force royal proximity.I'm not telling you anything, am I?Numerous faux royal tours, three now, we've had three.

They've used Invictus to grab attention.They've used it to merch product.They've used it to grasp for relevance and as a vehicle to try and destroy the monarchy.I'm serious.That's what they're trying to do.they're trying to destroy the monarchy.

I'm sure that appears in their secret little mission statement.Now, do you find any of what I've said acceptable?Do you think using veterans like this and now two innocent children, doesn't it make you feel ill?It makes me feel ill.

It's just so icky and yuck.And it's been going on for far too long.So I think Prince Harry has to be removed as patron to restore dignity to the veterans effective immediately.I see that as the only solution to all this.

The Invictus Game Foundation has to step in, because the palace evidently won't, step in and stop this self -indulgent family drama tainting absolutely everything.

I mean, really, how dare they?And I've said over the last four years that I've been making videos that the monarchy is not one family's plaything since Bear and the Netflix docudrama The process to have Harry and Meghan's titles formally removed should have been instigated.There's really no excuse.The institution of the monarchy belongs to the public of the UK and every country that has the monarch as their head of state, like mine.It doesn't belong to one family to do with it whatever they want.So I think we deserve better.

But I will go this far and say I think the veterans deserve better.I don't think anyone would argue with me on that score.But meanwhile, the press have been going along with it, all ditzy dodo, you know, printing Sussex and sadly, as I illustrated with the emotional comment about wanting to see his grandchildren, palace propaganda.There's too much PR positioning from the palace.There's too much trying to make the king look good while appeasing the public, while doing pretty much nothing while Harry and Meghan just run riot.They need boundaries.

They need firm boundaries.So we've got performative PR replacing institutional duty, and everyone that goes along with it, I think, is complicit.and they're dishonouring what truly, truly matters.It's like, you know, the Royal Family Jerry Springer Show Edition.Now, I know that dates me because you have to be of a certain age to know who Jerry Springer was.So I hope it doesn't date me too much.

All right.Enough telling off from Nanny.That's what I feel like, the Nanny.I'm going to give you something really juicy now, something quite interesting.

Now, the latest weaponised PR came from Bronte Coy.Now, Bronte Coy, I am confident to say, in my opinion, is a known Sussex amplifier.I don't think I'm out of line actually claiming that because I have read a lot of her articles over the last three days.I already knew it but I wanted to check if I had all my ducks in the row, if I had the proof and whether it was fair, fair assessment.And I think it is.So a known Sussex amplifier.

And I'll give you an example.I wanted to give you a real recent example, and it's proof provided by her recent coverage of Megan and Harry's trip to Australia.Now, Bronte didn't just cover the trip to Australia.She actually seemed to make it up as she went along.Now, all throughout her coverage, the Sussexes were framed as warm and welcoming and deeply connected to the Australian community, while managing to just slip in that the royal family is cold and distant and punitive.Now, the reason why this stands out is her reporting stands in sharp contrast to the majority of the reporting, the unbiased balance reporting, we still kind of get that sometimes, that was pushed out at the time in Australia.

And I know because I have it all.The Daily Telegraph reported that the crowds at the Sydney Opera House and Bondi were paltry.They featured gappy turnouts of just a few hundred people.The paper noted that tourist runners and local tradespeople in the precinct were blissfully unaware that the couple were even there, arriving and had pretty much zero impact.Outside of the little Invictus group, that had been quickly gathered together when they discovered that all the barricade areas of the Sydney Opera House were completely empty.Now, that didn't deter Bronte.

Harry and Meghan mobbed at Bondi Beach during emotional visit.This, well, I've got to blow it up, but it's a bit small, the subtitle.This very famous international couple wanted to keep their Bondi visit low key, but the word soon spread, leading to chaotic scenes.Okay Bronte, okay.Now the BBC News also covered this momentous occasion and pointed out that the vast majority of ordinary Australians they interviewed on the street were either entirely unaware, uninterested about the couple's arrival on Bondi Beach.But that's just an example of the use of amplifiers.

And you know what?The use of amplifiers isn't new.They've increased in number just over the last year.And I've got to say that some of the amplifiers are so dumb, they don't even know they're being used.Isn't that sad?Isn't that really, really sad?

I think it is.So, like I said, the use of amplifiers isn't new.Megan has been making targeted personal attacks on Catherine since 2014 and I can prove that.Okay in 2014 it's interesting that many familiar faces surface in the creation of the TIG in 2014 but that's for another program I'll go into it in depth.I have already several times but I might you know rejig people's memories a little bit.So the timing of the TIG creation coincides with her friendship with Eugenie, who was introduced to Megha by Mission Anu just prior to her starting the TIG.

They were all at Miami Soho House with Marcus Anderson a few months before the creation of the TIG in 2014.So I'm fairly confident, it's in my opinion, that this was the start of a campaignmake Meghans rehabilitated enough to become blind date worthy of a thankfully rather clueless, quite dumb, bachelor prince.Now regardless of who aided and abetted her, and there were quite a few, Harry and Meghan's sustained attacks on Catherine and later William have been really personal, really targeted and they've been serious.There have been serious attempts to undermine their reputations and they were designed to wound and they did wound, wounded quite horribly I think.Now that's the She -Ra Princess of Power article in the Tig.

Now interestingly we know that William and Catherine actually married, you know, years before this.Yet she launches the Tig with a dig at Catherine, saying that she'd be a better princess than her.She'd be a princess of power.Now we are led to believe that she hadn't met Harry yet.Okay.Or even though he was at Miami, so her house in 2013.

But OK, OK.But she hadn't met Harry, but I know she'd met Eugenie.I know she had.And also Misson Harriman actually was the one that introduced her to the princess that this article was actually based on.And Megan was a great pains to make the comparison that this princess she was interviewing was really cool and really smart.So the dig started in 2014, but let's just skip forward to 2016 and Lainey gossip.

Now it's provable that Megan's official arrival as girlfriend not announced yet, but she was at KP in between.Suits filming.She was coming over and seeing Harry every few weeks.Okay, so she was at KP.She'd been introduced to William and Catherine, but it hadn't been announced by Camilla Tominey that they were a thing until October of that year, around Halloween of that year.Now, it's provable that upon Megan's official arrival as a girlfriend at that time, it coincided with all these snippy, blind little riddles targeting Catherine by Laney Gossip.

And part of my suspicion But all of a sudden, Lainey Gossips getting inside Goss of what's going on, the comings and goings, the car being used, where Catherine's heading off to without Megan.From within the walls of Kensington Palace, all of a sudden, Lainey Gossips getting that information she wasn't getting it prior to Megan.arriving at KP in 2016.And we know that there was a photograph of Megan and her back in 2014, I believe, with the Mulroney's and Laney Gossett.But look, it's all a coincidence.Just stop your thinking.

It's all a coincidence.It's not a campaign against Catherine.Couldn't be.Now, very early on, too, in the piece, there was really bitchy snippets about Catherine that was leaked to Us Weekly, for example.And it's significant because prior to the arrival of Megan, negative snipes about Catherine, personal sort of digs, were largely non -existent in the USA tabloids.They loved her.

They adored her.Ever since the wedding, they thought she was just the aunt's pants.They thought she was beautiful and a romantic princess and they just loved her.But all of a sudden these snarky little bitchy thingsgetting printed.It's just a coincidence.

Now, do you really think Catherine and William were oblivious?Do you really think they didn't know who was attacking them?Do you think they didn't know the pack Megan ran with?So Catherine wasn't being sandoffish at all.She was protecting herself from a little mean girl posse who she knew intended to do her damage.Intended to do her reputational damage.

And do you think she didn't know that Yuge was a really good mate of Meghan, and we all know Euges attitude towards Catherine around the time she married William, running to the Queen, arguing that Catherine should still curtsy to them if she wasn't actually with William.And the Queen agreed, and they enforced it too.So is it all starting to make sense now?Now, let's skip forward a little further.Tom Bauer, this year, he stated in Betrayal that the editors traced the royal racist lie about Catherine to quote, and this is a direct quote from Betrayal.So Megan, if you want to, you know, sue anyone, Harper's Collins, honey, Harper's Collins.

Now, I know your husband has already sued Rupert, but if you want to go back for round two, Harper's Collins, and the quote was, to the Duchess, the Harper's Collins editors attributed the royal racist claim that was fed to Oman Scobie back to the Duchess.

So, you know, if it's not true, I suggest they challenge Tom Bower's publication of that.I doubt they will.Okay, Lainey Gossett back to that.It's interesting.

The nastiness went back a bit.

And it's really interesting that she's now felt moved to put a disclaimer on an early article that was really nasty about Catherine and William because I think it was affecting her career.It was affecting how people actually, you know, reacted to her.So I'll just bring that up.Sorry, I clicked the wrong button there.OK, here we go.So this is a disclaimer that you can go and see.

I'll actually link to the article because I think you'll enjoy reading it.This is the disclaimer at the top of this article.

It was posted during an early period of the site when some of the writing was extremely offensive.Since then our site has grown and evolved.

We have apologized, continued to take accountability and documented our changes.Please see our frequently asked questions on our about page for our formal statement.Well I didn't bother because I think that pretty much says it all, doesn't it?So the link for that will be in the description box below after this live.So it's also interesting to note Lainey Gossett's number of fawning pieces about Eugenie over the years.Still pretty favorable despite daddy's antics.

Still pretty favorable.Lainey Gossett was the first to defend Meghan against the Duchess difficult allegations.The very first one.This is before, you know, you had people seeking mental health help and you had Valentine Lowe actually formally reporting on it two years later, and this was before, when it was pushed out prior to the Oprah Winfrey interview, people were suffering.

People were complaining.And it started to slip into the newspapers, into the Daily Mail, and Lainey counted it.She framedit as a positive work ethic.And then, you know, then we had members of Parliament writing letters saying poor Megan was being picked on when in actual fact the allegations state that she was the one that was picking on everybody else.So have I illustrated to you that not setting firm boundaries with this too is in effect saying your treatment of Catherine doesn't matter.

And it does matter.It really matters because it's a targeted attack and it won't stop.Now, also be wary, detectives, of the whole William is furious narrative.Be wary of it.I'm not saying it's not true.I'm not saying that he's not angry.

But I'm fairly confident to say that the anger stems from the erosion of the institution of the monarchy.The anger doesn't stem from personal angst.It doesn't stem from any emotion he feels personally anymore.He's very happy with his life.He knows he's ready to become king when the time comes.He's interested in protecting his children and he's thrilled, thrilled, that Catherine is in remission.

So the whole William is furious narrative, of course, he feels anger.Everyone feels anger about this because they're seeing the erosion of the institution of the monarchy unnecessarily.But it places him in the role of the problem, not the victim of a sustained and targeted attack.That's why I was very careful to say before when I phrased it as a fight, it's not a fight.They attacked him.all he's doing is just protecting his family.

So the inference is

being pushed out that William is the obstacle.I've got a video from over a year ago that's going up Wednesday and you will giggle because it's me defending William against exactly the same articles that are being rolled out this summer.So everything just gets on repeat and I just wanted to show you it's in my archive rewind series.I wanted to show you that none of this has stopped.If anything, it's getting worse.So William is the obstacle.

William is inflexible.William is emotional.This isn't me saying this.This is, you know, what they're pushing out.

William is blocking reconciliation.

It reframes the entire situation against him.

And Harry becomes the son seeking peace.

And William becomes the brother refusing it.It's all about putting William in the frame.Same as when there was a big push for King Charles III to abdicate.That was all about putting William, who was the one with clean hands, who had nothing to do with Andrew Mountbatten -Windsor.It was all about putting him in the frame.That's what it was about.

It was a bit.It was a tactic.It was being rolled out.So the number one cry I usually get when people push back on this, and it's okay to push back on this, I'm usually really interested when people push back because it makes me sharper, makes me go and check that I had all my ducks in a row.What can the king do?What boundaries can he set?

Okay, I've got an easy one for you and it's about Invictus.This could be an official statement from the palace tomorrow.And it would completely pull the rug out from under Harry and Meghan's feet.It would completely destroy what they're trying to achieve on this trip.And this is it.This is the official statement.

A clear delineation that Invictus is not a royal event and is not part of or under any of the palace's operational remit, because that collapses the forced proximity tactic.and it stops the games being used as a political tool, weaponized by Harry and Meghan.Pulls the rug out from under their feet.Now the reason why he hasn't done that is because the King sort of likes the PR.That's what I'm saying.He's trying to get good PR here.

And it's stopping him stopping Harry and Meghan.

He's got to stop with trying to win out of this PR for himself.And he's got to act in the interests of the institution of the monarchy.Now, he's briefed in the last few days that he wants the games to be a success.And it was from the palace.He should not be commenting on them at all.Not at all.

He should not be attending them while Harry is patron.and he shouldn't be involving himself in it at all.It ties Invictus Games to the royal family and they are no longer tied.The split happened.They are no longer tied.The palace has no control, they claim, over who is the patron of the Invictus Games, so therefore they have nothing to do with it.

Don't pay it any attention.Now the king will have, actually I don't think it will hurt veterans any more than it's already hurt them.I think if it pushes Harry out of the picture, makes him no longer patron, that's for the good of veterans, at which point the royal family could step in at the next games.They could send a representative.Now the king, like I said, will have to stop briefing.He wants the games to be a success.

Now if he was going to go really hardarse, which is what I would recommend if I was his advisor, the king can use his constitutional powers to formally instruct the Lord Chancellor to prepare a royal warrant to strip Harry.He can do that right now.And by extension, Meghan, of their royal titles, Duke and Duchess of Sussex.And he can officially revoke their entitlement to the style until that goes through, he can revoke the style of Prince and His Royal Highness effective immediately.And do you know why I know he can do that?

Because he just did it with Andrew Mountbatten -Windsor.That was exactly the process.He formally instructed the Lord Chancellor to prepare the Royal Warrant, then he put out a statement saying how Andrew Mountbatten -Windsor was to be referred to from now, the style he should be referred to until the titles are formally stripped.

So he can do it.Now personally, I think that censure isn't over the top.Now, a lot of people would disagree with me, and that's fine, I understand.But after Spare, after the docudrama, after Columbia, after Nigeria, after Jordan, after Australia, after numerous threatening and damning interviews, after the alleged leaking and briefing about royal racist to Omid Scobie, oh, but maybe I'm being too vindictive.

What do you think?I think that censure is really, really appropriate.And get them off the bloody Royal website.So my message for the institution, the constitutional monarch who is my head of state, would be to set some real boundaries.you will win back so much respect.You will win back the affection of people.

They will trust you again.Trust will be restored in institutions and a new calm era will be felt across the land.We could only hope anyway, but I honestly think that real boundaries are long overdue.

So thank you so much for joining me. I'm going to go off and read your comments.I am going to do a live where I communicate with you, but I just wanted to get all of this through.I did script it because I wanted to get it right and I wanted to provide enough detail without waffling on too much.

Anyway, thanks for joining me and I'll see you again really soon.Bye all.Thanks for joining me.Bye.