Trump $2K Tariff Dividend, 50 Year Mortgage, Jan 6th Pipe Bomber + Shutdown Over? | PBD Podcast 681

You

Did you ever think you would make

The future looks bright Alright, so a lot going on folks. Government shutdown apparently. Eight senators on the Democratic side coming out agreeing to the same exact thing that Chuck would have agreed to before and Scott Jennings says, I think this was all about the mid- this was all about the special elections just to show strength and use this as a story to win a couple of those elections

and then now they're gonna go back and do the same thing. It was just a bunch of theater and President Trump was at the Washington Redskins game, and while he's at the Redskins game, and they're doing their thing, you know, there was some boon going on. And we're gonna show that boon, stuff that took place at the Redskins game. Congrats to the Dolphins, they beat the Bills, which was a miracle, we were there last night.

Miracle.

That was a miracle, I don't know what happened but good for them. Let me go through a couple of the stories for you guys that hope you guys had a good weekend. By the way, we started, you're late. What are you doing? Wake up! This entire time we've been here, where have you been?

You know what I'm saying? This guy shows up once on time and we get to go early and Miami, Trump proposes radical health care shakeup that would bypass insurers and hand cash directly to who? To you to make a decision on what you want to do with your health insurance. Housing director confirms, ready for this one? This is big.

Administration working on not a 30 year loan, not a 40 year loan, they want to get a 50, a 50 year mortgage after Trump hint okay 50 year mortgage loan Cornell to pay 60 million dollars to settle Trump's administration probe Trump dismisses affordability concerns insists prices are going down why lower mortgage rates aren't enough to make homes affordable in charts whopping wealth of Nancy Pelosi under scrutiny as it revealed she has earned $130 million

in stock profits, okay, while in Congress. 17,000% rate of return. The GOAT, okay? Of all time. Nancy Pelosi made $130 million, yes.

She shared that with America, right?

Of course she did. So Social Security's just fine, right? At Rolex, at the Security's just at Rolex at the Patek store at the Bentley store. Yes Vance's the front-runner for 2028 Rubio privately confides up to 20% of flights could be canceled in coming weeks if government shutdown shutdown drags on as airports indoor first day of crippling reductions NYPD already loses officers with morale plunging

as anti-cop Zohran Mamdani prepares to take reins. Top New York City realtor fired for comparing Mamdani to Hitler, predicting City Hall will play Muslim calls to prayer.

Now you can only compare Trump to Hitler, that's a law.

Yeah, then the government aims to ban access to social media for children under 15 years old. Tech job, flee California as H-1B visa, crime, tax and automation, drive workers out. Catherine Herridge, Inc's deal for investigative video series with LA Times. Kanye West meets with Adam's friends to apologize for their past remarks. Listen, steps in the right direction, John. Crazy day, man. Crazy weekend. That's that one right there. So funny.

We got a couple other things here. Senate breaks Democratic filibuster in key vote toward opening the government. Trump says he'll send $2,000 tariff dividend to all except high income people. Stimulus check, Tom, with that jacket that means you won't be getting Tom you're not getting anything. He has to pay $2,000. Tom's like Stefano Ricci addict. He needs to go to essay meetings. Yo, essay. He's itching for like a new tie. Stef Stefano Stefano if they have one I'm joining yeah Richie I'm wearing one as well today by the way. We're just with them this past we bought a bunch

The store Vinny takes a jacket has my son wear it my son walks up to me He were you wearing it was he wearing no I gave it to T. Go he son walks up to me. Were you wearing it or was he wearing it? No, I gave it to Tico. He's walking up to me. He says, how much do you think this is? And the lady's panicking in the back.

She looked at me like I...

Vim takes a picture of it. This is why it scored a point zero zero one percent. Sir, don't take that off the mannequin. $1,000 let me say it again 134 150 we got at that 150, but the jacket was insane Stefano, which is okay So next house Democrats fears that their Senate colleagues are caving on shutdown unconditional Surrender our stimulus checks being sent out in 2025 latest news on claims

Donald Trump's new city destroying nuclear missile is spotted for the first time as PlaneSpotter photographs it on a hush-hush test flight. The pipe bomber story doesn't add up. Vinny's going to talk about that one. Newsom gives Trump a new nickname after the president appears to nod off during White

House announcement. Did he really? He nodded off during White House announcement?

Who did? President Trump.

I didn't see it. Rob, is that true or no Rob?

Yes. It looked like his eyes were shut.

I don't know if he was asleep.

BBC expected apologize after using doctored footage of Trump's January 6th speech in documentary report. They apologize. You think an apology is gonna be plenty? You don't think a lawsuit might be good?

And their lead editor just, this just in, their lead editor resigned.

Whose lead editor?

The BBC.

They apologized, yeah we doctored it.

As if that's gonna stop a lawsuit.

Oh he quit.

Yeah.

Oh well.

Suddenly. Okay. Alright so that's what's going on and we got a few other stories. We'll get into it a couple clips to show you guys. However, you know what tomorrow is Tomorrow's Veterans Day and What we want to do for the veterans who are watching this We have a whole new series of merch for veterans Rob if you can zoom in into some of these guys here Whether your army we got an army future looks bright We got go a little bit lower Rob if you could we got those hats with the velcro that that right there the army future

Looks bright patches insane go low Rob you know Air Force Navy keep going keep going keep going we got those green eyes oh that one's a green hats they won't last long every time we have those they disappear the one on the right it's absolutely sick on the front of it it says future looks bright US Armed Forces Marines keep going and then you have the USA hat, that's another one. It's one of our most, I think it's the top five most reviewed hats of all time

that you have right there. The USA with the, what do you call it? Camouflage. Camouflage on there. Armed Forces in the middle with the dog tag. Sixth shirt. Keep going lower, Rob. Keep going lower. And you got the Army Greens, the hats in the middle, and then go to the next one, that

angry Patriots shirt to the right. You got a bunch of stuff here. And here's what it is. Go to VTMerch.com, place your order, use the code VETERAN for a discount, VETERAN for a discount, and 10% of every purchase made will go to charities that are related to folks who are serving. And we have a handful of them that we're working with.

Trust me, we're very selective on which one we go through. 10% of whatever purchase is made will go to different charities out there. And if you use the code, VETERAN, you'll get a 10% discount as well. Some of those items are limited supply that we ordered. So be sure to go out there and place the order for yourself.

And if it's not you, you have a friend that went to the Air Force, the Army, the Marines, the Navy, you know, gift them something from this that watches the podcast. Again, go to VTMerch.com, place your order using the discount, Veteran. Having said that, let's get right into it. All right. in. Having said that, let's get right into it. Alright. Rob, what videos do we have on the government shutdown? What videos do you have on the government shutdown?

Because there's a bunch of different things going on right now in the government shutdown. We hear the video that comes out, the story saying up to 20% of flights can be canceled in coming weeks if the government shutdown drags on as airports endure first day of crippling reductions. You hear pilots talking about a bunch of different things. You hear pilots saying, hey, you know, we have folks that are working right now that

are not getting paid but they're showing up today, etc., etc. And there was a rare Saturday Senate session that ends with few signs of shutdown progress. So as of right now, Rob, the latest thing we know is what? The fact that eight senators have agreed. Is that the clip right now, Rob, the latest thing we know is what? The fact that eight senators have agreed. Is that the clip right there, Rob? Okay, there we go.

Can you go back to it? Yeah. So the government shut down October 1st. On November 9th, the United States advanced a funding measure by 60-40 vote. This is the first major bipartisan movement towards reopening the government. The measure would extend federal funding through January 30, 2026 for some agencies, attach

three full-year appropriation bill, agriculture, veterans affairs, and legislative branch as part of the broader package, guarantee of future vote in December on Affordable Care Act, health insurance tax credit issues, which has been a key sticking point. And it's important to know this, that with the Obamacare, Trump wants to give you the credit. He wants you to make a decision what you want to do with it because all the promises Obama

made that you're not going to be able to keep your doctor, it's not going to be costing you anything, taxes will go up. We all know Obama lied on every one of those issues and that's proven by the left and the right. matter of many federal functions that have been severely disrupted the 900,000 federal employees that have been working without pay snap which is impacting a lot of people's lives especially immigrants that are here taking advantage of it uh you know who some of them that's that they're relying on you the hard working people to take care of them but Tom where are we at with this

well the the senate voted you had to break the filibuster. You need to have 60 votes. And what the Senate did, they haven't ended the government shutdown, but they have put together something and they're sending it back to the House and the House is all upset. However, this should be good news. But check this out. Look at the eight people that voted with the Republicans. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Jackie Rosen of Nevada. Wait a minute, wait a minute,

both Nevada senators voted, very interesting. We know Nevada was razor thin, you know, and Trump got traction, traction there, was used to be blue, blue, blue, but the election there. Also look at this, New Hampshire, Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan, both

senators from New Hampshire, went with them. And this guy, I'm really proud of this guy, Dick Durbin of Illinois, went with the Republicans to break this. And then Tim Kaine of Virginia, Tim Kaine was Hillary's VP candidate. And then, of course, the guy we expected for the last three months to be at the Republicans, John Fetterman. Yeah.

So those were the eight that went and they went with it. What's interesting, if you look at it, I believe the Republicans got about 80 percent of what they wanted in the Senate bill, whereas the Democrats got about 20 percent. For instance, Dick Durbin came across when he said that Trump, that what they would put in there, and John Thune gets credit for this. Lonely, not very charismatic, just very effective and just a good person, John Thune apparently...

He's not a majority leader you're talking about.

Yep, got everybody together, but you know John Thune has never been like the Schumer, the Pelosi, the camera guy. He's always just kind of just there working. And he got it done. But here's what he gave back to Durbin. He said, I'll tell you what, this is what we'll put in. All the federal workers that were fired during the shutdown, not the ones that were fired

during those at the beginning, when we started thinning things out, but all the ones that were fired during the shutdown will get their jobs back and there will be a provision to give them some back pay, which shouldn't be huge in American people because that back pay thing is really just kind of started.

You know, it's not as well. Some had started before, but it's not cataclysmic. It is to those people. But in terms of dollars to the U.S. taxpayer, you know, it's manageable. So he gave that back and Durbin said, okay, Thune, I'm in. And they went in.

And so it was very sensible, but what's really important, I'll go back, and these are my estimates, Pat, I think the Republicans got about 80% of what they wanted. Specifically, they didn't want the Obamacare subsidies just to roll over as this trillion dollar wave in the American people. They got that they got they got what we want is that's good publicans got eighty percent i

think the dams got twenty percent and people like dick durbin got the uh... unionized federal workers get their jobs back

and so they got their status so here's a tweet no more money hundreds of billions of dollars to the democratic support insurance companies for really bad obama cure the money must now go directly to the people taking the fat cat insurance companies out of the corrupt system of healthcare. The people can buy their own much better policy, much less money, saving for themselves an absolute fortune.

President Donald J. Trump. And while this is going on, and while this is going on, Scott Jennings, Rob, can you pull up the Scott Jennings clip where he's talking to Abby and on that clip? He do you know what you want? I'm talking about? I put it I may have put it in the In the PBD podcast if you want to if you want to look forward and he's saying look, you know I mean the reality of it is you guys got what you wanted, right? You know, you were able to

You were able to use this as for the election. Yeah, I think. Yeah, there you go. You were able to use this for the election, the special elections that was taking place. And watch how she answers this. Look at this. Go ahead,

Rob. Republicans going to use leverage in their fight with Democrats when the Democrats are actually the ones with the upper hand when in the eyes of voters. Well I'm sure Democrats will be more than happy to open the government now. The election's over. I mean I mean part of the reason they shut it down was to get through tonight. I mean I would suspect they'll be opening it up by the end of the week. Adam Schiff he was like hold the line. Look I don't see what is the incentive for Democrats

to back down when voters are basically saying, Trump's not doing enough. It's the Republicans' fault. And then they basically handed the keys in this past election to the Democrats. Where's the leverage?

Again, these are blue states electing Democrats. Not a shock. Democrats clearly wanted this shutdown to get through Election Day.

I do

think they are facing pressure from their internal coalitions, the unions, the air traffic controllers, the government employee unions are desperate to get the government back open. They're feeling a little bit of internal heat, but again, the election's now over. I'm sure tomorrow morning phones will start ringing and it'll be open soon enough. This was a

political shutdown and that's what they did and now we're through the election. So now by the way while this is this is going on you know Rob, Adam I'm gonna come to you I do want to show something because what he said right there is these were all blue states these were not this one Rob the other one the one with the link not not the one that goes to X but the one that goes to YouTube. Okay. That is showing what happens when they lose the special election. Yeah.

And then if you don't mind Rob, go fast forward to... Keep going, keep going, keep going. Go from right there. Go back a little bit. Go back a little bit. When that starts, play it from right there.

Okay. So watch this. So now, is there any patterns to show what this means to midterms that's going to come up in a year and watch what Anton says here and by the way whether you like Anton or not he is fair okay when he's going through some of these numbers so you can't just like him when the polls are good for you and then hate him what they're not

watch this one here go ahead.

I mean just take a look at the house special elections take a look here the 2025 house special elections. Take a look here, the 2025 House special elections. Look at those in which Democrats outran Kamala Harris. There have been five House special elections so far this year. In every single one of them across the board, Virginia, Texas 18, that was on Tuesday night, Florida six, Florida one, Arizona seven. From blue districts like Arizona seven to red districts like Florida one and six, What we are seeing are clear shifts towards the Democratic candidates in all five of them.

And we're talking about shifts on average, Kate Baldwin, of about or north of 15 percentage points from the 2024 presidential baseline, which is even larger than the shifts that we saw in both Virginia and New Jersey

on Tuesday night.

And a million things can happen in the year until the midterms.

With that caveat, what are you seeing?

A year is a very long period of time, but you know we've spoken about this.

I like going through history.

What do these...

Watch this.

Watch what magnesium does to your bowels.

Watch what magnesium does to your bowels. Is this a joke, Robert? With the magnesium bro to your body. Watch what magnesium does to your body. Is this a joke, Robert? With the magnesium, bro?

Stop it.

What do your elections usually forecast for the year ahead for the midterm elections? Well, I mean, we take a look at the House special elections, right? If a party outperforms in House special elections, five out of five times, what do we see? They've gone on to win the U.S. House the following midterm every single time since the 2005-2006 cycle. So when you see, of course, that the Democrats are outperforming in all of them, historically speaking, that means they go on to win the U.S. House of Representatives in the following

midterm. And then, yes, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, yes, there's a blue city in New York City, yes, the blue states in Virginia and New Jersey. But historically speaking, when you sweep all three three you go back since the FDR administration. Tom do you agree with him? Well yeah history is history is absolutely he is accurately recounting history and what happens is the special elections here usually are not about the candidates if you go deeper into it and

I know exactly what he's talking about and and he is faithfully showing it without spin so hats off to Mr. Enten. The issue is there's usually an overriding issue that goes beyond the candidates because all those candidates are different, yet five out of five races move. Make sense? Yeah.

So, wow, is this a candidate? So it also shows that the that the ballot down ballot effect by Kamala Harris was actually negative, not positive. She had a negative impact on the down ballot effect by Kamala Harris was actually negative, not positive. She had a negative impact on the down ballot races. In other words, she didn't help it at all. It's like, stay out of my state, I'm running for myself.

I don't need your help, I don't want you here. Well, guess what? The issue right now, the number one issue, when you talk to all the core voters, and Anton has talked about it, I've seen polls on it, is affordability. That's the word. It's James Carville all over again.

The core Americans is on affordability and the mainstream media really did a, it's terrible, it's capricious, but they did a pretty good job of pushing economic down, economic down, economic down out there on it, on the American people and American voter. And, and, and, and, you've got these angry women under 40. Adam's talked about it, I've talked about it, the polls have talked about it.

So those are the three things. Affordability is the top issue, the movement of basically angry women under 40, and then you've got the mainstream media that wouldn't get off economic topics

I got it Adam thought ghost of James Carville comes back. It's the economy still this whole government shutdown thing to me Said James Carville the economists do it to me. I don't even call it a government shutdown. I cover I call it a government showdown Because I feel like we've seen this with a groundhog day with With our tax dollars. Every year, every time they do these government showdowns, it's the same thing. It's theater, it's politics, they wait until Tuesday elections were done, and all it ends

up being is a short-term fix. I'm so sick of these short-term fixes. Every year it's the same movies, showdown time, showdown time, continue resolution continue your resolution time what are we gonna do filibuster time and it's actually just getting annoying at this point can we get a long-term solution so we stopped doing this every single year we know this movie we've seen it every single time we know what the government's not gonna shut down forever and how many

lives are affected when it shut down for 40 days. It only started moving the needle after the election was over one and all of a sudden everyday people are getting affected because their flights are getting canceled. So unless it affects people, the politicians have no problem basically playing chicken with your tax dollars. Once you start saying, dude, I just got my flight canceled.

Hey buddy, I'm going to miss a meeting. Can we get this thing figured out? That's when they'll start moving. Until then they don't really give a crap because they're getting paid. Of course they are. Politicians are getting paid but the everyday

worker isn't getting paid. The old bill compared to the new bill is nothing and the fact that I want Democrat voters to understand that your missed paychecks, your flights, your snap and all that, it's because the left was using it as leverage so they look good during their runs with Virginia and all that nonsense. And even the Hill did a piece that said, Democrat senators fear getting hammered after no kings for ending government shutdown. They have nothing.

You know, you know, just like remember with the border bill, Tom? They were like, no, we're not going to give you what you want unless you give, you know, billions of dollars to Ukraine, billions of dollars here, billions of dollars to like Israel and all these places. And it's like, bro, like what? I don't like this hostage stuff. I agree with you 100%. It's actually a hostage negotiation. But Tom, right now, the Republicans have the House and the Senate. I don't feel like they're doing enough to not only go after everybody that's been screwing Trump and screwing us for the past, you know, eight years. They're not doing enough to put stuff in place, Tom, that's going to last.

You know what I mean? He makes a great point.

Every year this is going to change. Every year they're going to keep doing the same thing. Remember, the fog of what happened in the election is fogging over all the winds. Look at the winds that have been happening on international trade deals. Look at the winds that have been happening on rare earth minerals. Look at the winds that have been happening on energy, drill baby drill, and the cost of oil and heating oil. When the Northeast Democrat voters have lower cost heating oil this winter, I hope they

remember who made that happen. I hope they remember that that was President Trump keeping his promise to drill baby drill, which translates to your fuel tank, to your airline ticket cost, and to your heating oil. I think all these wins are getting covered by the fog, and I think the administration needs to do a PR tour reminding us all of all the good things that happen, while at the same time they offer some concrete, you know, dates behind all this $1.5 trillion coming in to build more jobs in America.

When are those jobs coming? And to get after affordability. And I think if the president should go on the offense about this, he's got a lot of good stuff to talk about.

I do think the affordability is something that needs to be focused on. Every time we have Brandon on, when he talks about it from the younger standpoint, these are guys that want to have families, they want to get through the next phase. But one of the topics that was brought up is, you know, who gets a lot of the SNAP benefits? And here's CNN, this fellow shows stats on what's going on with who is getting the benefits the most.

This is Vinny, watch this video here.

Go ahead, Rob. Illegal immigrants are not the reason why our health care system is broken.

Yeah, it's not deflection at all. In fact, I brought receipts. So here's the CMS, the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services, right here with their press release earlier this year saying they were having to increase their oversight on states like California who were abusing Medicaid and classifying it as an EUSA, an emergency system, when it wasn't. You've got the average state spends 5% of its Medicaid roughly on emergency services. California 35 to 40%.

Why would that be? Because California passed a state law that says we will fund Medicaid for illegals and then oh by the way, we'll raise our provider taxes and then oh by the way, we'll use that as a match to draw down federal funds and they're using this whole cavitation process and accounting trick and exactly on the tax money is fungible and California's loophole is abusive. Alright back from CNN. That was a lively one and

they hate it when you bring receipts but let's talk about that Medicaid thing for a minute because what you have right now is a thing called the California loophole. Liberals hate it when you bring receipts, but the California loophole is real. And the reason why the left wants to get this whole spending package revised right now is because they want to be able to fund Medicaid for illegals like California is doing.

Pause right.

The center. So you see this, this is the thing about receipts when you bring it up in front of them and then they don't have an answer for it, right? Tom, what do you think about what he just said right there?

He's exactly right and we've talked about it on this podcast. You and I are from California. We speak of what we could actually see and you had things like the hospitals that were downtown, South Central or close to USC. They were actually providing services to students, local residents and yes, South Central, or close to USC, they were actually providing services to students, local residents, and yes, South Central Los Angeles. There's emergency rooms that close. Why did they close? Because California created Medi-Cal.

Let's do the math and go through the steps that he's talking about. Medi-Cal says, okay, you do it. And when he talks about emergency services, he's talking about a bleeding, unconscious, shot, stabbed, car accident, they're not asking for an insurance card in those hospitals.

They're taking care of you because you're a critical patient that paramedics are bringing in. Paramedics are there to preserve your status and stabilize you to get you to an emergency room. Emergency room does it and then they find out, you know, this person is whoever they are but they have no insurance, no means of paying, no nothing, but the services

were provided. That's Medi-Cal doing that. Then they use the loophole, he said the loophole to get the matching funds from the federal government. Did you hear him say that? That's how Newsom knows that the American people are paying the Medi-Cal gap to provide

Medicaid services in the state of California and then they put a tax on the hospitals. Remember we covered this Pat? They threw a tax on the hospital and said you can't charge more than eight cents for an aspirin or whatever it was. And guess what happened?

Emergency rooms closed. So thank you Gavin Newsom, your trick and what you did in California, not only as a loophole and the tax on the people of America, you lost emergency rooms that went bankrupt in the communities that could use that loss the least. That's what I think of that. He brought those

receipts. So while that's going on, the president goes to the Redskins game, right? Washington Redskins. Just back in the days when they won the Super Bowl with Mark Rippon, when they were the Redskins, he goes there. And this is what happens, the reaction to the audience at the Redskins game that he's at. I just want you to watch this here what happens. Listen to the booing because this is all they're playing everywhere right now. This is a very viral, exciting clip for the people on the left.

Go ahead, Rob.

I solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

That was President Trump at halftime of the Commander's Lions NFL game, receiving significant and sustained boos as he was featured on the stadium's jumbotrons, swearing in members of the U.S. military to honor Veterans Day. Trump is attending this game in Maryland on the 40th day of the government shutdown, affecting so many people in this region. And it comes after ESPN reported that the White House has had back-channel communications

with the Washington Commanders, where the president has expressed interest in having the team's new stadium here in DC named after himself. White House press secretary Caroline Levin saying it would surely be a beautiful...

Oh my god.

It's so unlike Trump to put his name on a building. That's crazy.

Yeah, but also think about it. That's DC. Of course. DC is the number one city where they have the biggest percentage of people making the highest salary on average and they have the biggest percentage of people making the least amount of salary, the poorest people.

It's the biggest difference on those two demos that you're looking at. So of course they're not gonna like that. It's filled with liberals, it's the biggest difference on those two demos that you're looking at. So of course, they're not going to like that. It's filled with liberals. It's filled with government employees. They're not happy about what's going on there.

Rob, which one is this? What is this?

So this is during the game yesterday when the lion scored a touchdown. The entire team did the Trump dance.

Stop.

Point at Trump. He points at Trump.

Yeah. Good. Right in everybody in Washington's face.

You can pause it.

Right. That's hilarious.

I don't know if you guys saw the flyover, but the flyover.

That was flyover was legit.

It was lower than the aluminum oxide all over everybody's face.

Look at this.

Apparently ESPN reported that the people at the operations at the stadium felt that that was lower than they thought it was gonna be yeah cuz when you look here take a look

They're right over the stage

Gangster

But was over all of them now take a boo all they want his butt was over there

Yeah, so so now now that full flaps out, just floating that bad boy. Now that let's just say the shutdown is about to be done. Now what they're going to, what are you going to say? You know, is it going to be, is it, is it, is it really who can tell the story better? Is it all marketing or is it really about, you know, people going to find out that, no, this wasn't on Republicans.

It was on Democrats. What do you think is going to happen, Adam?

As far as Trump and the RMKs, do you have any idea?

Yeah, yeah. No, no. What I'm saying is now, because they're booing because of the shutdown, right? They're booing because some of these guys don't have jobs and, you know, they're seeing what's going on. Why else do you think? I just think they don't like Trump. Let's just say half of them are boom because they don't like him, the other half are boom because of the shutdown.

But what do you think is going to happen when the shutdown is over with?

I think people don't care. So of all the topics we discuss, how interested are we in the shutdown?

I'm pretty interested.

We're somewhat interested, it doesn't affect us. I think in DC they're so insulated in this bubble that they think that everyone's thinking about the shutdown I don't think that most people thought about the shutdown until last week when a flight was canceled Like I said, they see this movie the same time before it's like The little boy who cried shutdown. Oh, we have a shutdown Oh, really? Has it affected your life at all unless your government employee unless you're actually collecting

You're on the government diamond on the government dole has the government affected your life the government shutdown affected your life at all? Unless you're a government employee, unless you're actually collecting you're on the government diamond, on the government dole. Has the government affected your life? Has the government shutdown affected your life at all?

Or not a diamond dole, an honest paycheck like Denny's.

Yeah, like my sister who's still calling me and messaging me and saying, what's happening?

Or Space Force. Space Force.

Yep. So as far as DC, you can't trust what's coming out of there. That's like, maybe let me ask this question. Did you think when he went to this game, did you think he knew that he was going to get booed like this?

I just don't think Trump gives a shit at this point.

I think so.

I think if Trump gets booed, he knows he's going to get booed. He knows he's going to get booed like this Vinny?

I don't think he likes, you know him, you think he likes that?

People booing him.

I think he's a Teflon Don.

While he's reading that stuff to freaking soldiers and Veterans Day is coming up, have some respect. I don't care if you hate him. He's reading this thing for the freaking, for the soldiers. Like, what are you doing? Like, show some decency, but you can't ask,

you can't expect that from people in DC. Doesn't matter what he's saying, it's who's saying it. Rob, do you have the most liberal cities in America?

Yeah, it's pulling it up right now.

Okay.

Is DC number one or is York City, mom, Donny City, get out of here. Where's DC rank? It just says DC ranks among the most strongly blue jurisdictions in the U.S. based on presidential

elections. I thought elections, it was Hawaii and keeping 90 to your point, 90% normally

vote Democratic in Washington. God, 90% in 90 in 2020. at Avani, the Democratic nominee got roughly 92% of the vote in DC. And the Republican got 5.4%. They hate Trump!

What is the definition of a monopoly percentage-wise?

55, 65%.

55%! And then 92%! 70% is like, dude, call antitrust, call the lawyer, 92%. Wow. So if you're operating in DC, by the way, you have any friends in DC who says... I don't have any friends in DC. You don't have any friends? I have multiple friends in DC, they say DC's different. You got a very important friend in DC, he works at the White House. That's a very good friend. He's a friend of ours. And he likes you. He likes Benny. Okay, let's go to the next story. Next story is guys, if you got big plans for 2026 with your

investments, look no other than Nancy Pelosi, the GOAT. I mean, listen, she is like... Folks, can you do me a favor? I'll give you guys five seconds. Get your pen and paper out and take notes. The legend's resume is about to be shown and you know You know all of these investments she made was all due to research and intuition It's all about her gut. She's got that gut, the instinct, the intuition of a Warren Buffett on steroids. By the way, you're about to find out what their net worth was before they started investing to where they are today.

Rob, please play this clip.

The legend.

Reportedly raking in more than $130 million in profits from trading stocks during their 37 years in Congress. That's according to a new report by the New York Post, the former house speaker, saw a whopping return of nearly 17,000 percent while in office.

The guy is like, he's almost at a heart attack.

Before taking office in 1987, a financial form showed California Democrat and her husband reported up to $785,000 to $133,000 worthstocks in their portfolio. The report comes days after the 85-year-old announced she won't be seeking re-election.

This is the kind of stuff that makes people just hate government, hate politicians.

Is that compost?

I don't know why.

She just feels the way she feels.

She's the best. There's nothing happening to her. That's clearly inside information.

There's no way she's that smart.

Clearly. It's a very very profitable business to be in politics.

You know, what I don't like is every once in a while when you get a legend that comes through people don't want to give her credit. You have to tip your hat off to her. Listen, she is possibly the greatest insider traitor in the history of politics. Who do you put ahead of her, Tom? She's a legend.

Why don't we recognize legends like her?

No, no, she's right up there on Mount Trademore. She is number one up there. And I'm upset she's retiring. Why can't they just have her move her office across the street to the SSA, Social Security Administration, and manage the Social Security Administration trust fund.

Why can't they do that? I know. You know, she'd be doing a service to people on Social Security like her. She's about to receive a Social Security check. Lord knows she needs it.

You know, that's what I think. But you know what? Every now and then, there's an old saying. Estimated net worth, 240 to 280. I'll tell you, I don't know who said it. We can look it up and find out who said it. But it was the following quote, and I love it. Every now and then, an innocent man

is sent to the legislature.

Every once in a while.

An innocent man is sent to the legislature. And when we hear all the jokes that we make, led by me, I do think it's really pathetic that we don't have conflict of interest or insider rules for our elected officials. And we make jokes about it, comedians make jokes about it, everybody makes jokes about it,

because it's just joke in plain sight. So Martha Stewart, over a less than $200,000 gain, that's a lot of money, that's two, three years salary for people, but think about it. Martha did time for less than 200 grand.

Yep.

This person made $133 million for the time she did in Congress. It just, it's, we gotta give greater voice to the people that have been trying to put those bills. And there's been a couple of them this year, right, Pat, that people have been trying to put trader bills out there on them a couple times this year.

And I think the Congress just needs to get serious. They'll never vote for line item veto. They'll never vote balanced budget amendment. But can you at least vote that there's no insider trading in Congress?

You think she's stepping away because of being age and done and healthy? You think she's stepping away because this Congress not being able to invest is getting so close that on both sides they want to pass it that she just wants that to be gone and doesn't happen under her watch?

I think there's a little of that. There has to be a little of that. Nancy is frail. You see her everywhere. You see her everywhere you see her now. She's holding the elbow of somebody who's like escorting her It looks like a person exactly by the way. We're 40 years away from them. Yeah, I mean to be fair that by the way

I'm just being I'm just being observant right you observe where you see Nancy the security people are people next door She's holding the elbow just same way I do with my mom. So number one, health-wise, it's time for her. Number two, you listen to the way she's reasoning and you know what I'm saying? She's not as sharp as she once was. She's not saying wild ass crap the way Biden was. She's not shaking hands with ghosts the way Biden was, but you can see the human frailty.

Good grief, she's 85 years old. But Pat, I also believe that's the last thing she wants on her legacy is to have one of those things passed and to have her accounts be the first one at the top of the list for a congressional hearing. She don't want that.

I have a different take on why, but it'll be a later story that I'll bring her back up.

Adam. So PBT, can you do some math with me real quick?

So she's been in office 38 years.

She's made what, 170,000%, 17,000%? 17,000%.

Okay, $133 million in profits.

Yep.

So maybe I'm doing the math wrong. 17,000 divided by 38 years, right? That would give you an average rate of return each year. Is that how you would do it? Comes out to 447% a year. How would you do that math?

If that's a straight return, yes, but you have to use compound interest.

Yeah, you have to compound it back.

So to ask, if I started with $785,000 in an account in 1987, and now I have $133 million in that account. What's my CAGR? What has been my...

Cumulative Annual Growth rate, CAGR.

Okay. So I think... It's still a big number, by the way. It should be... It should be a big number because you're dealing with compound... um, interest is what you're dealing with. But, uh...

How does it... 15% per year. Your CAGR is 15% per year. From 785.

Rob, what is it telling you? I have the numbers wrong.

785 and the net, the total is 130?

$130 million. So she is 167 Xed. But what I'm trying to find out is what is the annual average rate of return?

Because the average rate of return on the S&P 500, you know,

See it says if you want, I can do the annual, I can give you the K-agreement and say yes.

Because Tom, the average annual rate of return is 8 to 10% from the S&P 500, right? Depending on inflation, depending on,

14.46% is what it says.

So it doesn't seem like an absurd number to average 15% a year, does it?

15% a year, no. But the part that sounds absurd, you have to also realize that's how much is in the portfolio. They're guesstimating their net worth is around $250 million. You're assuming the 785, they never took money out to buy a house or buy weddings and all this other stuff that they have to do.

Or buy an election

You know, I would say they're probably at 30 to 40 percent Rate of return with some of the activities that they had that's been a little bit suspicious

Specifically, I know we kind of clown on Paul Pelosi after that Rendezvous with the hammer. What does he actually have? There's 22 bucks. What does he actually do for work because everyone you know piles on Nancy but what does her husband do because I assume he's the moneymaker in the family you just invest and does that type of stuff okay what do you mean he just invests what he does there were 250 million bucks yeah he's she kips him off and he's a venture capitalist and he's and he's an

investor listener of Nancy Pelosi he just listens to what she gets from the insiders and that's what she does.

Her husband. Yeah, she's in Congress for how long? Why is nobody, if she is doing something illegal, do you think she's done something actually illegal and broken the laws? Or are our stock act laws so gray that politicians can just maneuver within this with no accountability and you can just yell at them and call them frauds but nothing actually happens? Which one do you think it is? So has she

actually broken the law? I can't say yes or no but I can say this you know you know what I've been doing with autopilot since July 1st. I went in and looked at those list of things and the things that were bought and you know Palantir showed up and came and went you you know, before the announcement on Congress. And remember, they're reading off all of the forms that have to get filed.

And so the interesting thing about all this is that you can see the trades happening there. And CNN and others and Fox have pointed out trades that were made by our elected officials. And then three weeks later, there's a bill that says oh you you and you get the government contract. I guess this is the main thing Tom.

So I can't I can't say yes she broke the law. It's a very basic question for you. The basic question for you is the following. Do you think do you think people who are in office who have access to information that you don't have they should be able to invest

in a market based on information that they have.

No.

Should they be able to invest in the market? Yes. Should they be able to actively trade based on information?

Hell no.

How do you manage that?

I can tell the difference. How do you manage that? So you put it in the index fund and that's it. I feel like there should be a rule that you cannot do active trading right because there's passive investment. That's what she's doing. I agree. Yeah. But I assume that who's the Republican version of Nancy? Oh there's plenty of them. That's my point. No no this is not a left thing. She's the poster child of this. Yeah but she is the highest ranking person to do what she's

done at the levels that she's done. No doubt. She's the poster child for this. But there's Republicans guilty of this as well. Who is it? Romney is... well Romney was a successful guy before...

Before, correct, with Bain Capital I believe.

But you could have a few other guys, see, that could be... like Mitch McConnell is a good one. Perfect. Okay, but look at Mitch McConnell's profit. How much was that? Six mil. Okay, look at hers.

Yeah, come on. not in the same league. 24.1 million. What I'd be most interested in hearing is what politicians from the left and the right are saying about this. Who is it? Who is our buddy that was here that's the representative in Silicon Valley? Ro Khanna. Ro Khanna. Isn't

he actively talking about something like this? He wants to stop the stock market. Yes. Yes. It's not only him though. I would love to see a bipartisan approach. AOC is a few few different people are on both sides even Anna Paulina Luna's that was here the other day when we spoke to her Tom

Senator Mark Kelly set up an ethics committee approved Blind trust and demonstrated that he had moved all of his assets into the blind trust and the blind trust purpose is for the independent financial advisors to trade limited independent financial advisors to trade limited Limited transactions and he is not part of the decision-making process mostly were related to REITs and

Indexes bingo, so I love that you highlighted one word Limited you said limited what yeah, they limit the trades They limit the trade flow because you know you know in an index fund or a passive fund you're not in and out of the market. You're not trading based on information or new stock that might come up. The active tradings I think of where people get in trouble. Oh yeah I really heard about this. I feel like they should put a law or some sort of guideline.

You cannot trade in and out of stocks. That's where you take advantage of this. Yeah, so here it is. So US politicians on trying to ban or restrict lawmakers from trading individual stocks because of concerns about access to non-public information. John Alsop, Senator Georgia, he's a Democrat, sponsored the Senate Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act. Then you have Mark Kelly, Arizona, who is a guy we just also a Democrat work with all stuff on the same thing then you have Josh Hawley as well Republican

At a Missouri who has joined it as well. You got Dean Phillips that I think he wanted to run for president Minnesota co-sponsored it and then roll counter who we talked about earlier. I

just

He would know in his individual stocks is where you get into hot water. Because I think a politician if they have a 401k, listen, a politician, this is how they're supposed to have retirement money, right? In their 401k or four, three B or whatever it's called in Congress, like anybody else. Yeah, they should be in an index fund. They should be in the ETF, they should not be able to trade individual stocks.

And then there's no conflict of interest if you're trading in out of stocks that's where it kind of comes into all this and then they should and then they should have a target longest

pause like there was a brain I felt like the brain stopped. And I went like this, I went. Yeah, get this man some coffee, folks.

Most people pray for weeks.

Holy shit.

You know how when you invest in the market, PBD.

This is brought to you by Ephedrine.

Exactly, hello, wake up, Adam, just had some coffee.

Dripped fuel.

You know, so Warren Buffet says, listen, America, but that's not your only component of the story. Let me just ask you one question What percent of your asset allocation is in an American funds?

American companies versus international I

Am pro America. I am very little international. I just traded

Yeah, so I have my money with Fidelity apparently if you want to do a world index like a world Conglomerate, what do you call it? They they mandate that you do two-thirds of your portfolio into America and one-third into international. I'm speaking to my guys I said, let me ask you guys a question over the last 10 years. What has been the rate of return? for the S&P 500 versus whatever you're calling the world index that has emerging markets and everything and Basically was double the rate of return America versus the international I go. So why am I invested in international at all?

They go. Well, we want to diversify I go f your diversification put everything 100% into America Everything so what's my point every single one of these politicians should be in an ETF, S&P 500, all in America. I don't need you investing in emerging markets in India. I don't want you talking about a new company in Bangladesh. 100% of their stock allocation should be in America and you should not be able to actively trade in and out of

it. Let's go to the next one. Good, Good point. So next one to get into. Here's the next one. So housing director confirms administration working on a 50 year mortgage after Trump

hint.

Oh my God.

50 year mortgage. Yes. 50 year mortgage. What would it look like? Go ahead, Rob.

I'm trying to find an answer on affordability for housing, which right now we're seeing one of the worst housing markets that we've seen in recent times. And so the 50-year mortgage is a play to lower people's monthly mortgage payments. But the downside is, especially early on, all of that payment will be going to interest. And of course, since you're paying over 50 years and not over 30 years, you're going to be paying off that mortgage for a lot longer

So the details are still to be worked out

But it looks to be like the president's looking for a quick fix to a market that is fundamentally broken right now

Okay, so this guy's a Democrat right because you see the back in the back if you zoom in on the books You'll see the new deal go back a little bit right. Do you see that to the left? He's got the new deal. You can always tell what books they're reading. Okay, do you know, while this guy's saying this, it's so funny, do you know who came up with the 30-year mortgage?

Who?

Do you know who came up with the 30-year mortgage?

Who was that?

I want you to think about it. Can you, say the same thing back in the day, fellow? I don't know what your name is, but you know, well-spoken guy a minute ago? Crashed. So he did 30 years. Trump's going to 50 years. By the way, Tom, the question is if you're a bank, if you're a bank, would you get into the 50-year business game? Would we do that knowing you're collecting the interest up front? Would you entertain the 30 versus 50 because how do you set it up? You still

have to find a way to make it profitable for the banks right? Right. So the bank has to get their money or else there's no incentive for them to want to sell this loan okay? What would be the incentive for banks to sell 50-year

loans? Well as long as they felt that the underlying asset wasn't going to drop. Now, so here's what the bank has to do. Your house is a collateral. You stop paying Vinny. I'm going to take your house. I'm going to sell it to the next guy. That's what a bank will do. We'll auction it. You'll auction it off. Now, then what it means, Pat, is the first 10 years of that 50 year loan, the bank has to underwrite it and be comfortable that that house won't

decline in value. You follow that? Because not much will be paid off in 10 years, Pat. Not much at all. So if you and I, Tom and Pat's bank, and we do a 50-year mortgage, our underwriting has to say, are we sure that house is not going to go down in these first 10 years? Because if we have to seize the house and auction it, we got to make sure that house is worth more than the loan's worth.

So it makes the front end underwriting has to be more certain for the banks. But I just did a little analysis. 30 year, $400,000, six and a quarter, $2,462 is the payment. 50 year, six and a quarter, $400,000, $2,179. So about a $300 difference on a $400,000 mortgage. However, next to no principles paid off in those first 10 years.

Very little. And then it accelerates. So for the banks, more people will qualify using standard ratios and measurements, but the bank better be sure that those houses don't drop in those first 10 years.

Rob, go back to where you were at right there a minute ago. Watch this. So this is 30-year payment, 30-year loan, 360 payments. Your main payment will be $2684. Total interest paid for was 466 40 $2,400 so you save maybe 150 bucks 130 buck. No hundred. No you save 270 bucks and Eventually end up paying six hundred fifty thousand dollars to one thousand dollars more and in 50 years is 2272 which is a hundred and forty two dollars less of The 40-year and you end up paying $863 long term. So what's the price of the house?

Yeah.

Is that based on a half a million?

What is this?

I think that's a half a million dollar loan.

So half a million dollar loan is what you're looking at. So it's a half a million dollar house. So what's the interest rate that you put on this Rob? 6%? 5% fix. Yeah, okay, but it's not even 5% right now Got it. What would it be? Okay, PBD. I mean you already know where I stand on this. I just know what you're doing. I know you're running your numbers

What are you thinking on this right now?

Well here's the thing Adam. I've never lost money buying a house Because the math on buying a house is the following here's the math on buying a house. Okay, let's just kind of do, you know, if you just do the flat interest, you're not making a lot of money. If I buy a $600,000 house, how much down payment am I putting on a $600,000 house, Tom, if I got a 750 credit score? A $600,000 house, you'll have to put down about 120.

20%? Okay. 20% of the put down? Okay, let's just say, let's just, let's just type in Rob, if I have a $600,000 house, 750 credit score, how much down payment would I need to put down? Can I do 10%? Yeah, like there are some states who give you a first time home buyer for 10%. First time, let's just say 10%. So if I do first time, I'm putting 60K down. And you have to pay PNI.

So I'm financing 540 is what I'm financing. Okay. So now what is the rate of return on real estate the last decade?

5%.

Okay. But what I'm saying is fine. Sure. Go 5%. If we do 5% on that 600K,

let's take 6%. Okay. So what is the price of the $600,000 house come 10 years from now? What's the price of the $600,000 house come 10 years from now at 6%.

and it grows at 6% every year what is the property value 10 years from now? 7% will be 1.2 million so I'm probably going to say 6% is going to be 980. Let's just say 980 is what it should be. $1,074,000. So $1,074,000, you just made $574,000 on that money. Okay. $574,000 on the 600K, you put $60,000 down. What's your monthly payment on that, Rob? Just say

what is your payment on a $540,000 loan at 6% 30-year fix. Let's just not even say 30-year fix. Tom, let's say we do a 10-year adjustable. I'm doing it. Do a 10-year arm, okay? 10-year arm. So, 540. Vinny, an arm is an adjustable rate mortgage. It's not a working bicep. Gotcha. So, what is the payment on that? Everything 32 30 years. So let's actually do the math right now So I'm and then Rob, can you do me a favor? I just ask what is the rent? What is the average rent nationwide? Okay. What is the six hundred thousand dollar house average get in the house in the country today? We're gonna actually do the math very deep right now. I love it. So go what is a

$600,000 budget get you, how big of a house does a $600,000 budget get you in America on average? We're not saying Toledo, we're not saying Beverly Hills, I'm saying Toledo. How big of a house? Yeah, like I'm getting married, I got a wife and kids, I want to have a family. How many bedrooms is that? 2576. Okay. 2576.

Three bedrooms.

I think that's four three. I think that's four three. Okay, Rob, can you then ask the following question? What is the average rent for a 2,576 square foot home in America? We're getting very deep if you notice what I'm doing right now exactly Okay, cuz I know where you're going and I'm gonna do the math as deep as you want to go with this here right now

So the average rent is what? 1754 Okay. So now notice. Oh, there's something 54 for an oh 908. So what is the average rent for?

What does that say?

5900 what is that 5900 rent holy shit that's a lot extrapolate 2500 square foot home though okay I that's a lot of rent Rob holy moly so why don't we damn so I don't think it's gonna be 50 or mortgage no I want to do rent okay what is the what is the average rent for a 2,570 square foot home in America? Give me average. Not high or low, but average.

Okay? I don't know if you're getting this number or not. We're getting to the bottom of it. That number should be $2,100. Still saying the same the same number right that's telling me the same number as well What number do you guys want to pick let's pick a rent?

I wrote 1900 before I came out because that's the stuff I've been reading okay

Can we just say it's $2,000 a month? Let's just say the average rent right there's $2,100 a month. Let's go with $2,100 a month. Okay, so what's 2,100? What's 3238 minus 2,100? 3238 minus 2,100 is 1138. Now take 1138 times 120 because you know what I'm doing. Adam, are you tracking or no? 1138 times 120, Vinny, is... Look at his face!

By the way... Stop, stop, just stop! Are you guys still... 120 Vinny is But you know what we're doing Vinny this is very

Okay, so if we take that 6% concept, if we take that 6% concept, that the value of real estate makes an average return of 6% every year, over 10 years your $600,000 house you bought will be a $1,074,000. $1,074,000 minus, okay, minus, I can't believe we're getting this deep in the loan, but let's do it anyways. Minus $600,000. You've made $474,000 in return. If I take $474,000 minus Vinny, $136,540 that you would have paid at a $2,100 rent, 10 years later, owning a home

would have gotten you $337,000, let's add the $60,000 down payment to it as well. I mean, you're making $397,460 buying a house versus renting a house over 10 years.

But let's go deeper.

Go.

Let's extrapolate it, Adam. Go ahead. So, your argument, or not your argument, the argument is you're not going to lose money by buying a real estate. It's almost like buying a bond.

There's a lot of caveats, buddy. But I want to hear you. Go ahead. make your argument. So What what's a better another three-second what's it what's a better you're on my guys get this guy some brain

It was Rory's 13th birthday I went all yeah The argument is not is buying a house a good investment. It is a okay investment. I'm not shitting on the investment. I don't think it's a bad investment. I'm not recommending that you don't do the investment. I'm saying if

you're solving for a return. Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop. Based on this argument. We did it as technical as possible. I'm willing to bet we lost viewership right now. Let me just see where people are probably like stop talking about this. I don't want to talk about this. I'm telling you right now Adam, okay? This is my advice to people. If you're in the area where you're working for company advance, like if I'm working for Marriott, say I'm working for Marriott and my goal is to be a general manager running a hotel one day. Guess what I'm not doing for 10 years?

I'm not buying a house.

Correct.

Because you could be moving around. I'm going to be moving. We're opening up a new Marriott in London. Do you want to go? No. I'm not going to get stabbed, but I'll go to Dubai, right? Do you want to go to a new Marriott that's coming? Yes. If your job requires potential promotions to move.

For me, when I was PHP, I know I'm moving. As crazy as it is, I bought a house eventually in that community that we lived in Trammell State. You've never been to it. Tom has been to it. I bought the cul- the corner. Two years later, I'm leaving. You remember that time? Tuesday,

I'm like, shit, I'm going to Texas. I still made $200,000. I still made $200,000 when I bought that because it was prime property cul-de-sac in a gated community with only 21, uh, 21 homes. Then we go to the house in Dallas. You've been to our house in Dallas. Did you go to both of them or just one of them? Did you go to the other house? In Dallas? The four story, 15,000 square foot home?

You didn't go to that one? I didn't go to that one. Okay. So, the one, but the other one you went to, right? With the pool table. If a person's buying long-term, you have, like if this is what I did for a living financially, but you're still not doing the math with them.

When you get to the bottom of it, the question is simple. Are you planning on living in this place for 10 years? Yes. Then I would lean more towards buying than renting. If you tell me no, then I would say pump the brakes. That's really how simple it is.

We are fully on the same page fully I'm not zero disagreements So that might my contention is never don't buy real estate I've never said this is as thorough as a breakdown we could have done for the Course, of course if you could put these three your PBDs money, we know 150 million ain't what it used to be. PBD's money if you could put the following three things where you've made the most money. Working on a business, your stock portfolio,

or your housing portfolio what rank those three for you? I'm not everybody though. I'm saying for you I want to know you. I know a guy asked me if you could define yourself with one word what would would it be? And it can't be politics or family non-family I said operator. I love the day-to-day grind You know since what time I've been at the office today, you don't even know what time I've been at the office today Yesterday I was at Naples Dylan had a game

I went to the championship coming back and I've been dealing with a bunch of chaos this weekend. PHP was here the day before Saturday. 7.45 I'm at the office. You know what day, what time my Saturday ended? You know what time my Saturday ended? 2 o'clock in the morning. My day started Saturday 7.45 in the morning. It ended Sunday 2 o'clock in the morning. I come home Sunday 2 o'clock in the morning, then I got to get the you know doing stuff with the kids to go to the So I'm back and forth, but I freaking love being an operator, right?

But that's not everybody if somebody's watching this right now who has a job making eighty two thousand dollars your wife makes fifty nine thousand Dollars you they're trying to make a decision Do we listen to the people that are saying it or not or you and you know there's not going to be a massive amount of changes in your life the next 10 years.

Massive.

If there is, then you have to adjust accordingly. But if you know it's going to be, I'm going to be with this company long term, I love it here, this is what I'm going to be doing, this is the industry I'm going to be on, this is the city I'm going to live in, probably within a 5-10 mile radius, then guess what? Lock it up and get something if you can afford it. And then by the way, guess what else you have to be thinking about? Never has there been more important time, Tom, to buy a house in a community in an area

based on politics than today. Do you know what just happened right now with California and Texas? Folks, let me tell you what happened with California and Texas. This whole thing with the elections and all this stuff that they're saying going into midterms, do you know what California and Texas just did with redistricting? You know Prop 50 and what Texas did?

Do you know what they did? Guess what's going to happen? Texas protected themselves. We're going to stay Republican for many, many decades. Come do something about it. You know what California did? We're going to stay Democrat for many, many decades. Come do something about it.

A-Rod's being interviewed, and he's being asked, what areas do you buy properties in? And he says, red states. Why red states? Because people are moving to red states. What are red states?

Pick them. Pick them.

Tennessee, Florida used to be purple, now it's red. Texas, what are you investing in? So these are the types of decisions you've got to make with your family and say, where are we going to go buy a home long term? But if it's 10 years, I'm banking on buying a home instead of renting a home because 10 years later, that family is going to have an additional $400,000 of net worth added

to their name that they wouldn't have had. All right, let's go to the next story. Next story, next story, next story. Boom, boom, where's that one story, Vinny, you wanted to get to? The Janssex? Yeah, I'm gonna go to, you wanna go to that or you wanna go to the Newsom one? Whichever one you want.

Yeah, let's go Newsom. Newsom gives Trump a new nickname after President appears to nod off during White House announcement. So what happened here? Is this a real nodding off in you or no? I honestly didn't even see this one. Rob, do you have a clip or no of this? I don't have a

clip of that. I do have a clip of Newsom talking about snap benefits where he

recites Bible verses. Oh this is, this really bothered me. No this is Gavin Newsom. You called him the worst not father in a golden. Some movie saw this, had to share it, social media post. 79-year-old president struggled to keep his eyes open Friday during a televised event at the White House where several administration officials announced lower prices for weight loss drugs.

People can't sleep again because they can't breathe when they go to bed. Dr. Oz said this.

So what is he talking about here is this actual story with the not father it's all BS okay this is the same guy Pat that said Joe Biden was the best and he's doubled down a thousand times for the first time in nine years Donald Trump kind of closed his eyes kind Okay. Kind of did that. I'm, I don't, I've never had this type of feeling towards any politician and I keep, I'm going to keep doing it because as these years, by the way, it's happening, it's happening. We're almost, we're one year past. It's going to be 2028. Tom, look, look at him. Oh my goodness. An 80 year old guy got one time got a little,

oh, maybe, yeah. Oh my, oh my, it's over guys. It's over. This is the same. What is Newsom trying to say here? What do you think? The Nodfather. He's trying to, let me explain something to you. This guy is, is, I've already called it. I said, he gonna be the front runner, it's no secret. What he's doing, he just went overseas, now he's in Texas. He has the freaking audacity to put the American flag behind him. He's the most un-American person out there. I love that you're saying, Pat, who's going to California?

And it still boggles my mind. People like Bill Maher, and I get it. You're in California, your show's in California, you love Gavin Newsom, his words exactly. I love the guy. I love the guy because you have the money and you can afford it but the rest of the freaking people in California are bleeding out. There's a clip, is this the one Rob about?

God's will scripture.

No, this one right here Robby, is this the one where he says we have to democratize the economy? Is that one it?

Uh, one it? I think this one. Listen to this. Look at what he has to do.

We've got to deal with the issue of our time. We have to democratize this economy if we're going to save democracy. You can't have 10% of people owning 2 thirds of the wealth in this country. You can't have that 30 year old that's doing worse than his parents

generation for the first time in US history. And so those

are fundamental issues that were obviously present in this election

on Tuesday.

And Donald Trump...

You can stop it, so bye. He's saying that Trump has done nothing to cater to his billionaire friends and the result, folks working at Amazon are paying 12% more, Target, blah blah blah. Here's the problem, the majority of California pays over 11% in sales tax no matter how poor they are, thanks to Gavin Newsom. It has the highest gas prices in the nation, an electricity crisis, sky-high

insurance costs, and if people even get coverage anymore that's thanks to him. And he turned one of the most beautiful states in America that you lived in, that he lived in, that I lived in, into a nightmare for the middle class. He's choke working families with endless taxes, regulations, failed policies. Let's forget about COVID. Let's forget about the response for the Palisades.

And there's over 190,000 homeless people in California, guys. They look like freaking third world zones, these cities in California and San Francisco. Instead of making California healthier and wealthier, he's made them poor, sicker and hopeless and now Tom I've been dying last night I thought about you when I about this clip Rob can you go to the clip with him talking about besides him having the flag behind him which I think is a disgrace him this serpent trying to talk about God and scripture no Adam this drove me to the

roof you think he's a Christian you think Gavin Newsom is going to church you think he's professing his faith to people the fact that he was trying to use snap and food stamps with the Bible

drove me nuts God Rob play this think about the state of mind of the vice president how do they how do they honestly how do you square the circle when you go to a prayer breakfast how do you square the circle I mean Old Testament New Testament well what's the fundamental thing that connects every, I mean from John to Matthew to Proverbs? Proverbs. It's this notion of hunger, feeding the poor, the sick, the tired. It's not an option, it's central to advancing God's Word.

The fundamental point that we'd be using, this is what it's about, and the federal government said it in the lawsuit, that they want to use it as a bargaining chip a Bargaining chip to end this shutdown. That's shameful. It's never happened in your life

You stop it. I never thought the day would come that this unholy Serpent the fact that he's trying to go to scripture like to justify the government's decency to me is sick And guess what because he's talking about these people deserve this money, right? In the Bible, and I know what you're going to say, this is what it says in regards to work, responsibility, and self-reliance. In 2 Thessalonians chapter 3 verse 10,

if anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat. Paul said this to his believers who stopped working. Not crippled, but if it's not willing. Not willing meaning you don't want to work. Well he incentivizes illegals to come because their votes Tom. And then in Genesis 2 verse 15 the Lord took the man and put him in the garden to work and to keep it. You have to work. Alright that's the thing he did with Adam after he created it. He gave him a job. Before sin even entered the world God was like hey Adam

nice you like the bushes get over there and work. And the last one was Proverbs, lazy hands make for poverty, but diligent hands bring wealth. God honors the worker, not the idol. This guy, his entire party, I want everybody to understand, is bring illegals, give them money, and they vote for you, and that's it. Period.

So, part of Gavin Newsom, he's running for president and you expect him to say certain things. Yes. But when he tries to cross over and do this, he's going to get called to receipts, and the receipts have never been greater than on the pages of Scripture. And he is attempting to use Scripture to make his point. Well, I'll tell you, there was a time when Jesus was tempted. Satan came to Jesus and attempted to use Scripture with him. He said, took him to the desert for 40 days,

and he said, you know, you can make these stones turn into bread, you know, why don't you do that? And he says, look, the Scripture says, man does not live by bread alone. He took him to the highest point in the temple, and he said, throw yourself down.

Won't legions of angels come and rescue you? And he said, the yourself down, won't legions of angels come and rescue you? And he said, the Scripture says, do not put the Lord your God to the test. And so when you start using Scripture and you try to make political points, you need to be very, very careful, because you're dealing with a consequential result here that is much bigger than any pundit, than any person can bring to you, is as you're attempting to use the word of God and to morph it to make your argument and you're morphing it in the wrong way, he's got a serious issue. But what we need to do, we need to

bring the receipts to the American people and we need to find the reasonable Californians and the reasonable liberals that want to look at facts. Because I'll tell you what's going on. What's going on is he's an effective campaigner. What's going on is he's effective to the media. What's going on is he may turn your stomach on one side, but he is turning voters on his side. Take a look at this. You see that in the lower left corner, Pat? 27.5 million dollars has been wagered and it's currently right now at a 37, 36 percent chance this is not polling. So it's not, he doesn't have 36% of the polls.

The wagering public on Cali she believes that there is a 36% chance that Gavin Newsom will be the nominee. And the key to that are right in there with him is AOC and Kamala Harris, AOC at 10%, Kamala Harris at 6, and then the field. So this will change. JB Pritzker wants to run and he's going to put money into it and he's going to weigh in and the DNC wants him because frankly the DNC allegedly believes that all the stuff that Gavin is doing right now, he's making a bunch of negative campaign ads for himself,

Pat. There are people in the DNC that think that all of this activity, all the things he did, getting called out in the mini debate a year and a half ago with DeSantis on the, hey, let me show you the map of San Francisco. This is from your own people. There's a lot of people that are frustrated by that and think that he's just filled the cannon with a lot of negative ads are going to come back the other way. But right now you got $27 million that's been wagered.

That he's going to go.

That there's a 37% chance. You know what I think Republicans have to be aware of? Is the following. This is what I wanted to hear. What I think Republicans have to be aware of is, you know, there's nothing more, what's the word? The blind spots that come from being super cocky, just because you have Trump right now,

and he's the most formidable guy they've had going against the establishment, at least in our generation that we've had, that he stood up to these guys, that doesn't guarantee the next guy is going to be as tough as him. That doesn't guarantee how American people are going to react to Vance, or Rubio, or all these other guys. Newsom's going to be formidable. AOC is going to be formidable. AOC is going to be formidable. Kamala Harris,

the worst candidate in the history of my lifetime. I've never met a candidate more annoying and unattractive than Kamala. Kamala's like the girl you went on a date with and you're sitting when she walks up. It's a blind date and you're sitting down like, oh my god, she is hot, until she opens her mouth. And you look at the waiter and you're trying to give all the signals to say, you know, please save me. Poor hot tea on my lap.

Please, you're like, save me. Tell me there's a phone call at the front. Say there's an emergency, I'm needed. Please have a fight accidentally break out so I can jump in it and get arrested so I can leave.

Pull the fire alarm, please.

But whatever you do, get me the hell away from this candidate here. That was Kamala. If I saw Kamala on TV, it was painful, right? But if Democrats think Gavin Newsom is not gonna, he doesn't have a high likelihood of becoming a president,

it's very, very high. Very high. Did you see Kamala this weekend declared that she was the single most qualified person for president ever? I think the more she does that, the more Newsom wins.

That was about, that's exactly what I was saying. And she was on there really not really challenged by who she on there with.

Is this the one?

Yep. Go ahead.

Oh, Kara Swisher go ahead

Said I was the most qualified candidate ever to run for president. Oh my god

Vodka I like to say I like this

People are saying. I'm just speaking fact. But you know what drives me? But you know what?

I think if what? I hope she's the candidate. Me too. By the way, listen to me, guys. Republicans, and conservatives, and libertarians, just watch, please.

Just let's speak. Let's all get behind her. Let's all get behind her. Turn off the light. her. Let's all get behind her. No, no, I'm telling you, let's, let's all get behind her and just build her up to get past the primaries. And then let her do her thing all over again. Because, you know, you, you, you thank God upstairs if Hillary or Kamala run. You hope they run. Hope. You ask AOC a

question, she can give you a nice answer. Of course. It's gotten better over the years. I mean she was a rookie congresswoman coming in but guess what? She can really put something together, okay? You ask her a question. Oh man. You ask Hillary Clinton a question, you know, you need like 20 security guards around you to make sure if you're, you know. You don't want to suicide yourself. It's a very different thing, but I think in 2028, as we're going through this next process, I don't think Republicans have 2020 guaranteed on lockdown.

I have an idea. I could be her campaign manager. I have an idea. How about this? Kamala point to eight

Funny, but I honestly I see guys a question what because you want to get behind Kamala, right? Yeah If you had to pick the president the next president of the United States, it's not a Republican. It's not Trump It's not JD Vance. It's not Marco Rubio had to be one of these three people Had to be okay

And I'm gonna give you my name. Hang on, don't say it yet.

AOC, Hillary Clinton. You know how to play Mary, FK? You know that game?

I would choose Hillary.

Hillary. No doubt. You would choose Hillary. Out of those three?

Correct.

Hillary.

Cool. Got it. Tom, do you have a different pick? No, no. If you're going to play cool. It's gotta be Hillary. This guy. So we're on the same page. Hillary. Cool. Boom. But she, I don't think she's running now between Kamala and AOC. Who do you pick Costa Rica?

Speaker 2 11. Well, you know, you Kamala. To be the President of the United States in 2028, you have to vote for one. It's a bad game.

It's a horrible game.

It's a horrible game.

It's a horrible game. Who do you pick? Who do you pick? I am refusing to play this game.

No, PBD.

Between those two, I'm sitting it out. Are you ready for this? But I tell you but I tell you honestly my pick honestly it would probably be a OC It would probably over Kamala Harris because you know what's gonna happen the same people that were telling Joe Biden the real presidents the Obamas They're behind them. They're good. They're running the show guys. And again, you know, why would say OC you want me to tell you? Because if Kamala becomes president Kamala is not president. She's not smart. Thank you Okay, she's not she's not smart if a OC becomes president

She's at least gonna clean up some of the what he called it. He I like I truly believe she's a true believer when it comes on to the Nancy Pelosi stuff I do believe she has you know know, true belief in certain areas I don't know what Kamala Harris believes in so

You know, that's a really good point It's like what do you believe they will actually do and have so would you rather the coalition in the juice to do or socialist? That's what it pets bringing up a great processing point, even if you don't like the candidate, what do you believe they can actually get accomplished and have the coalition and the juice to do it? AOC, I agree with Pat. I think she'll get some of these things.

Who do you think can be bullied more Kamala or, or, or AOC? Who do you think can be owned Kamala or AOC?

Kamala.

What I'm trying to say is that.

No way guys. What I'm trying to say what I'm trying to say is that legend and man Yeah, no listen, that's why so you have conversations both of them have the most annoying voices ever so let's not Voice is more annoying. Okay. That's my opinion. Have you seen her in the last the way she's speaking the way she's my She's different. Let's just state facts here for me. She's been a senator. She's been a vice president She's been a drunk Borders are so great. There you go What the hell is a OC ever done in her career other than hang out in the Bronx and but those are the side Communism how did how did come what is a OC ever done? How did Kamala get?

I don't say didn't look like a Latina 6. Would we even pretend to even know who she was? They managed to get the Green New Deal in there and get certain things screwed with the energy industry. Hold on, hold on.

I want you to stay like this. By the way, I want you to stay in this mode for three

years so Kamala becomes a candidate. I want you to defend her like this. Kamala is the most accomplished president nominee in America. You named three accolades. You were one of those people. How did she get into Congress? Let's talk about her mayor friend. Hold on. How did she become the vice president?

What did she do? How did AOC get there? All those things that you said, but hold on. AOC didn't know people that were mayors and no.

AOC hasn't done anything.

She's a representative.

She's a representative. She's a loser in the Bronx. I'm not spending this much time on this story. I'm going to go to the next one. Vance is the frontrunner for 2028. Rubio privately confides, Rob, if you want to play this clip, in regards to who is the presidential candidate, frontrunner for 2028 for the Republican Party.

Go ahead, Rob.

This great Politico article that came out today where it talks about Secretary Rubio privately talking about and expecting Vice President Vance to be the 2028 GOP nominee and obviously there has been a lot of talks already on who would it be maybe the front-runner would it be Vance would it be Rubio you know they the figure would be that they would both try to run for. But let's now talk to Politico right here, one of the reporters on the story.

Great article, Diana Nerozi with Politico, always great to have you on. And yeah, I thought this was a fascinating look at how President Trump,

not even a year into this second administration

and they're already jockeying.

Okay, Scott's talking jockeying.

I can't do that anymore. So yeah, so Marco has been very clear on that. JD is going to be the Republican nominee if he wants to be said the person close to the secretary noting that Rubio has expressed sentiment privately and publicly. He will do anything he can just to support the vice president. That effort said the person close to Rubio who was granted an anonymity to share the

secretary of state's private conversations and no one expects Marco to resign from the cabinet and start taking potshots at the vice president. So that's kind of where you're at with this. Are you at a point, Tom, like is there an outsider for you as well outside of J.D. or Rubio?

Is there anybody else as an outsider for for Republican for 2028? I I think there will be outsiders that try to run Because you you elevate your your presence for other considerations Many people think Pete Buttigieg did exactly that elevated himself so that he would be You know drawn into the mix and then he was Secretary of Transportation. So I believe there will be outsiders trying to run,

but I don't think they will be serious campaigns, and I think they'll be there to elevate their presence, get a little forward. Now, do I think that people like MTG are serious, and it's gonna be a distraction, and it's gonna take well past South Carolina to figure out how we make a coalition.

Yeah, I think that's going to be a problem. But I also believe that the Republicans are smart enough right now. And what you're hearing from Rubio, I believe, is this is, hey, Marco, you have really stepped it up. Foreign policy. Just check the box. You look Foreign policy, just check the box.

You look far more mature, check the box. You got the support of the big guy, check the box. You've got wins in foreign policy, check the box. Do you wanna go? We were behind you all for the Senate years, we're there. You have to remember, he's got a coalition

that got into Senate in the state of Florida and he would probably carry, he would definitely carry Florida. And so it's Rubio probably saying, you know what, the machine is really thinking Vance. I'm not sure I want to throw my fingers into the gears of the machine, but I think there might be outsiders, Pat, but it'll be very temporary.

You know, there's always 20 people that show up in New Hampshire and everybody in New Hampshire gets free coffee for five weeks because the candidates are buying your coffee to come to Starbucks and hear what they say. I think there'll be outsiders there, but I think they'll come and go quick and the Republicans

will get by.

So many call order.

I get buzzed over.

You may like everything that you've been saying with Gavin and all these guys and all the kind of fighting with the Republicans and stuff. I honestly, if an election happened right now, I honestly don't think any of these guys would be able to be Gavin. And I'm not saying that happily. I'm just saying because the left just votes on feeling.

These are the Hitlers and this whole Gestapo's Nazis going to keep going.

They take children away from their families.

That's a good thing. See how they feel in a couple of years.

I get it, but Tom, I understand 100%, but that's how they're going to vote. The fact that you can cheer for Gavin Newsom with the resume that this guy has. Tom, if he was in charge of the tour bus guy and his tour bus has crashed and killed people and everything, they'd still vote for that guy because it's not the trouble.

He's a candidate, not a business guy. If he ran a funeral parlor, no one would die.

Exactly.

So, you know, that's, that's the reality you've got there. But is he running a campaign? Does he know what he's doing? Yes, he does.

Yes. And it's very effective. It's scary because I know what's going to back and endorse to become the next president It's gonna be it might be him or might be Rubio The question is will Trump in three years still have that fire and that? Magga push back to put them over the edge or is the Democrats the Gavin Newsom gonna be like no they're there They're negative still haven't given any outsider names Tulsi Gabbert. Okay, Tulsi. Yeah, I would vote for it

Why you know when you say that we'll have to find outsider remainard. Okay, Tulsi Gabbard. I would vote for it. Why you say that? Define outsider. What do you mean outsider? Okay, so to me, think Tucker, Massey, think Jamie Dimon, think, you know, Iger, think... On the Republican side? On the Republican side. I think most of those names you just, or most of those names are... Tucker?

No, no, no. Massie?

No, Tucker, Tucker.

Well, Massie's an insider.

You think Jamie runs as a Democrat?

Well, Tucker being an outsider... You think Jamie runs as a Republican or Democrat? If Jamie ever did it, I think honestly he could only run as Ross Perot. Honestly. I think he's smart. You think there's anybody that's on the outside? Besides a Tucker, no.

Our draft pick has been assassinated.

You think Tucker will? No question about it. You think Tucker will?

No way. No.

No. You said no way?

I mean, listen. His dad was part of the machine, man. He understands this stuff. I think we, didn't you ask him that's why he wouldn't know I think that's why he may understand what it takes to do it Like meaning a call to action like he has to do it. No, I mean he he through his dad He knows about the machine. He knows about what went on go take a look at all the things

He was exposed to so and he sees it on Fox He would know exactly what would take and so if he makes a decision he's knowledgeable. He's not making an emotional decision He knows who he's getting into

Who do you think? Who do you think? No, but I gave you guys a bunch of names. Oh fantastic! I see like poised, soldier, you know.

Ted Cruz?

Oh God, no.

So when you say inside outside, what do you mean?

You don't think he's running? Cruz when you say inside outside, what do you mean? You don't think he's running, Cruz?

So does he still have the desire? Yeah, but I think he's an insider, isn't he?

I have a very close friend that's friends with Tucker and they were talking about a presidential run in 2028. If the guys in the back could not show this, I'd appreciate that, but for you guys, I wanted to show you. Tucker's response to him when he said, what about running in 2028? Tucker's message is the bottom one.

Basically, no chance in hell. Yeah, I agree. Yeah, I think those are those his position. I know he's never expressed any interest in running for president. It's he's kind of like the Michelle Obama of the left. Oh, he could never run.

Can I ask you one question before you before you say anything? Well, he is a man. Let's say we're getting closer to the 2020 election. He knows that the splintered Republican party, it's going to be this guy, this guy, they're

all different. Tucker cannot win a general election.

Hold on, hold on, hold on one second.

Tucker can barely get through a Republican primary, much less a general election. You don't think he could? There's levels to things. You can be the best high school basketball player that you're at the end of the bench in college. You can be the best player on your college team and then you're at the end of the bench at the NBA. You could be one of the best players in the NBA. You could barely be a six man.

There's different levels to this. The Republican Party has a Trump problem. There's nobody, nobody who can hold a candle to Trump. Nobody. JD Vance can't hold a candle to Trump. Marco Rubio, Tulsi Gabbard, Tucker. None of these people are Trump.

They're all going to have a Trump problem. On the left, completely wide open. This is probably going to be the most wide open election in 2028.

That's what I'm saying.

We're going to have two primaries with 50 people on stage.

It's anybody's game. I'm personally making a few phone calls for some outsider to get in. I think this is a very unique year, 2028. I'm personally calling on a few people. And as we get closer, I'll be more public about it, but I'm personally going to call on a few people for 2028, post midterms. Let's let midterms be done, and then we'll be nominating some people

and doing some reaching out. If I have to go I have to go after anybody with a representative in front of their name

Representative film the blank has approximately zero chance of doing anything in any type of election your question general

Do you think it's a challenge folks if you're listening? AOC do not let Adam talk to you

Do you think a Tucker is the type of guy that once he sees the writing on the wall and is like, Oh my God, somebody like Gavin Newsom is going to be the president,

he wouldn't say, I have to do this for the country. Tucker ain't Superman.

No, I didn't say Superman.

I didn't say Superman.

I said he had I either want to hear Pat process this or this was make it Israel's fault and fight for real right this was one of the two things here that who would do what let's either I either want to hear Pat process it or let's just bring Israel into this and go are you fight for five

minutes for real yeah so let's let's do it let's go to this all right so meet up Denmark folks here's what Denmark is doing. Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media for children under 15. Freaking love that. Go ahead, Rob.

With 14 points about how to protect minors better online. We're standing in a situation in Denmark where far too many young people, far too many children are having a profile on a big social media platform. We have agreed on an age limit of 15 years of age, but with the opportunity for parents to consent from the age of 13 if they want their children and young people to be on the social media platform.

Guys, be quiet in the back.

Guys, shut up! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. Well, we are not regulating based on specific companies.

Adam, you like that tiger shirt? In Denmark, do're not regulating

You like that tiger shirt Adam

That a tiger thing or what is that leopard leopard women like wearing cheetah colors women like wearing this type of ice-key guy

speaking to Associated Press Caroline stage Denmark's Minister for Digital Affairs said 94% of Danish children under the age of 13 have profiles on at least one social media platform and more than half of those under 10 do so. So Rob, run a poll. Run a poll. Do you, I don't know if it's run a poll. Okay, so put one. Should a poll. Do you? I don't know if it's run a poll. OK, so put one.

Should kids be without social media? One option at any age. Another option at 13. Another 15. Then put the last one at 18. Let's see what our audience votes.

I'm actually really curious. Tom, what do you think about this?

I think it's common sense coming forward because there's some, look, you can argue about social media all day long. You can argue about governments. New Zealand got it right. Remember during COVID actually New Zealand raised his hand and said, Hey, we want to put limits on social media for kids. There are two, actually three avenues that you can look at very, very clearly, and you can be fact-based. And that is exactly what, at least in this case,

Carlin Stagge, or Stagge from Denmark, I think it's Stagge, I believe it's pronounced that way there, that kids being approached by pedophiles, kids being approached for relation to number one, number two, the girls and depression and girls and responses to, you need the likes and you need all this to be validated and through that lack of validation brings depression and bad behavior in girls.

The studies are out, the studies are clear and Facebook meta admitted it to Congress that they had done those things to hook the girls and to cause this. So you have Facebook admitting it. And then the last thing that you have also that you can look to is test scores and education of kids in middle school who have access to social media. So now Denmark is saying, hey

parents, if you want to go through an assessment, and the parents have to fill out an assessment, which my understanding is basically, are you married, are you involved in your kids, and then you could say, my kid could have a profile at 13 if I sign the assessment. Or they can't have it until 15, because they're just looking at the facts. They're just looking at those three simple facts. So I think it's common sense, Pat. I think it's absolute common sense, finally, that people are looking at it.

You can see in theaters, did you see theaters, we go to those things, you see the Dove soap commercial where the moms and the young women are talking about, you know, about, you know, Dove soap is pure. And it says you need to have pure friends and pure truth. You don't need to have all the social media. You are validated in who you are and all of that. Why is that all happening? And Denmark, I think, is doing the right thing here and they're following

New Zealand. And I think when you take a look, you know, in the U.S., why hasn't, why has anybody from Congress brought this up? After all the things that happened in Congress, and I'm not out here to bash social media companies or tech bros, but you admitted certain things in Congress, so why hasn't the US put similar restrictions in place? Especially when we have the data on pedophilia.

We have the data on girls under 16 and depression, and we have the data on test scores we have data so with all these data it's not one data point and then you try to make you know I'm not running for Congress I throw up one stat out there and I try to make a story out of it you've got a list of stats here so hats off to Denmark hats off to Caroline Stagge or stage I think it's pronounced I gave

Denmark minister might be Stronge.

So yeah.

It might be that. What do you think though? What do you think, Rob? The poll has shown what? Almost 4,000 people voted, look at the poll.

Very interesting.

At 18 years old, 52%.

Yeah, I agree with our audience Go for it, four year old.

Take this phone, you idiot.

Let me tell you something, PBD, I love what you said-

Did we tell him we cooked it?

When you were being interviewed by Brett Baer at the American Business Forum, which was an amazing event. Shout out to Mayor Francis Suarez for helping put that on. But you talked about the Tico, Dilly, two girls, you know, you're very, very in this world. You know, me, Rory, my nephew, just turned 13 yesterday. I said, what do you want for your birthday? He's like, well, I'm thinking about maybe getting a new phone. I said, I'm gonna talk to your dad.

My brother-in-law, my sister's husband. I said, guys, to him. Third birthday yesterday. Good hands. Him and Tico shook hands. I go, let's see who's stronger. Tico goes, he's got him, bro. Tico's a strong kid.

I said, what do we want to do with this guy, man? He's the sweetest kid. Do we want him having a cell phone with social media? We all said, hell no. There's a difference between Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok versus, Hey, I want to watch something on YouTube. YouTube is just like a world encyclopedia. So there's a difference to this.

If you can go back to that poll, Rob, I think there's steps to where you do. Whoever's at saying any kid could just watch whatever they want. At 13, you should be able to go onto YouTube, do some research, see what's out there. A phone just to call your parents between 15 and 18 is where these conversations in my opinion. When do you want to do this? This thing is the most dangerous and also the most amazing thing that any man is as any human is

22 and you're gonna put that in the hand of a 10 year old or 12 year old Let me give you a counter-argument. I have a good friend. I'm not going to say his name. He has two kids. One of his kids Is maybe nine years old This kid does not come up for oxygen if he has a phone. He is knee deep in this He has a youtube channel. He's concerned about likes clicks videos. It's Genuinely sad

I said, hey buddy, you're at the dinner table. I did your rule buddy you're at the dinner table I did your rule you're at the dinner table put it down he goes you're not my dad I go dad tell him he goes put the phone down he goes no the kid is so obsessed with his phone and my concern is how many millions of other kids are just like that we talk about we have the data yeah we talk about anxious generation what about a generation of kids who this is all they know they

can't do this. That's concerning to me. Yeah in a big way in a big way so the poll again I'm surprised Rob the poll is like 5,000 people voted 53% said at 18.

I agree with our audience they're smart people 53% said at 18. I agree with our audience. They're smart people.

53% at age 18. That's some...

Where are you on this? Vinny, there's hope. Do you think that...

Where would you be on this, Vinny? I'm pretty close to that. You're there. I'm not... You're at least at 15 to 18. No, no, no. I'm at 18. I'm at 18 because... So what do you do at 18? Say here's your phone, here's your account? No, I'm... I've been managing all their accounts since the day they were born. I've been managing their accounts. It's all me. If you ever see anything with their accounts, I manage all of it. I see all the DMs. I do all of it. So if you DM my kids, you're DMing me. Okay? So don't DM my kids. Well now you're going to get business propositions. Hey Patrick DVD on Brooklyn!

Hey Vinny, can I close this out with a question for you? Do you think five years ago, before congressional testimony, COVID, and everything we saw and what we realized about social media and what New Zealand did, do you think that's 54% five years ago?

Absolutely not.

No, it's less. It's way less. I agree with you. What has happened data and facts? What this tells me when I see things like this on a lightning rod issue, it tells me there's hope for the California voter

President wants to send you $2,000 He says they'll issue $2,000 tariff dividends to all except high-income Earning people Rob has that been announced or know that he's gonna be doing that. Is that a he announced it yesterday? I have he announced it yesterday. So let me read this to you for some of you guys if you haven't received it yet on what 800 number to call. President Donald Trump on Sunday gave his cell phone number to call for the $2,000 tariffs payments that at any point you can text them.

That's a joke folks. I'm not giving you his phone number. Claim the dividend check of at least $2,000 will be paid to Americans except for high income earners. Saying the country is now wealthy as a result of its tariff policies. People that are against tariffs are fools. We are now the richest, most respected country in the world with almost no inflation and a record stock market.

401ks are higher than ever. We are taking in trillions of dollars and soon we'll be beginning paying down our enormous $37 trillion debt. Record investment in the US plants and factories are going all over the place. A dividend of at least $2,000 a person, not including high income people, will be paid to everyone.

I wonder when, can I give a guess on when I think the payment will be made? When is the midterms? October of 2026. Right before the midterms.

Yeah, exactly.

Smart. In an ABC interview this week on Sunday, Treasurer Scott Besson said that he has not spoken to the president about the proposed dividends. A $2,000 dividend could come in a lot of forms, in a lot of ways, best and told anchor, Stepanopoulos, you know it could be just the tax decreases that we're going to see in the president's agenda. And no tax on tips, no tax on overtime,

no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans. Tom, how important is this, Tom?

I think it's very important. And I think people that want to call that number 1-800-86-NANCY to put their name on the list. You know, I think it's stepping back a minute. I think it's important because he said there's going to be a benefit for all Americans. And I don't think this is George McGovern's hundred dollar, you know, trick that didn't work.

I don't think this is the stimulus package that Biden put out where he basically printed money and don't throw the comments out. I know we don't print anymore, but issuing digital currency. I think this is real. And I think he's trying to help people. And I think he's throwing in that little bit.

But not the people that are over wealthy. You don't need that. This is for the people.

That's what Mr. Besson has to say.

Go ahead, Ron.

I love this guy. His main argument, though, seems to be that it's about taking in the revenue. And he also promised this morning a dividend of at least $2,000 a person, not including high income people.

How is he going to pay that dividend of $2,000 a person? about taking in the revenue, it's about rebalancing. And the revenue occurs early on, and then as we rebalance and the jobs come home, then it becomes domestic tax revenue.

Are you worried that the President's focus on revenue, though, which is what he's been focusing on in his public statements, is gonna hurt your argument

at the Supreme Court? Not at all. It's completely consistent that the revenues come in at the beginning, then, as we rebalance, which is the goal of this, bring back high-paid manufacturing jobs to the U.S., then it will then morph into domestic tax revenues.

President Trump has consistently fought for the American worker, and we are seeing trillions of investments in the U.S. that would not have occurred without the tariffs The other thing too is the authority that he uses is called a EIPA. It is an emergency authority Are you sure and he used that emergency authority? He got the Chinese to the table to negotiate on stopping the precursors for fentanyl drugs. If fentanyl, hundreds of thousands

of Americans dying every year is not an emergency, what is? On October 8th

Chinese threatened to put export controls on. So do you think good idea or bad idea? Send $2,000. I think it's a good idea. Tell me why it's a good idea. I think it's a good idea because... It's not buying votes though? Um...

I think lowering taxes is buying votes.

You almost beat Adam on the pause.

No, I think... Anything a politician does can be said to be buying votes. But there's fair ways to do it

and there's not fair ways to do it. Because that's what they're going to criticize him for. They're going to say like, you know, he's just and all these years they made fun of what Democrats do that all they do is buy votes and at the end of the day, that's what Republicans did.

Look, you go on TV with George Sucking Octopus and you know, you know, you're gonna get that response. You're gonna get that response. You're really going low today. No, it doesn't matter what you do. It's going to be, you're going to get hit either way. You know, it's a, you do it and you're buying votes. You don't do it. And you're, you don't care about the little guy. That's the way it's going to be spun. It's going to be spun.

Little, but what do you think? How does Stephanopoulos even have a job?

Like if, if you were sued for however many million dollars. Well there's an expiration date on his career. Oh okay because I would have been like, yo bro, you're not going to be from the channel. You keep watching. It's not going to be tomorrow. It's not going to be this year.

He's going to go buy more.

But he's another one of these guys with the big contracts that are getting truncated. And the contracts are going to be lower or gonna show you what's happened in the media landscape You wait and see Alan conference is coming. We can't wait. Yeah, you said

What do you think another pause you're about to go over by the Functioning normally today I'm going What do I think that they should send $2,000 stimulus checks to people hell no, you know how much money they spend to be send to people zero Absolutely. Stop giving people money. Stop printing more money. It doesn't work It's never worked these stimmy checks where you're sending people 500 bucks, 1400 bucks, 3000 bucks. You're making the country broke and you're making broke people feel somewhat wealthy

for about five seconds. And then they go spend that money and it circulates back to the economy. And that broke person who doesn't know how to spend their money stays broke. And the money flows where upper down P, flows to the top. Stop printing money. Zero, the COVID stuff, $5 trillion, the CARES Act, the TARP, the American Rescue Plan.

Enough with giving people money. It's not about buying votes. It's about we're $37 fricking trillion in debt and you wanna give every American 2,000 bucks? Save that money, idiots.

We're not giving you any more money so here's the challenge the challenge with that is as great of a You know Common sense message it is I get it This is the challenge right now Challenges

You've already brainwashed everybody into where we are today with the debt system. Right after we got off the gold, it's where we are today. This is America, right? This is the new America with debt. For somebody to come in to want to pay off the $37 trillion of debt, you almost have to be a five-term president.

You need 20 years. Trump 40, 20, 45. You need 20 years to be able to put that together. I agree with that. So let's just say you save the money, next guys come in, they spend the money, and then they win.

We're going to give you free. We're going to, you know, lower ten, we're're gonna give you free. We're gonna you know the lower 10. We're gonna give you free We're gonna we're gonna give you free You know and it's like the back and forth and you know what happens every single time that increases what it's a Republican or Democrat It's not like now the difference here is this tariff thing is so sexy to me Let me tell you it's so exciting and sexy to me because I think it's a real way for us to pay off some of that debt.

That excites guys like me. But unfortunately, you know, if we were to get, Tom, if we were to get a land, okay, real nice mountains on the water, both sides, and you were giving us 10 million people, you know what we would do, Tom? We wouldn't allow everybody to vote. We wouldn't. We would treat it like a company.

Shareholders get to vote. Everybody else, you don't get to vote. Decisions are going to be made by people that contribute to society.

For sure.

That is the biggest problem we have in America because common sense policies won't permanently win because the way you get to vote in America.

I hope this doesn't upset you, but we should put the link to something you did. I think it's now seven years ago, which was in the analysis of who gets to vote and how many votes you get. You know, it was a lightning rod at the time, but maybe put the link in the comments here.

People go back and look at that because it talked about, hey, stakeholders and contributors, you vote. That's such an old video, Tom. It was. Well, let me tell you, if may put the unlisted version of it. Here's what we'll do.

If for those of you guys that are on the PBD podcast circle, if you're in it, that video I don't think is...

Is that it, Matt?

No, that's not. It's a different one. That's not it. It's a different one. Rob, if you can, just text it to me. Text it to me if you can. That's a conversation that we had. But I'm gonna find an old, old, old one where, uh, um. You laid out the logic. I did, but it's, it's gonna,

it's gonna piss off so many people. Good. Not the people that read the logic. And remember, I shot this video April 15th of 2014. Oh wow. Wow. This is how many years ago? 11 and a half years ago and guess what jersey I'm wearing? How weird is this? Look at the jersey I'm wearing. This is like a, you know what jersey I'm wearing Vinny? Sabonis? No, I'm wearing a, yeah. Barbuda Sabonis?

I'm wearing a,

Sir Dettliff Shrumpf?

I'm wearing a Yankees jersey.

Whoa, love it.

Okay, forecasting. Look at this. I love it. I'm gonna post this in... It was April 15th, right? April 15th, yeah.

And it was 4 in the afternoon after you'd written a check, so you're in kind of a bad

mood.

Nehemiah's just like, he's wrong, huh? You better go earn the right to damn vote. If you want to see it, Rob, give him the it to be, I think it's an unlisted video. If Humberto's listening, Humberto, if you can make it unlisted, that will be great. And then just text me back the video. I'll text it to Humberto so he has it in small.

Hey Pat, just really fast about the tariffs, Tom. Like, you know how, like, again, every single thing that the president has been trying to do, they have to oppose it. Every single thing, right? Even the tariffs, didn't it go to the Supreme Court that they're trying to fight to reverse what he's doing and bringing in billions of dollars every single month, but you morons are out there like, no, we don't, this is unconstitutional,

and they're literally, I think November 5th, they heard oral arguments about it. They're trying to reverse the tariffs where this freaking guy is trying to make us money.

What the hell is wrong with the, what's wrong with the Democrats?

So let me see, the Democrats want the Supreme Court to say you didn't have the authority to do that. So the tariffs get pulled back. So the economy becomes really worse and it goes to from, from almost crap to complete crap in time for the elections next year. So tell me what you don't understand. Oh, now that you clarify like that, I'm good.

And by the way, and by the way, to 350 million of you, to hell with you guys. We're going to get power.

Yeah, exactly.

So good for you.

Yeah.

It's not a Rubik's Cube.

No, I'm going to go to this next story. Okay. That doesn't add up. Can you tell us about the story? Are you ready for this? So Pat, we're ready Vinny. And again, you're not gonna see it mainstream media. It's not gonna be all over the place because you know who runs the mainstream media. So it's gonna be people like us on the PBD podcast. Rob, I sent you two, there's two tweets, one by Thomas Massey and one of the tweets he says, up today to learn that Capitol Police turned CIA orchestrated the pipe bombs on January 6th and the FBI has covered it up for over four years. I question FBI director Wray, ATF director Dadelbach, and FBI assistant director over DC. The Antinow under oath all played dumb. And there's one more he posted Robbie. It says you might not I mean you might be able to find it. He goes, this is the biggest scandal of my lifetime.

Steve Baker did what an $11 billion agency, the FBI could not do, or worse yet, covered it up. He identified the January 6th bomber, and she, she wasn't working alone. Ready for this, Kash Patel needs to make a statement tomorrow when this breaks. So Steve Baker who works for the Blaze, he did reports of a forensics gate analysis,

G-A-I-T, which is technology used to compare a person's walking pattern. It produced a 94% match between the unidentified January 6th pipe bomb bomber, former Capitol Police officer, Shauni Ray Kirkhoff, who served with the department until 2022 according to the report. This analysis came from internal video footage reviewed by investigative searches. So Adam, somebody reviewed for God knows how long the way this person was walking. There was moments where she allegedly was messing with her bra and stuff.

The FBI has been searching for this person that put two live pipe bombs the night before the Capitol riot. Think about the timing, guys. One outside the RNC headquarters and one outside the DNC headquarters in Washington. Each device was actually real, equipped with a one-hour kitchen timer, placed there on 8 p.m. on January 5th.

They were found just before and during the attack at the Capitol the following day. Now think about this. The authorities believe the goal was planting these bombs at them to distract and divide law enforcement. Because think about it. They know the attack was coming. They're like, how do we divert cops to make sure this shit burns?

Okay, that's what they did. Okay. So as of now, today, the FBI has the investigation remains open.

There's a $500,000 reward for information leading to the arrest.

Who's the person they showed? So the person on the left, they're alleging the faces on the screen a second ago. Who are those people?

What do you mean?

Oh, this tweet right here. Oh, that's that's allegedly her. That person that on the outside. That's her That's her it took this long for an investigative journalist that person located today She works for the CIA. Well, allegedly she worked for the CIA now. So she was a Capitol Police member of the Adam no, no, no, nothing. Yeah, I mean they have a brother in no, that's her name. This just this just broke her name Pat is

I'm sorry, a Shawnee sh a What's her name? This just broke. Her name, Pat, is Shani, S-H-A-U-N-I, and then Kirkoff, K-E-R-K-H-O-F-F.

I believe she is a...

And they're alleging that.

It's all alleged.

This is all blaze. And that name has come out of multiple news outlets, right?

This is a Blaze Media Report. Did any of these pipe bombs go off? No, Adam, and that's the whole thing. It was just, the actual bomb was real, but you know what they did, Adam? They wanted to distract, listen to me, they wanted to distract and get agents and cops and Capitol police away from January 6th, okay? So now here's the thing. From the Capitol, you mean?

Yeah, from the Capitol, I'm sorry. So think about it. Now really break it down. Is it that far-fetched that they had informants everywhere in the crowd, Pelosi is on camera guys, on camera saying, no National Guard I should have brought them and I should have done this and you mean to tell me all these years later with all the people they arrested, all the grandmothers, you can't find this person with all the geo-tracking

and fencing and all that nonsense? So again... So Vinny, what's your point with this? My point is, Adam, this thing that we've just let go January 6th, January 6th was a setup from the beginning to the end to not only arrest all these January 6 people. It was to make sure this was one ploy, Adam, never to let Trump get back into office. And if we go back from Russia collusion to the freaking impeachments, to shooting him in his head, to having another dude at the golf course that wanted to assassinate him.

When I say that these FBI and just an FYI guys, John Brennan, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, they all just got another subpoena for their role. This is the FBI item. That's why, you know, we talk about trusting all these people that are in the FBI. This agency from Comey and all these people have been so freaking corrupt and so weaponized. It's it's unbelievable.

And I think going back to Nancy Pelosi, I think one of the reasons she is stepping back because obviously she's made all the money she's implicated in all this. She's the money. She's implicated in all this. She's one of the main ones that was like, nope, not National Guard, do all this. I believe Adam. They all knew. Okay. That's why they were arresting grandmothers. They arrested people that weren't even at January 6th because this was going to be there. I got you. He

orchestrated a insurrection and he'll never be able to run for the president of the United States because in the constitution, Tom, is that the constitution that says if you

have an insurrection towards the government you can never become the president of the United States?

That's why all the media was told to use the word insurrection because that's the word that was in

the constitution. By the way, Vincent, did you see this other story about BBC? I love it, Pat, Do you mind if I roll this story right into it guys? So let me just read the title for you. The BBC is expected to apologize after using doctored footage of Trump's January 6th speech in documentary. They're expected to apologize after using doctored footage. The Mea culpa clip comes after Michael Prescott, the British network's former editorial guidelines and standards advisor, released a damning 19-page report alleging widespread bias within the organization highlighting warnings he issued in May about the doctored speech.

Do we have the difference of what they did? I think they spliced it, cut it, flipped it, ripped it upside down. A whistleblower inside the network revealed that the edit came for a peaceful, Trump was saying be peaceful and patriotic, but they made it look like he was trying to incite violence.

We're going to walk down to the Capitol and I'll be there with you and we fight.

We fight like hell.

So that was the doctor. It makes it, what does it make it sound like he's saying guys we're gonna go

We're gonna cause problems. So play the original. This is the original

And we're gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women

Now and guys doesn doesn't this.

They added the fight like hell part. Yes. From a different section. Yeah.

Edited it.

Yep. Sounds like somebody got some explaining to do. So by the way, didn't Trump sue, I believe 60 minutes for the combo thing and win 17 million dollars. If you don't think the Trump library is basically funded by media. Oh, let me understand something. Are you saying that the mainstream media has been lying and doctoring and editing and been

against Trump this entire time? Is that your claim?

I've been tools of the FBI and mind you. Yes, Adam, this is BBC. This is another country's mainstream media. What are you getting off? What are you doing? Okay, and by the way, this is the same media.

They twisted the Charlottesville thing when he tried to do the, they praised, it made it seem like he was praising the white supremacist, even though he was condemning them. By the way, let's not this, Jimmy Saville, for decades he was sexually abusing hundreds of victims, including children. Internal investigation shows that the producers and executives ignored and buried complaints

just to protect the brand. That's the BBC.

And Rob, you're going to love this one. BBC is like the MSNBC or left-wing CNN of the UK. Rob will know exactly who this is.

This is the same BBC that on 9-11

And the MI6 megaphone by the way

On 9-11 BBC Can I finish what I'm saying, please? What's happening? I'm trying to finish what I'm saying The same BBC that on 9-11 went live and announced that building number 7 collapsed all the time it was still standing behind them and the reporter was Jane Stanley. I don't, I hope, I don't hope, I know it's going to happen that Trump goes after them

because mind you this is connected to January 6th. They wanted, they pulled support away from the Capitol because they wanted it, Adam, they wanted pandemonium. They took peaceful people, they shot them with tear gas, they shot them with bullets. You had people like Ray Epps who got a slap on the wrist misdemeanor saying we're going into the Capitol, we're going into the Capitol and it failed.

And it failed. And I hope they all get accountable and whoever that Shawny Ray Kirkhoff is, I hope they're

doing an investigation right now. Rob just pulled this up. Good find Rob, BBC to apologize deceptively editing President Trump's January 6th speech in an effort to make it look like he encouraged violence. The apology letter is purported to come in next week. Samir Shah, BBC chairman, will write to the Culture, Media and Sports Committee on Monday to express regret for the way the speech made on the day January 6th, 2021

Capitol ride was spliced together. The Telegraph reported BBC's Director General Tim Davie and Shaw were both allegedly warned about the doctorate footage in May but decided to keep quiet. What? Wow. So they knew about it. Can you pull up who these guys are?

Who resigned last night? Somebody resigned. Yeah I'll tell you who resigned. Davie. Tim, yesterday BBC's Director General Tim Davie and new CEO Deborah Ternus resigned after controversy after the speech.

This guy's bye bye.

And so Davie resigns and now they're going after the Shah.

Won't be the first time they went after him.

PVD.

Yeah.

They're issuing an apology as if they think it's going to end there. No, it's definitely not. Trump is gonna sue them, yes?

Yeah.

I mean, you would assume- He's suing everybody.

He's suing everybody.

He's suing everybody. That Trump library getting prettier and prettier.

The Jerky Boys sue everybody.

And by the way, he's probably gonna win. Yes, Adam, this is proof. This is another couple million dollars. All these outlets that have been lying and gaslighting the public they're gonna I want they're gonna receive their accountability I'm the fan of a beautiful. That's what I'm saying. We have the house. We have the Senate

I think you divided America and you impacted another country's elections publicly and you Manipulated where everybody said this guy was rooting for violence So yes, there needs to be a certain level of accountability being held there, bro

I remember watching that speech and being like this mother ever There needs to be a certain level of accountability being held there. If you're watching that, I'm watching the news, and what am I gonna think? He's probably edited it. Adam, it's not your fault. Adam, it's not. No, no, Vinny, you've gotta understand. Adam.

What, Vinny? It's not your fault.

Thank you. Vinny, I'd like to add something quick. Vinny, you're not crazy. During the drug wars between the paramedics and I also spoke to other people who are paramedics. And at that time, the paramedics would be coming down to a shooting and they would hear

additional shots. It was supposedly FBI later figured out who wanted to reroute them to who wanted to keep the wars going. Wow. Bloods and they would fire additional shots. Well, guess what? The paramedics would stop at a perimeter before they're going in to get the victims of the

shooting and they would hear the extra shots and are waiting for LAPD crash units and all the things there. They're waiting for all them to get in there and for it to stop. Meanwhile the guys that were shot are bleeding out and there was and the violence was suppressed and they say that it was actually our government that won it. And if you read the history of the drug wars And crips and bloods they were bad and they had stuff going on

but there was also government manipulation that was going in there and also the Country of Mexico and a group that was called the South Which was the gangs that were from Mexico in LA were known as the South and so it's not the first time the government has thrown a distraction over here to keep it going on over there.

I love that story, Tom. By the way, I thought you were going a completely different direction. I thought you were going to be like, listen, when I was gangbanging with the Crips and

the Bloods, let me tell you.

Hey, what's up?

Adam, it's about how the government's go to another story here for those guys that are cops NYPD already losing officers with morale

plunging as anti cop

Prepares to take reins Rob. I don't know if we have a I don't think we have a video on this Maybe just pull up the story There you have. Okay. So let's see what's going on over here. Okay. What is this cops? Why are you you you mean to tell me like cops don't want to work for mom Donnie? What doesn't seem like a nice? Myers you he admires what you're doing folks as NYPD exit is already underway with a surge of officers quitting in a month leading up to anti cop socialist mom Donnie's win and More my goal of Police commissioner Jessica Tish as exits

according to data the NYPD saw 35% hiking cops of all ranks ranks leaving in October 245 officers compared to 181 same year according to the pension fund morale is down because everyone is concerned about the police Mamdani wants to put an off in place. Said Detectives Endowment Association President Scott Munro, you have a person who is supposed to be running New York City that does not believe in law enforcement. What's coming out of everyone's mouth, we're in trouble. Whether more cops leave in the coming months will depend on the Tisch factor, police union

said. If she leaves, it may result in an uptick. The sources said if she stays, maybe not. So it will certainly get worse if our city leaders don't work with us to fix unsustainable workload, our expired contract, and the constant second guessing that is driving good cops away from the job.

Can you pull up who this lady is, Rob? Can you pull up who she is? What's her name? Tish is the last name. Jessica Tish. Jessica Tish. Can we see who Jessica Tish is? Tom what do you know about her? Jessica Tish. Can we go to Wikipedia please? Go to see what her background is. Tish, like from the famous Tish family? Tish, Tish. Okay is an American public servant, formerly a public servant, previously served as commissioner of New York City sanitation. So she's apparently respected.

Well the Tisch family. Tisch was born, Merrill Tisch, CEO of Lowe's Corporation. She received a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 at Harvard University, which of JBM. And Tisch began her career with Counterterrorism Bureau of New York City, department facilitated by Commissioner Raymond Kelly. She went to hold office positions within the agency in 2020 and 2014 February she was appointed Deputy Commissioner Information Technology

what is her background politically she was appointed by Mayor Adams after being appointed by de Blasio so then why are they saying that if she is Jewish, married to Daniel Zachary,

this is a billionaire family,

Rabbi Philip Hyatt at Senegal, go a little bit lower, okay. De Blasio, Democratic Party, Tisch, New York, Harvard. So why are they saying if she leaves, more will leave? Why are they saying that, Rob? Do we know?

I don't, let me take a look. Is she kind of

a law and order liberal? They do exist with her family. Tish. T-I-S-C-H? Is that what

it is? Well her dad was the um… Lowe's. Yeah, Lowe's Hardware. So maybe So maybe unrest means you sell more stuff at Lowe's to rebuild it?

Many have some morale as down to the minimum. NYPD reportedly documents concerns among the... Tish is viewed as by many as a stable force, a leader they trust, especially during the time of proposed reforms to policing and large changes in public safety priorities or potential departures seen as leaving them vulnerable or signaling instability. The income is marginalized from significant restructuring, for example, there's a some

insiders argue that if Tish will leave, it would be a flashpoint, a signal to officers that leadership is unstable. Yeah. Wow.

Okay.

Interesting. Interesting. So she's an influencer. People trust her. Tom, how bad do you think this is going to be with cops leaving?

I think it's going to be very bad and I am sending a link to Rob right now. Hopefully you got this, Rob. Because it's being noticed across the United States. What do you think of New York cops? Pretty good? Pretty tough? I think so. Man, they are together. When you see funerals that are there of the cops, I mean they are together. They operate, you know, very well. People say, well you don't know all the New York cops. No, no, no, no, no. 98% of these New York cops are tough. They love their city. I've had nothing but great experiences. Me11. We saw it the New York Fire Department. These

are some of the toughest, most dedicated men serving and we meet them. I have met more than one. As a matter of fact, this year, Kim and I played golf with a retired New York cop and his wife. He retired down here and he had a little bit of a limp, and I said, what's going on? He said, I gotta have my hip replacement. I was, you know, I was beat cop for many, many, many years, and I gotta, Medicare's gonna get me my hip replacement. And, cause you could see he had a little bit of a,

favoring it. But he was just a great guy, and you talk to him about stuff, not a Trumper guy, he was a pure independent guy, and I think he was just a perfect example of what these New York cops are. They are great, they're well-trained, and yeah, there's some percent of them

that are what they are, and gave me the direction.

You're always gonna have that.

Which I imagine.

You're always gonna have that.

Always gonna be 100%.

But what's interesting, there are many cities that know how good New York cops are, Pat. You know what one of them is? Houston. They know how good New York cops are. And the Houston Police Union, they're unionized in Houston, invites the NYPD officers to work for Houston. Come to a state with no income tax, come to a little bit better weather,

come from the first largest city in the United States to the fourth largest city in the United States, come on down. And you got, that's what I think. So I think that if her bio shows up to be true and then somehow she's moved out and the comments that they feel insecure about that and feel that that would be destabilizing,

then they're going to lose cops. But you know what? This case study has played out, Pat. You know where? Portland. And the people of Portland are begging for people to come be cops there. And remember we saw the signing bonuses. There are significant signing bonuses in Portland. I don't know if we could search for that. What's a signing bonus right now in Portland? It's very real,

you know? And so, Portland's a case study, you want New York to become Portland? Chase the cops out and see what happens.

Hey, can you imagine your mayor on record saying, I want to defund your police department, the NYPD, they're racist, they're bigoted, all the stuff that he said to them, he's pro-LGBT, whatever the hell, like, why would you want that to be, at the end of the day, your boss?

Are you freaking kidding?

Unless you need the unrest to guarantee there will never be enough conservatives in town to ever elect you.

Exactly, exactly. And then, God forbid, you actually have to use your service weapon, you have to get involved. You think the mayor's gonna have your back? You think the mayor's gonna look out for you? And you guys nailed it, hold on real quick. The job of a New York, like NYPD guys, besides Chicago's rough as hell too to be a fricking cop in the South Side, there's neighborhoods that they don't even drive down.

The fact that that's happening, and remember during Eric Adams, Mr. Now all of a sudden

he's turned the opposite way. Do you remember when the Venezuelan guys were beating the crap out of the-

Don't criticize him for getting it right.

No, no, no, no, no.

You can criticize him for his history, but don't criticize Eric Adams for getting it right and saying this is where I stand because you know what kind of balls that took in the face of all

the people that were beating the hell out of the freaking cops, the Venezuelans and the next day they got to jail and they're walking like this flipping the bird.

Who's the man who's in charge?

Let me tell you what the problem is going to be. Let me tell you what the problem is going to be in New York. So Rob, if you can do me a favor, pull up this clip I just gave you because reality is sinking in in New York City on what Hockel remembers let me tell you what Hockel remembers with these two so she was asked about free buses Okay, huh and watch what she does. She was asked about free buses. Go ahead Rob

So I just want to set the stage that you know You look at the history of people who've run multi-million dollar ad campaigns to try and get me to change my position, I don't change my position. So I just want to put it out there. I respect people's opinions. I respect the proper place to convey them.

And so I've said to people, I hear you. And that was important. But also, there is a time and place. And so that's all on that. No, I've had conversations on this trip, but many conversations I'd say over the summer and the fall that were important, that led

to an understanding of what's in the realm of possibility, shared ambitions, but what is doable is the question. And so, no, we're aligned on some of these issues. You know, I've made it clear where I have strong disagreements with issues that really do not pertain to, you know, the governance of New York City.

Make your point.

Said you need to get a police commissioner that people trust, who has a record of accomplishment.

She says free buses is a no-go.

Crime is going down. Crime is going down significantly. You don't say mission accomplished, but that is a great trend. So him agreeing with that assessment, that recommendation to keep Jessica Tish wasn't

important. Now, she's saying, shuts down the idea of free buses and taxing the rich. She's saying that. What she didn't forget is this go ahead Rob play this clip

Sure of hands who supports Kathy Hochul for reelection

It's a decision that should be made after this general election

So no decision the show of hands who supports you see what he said

So no, but specifically he said after this election. So is Hockel sitting there saying, oh really? Oh really? Okay, no problem. You need me, buddy.

Yeah, I don't need you.

So you need me on some of this stuff. So you don't wanna support me, so why am I gonna support you when you come? So I don't know what's gonna happen to New York City. My biggest thing is as much as we have fun with this York City. We have a lot of friends and family that live in New York and we want the best for them and ideally I would like all of this to be figured out and keep New York City as a special city but unfortunately you guys voted for this.

And if you say I didn't vote for this, if you didn't vote for it, you voted for this. If you didn't publicly rally other people to go vote against this, you voted for this. But either way, you voted for this. But either way, you voted for this. This is kind of what happens eventually, right? This is kind of what happens. Whether it's, you know, what happened during COVID, the decisions that were made, the people

that left, more and more of the people that probably view the world the way you do have left your great state and your great city, okay? And have gone to a different place. What happens there?

Who knows?

Go ahead, Adam. As you always say, elections have consequences. You know, if you want to just quote Isaac Newton, for every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. So Mamdani is a reaction to what happened with capitalism. And now the socialism is in vogue. And we all know where this sort of story ends.

You know, I'm receiving calls, Rob, and I put this number on my phone if you get a call from this number Just put that guy that face right there scam and that's gonna show up right there because it's likely a scam Because he's likely lying to your face. It's likely a Trojan horse It's likely a wolf in sheep's clothing and none of what he's basically standing for is what is actually gonna happen So New York, you know, here's one example. Did you see where mom Donnie was this week?

Puerto Rico.

He was in Puerto Rico. So this is the same guy that says, would you go visit Israel? I would not. I only focus on New York. Oh, but you're going to go to Puerto Rico. So what's going to happen is in the day of social media, all the BS lies.

Those are two different things. That mom don't recall is America. Israel is not America. So for him to go visit Puerto Rico, but it's the same guy who condemns Andrew Cuomo for not visiting a mosque. Why does he have to visit a mosque? You don't have to visit anything you can go

Find it where the electorate is you can go campaign where you want to campaign that that's the part of the politics stuff that it's just you know that to me it's like you know, it's it's Unnecessary questions that they ask that people are requesting to us But the reality being on what you're saying with them, I get it I get the fact that New York City got scammed with this guy, but let's see what he does Maybe the controls don't allow him to do all the stuff that he wants to do. Maybe Hulkko is going to be his number one enemy. Maybe this is going to be a civil war in New York. We don't know yet. Let's see what happens. What we do know is

Diska is not good for New York City. That's what we do know. 100%.

These policies I've been trying to advise people on.

Hey, nobody's leaving, right? Yeah. Yeah.

No, that's for sure. Everyone's going be expensive. By the way, I was just sent this by a listener, I won't say the name, and sent me that on the inside that said that the Portland Police Bureau is now offering 100 to 120k pay package and the list of benefits, including healthcare, are 95% covered. So you only have to take 5% out of your paycheck to cover the full list of benefits. So almost it's like 100-

They're begging now.

Begging you to come and please them. That's what it's taking to get people to come to Portland to be great cops.

For sure. I actually wish that New Yorkers will stay in New York. Cops specifically, your city needs you more than ever. Now's not the time to cut and run police officers And I built that way or I know it's Veterans Day tomorrow our military Service men and women are not built that way stay in New York and make it great look

I mean you never know you may be looking at a panel with three different mayors here You got mayor of Fort Lauderdale Tom soon you, you got Mayor of Pompano, Mayor O'Shaughnessy, and you got Mayor of Miami Beach, one day who got, he got involved in the Miami Beach election and wasn't good news.

Steven Miner, congratulations.

I hope we can get you elected.

Folks, we're not messing around on this.

Stay tuned in the future, you'll hear Pat talk about it, but we're not messing around about standing up and going and serving in our communities and serving as elected officials and getting into the fight. You get in the fight too. It starts with registering to vote, getting people around you registering to vote, and having reasonable conversations with family members and getting people to hear the facts, bring the receipts, move a person, move a family, move a street,

move a county, move the world. I'm Vincent LaChon and I approve this message.

Go to VTMerch.com. Veterans, we love you, we respect you. Take care everybody. God bless.

Bye bye. Bye bye. . . . . .