WHACKED OUT Trump says he HAS to steal a country

Donald Trump held a sort of a impromptu press conference yesterday at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. His brain seemed to turn to mush when the topic of Jeffrey Epstein came up, but we're going to get to that in a moment. I want to start with Donald Trump simply saying, I think I have to steal a country for national security.

The winner of the FIFA Peace Prize, says we need Greenland. And Trump seemingly reinvigorated in his thirst to take Greenland from Denmark. Here he is explaining that it is for national security reasons that we got to have it. We've got to have Denmark.

But he he felt very strongly. We needed financials. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.

And if you take a look at Greenland, you look up and down.

By the way, Marco Rubio's shifting body language in the background tells you a lot about what he thinks of the cause.

You have Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need it for national security. We have to have it. And he wanted to lead the charge. So we're making him, Marco, today a special envoy to Greenland. Greenland.

That's right. And as we covered yesterday on the bonus show, Donald Trump is picking a special envoy to Greenland who believes that Greenland should actually become part of the United States. Trump continuing on this issue. And as is often the case with Trump, he can't avoid getting into factually untrue statements

as to whatever he's talking about.

Comes through Mexico.

Thank you, sir. You've named Governor Landry to be new special envoy to Greenland. How do you what do you see that role in tailing?

And is it still your intention that he called me? He viewed Louisiana, the Louisiana purchase. He said, I'm governor of Louisiana. And he said, I would love I didn't call him. He called me. He's very proactive. He's a great guy.

He's a deal guy. He's a deal maker type guy. And we need it for national protection. We need Greenland for national protection. We need Greenland for national protection. They have a very small population. And I don't know. They say Denmark, but Denmark has spent no money.

They have no military protection. They say that Denmark was there 300 years ago or something with a boat. Well, we were there with boats, too, I'm sure.

Actually, there is no record whatsoever of U.S. people from the United States visiting Greenland by boat 300 years ago. And in fact, they wouldn't even really have been Americans then because the U.S. didn't exist until 1776. So if you go back to the 18th century, Danes went to Greenland, Norwegians, other Europeans appearance.

But Americans did not go to Greenland 300 years ago. There were no Americans 300 years ago, in a sense.

So it comes through Mexico.

All right. Oh, and one one other thing before we move on. Trump claiming that Denmark has no military protection for Greenland. That's just completely untrue. The reality is that Denmark provides aid. Denmark provides defense and has had continuous presence in Greenland.

So it's all just made up. But Trump wants Greenland. That's the point. The Peace Prize winner of FIFA wants Greenland. Check this out. Donald Trump says we're going to hire robots and employ artificial things.

I don't think he knows what he's talking about. You have robots, but you're going to have to get somebody to start those robots and you're going to have to improve the robots. But we're going to have robotic factories plus man elements of robot and power. So we're going to have enough. We're going to need the help of robots and other forms of, uh, I guess you could say employment. We're going to be employing a lot of artificial things, but the beauty is we're going to have more jobs than we've ever had.

We're going to be employing a lot of artificial things. He has no idea what artificial intelligence is. He has no idea how it works. He doesn't know what crypto is or how it works. He doesn't know anything about technology or robotics, but that will. Here's my prediction.

Knowing nothing about those things is not going to prevent him from trying to personally benefit from it, nor from talking about it. He'll keep talking and talking and talking. The arithmetic confusion is back. Trump doesn't feel that reducing the price of something 600 percent is enough. Forget about the mathematical impossibility. Trump now is talking about reducing prices

even 3000 percent. He encourages the audience to do their own math. I'm trying.

But instead of talking about the battleships or instead of talking about most favored nations drugs, we're bringing down drug prices like at a level that has never even been thought of by thousands. Think of it by 1000 percent by 1200, 1300, 1400 percent. In some cases, a drug that sells for $10 in London is costing $130 in New York. We're bringing it down to $20 and they're going to go up to 20.

So they're going from 10 to 20, which is a doubling. It's a doubling. It's a lot.

It's double in Ireland.

It's a doubling, but we're going down to 20. So we're going down. If you can do the your own math, but it's it's a two thousand percent, three thousand

percent.

Well, you know, I admit I am trying to do my own math on this and I am really struggling. I believe that there should be an opportunity to hand Trump a calculator, maybe one of my, my favorite, my T I 83 back from calc two. Um, and say, show me, show me, show me the math, explain 3000%. And what we've seen is that when there is really an opportunity to challenge them on this, like last week when Fox host, John Roberts challenged Howard Lutnick about the numbers, uh, it becomes very clear that it's all just totally fabricated. Makes no sense whatsoever.

Trump asked what happens with the seized oil from the Venezuelan tanker? Trump's answer alludes to criminality. I believe what Trump says he is going to do is against the law.

Speaking of Venezuela oil, what are we going to do with the oil that we have going to do with what the oil that has been seized? The United States sees 1.9 million barrels of oil on December 10th.

We're going to keep it.

Where are we going to sell it? I'm going to put in the strategic.

Maybe we'll sell it. Maybe we'll keep it. Maybe we'll use it in the strategic reserves. We're keeping it. We're keeping the ships also.

Yeah, I think that that's against the law. Put aside for a second that it might casually count as piracy. Ignore that little detail for a second. The U.S. can only lawfully seize oil under really narrow circumstances. If you are enforcing sanctions, meaning that there's been a court proceeding and there is forfeited oil, you could then seize it. That is not what has taken place. You could seize oil if there has been a declared war and you have obtained it. Of course, there is no declared war against Venezuela. And if there is a judicial process for criminal forfeiture or even customs forfeiture, if

they tried to bring, you know, sneak the oil into the U.S. illegally, custom seizes it. There's a forfeiture that's legally adjudicated. Then you could say, well, we're now going to keep the oil. There is no general presidential power to just take another country's oil because the U.S. has military or naval control in the area or because you have seized a tanker. U.S. has military or naval control in the area or because you have seized a tanker.

He's alluding to crimes and he says it on live TV and he doesn't give a damn.