ਕੱਟੜ ਇਮਾਨਦਾਰਾਂ ਦਾ ਕਾਰਾ? | Punjab Politics | AAP PUNJAB #shorts

Kattad Imandar who says that he spends every single rupee of people's taxes on people.He doesn't spend it on himself.But what are you doing?Harjod Bansuri goes to Canada in January 2024.He gives a four -day tour.Tickets were sold.

Everything was done.

He asked for permission from the central government.Because you have to get permission from the central government, whether you are a Chief Minister, a Minister, a MLA, or an MP.You have to get permission from the central government.He didn't get permission from the central government, and he left.The Chief Minister, Bhagwant Maharaj, told him, and he left.

He came back after 4 days.And after 4 days, he told the department that the expenses that I got there, for going to Canada, for the tickets, the small expenses there, they paid a bill of Rs. 4 ,48 ,900.department to pass the bill.I spent 4 ,48 ,900 rupees there.I mean, I spent 4 ,50 ,000 rupees there.I found out that the bill of 3 ,00 ,000 rupees was passed by the department.

The department passed the bill of 3 ,00 ,000 rupees.The balance of 1 ,50 ,000 rupees is still there.Then what did they do?They brought the bill of foreign currency and got it done.

In those four days, The car that was authorized by him as a minister, he gave a different bail for that car.

In those four days, he was in Canada for those four days.That brother, this car, Mr. Anandpur, Chandigarh, with Chandigarh, went to Delhi, Delhi, came to Delhi.Those four days of the car are going on as long as Mr. Bans was in Canada.Now, that car is broken.We don't know who paid for it.But he was given a bail.

The department paid Rs. 3 ,700.

The oil and water expenses of the car, which are decided by the minister, how many kilometers per kilometer they have to pay, he paid a bill of Rs. 8 ,700 ,000 in that account.

I got it.Now, PIL has been found on the basis of how a person can be present in two places.Either he will get a bill from Canada or he will get a bill from his car.It is not possible that he drives his car here and gets a bill from here.

Then he would not get a bill from Chandigarh, then he would not get a bill from Delhi, then he would get a bill from Toronto, Vancouver, etc.The bill is there.Then who would have driven the minister's car?And if no one drives, can't drive, the authorized person will be the same.If not, then how is this bill double?

Now there is a firecracker here, there is a curse, and now the matter has reached the court.And if the matter is proven in the court, if the matter is removed from this side, then what?Here, on the basis of ethics, if it is proven that you are spending people's money on people, then you put the bill on your pockets from a distance.